WHO'S PAYING HIM TO SAY THIS STUFF ON AIR? #NASA FREEMASONS 🔥 This is just so comical Hey Neil deGrasse Tyson, when are you going to debate Eric Dubay or Dean Odle Ministries where you, and your Pseudoscience ilk can be EXPOSED once and for all??? #ditrh will take you on too! We KNOW your lies cannot stand up to scrutiny, so you are scared, but it's really pathetic to see you telling Americans they are "Too Dumb" to comprehend the data for themselves! Come and PROVE how much smarter you "Experts" are! An open invitation has been extended from Eric Dubay, and I'm fairly certain ANY OTHER True Earther will take you on too! Especially Pastor Dean Odle Ministries, who will not only destroy your LIES and half truths, but he'll do it with his bible in hand You are nothing but a spewer if dis and mis-information! And we are sick and tired of hearing your TALK, when we ALL KNOW you can't WALK the WALK! The Earth is Flat and Stationary, NOT "Pear-Shaped" and spinning 1038mph, as it orbits the sun 66,600mph ALL of that nonsense is "Pseudoscience" Hey Neil.... Do you know the difference between the earth's supposed "curvature" and Waldo??? YOU CAN ACTUALLY FIND WALDO! https://old.bitchute.com/video/k5rElSLnaA0J/

Tiny Homes NOT Allowed: County Commissioners & State Rep SLAM Youtuber For Standing Up For the Poor! 159,806 views Dec 4, 2024 #helene #asheville #justice #helene #asheville #tinyhome #justice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcBdkgqN3z8 The prohibition of tiny homes in Haywood County has sparked significant controversy, especially after YouTuber John Ward's video on the subject went viral, prompting a county commissioners' meeting. In his video, Ward highlights the county's refusal to permit tiny homes for victims of Hurricane Helene, questioning whether the commissioners will act to prevent residents from freezing this winter. Commissioner Terry Ramey has advocated for suspending certain housing regulations to assist flood survivors, emphasizing the urgency of providing warm shelter. He has collaborated with local churches to develop temporary "Rustic Cabins" for those still living in tents. However, these structures have faced pushback for not meeting residential building codes, as they lack required amenities like bathrooms. Ramey plans to address this issue at the upcoming county commissioners' meeting, seeking temporary relief from stringent codes to ensure residents have safe and warm accommodations during the winter. He acknowledges potential criticism from his appearance in Ward's video but remains committed to aiding his constituents. The debate underscores the challenges of balancing regulatory compliance with immediate humanitarian needs, especially in the aftermath of natural disasters. Camp Rosebuds GOFUNDME: https://gofund.me/acc9425c Email me: [email protected]

Tiny Homes NOT Allowed: County Commissioners & State Rep SLAM Youtuber For Standing Up For the Poor! 159,806 views Dec 4, 2024 #helene #asheville #justice #helene #asheville #tinyhome #justice The prohibition of tiny homes in Haywood County has sparked significant controversy, especially after YouTuber John Ward's video on the subject went viral, prompting a county commissioners' meeting. In his video, Ward highlights the county's refusal to permit tiny homes for victims of Hurricane Helene, questioning whether the commissioners will act to prevent residents from freezing this winter. Commissioner Terry Ramey has advocated for suspending certain housing regulations to assist flood survivors, emphasizing the urgency of providing warm shelter. He has collaborated with local churches to develop temporary "Rustic Cabins" for those still living in tents. However, these structures have faced pushback for not meeting residential building codes, as they lack required amenities like bathrooms. Ramey plans to address this issue at the upcoming county commissioners' meeting, seeking temporary relief from stringent codes to ensure residents have safe and warm accommodations during the winter. He acknowledges potential criticism from his appearance in Ward's video but remains committed to aiding his constituents. The debate underscores the challenges of balancing regulatory compliance with immediate humanitarian needs, especially in the aftermath of natural disasters. Camp Rosebuds GOFUNDME: https://gofund.me/acc9425c Email me: [email protected]

The Most WORST Carry Method! - Avoid This at All Costs! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpKKQuCWNaU Carrying a gun isn’t just about owning a firearm -- it’s about being prepared to defend yourself in a moment of need. For most of us in the gun community, the focus is often on perfecting the best ways to carry: inside the waistband, outside the waistband, or even appendix carry. But what about the mistakes? Sometimes, knowing the wrong way to carry is just as important as knowing the right way. Today we’ll talk about the most dangerous and impractical methods of carrying a firearm -- and why some of them could put your safety at serious risk. We’ll cover commonly debated techniques, break down their flaws, and highlight the method that stands out as the worst of the worst.

'The Rail Minister stated that Euston station is "no longer in a fit condition" during a debate in the House of Lords, following remarks about the station. Meanwhile, HS2 is constructing a massive new station at Old Oak Common, with GWR trains being diverted to Euston in a rare route change during the construction of the HS2 station. This raises the question: What is to become of Euston?'"

#ClimateChange and #GlobaklWarming is a #HOAX! You have mentally ill people around the world claiming that CO2 is causing this BS "Climate Change" yet these same people generally have NO IDEA how much CO2 is even in our atmosphere! It's a mere 0.04% by the way, very little CO2 is a gas of LIFE! It is what humans exhale after breathing in oxygen... And in PERFECT BALANCE the plants BREATHE IN CO2 AND EXHALE OXYGEN! It's a perfect system. Yet, we have zealots bent on #Eugenics who want to kill us all... and if not KILL, they definitely want to CONTROL everyone! Their fictional "Climate Change" narrative is designed to give them FULL CONTROL OVER THE EARTH AND EVERYONE IN IT! These #Criminals will do whatever it takes to gain control over all of mankind! And that includes spraying TOXINS into our skies, poisoning the entire agricultural system, all men and women, and even the water! These lunatics have been trying to accomplish this #Evil plan for over 150 years! And it is time they are STOPPED! These morons have no more rights to this earth than we do.... And there are BILLIONS OF US opposed to poisoning our earth and ourselves! It's about time that we start acting like it! These people belong in PRISON Here's the short list of LIES we have been told about how "Climate is going to kill us all" PURELY FICTION AND LIES! Scientists seeking funding and journalists seeking an audience agree: panic sells. “Global cooling is going to kills us all!” “No, wait: global warming is going to kill us all!” Here's the list - an amazing chronology of the last 120 years of scare-mongering on climate 1895 - Geologists Think theWorld May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895 1902 - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times 1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912 1923 - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune 1923 - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post 1924 - MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924 1929 - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming? 1932 - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World 1933 - America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933 1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.” 1938 - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 1938 - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune 1939 - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post 1952 - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962 1954 - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report 1954 - Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine 1959 - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times 1969 - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969 1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation) 1970 - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post 1974 - Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine 1974 - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –Washington Post 1974 - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger 1974 - “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age 1975 - Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975 1975 - “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine 1976 - “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – U.S. News and World Report 1981 - Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times 1988 - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote andHis superior’s objection for context 1989 -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Discover magazine, October 1989 1990 - “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – Senator Timothy Wirth 1993 - “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – U.S. News and World Report 1998 - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998 2001 - “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001 2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003 2006 - “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006 2006 – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” —Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT 2006 – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —Philip Stott, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the University of London 2006 - “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” –Senator James Inhofe, Monday, September 25, 2006 2007- “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – Dr. Tim Ball, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007 2008 – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – Dr. John S. Theon, retired Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA, see above for Hansen quotes You can find this article by searching : American Thinker August 4, 2014 "120 years of climate scares" It's time to tell these liars and eugenicists that the jig is up! And their little HOAX is over! Just look at the lunacy these people are printing! It’s Time to Engineer the Sky Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/its-time-to-engineer-the-sky/

‘You'll not erase us’: Palestinian activist Susan Abulhawa’s speech at Oxford Union debate Tuesday, 03 December 2024 10:05 AM [ Last Update: Tuesday, 03 December 2024 11:51 AM ] A Powerful statement against #Israel's #Genocide A #Crime spree that has went on for far too long! I have far more in common with the Palestinian People than I have with the lying murderers of Israel Everyone must comprehend that first of all, the #Jews of Israel have absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PEOPLE OF THE BIBLE! This is a people who hijacked a religion AND a people's history! A nation of liars, thieve, #Pedophiles, and murderers! Having ZERO RELATION to the Israelites! A people who are TRYING TO ERASE YOU as well as the Palestinians! This is the people who CREATED the "vaccine" weapon of Genocide with the DOD Satan's Spawn A people capable of Evil most people cannot even imagine! And they use LIES, TRICKERY, and DECEPTION to get you to help in your own extermination! It's time to stop being played like a funky piano by these demons! https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2024/12/03/738403/you-wont-erase-us-palestinian-activist-speech-oxford-union-debate

This Is The Most Blistering Takedown Of Zionism You Will Ever Hear SHUT UP AND LISTEN AMERICA (And the world) This was written by Palestinian author and human rights activist Susan Abulhawa, my sister, who possesses a much sharper vocabulary than my own, and a much better personal understanding of the #Evil committed by the #Jewish State of #Israel I stand in awe of her words, and the sentiment behind them! This WILL be mirrored on my channel without a doubt! I detest the #Zionist murderers as much as she does, her sentiments could easily be my own SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE! 86,381 views Dec 1, 2024 UNITED KINGDOM The Oxford Union debate over Israel hosted the most standout takedown of Israel and Zionism you will have ever heard. It is brilliant. Right, so sometimes you come across a piece of writing or an oratory so profound and so exacting that it literally stops you in your tracks. That is how this particular speech I’ve come across today has left me and I make no apologies for this video being a little longer than usual as a result. It was breathtaking. To be able to write a speech that is so quietly and calmly eviscerating, I think is more powerful than a 100 news articles or political commentaries covering atrocity and I absolutely had to share this with you, shared on social media as it was today by Electronic Intifada’s Asa Winstanley. This has come from Palestinian author and human rights activist Susan Abulhawa, the author of Mornings in Jenin, a story of life set in the aftermath of the 1967 6 day war and a book I now plan on getting as a matter of essential reading. This speech was made at the recent Oxford Union debate, a debate which actually descended into chaos as many students sought to leave the moment they became aware that a former IDF spy was present to speak on behalf of Israel in a debate where the motion presented was ‘This House believes Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide’ Zionists were apoplectic with rage when the vote came through, passing by 278 to 59 in favour and despite many people speaking in favour of the motion eloquently, emotionally and forcefully, Abulhawa’s contribution is one everyone has to hear. Right, so Susan Abulhawa’s speech to the Oxford Union, speaking in favour of their motion which passed by 278 votes to 59 in favour of believing Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide I think is probably the most powerful statement I’ve ever read in response not just to the events of the last 15 months but long before that too, the daughter of Palestinians expelled by Israel following the 1967 war, this is her history, her heritage and is the founder of Playgrounds for Palestine, an NGO that builds playgrounds for children in Palestine, as well as UN refugee camps in Lebanon. She was invited to speak in this debate at the Oxford Union and she absolutely did just that and frankly after hearing this only the hardest hearted of Zionists could possibly have voted against the motion. ‘Addressing the challenge of what to do about the indigenous inhabitants of the land Chaim Weizman, a Russian Jew, said to the World Zionist Congress in 1921 that Palestinians were akin to “the rocks of Judea, obstacles that had to be cleared on a difficult path." David Gruen, a Polish Jew, who changed his name to David Ben Gurion to sound relevant to the region, said. "We must expel Arabs and take their places” There are thousands of such conversations among the early zionists who plotted and implemented the violent colonization of Palestine and the annihilation of her native people. But they were only partially successful, murdering or ethnically cleansing 80% of Palestinians, which meant that 20% of us remained, an enduring obstacle to their colonial fantasies, which became the subject of their obsessions in the decades that followed, especially after conquering what remained of Palestine in 1967. https://youtu.be/m4snHu0SOm0

Recent congressional hearings have focused on the alleged recovery and reverse engineering of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), commonly referred to as UFOs. Witnesses have claimed the existence of secret government programs aimed at understanding and replicating advanced technologies from these objects. However, the Pentagon has denied these claims, stating that they have no verifiable information to support them. The topic of UAPs and potential reverse engineering has sparked debate and speculation. Some believe that the government is withholding crucial information from the public, while others remain skeptical of the claims. The potential implications of successful UAP reverse engineering are significant. It could lead to revolutionary advancements in various fields, including propulsion, materials science, and energy technology. However, it could also raise ethical concerns about the use of such advanced technology and its potential impact on society.

Another Jump in Astrophysics: Early Galaxies Challenging Dark Matter Models, The field of astrophysics has always been rife with surprising discoveries, and the latest findings from cutting-edge telescope data are no exception. Recent observations have cast doubt on some long-held assumptions about the formation of the early universe, leading scientists to question whether our current cosmological models, including the standard ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, truly represent the intricacies of cosmic evolution. A Glimpse into Early Galaxies Data from advanced telescopes, like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has shown that early galaxies, formed less than a billion years after the Big Bang, were much larger and more luminous than previously believed possible. According to traditional models, galaxies were expected to grow more gradually, accruing mass and light over billions of years. The revelation that such massive and bright galaxies existed so early in the universe’s history has prompted a reevaluation of the ΛCDM model. The Standard ΛCDM Model: A Quick Overview The ΛCDM model is a mathematical framework that has long been the backbone of Big Bang cosmology. It consists of three main components: A cosmological constant (Λ): This represents dark energy, an enigmatic force driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. Cold dark matter (CDM): Hypothetical matter that does not emit or interact with electromagnetic radiation, explaining the unseen mass that affects gravitational forces on large scales. Ordinary matter: The familiar atoms and particles that make up stars, planets, and everything else visible in the universe. This model is referred to as the standard model of cosmology because it is the simplest and most comprehensive framework that has so far provided a reasonable explanation for a wide range of astronomical observations, from the cosmic microwave background to the distribution of galaxies. Early Challenges and New Theories However, the discovery of unexpectedly large and bright early galaxies implies that our models might be missing key details about the dynamics of the early universe. If galaxies formed so rapidly after the Big Bang, alternative explanations may be necessary. These might include modifications to our understanding of gravitational interactions on cosmic scales or the introduction of new interactions between particles that do not fit into the current ΛCDM framework. Some astrophysicists are exploring models that propose dark matter behaves differently in the presence of extreme conditions, while others suggest entirely new mechanisms that accelerate the process of galaxy formation. These theories challenge the conventional narrative by suggesting that dark matter might not be a universal constant, or that additional factors, such as modified gravity theories, might come into play. The Future of Cosmological Exploration As these observations continue to be studied and debated, it is clear that our current cosmological models may need to be updated or expanded to align with this unexpected data. The insights gained from the JWST and similar telescopes will undoubtedly continue to push the boundaries of our understanding, leading to new theories that could redefine our comprehension of the universe’s origins and its early development. The journey of discovery is far from over, and the universe, as always, holds more mysteries yet to be revealed. Whether these findings lead to small adjustments in the ΛCDM model or prompt the development of entirely new paradigms, one thing is certain: astrophysics is entering an exciting new chapter.