Punitive Damages Limited by Reprehensibility of the Defendant’s Conduct
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gUcdHVa and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gKHQAV3 and at https://lnkd.in/gJ5zQzi and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3600 posts.
In State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell (2003) 538 U.S. 408, the United States Supreme Court held that “‘the most important indicium of the reasonableness of a punitive damages award is the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct.'” (Id. at p. 419.) Moreover, in Campbell, the high court noted that its “‘holdings that a recidivist may be punished more severely than a first offender recognize that repeated misconduct is more reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance.'”
In California punitive damages have long been a part of traditional state tort law. [Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip (1991) 499 U.S. 1, 15, 111 S.Ct. 1032, 113 L.Ed.2d 1 (Haslip)], and the states have “broad discretion” with respect to their imposition.
Site içinde arama yapın
Kategoriler
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Oyunlar
- Gardening
- Health
- Home
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Other
- Politics
- History
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Read More
ZIFL - 08/01/2021 - Volume 25 Number 15
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – August 1, 2021
Posted on July 31, 2021 by Barry...
What was the mask thing really all about?
I was responding to a comment on other alt media and in my own response I became aware of a...
Cindy McCain: ‘There Is a Role for Republicans’ in a Biden Administration
Cindy McCain, an advisory board member on former Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential...
The Modern Market at Lloyd's
A Video Explaining The Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London
Read the full article at...