He who represents himself has an IDIOT for a Client

0
3Кб

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished Because Court Refused to Ignore Pro Se Plaintiff


Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/litigant-who-represents-himself-has-idiot-client-zalma-esq-cfe and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4150 posts.


After an automobile accident involving Neco Moss on the eastbound 210 freeway in Fontana, California. 


In Neco Moss v. 21st Century Insurance Company, E074487, California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division (April 7, 2022) Moss claimed that 21st Century defrauded him by refusing to provide a lawyer to sue the other drivers involved in the accident.


The only issue at the summary judgment stage was whether the evidence was sufficient to go forward to trial on Moss’s cause of action against 21st Century-whether they had committed fraud by telling Moss they would hire an attorney to sue the other drivers on his behalf.


SUMMARY JUDGMENT


The adjuster’s declared that 21st Century received copies of lawsuits Moss had filed against the other drivers, their insurers, and other parties.. 


The trial judge granted 21st Century’s motion and later issued a written ruling stating that 21st Century met its initial burden on the issues of detrimental reliance, causation, and damages, and Plaintiff fails to submit evidence raising any disputed issues of material fact in response.


ANALYSIS


The policy and the declarations of two adjusters negated the misrepresentation and justifiable reliance elements essential to Moss’s fraud claim and shifted the burden to Moss to set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to those elements. 


The Court of Appeal concluded that trial judge correctly granted summary judgment in 21st Century’s favor. 


ZALMA OPINION


This entire lawsuit and appeal was idiotic, brought by a person who had no idea what he was doing, and wasted the time of a trial and an appellate court, not to mention the amounts paid by the insurer to defend itself against an insured who had received every benefit promised by the policy.


(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.


Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].


Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.


Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.


Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

Спонсоры

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Поиск
Категории
Больше
Другое
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
Providing a “Courtesy Defense” Does Not Create Coverage by Estoppel  Read the...
От Barry Zalma 2021-04-06 12:38:56 0 3Кб
Politically Incorrect
Big Apple Blues
https://archive.ph/A0xxm Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Dissent stirring up in the...
От Scathing Take 2020-05-25 18:01:04 0 8Кб
True Crime
True Crime of Insurance Fraud Number 47
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire Read the full article at...
От Barry Zalma 2022-04-04 13:15:12 0 3Кб
Politics
Modern Britain
От William Henwood 2020-07-20 11:09:11 0 4Кб
Другое
Tort Victim Not a Beneficiary to a Mortgage Contract
Mortgage Insurance Requirements Are Solely for the Benefit of the Lender Read the full article at...
От Barry Zalma 2022-03-09 13:54:50 0 4Кб