The Coinsurance Clause

0
3K

A Video Explaining the Coinsurance Clause

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/coinsurance-clause-commercial-property-insurance-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://youtu.be/aUDUUrg-us0 and https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3850 posts.

Coinsurance is often misunderstood in first party property insurance. It is a clause that causes frequent dissatisfaction with insureds over claim settlements.

Historically most losses are partial losses. It is rare that the entire building or amount of covered property is destroyed. Knowing this, individuals deciding to insure their business property might insure for only part of its value. The insured may reason that since it is more likely to have a partial loss than a total loss, it is wasteful to spend premiums on complete insurance.

This reasoning, of course, defeats the concept that insurance is the sharing of risk. If the insured does not obtain insurance for the total values at risk, then the risk is not shared equally with other insureds. If most insureds chose to insure only part of the value of their property, the insurance industry would still have approximately the same number of claims to pay; however, the premiums that it collected to pay those claims would be vastly reduced. In order to have enough money to pay the losses, insurers would charge more for the lower values that insureds chose to insure. Those insureds who chose to insure the full value of their property would pay even more than they now pay for the same amount of coverage. Encouraging insureds to carry full insurance on their property allows premium levels to be fairer and that is why the coinsurance provisions were created.

The authors of the coverage forms were aware that expecting insured individuals and businesses to carry coverage for 100 percent of the value of their property was unrealistic. They allowed the choice (and the corresponding premium level) of insuring against the risk of loss of only a percentage of the value of the property.

The percentage that the insured chooses is called the “coinsurance percentage.” The insured and the insurance company are coinsuring the property because the percentage that the insured chooses not to insure represents the amount of coverage that the insured will pay.

In order to encourage insureds to insure a reasonably high percentage of their property’s value, the coverage form provides the incentive of coverage extensions—broader coverage—to those insureds who choose at least an 80 percent coinsurance.
ZALMA OPINION

It is essential that every person presenting or adjusting a commercial property claim understand the meaning and operation of coinsurance in any commercial property loss.

Patrocinado

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Pesquisar
Categorias
Leia Mais
Politically Incorrect
GIVE ME AN F'ING BREAK...
https://twitter.com/BooksInReverse/status/1380890760585875460?s=19 I can  & ...
Por Kate 4u2c 2021-04-10 19:31:31 0 4K
Outro
Mold & the Ballard Allison Case & Bad Faith
A Video Explaining How Mold Claims Became Popular Read the full article at...
Por Barry Zalma 2021-11-12 14:19:38 0 3K
Politics
Capitol Raid.
The start of this year was a changing event that will shape the future of our Republic for years...
Por Ron Patton 2021-01-31 01:23:14 0 9K
Politics
If you think 1783 saw the end of British Empire efforts to destroy the USA, you aren't watching the west coast... and more.
If you happen to think that today's violence and attempts to undermine the authority and...
Por Scarecrow III 2020-10-12 22:14:39 0 5K
Health
Are mass even close to helpful?
"Whether a COVID-19 Mask Mandate makes sense comes down to two scientific questions: > 1 - Are...
Por Scarecrow III 2021-11-22 12:24:45 0 5K