Errors & Omissions and the Claims Made & Reported Policy

0
4K

A Video Explaining the Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Policies


Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/errors-omissions-claims-made-reported-policy-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://youtu.be/DvxXr2Toh5w and at https://rumble.com/vny2t6-a-video-explaining-the-difference-between-claims-made-and-occurrence-polici.html and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3950 posts.


When purchasing errors and omissions insurance the insured must be aware that the policy will invariably only respond to claims that are made and reported during the policy period. further, since the application becomes a part of the policy and is incorporated into the policy the insured is warranting the absolute truth of every statement made in the application.


Claims-Made policies are common in the professional liability insurance market. They differ from traditional “occurrence”-based policies primarily based upon the scope of the risk against which they insure. With claims-made policies, coverage is provided only where the act giving rise to coverage is discovered and brought to the attention of the insurance company during the period of the policy. The essence of a claims-made policy is notice to the carrier within the policy period. Claims-made or discovered policies are essentially reporting policies. If the claim is reported to the insurer during the policy period, then the carrier is legally obligated to pay; if the claim is not reported during the policy period, no liability attaches.


Courts have found that claims made policies do not offend public policy and serve a useful function in permitting insurers to more closely control the risks they wish to insure. [Scarborough v. Travelers Insurance Company, 718 F. 2d 702 (5th Cir. 1983); Langley v. Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company, 512 So. 2d 752 (Ala. 1987); Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 495 A. 2d 395 (N.J. 1985) And Gulf Insurance Company v. Dolan, Fertig and Curtis, 433 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1983).


© 2021 – Barry Zalma


Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders.

 

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

 

 

Patrocinados

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Buscar
Categorías
Read More
Health
Surely no one remembers when I posted this:
"it is a connect the dots exercise….   first they put up hundreds of 5G satellites in...
By Scarecrow III 2021-12-13 17:52:15 1 6K
Philosophy
Stoic Journal: Can You Hold Your Tongue Today?
What follows is a not-entirely-serious observation which is intended to revisit and perhaps...
By The Spider 2023-08-05 13:25:14 0 6K
Other
Adjusting Liability Claims
A Video Explaining the Need for Professional Liability Claims Adjusters Read the full article at...
By Barry Zalma 2021-10-04 12:36:51 0 4K
Other
#insurance, #claims, #insurance claims, #fraud, #report, #defamation, #privilege,
It is not Defamation to Report a Suspected Fraud to the State Read the full article at...
By Barry Zalma 2021-08-24 12:32:36 0 8K
Other
Renewal is a New Contract
Renewal is a New Contract Claim that $16 Extra Premium on Renewal is Bad Faith Fails Posted on...
By Barry Zalma 2023-01-04 13:43:38 0 3K