-
- EXPLORE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sponsorizzato
We are 100% funded for October.
Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Cerca
Categorie
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Giochi
- Gardening
- Health
- Home
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Altre informazioni
- Politics
- Elenco
- News
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Leggi tutto
Lawyer Admits to Insurance Fraud and Theft to be Disbarred
Convicted of Fraud & Theft Enough for DisbarmentRead the full article...
Never Lie on an Insurance Application
Material Misrepresentation on Application Sufficient to Rescind Disability Coverage
Read the full...
MESSENGERS OF THE FATHER
But when all this has befallen, Asclepius, then the Master and Father, God, the first before all,...
No Insurer Will Pay a Liar a Profit
Michigan Concludes Policy Void When Insured Lies On Application About a Material Fact
Read the...
Read the full video at https://lnkd.in/gTeJAzP and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3800 posts.
uis Montano, sued seeking a declaratory judgment that he was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under an insurance policy issued to his father and stepmother by Erie Insurance Exchange. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In Luis Montano v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 1-20-1306, 2021 IL App (1st) 201306-U, Appellate Court Of Illinois First Judicial District First District Fifth Division (June 11, 2021) the Court of Appeal was asked to conclude that a relative who had his own apartment was still a regular resident of his parents home and entitled to UIM coverage.
ZALMA OPINION
Plaintiff was able to establish that his domicile was his parents home. He also often lived in his parents home even when he was away at college and when he maintained an apartment when he worked in a factory. Since he lived in his parents home “often” that fact was sufficient for the Illinois Court of Appeal to conclude he was a “regular” resident of the parents household and could tap into the $250,000 available UIM coverage that, since he spent two months in hospital, could easily take the limits. It appears that the insurer needs a definition of “regular” in its UIM coverage.