you only get flak over the target....
I'm not often on this platform, mostly because I find the others easier to input... anyway...
The reason for this is to note that I was banned from MINDS for, I believe, the following post. No, nothing profane, c'mon, get real... but an idea to my mind that you only get flak when you're over the target. You tell me. the post:
"Maybe I'm missing something, but in reviewing the Covid death autopsy reports there is a curious pattern....
Initial Italian autopsies performed in violation of WHO rules {{why, as that should be a scientific enquiry???}} reported severe thrombosis infections that were exacerbated by treatment as though the infection was pulmonary; thus recommending that aspirin and antibiotics were more effective treatments and the pulmonary intubations actually exacerbated the condition and led the patient to death.
In response to this revelation, curiously, a vast horde of Camarilla flavoured "fact-checkers" and {likely} bought-off "professional" medical establishments deluged the net with denials and refutations based on their Dogma, but not apparently on reproduction of the Italian tests... though some gave lip service to pulmonary thrombosis, but denied it as the cause of death.... huh? (The third citation references this unscientific spleen venting.)
The question is whether we are in a rather large scale effort to produce as many deaths as possible by institutionally misdiagnosing and mistreating a thrombosis bacterial infection as though it were merely pulmonary, thus realising the Italian conclusion of death brought about by ventilator application?
Just a question and observation... particularly acute as the deaths in "vaxx" {how can you produce a vaccine if you haven't isolated the pathogen?} injected patients seem to have severe haematological dysfunctions, as revealed by autopsies performed thereon. Further, debilitating reactions to the vaxx include a lot of heart and vascular issues, often leading to death.
So, is it not curious that we are being potentially misdirected to pulmonary viral issues when the actual and serious pathological culprit may be haematological? Are medical authorities being told to misdiagnose and mistreat and for what purpose? You see, here rears the head of blindly following Dogma rather than inquiry based science.... and that appears to be the funding trap into which medical treatment and community has captured itself.
A few sources are cited in the first comment box, but you can find the "usual suspect self-proclaiming fact checkers" by searching for "Italian autopsy on covid patients" yourself....
Just like the propaganda outburst was an hyperbole when this stage show began, so is the outpouring of denials - which is what brought to mind the idea that they are mere Camarilla trolls, stooges, and paid patsies.
Perspective; because the problem with false denials is that it is a known practice that they go far overboard to overwhelm citations of the actual data... we used to see that kind of volume masking when we reviewed research papers in grad school."
Sponsored
We are 100% funded for October.
Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek