Commandité
We are now 100% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Rechercher
Commandité
Catégories
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Jeux
- Gardening
- Health
- Domicile
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Autre
- Politics
- History
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Lire la suite
True Crime of Insurance Fraud Video Number 42
Shoes on Melrose
Read the full article at...
Ohio Bill Would Bar Transgender Athletes from Girls Sports
A Republican lawmaker in Ohio is sponsoring legislation to protect female student athletes from...
Sixth Circuit Reverses Cases Finding Cover for Covid Shutdowns
For Business Interruption Coverage there Must be Direct Physical Damage
Read the full article at...
Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement Eliminates Need to Consider Other Insurance Clause
Insurer Entitled to Step in Shoes of Insured and Recover More than Three Million Dollars in Fees...
Why you support sexual abuse and pedophilia if you support Joe Biden: A liberal perspective.
By liberal perspective, I don't mean that I'm a liberal. But in the age of...
Read the full video at https://lnkd.in/gTeJAzP and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3800 posts.
uis Montano, sued seeking a declaratory judgment that he was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under an insurance policy issued to his father and stepmother by Erie Insurance Exchange. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In Luis Montano v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 1-20-1306, 2021 IL App (1st) 201306-U, Appellate Court Of Illinois First Judicial District First District Fifth Division (June 11, 2021) the Court of Appeal was asked to conclude that a relative who had his own apartment was still a regular resident of his parents home and entitled to UIM coverage.
ZALMA OPINION
Plaintiff was able to establish that his domicile was his parents home. He also often lived in his parents home even when he was away at college and when he maintained an apartment when he worked in a factory. Since he lived in his parents home “often” that fact was sufficient for the Illinois Court of Appeal to conclude he was a “regular” resident of the parents household and could tap into the $250,000 available UIM coverage that, since he spent two months in hospital, could easily take the limits. It appears that the insurer needs a definition of “regular” in its UIM coverage.