Errors & Omissions and the Claims Made & Reported Policy

0
4Кб

A Video Explaining the Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Policies


Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/errors-omissions-claims-made-reported-policy-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://youtu.be/DvxXr2Toh5w and at https://rumble.com/vny2t6-a-video-explaining-the-difference-between-claims-made-and-occurrence-polici.html and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3950 posts.


When purchasing errors and omissions insurance the insured must be aware that the policy will invariably only respond to claims that are made and reported during the policy period. further, since the application becomes a part of the policy and is incorporated into the policy the insured is warranting the absolute truth of every statement made in the application.


Claims-Made policies are common in the professional liability insurance market. They differ from traditional “occurrence”-based policies primarily based upon the scope of the risk against which they insure. With claims-made policies, coverage is provided only where the act giving rise to coverage is discovered and brought to the attention of the insurance company during the period of the policy. The essence of a claims-made policy is notice to the carrier within the policy period. Claims-made or discovered policies are essentially reporting policies. If the claim is reported to the insurer during the policy period, then the carrier is legally obligated to pay; if the claim is not reported during the policy period, no liability attaches.


Courts have found that claims made policies do not offend public policy and serve a useful function in permitting insurers to more closely control the risks they wish to insure. [Scarborough v. Travelers Insurance Company, 718 F. 2d 702 (5th Cir. 1983); Langley v. Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company, 512 So. 2d 752 (Ala. 1987); Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 495 A. 2d 395 (N.J. 1985) And Gulf Insurance Company v. Dolan, Fertig and Curtis, 433 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1983).


© 2021 – Barry Zalma


Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders.

 

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

 

 

Спонсоры

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Поиск
Категории
Больше
Finance
Liability Insurance Does not Continue ad Infinitum
Occurrence After Expiration of Policy Not Covered Read the full article at...
От Barry Zalma 2022-05-10 13:03:54 0 3Кб
Другое
Awareness of an Injury is not a "Claim"
Claim Must Be Made During Policy Period to Obtain Coverage on a Claims Made Policy Read the full...
От Barry Zalma 2022-01-24 13:44:57 0 4Кб
Crime
Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - August 1, 2022
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – August 1, 2022 Read the full article at...
От Barry Zalma 2022-08-01 12:57:23 0 3Кб
Health
Dr Simone Gold speaks boldly on the dangers of experimental vaccines...and the nefarious lies spoon fed to each of us by way of the media.
Truth and Freedom always ring so clear. Dr Simone Gold speaks boldly on the dangers of...
От Medic Ineman9 2021-01-25 12:31:29 0 7Кб
Другое
Business Use Exclusion Effective
Warranty Statute Does Not Apply to an Exclusion Red the full article at...
От Barry Zalma 2021-09-21 12:15:51 0 4Кб