-
- EXPLORE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Reasonable Expectations do not Defeat Clear and Unambiguous Policy Langugae
Posted 2021-02-19 14:13:04
0
3K
Sponsored
We are 100% funded for October.
Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Search
Categories
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Games
- Gardening
- Health
- Home
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Other
- Politics
- History
- News
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Read More
Trudeau to join Global CV-19 Fundraiser
https://ifthetruthbetold.blog/2019/01/20/health-and-fitness/comment-page-1/?unapproved=166&mo...
A Video Explaining the Equitable Remedy of Salvage
How to Determine the Priority of Rights to Salvage
Read the full article at...
An Unhappy Insured is not Evidence of Bad Faith
To Plead & Prove a Tort of Bad Faith Claim There Must Be Evidence
Read the full article at...
Broker Owes no duty to a Third Party
Insurance Broker is Only Required to Acquire the Policy Ordered by the Named Insured
Read the...
Biden Briefed After 5 Americans Injured In Iraq Rocket Attack
President Joe Biden has been briefed on a rocket attack in Iraq that injured five American...
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gQHDiST and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3600 posts.
Courts deal with claims from insureds that claim their reasonable expectations of coverage should supersede the policy wording when the clear and unambiguous language of the policy establish that the expectations of the insured are not reasonable nor correct. Over the 53 years I have worked in the insurance business I have asked hundreds, if not thousands, of individuals if they read and understood their policy. Only two answered in the affirmative — both lied.
In Lang Fur Farms, Inc., et al. v. Bird Island – Hawk Creek Mutual Ins. Co., A20-0683, Minnesota Court Of Appeals (February 8, 2021) insureds challenged the partial summary judgment granted to the insurer.
ZALMA OPINION
Not all states allow the concurrent cause analysis in first party claims like Minnesota, California, for example, that first stated the doctrine, has limited it to only apply to third party claims. People who acquire insurance should read it, or hire a professional risk manager to read it for them, to ascertain coverage.