Coinsurance

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gSAdenqU and https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9 You can subscribe at https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9

An Important Condition of Every Commercial Property Insurer

Coinsurance

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gSAdenqU and https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9 You can subscribe at https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9

An Important Condition of Every Commercial Property Insurer

An Important Condition of Commercial Property Insurance Policies Coinsurance is often misunderstood in first party property insurance. It is a clause that causes frequent dissatisfaction with insureds over claim settlements.

Historically most losses are partial losses. It is rare that the entire building or amount of covered property is destroyed. Knowing this, individuals deciding to insure their business property might insure for only part of its value. The insured may reason that since it is more likely to have a partial loss than a total loss, it is wasteful to spend premiums on complete insurance.

This reasoning, of course, defeats the concept that insurance is the sharing of risk. If the insured does not obtain insurance for the total values at risk, then the risk is not shared equally with other insureds. If most insureds chose to insure only part of the value of their property, the insurance industry would still have approximately the same number of claims to pay; however, the premiums that it collected to pay those claims would be vastly reduced. In order to have enough money to pay the losses, insurers would charge more for the lower values that insureds chose to insure.

Those insureds who chose to insure the full value of their property would pay even more than they now pay for the same amount of coverage. Encouraging insureds to carry full insurance on their property allows premium levels to be fairer and that is why the coinsurance provisions were created. The authors of the coverage forms were aware that expecting insured individuals and businesses to carry coverage for 100 percent of the value of their property was unrealistic. They allowed the choice (and the corresponding premium level) of insuring against the risk of loss of only a percentage of the value of the property.

The term “coinsurance” means “a relative division of the risk between the insurer and the insured”. 15 Couch § 220.3. Coinsurance clauses are provisions in insurance policies that require the insured to maintain coverage to a specified value of the property. If the insured failed to maintain sufficient limits he or she becomes a coinsurer and must bear his or her proportional part of the loss. In regard to coinsurance, the Michigan Court of Appeal concluded that there is no ambiguity in the coinsurance provision.

The full article is only available to Substack subscribers. You can subscribe at https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9 and be able to see all substack publications including the full article on coinsurance.

The full article is only available to Substack subscribers. You can subscribe at https://lnkd.in/gku-R8V9 and be able to see all substack publications including the full article on coinsurance.