STOLI Fraud Victims - Who Gets the Premium?

0
4χλμ.

Lack of Insurable Interest Makes Life Policy Void from Inception

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g_zv5wCf and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gGdwqJM4 and at https://lnkd.in/gAYXPuyQ, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4300 posts.

Lack of Insurable Interest Makes Life Policy Void from Inception

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g_zv5wCf and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gGdwqJM4 and at https://lnkd.in/gAYXPuyQ, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4300 posts.

Policy Acquired as Part of a STOLI Fraud Never Existed as a Matter of Law

In Geronta Funding, a Delaware Statutory Trust v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company, No. 380, 2021, Supreme Court of Delaware (August 25, 2022) the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether premiums paid on insurance policies declared void ab initio for lack of an insurable interest should be returned. The trial court agreed with Brighthouse and relied on the Restatement (Second) of Contracts (the “Restatement”) to determine whether Geronta was entitled to restitution.

Specifically, the court held that Geronta may obtain restitution under Section 198 of the Restatement (“Section 198”) if it could prove excusable ignorance or that it was not equally at fault.

RELEVANT FACTS AND BACKGROUND

On July 11, 2007, the fictitious Mansour Seck Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (the “Seck Trust”) applied to MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (Brighthouse’s predecessor) for a $5 million universal life insurance policy insuring the life of a fictitious man identified as Mansour Seck (the “Policy”).

After confirming that its procedures and guidelines were met, MetLife issued the Policy on or around July 24, 2007.

The Superior Court Failed to Consider Whether Either Party Had Inquiry Notice of the Void Nature of the Policy

Geronta’s due diligence as to the Seck Policy was extremely limited.
The Superior Court also concluded that Brighthouse was not at fault because Geronta failed to show that Brighthouse had actual knowledge of the void nature of the Policy.

The Supreme Court remanded the case for the Superior Court to reconsider its factual findings in light of this Court’s articulated test and specifically direct the court to consider whether either party had inquiry notice of the void nature of the Policy and reversed the court’s holdings regarding entitlement to premiums and remanded the case for consideration consistent with its opinion.

ZALMA OPINON

The original fraud was transferred twice to buyer yet, since Mansour Seck did not exist the policy was not real, it was a gamble and a fraud. That the criminal invested a great deal of money, sold the risk to another and profited from the crime only to have the victim sell again until Geronta found itself paying premium on a void policy.

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gKCTg53

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Subscribe and receive videos limited to subscribers of Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe.

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

Now available Barry Zalma’s newest book, The Tort of Bad Faith, available here. 

The new book "The Tort of Bad Faith,"  is available as a Kindle book, a paperback or as a hard cover.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

Προωθημένο

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Αναζήτηση
Κατηγορίες
Διαβάζω περισσότερα
άλλο
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – June 1, 2024
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – June 1, 2024 ZIFL Volume 28, Issue 11...
από Barry Zalma 2024-05-31 13:13:07 0 1χλμ.
άλλο
You Win Some - You Lose Some
You Win Some & You Lose Some Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gPNCydH4 and see the...
από Barry Zalma 2023-11-24 13:13:43 0 4χλμ.
Finance
Waiver of UIM
Waiver of UIM Coverage is Effective Read the full article at https://zalma.com/blog Posted on...
από Barry Zalma 2022-08-09 15:35:24 0 4χλμ.
άλλο
Incompetent Insurance Fraud Claim Results in Conviction
Incompetent Insurance Fraud Claim Results in Conviction Fraudster Pawns Jewelry & Then...
από Barry Zalma 2024-05-08 12:36:56 0 2χλμ.