Claims Made Policies are Very Different than Occurrence Policies

0
4K

Insured Who Settled Suit Without Insurer’s Consent Lost Indemnity Coverage

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/claims-made-policies-very-different-from-occurrence-zalma-esq-cfe and at https://zalma.com/blog and more than 3900 posts. 

Benecard Services, Inc. is a company that manages prescription drug benefit plans. In 2015, it was sued by its onetime business partner, another company that sponsors such plans under Medicare Part D. The lawsuit included claims for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation. In 2016, the lawsuit settled. In Benecard Services, Inc. v. Allied World Specialty Insurance Company, f/k/a Darwin National Assurance Company; Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company; Rsui Indemnity Company; Travelers Property Casualty Company Of America; Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Allied World Assurance Company (US) Inc v. Benecard Services, Inc., Nos. 20-2359, 20-2360, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (September 8, 2021) it sought  coverage for its defense and settlement costs under various business insurance policies it held. Denials of coverage, and then litigation, followed. In 2020, the District Court granted summary judgment to the insurers in both cases composing this litigation-one case involving Benecard’s directors and officers liability and general liability policies, and another involving its errors and omissions liability policy.

ZALMA OPINION

Insurance protects the insureds against many risks of loss – not every possible loss. It is the duty of the insured to prove that the loss was due to a peril insured against and that it fulfilled the terms and conditions of the policy. One of those conditions required that the insurer consent to any settlement. Since Benecard effected a settlement without requesting the consent of the insurer, it breached the contract condition and was not entitled to any benefits. Its other claims of coverage against three different insurers were not viable and it must now use its own funds to pay the settlement. It is imperative that every insured read, understand and apply the terms and conditions of the policy and act fairly and in good faith in its dealings with its insurers. Failure to do so in this case was very expensive to Benecard.

Sponsorizzato

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here

Cerca
Categorie
Leggi tutto
Altre informazioni
A Video Explaining the Notice-Prejudice Rule When Interpreting an Insurance Policy
The Notice-Prejudice Rule Limits the Effectiveness of a Material Condition See the full video at...
By Barry Zalma 2020-10-20 15:09:39 0 5K
Altre informazioni
Bad Faith Claims Fail for Lack of Unreasonable Conduct
Even an Ineffective Refusal to Defend is not Bad Faith if Made in Good Faith Read the full...
By Barry Zalma 2021-03-26 12:36:24 0 4K
Politically Incorrect
How are Islamists like US progressives? Neither accept responsibility for their crimes.
Avoiding the apparently purloined US election for a moment, let's talk about the entirely...
By Scarecrow III 2020-11-04 16:46:23 0 5K
Health
Never Lie on an Insurance Application
Material Misrepresentation on Application Sufficient to Rescind Disability Coverage Read the full...
By Barry Zalma 2022-09-14 12:55:01 0 5K
Politics
Justice for Lavoy Finicum
Oregon Governor Kate Brown complained that an innocent protester was injured by Federal officers...
By Rogue Nation Eternal Militia 2020-07-29 23:15:40 1 7K