Mold Exclusions & Conflicting Court Decisions

0
3KB

A Video Explaining How Insurers Avoid Mold Litigation


Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mold-exclusions-conflicting-court-decisions-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://rumble.com/vqbcjq-mold-exclusionsconflicting-court-decisions.html and at https://youtu.be/Q1DnDWQE-xk and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4000 posts.


Insurance companies in most states have been permitted to exclude mold coverage from new and existing policies. There are hundreds (perhaps thousands) of pending cases against homeowner insurance carriers seeking coverage for losses incurred as a result of mold contamination. In many of these homeowner policies, damage “caused by” mold contamination is expressly excluded from coverage. In the face of this exclusion, homeowners often take the position that their claimed damages were not “caused by” mold, but rather that the damage was caused by some form of water intrusion which resulted in mold contamination, or some other covered peril, and therefore the loss is covered. Insurers often contend that the exclusion applies to any claimed damages concerning mold, arguing either that the damage itself was caused by mold or some other excluded cause or event.


State courts that have faced this issue cannot agree. Some have held that the “caused by” exclusion applies to all mold damage, while other courts have found an ambiguity in the exclusion. Summary judgment for either party is almost impossible because coverage decisions are determined by the facts presented at trial.


The most recent ISO forms, which are used by many insurers in their homeowner policies, contain the following exclusion regarding mold:


We will not pay for loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by [mold]. Such loss or damage is excluded regardless of any other cause or event that contributes concurrently or in any sequence to the loss. But if [mold] results in a Covered Cause of Loss, we will pay for the loss or damage caused by that Covered Cause of Loss.


Courts across the country have reached different conclusions regarding its meaning and applicability. The video details some of the cases that deal with mold exclusions and the ensuing loss clauses.


ZALMA OPINION


Insurers, by carefully writing their policies, have been able to avoid most mold claims and the resulting litigation after the claim is denied. Some decided to provide coverage for mold claims but set low limits of liability while others drafted clear and unambiguous exclusions. Those insurers have avoided some litigation while most have found the new exclusions or limitations of liability to allow the insurer to successfully defend the suits.


© 2021 – Barry Zalma

 

Gesponsert

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. đŸ„°

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Search
Nach Verein filtern
Read More
Other
Perjury by Witness is a Superseding Cause of Injury
Summary Judgment for Lawyers Sued for Malpractice ReversedPost 4910 Read the full article...
Von Barry Zalma 2024-10-14 13:07:38 0 850
Other
Insurance Fraudster Convicted
Conviction Deserved When Perpetrator Admits He Was Not InjuredRead the full article at...
Von Barry Zalma 2022-01-12 13:58:20 0 3KB
Other
Additional Insured only Created by Contract Terms
No Requirement for “Additional Insured” Status if not Called for by the Construction...
Von Barry Zalma 2020-12-24 13:30:53 0 4KB
Politics
Way too many Republicans waving the white flag before the real battle starts. Could it be there are that many involved with the fraud? Chris Christie calls Trump's legal team 'a national embarrassment'
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) on Sunday called President Trump's legal team "a...
Von Meme King 2020-11-22 17:43:02 0 5KB