Sponsorluk
We are now 100% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Site içinde arama yapın
Sponsorluk
Kategoriler
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Oyunlar
- Gardening
- Health
- Home
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Other
- Politics
- History
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Read More
No Sprinklers - No Coverage
No Sprinklers – No Coverage
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gufbr2Ck and see the...
Refusal to Testify at EUO is a Breach of a Condition Precedent
Court of Appeal Requires Third Trial of Breach of Condition Precedent Case
Read the full article...
Closeted Ideology? Is America a Socialist Country? The Possibility of a Gainsaid Reality.
Is the USA a socialist country because its government has a monopoly on supplying bank reserves...
New Book From Barry Zalma - Property Investigation Checklists
Property Investigation Checklists – 14th EditionRead the full article at...
Unwritten Intent Uninforceable
Unwritten Intent Uninforceable
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gU_Q_GMb and see the...
Read the full video at https://lnkd.in/gTeJAzP and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3800 posts.
uis Montano, sued seeking a declaratory judgment that he was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under an insurance policy issued to his father and stepmother by Erie Insurance Exchange. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In Luis Montano v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 1-20-1306, 2021 IL App (1st) 201306-U, Appellate Court Of Illinois First Judicial District First District Fifth Division (June 11, 2021) the Court of Appeal was asked to conclude that a relative who had his own apartment was still a regular resident of his parents home and entitled to UIM coverage.
ZALMA OPINION
Plaintiff was able to establish that his domicile was his parents home. He also often lived in his parents home even when he was away at college and when he maintained an apartment when he worked in a factory. Since he lived in his parents home “often” that fact was sufficient for the Illinois Court of Appeal to conclude he was a “regular” resident of the parents household and could tap into the $250,000 available UIM coverage that, since he spent two months in hospital, could easily take the limits. It appears that the insurer needs a definition of “regular” in its UIM coverage.