The Fortuity Doctrine

0
3K

A Video Explaining “Fortuity” as an Unwritten Exclusion

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fortuity-doctrine-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and See the full video at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921 and at https://youtu.be/EJwsF5HmB7I and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3850 posts.

Because the purpose of insurance is to protect insureds against unknown, or fortuitous, risks, fortuity is an inherent requirement of all insurance policies that take on the risk of loss accepted by the policy. [Two Pesos, Inc. v. Gulf Ins. Co., 901 S.W. 2d 495, 502 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, no writ)]. The fortuity doctrine precludes coverage for both a “known loss” and a “loss in progress.” A “known loss” is a loss the insured knew had occurred prior to making the insurance contract. [Burch v. Commonwealth Mut. Ins. Co., 450 S.W. 2d 838, 840-41 (Tex. 1970)].

The doctrine has its roots in the prevention of fraud: because insurance policies are designed to insure against fortuities, fraud occurs when a policy is misused to insure a certainty. Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co., 997 F. 2d 172, 175-77 (6th Cir. 1993) and Scottsdale Insurance Company v. William Barret Travis, Maintenance, Inc., No. 05-99-01831-CV (Tex. App. Dist. 5 05/29/2001).

The California Supreme Court considered the complex questions of insurance policy coverage interpretation that arose in connection with a federal court-ordered cleanup of the state’s Stringfellow Acid Pits waste site. The Supreme Court initially addressed the “‘continuous injury’ trigger of coverage,” as that principle was explained in Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 645, (P.2d 878 (1995) and the “all sums” rule adopted in Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co. (1997) 17 Cal.4th 38, 55-57 (Aerojet). The California Supreme Court brought to an end the dispute that started in the 1960’s when the Stringfellow Acid Pits began to leak. [State Of California v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (2006) 146 Cal.App.4th 851 (54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 343)]

Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Search
Categories
Read More
Other
The Trigger of Coverage/Property Claims
A Video Explaining “Trigger” of Property Damage Coverage Read the full article at...
By Barry Zalma 2021-08-11 12:13:32 0 3K
Politically Incorrect
Jetzt kommt der größte Wahlbetrug in der Geschichte der USA an die Öffentlichkeit
Jetzt kommt der größte Wahlbetrug in der Geschichte der USA an die...
By Medic Ineman9 2020-11-16 15:49:07 0 4K
Other
Covid Class Action Fails Seeking Insurance for Lost Business
Covid Shut Down is not Direct Physical Loss or Damage Read the full article at...
By Barry Zalma 2021-09-08 12:36:36 0 4K
Other
The Covenant of Good Faith
The Covenant of Good Faith Read the full article - much longer than this summary - at...
By Barry Zalma 2023-01-06 14:15:03 0 3K
Politically Incorrect
WHAT A B!TCH 🙄
🤨  It's  amazing how ppl act even if  uncalled for...she had a HISTORY ...
By Kate 4u2c 2021-05-04 01:29:34 0 5K