Infowars’ Owen Shroyer Debates Leftist Destiny on Trump-Harris Election: WATCH LIVE! https://www.infowars.com/posts/infowars-owen-shroyer-debates-leftist-destiny-on-trump-harris-election-watch-live

This is the same guy who released the affidavit from a woman who worked at ABC and witnessed ABC colluding with Kamala to rigg the debate. Link: https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1844791250886467946

DEBATE: Will China or the USA COLLAPSE first? [MUST WATCH] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjhTweywZpw

Monstrous Bullets Vaporize Targets Before They Even See It Coming As the arms race intensified, few could have anticipated the astonishing evolution of modern weaponry. Today, we delve into four groundbreaking munitions that redefine lethality on the battlefield. In 1956, the Air Force unveiled the Lockheed F-104A Starfighter at Edwards Air Force Base, astonishing onlookers with its slender wings and incredible 1,500 miles per hour speed. However, it was a mysterious bump on the fuselage that truly captured attention — the introduction of the M61 Vulcan machine gun. With a jaw-dropping firing rate of 6,000 rounds per minute, this weapon revolutionized aerial combat, blending nearly a century of technological evolution with modern firepower. As global tensions escalate, the German Bundeswehr has embraced the MANTIS, a rapid-response auto-defense system. Capable of firing 1,000 rounds in just one minute, this state-of-the-art arsenal can obliterate incoming threats with a response time of just 4.5 seconds. In a world of escalating warfare, the MANTIS stands as a formidable shield for Germany and its allies. Meanwhile, the controversial Raufoss Mk 211 .50-caliber round has emerged as a topic of heated debate. Known for its unparalleled destructive capabilities, this multipurpose ammunition poses a dilemma for military leaders: should such devastating firepower be utilized, or is it too dangerous in populated areas? The whispers surrounding its potential on the battlefield continue to grow, fueling discussions on the ethics of warfare. Lastly, we spotlight the groundbreaking EXACTO bullet, a self-steering innovation that could transform the role of snipers. Developed by DARPA, this remarkable round navigates environmental challenges with astonishing accuracy, giving soldiers the power to engage distant targets safely and effectively. https://youtu.be/j0B9cV_bIDY?si=4oOuF_OLrjvQ7YuL

Kari Lake Schools Ruben Gallegos in AZ Senate Debate Ruben Gallego's consultants have built him up in these ads to make him look like a cross between Mr. Rogers & G.I. Joe. It was never going to hold up to actual scrutiny. He couldn't connect with Arizonans at our debate because he was trying to sell them a false version of himself. He's still the same Radical Ruben. https://rumble.com/v5i9gil-kari-lake-schools-ruben-gallegos-in-az-senate-debate.html

During a recent interview with Fox News, Republican Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance exposed an “astonishing” lie touted by Vice President Kamala Harris. The Democratic presidential candidate claimed in the recent presidential debate against former President Donald Trump that there were no active duty U.S. military service members deployed in a combat zone. https://rumble.com/v5i6fn7-watch-vance-takes-mere-minutes-to-expose-kamalas-astonishing-lie.html

https://medforth.biz/oxford-university-set-to-launch-new-debate-series-to-reaffirm-importance-of-free-speech-which-is-institutions-lifeblood/

GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: IT'S BEEN MANY DAYS SINCE WE HAD THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. IN POLITICS, ONE WEEK CAN BE LIKE ETERNITY, MANY THINGS CAN HAPPEN BUT THE DEBATE REVEALED MANY THINGS THAT POSSIBLY ESCAPED AT THE FIRST SIGHT. THIS VIDEO ANALYSES AND REVEALS MANY OF THE HIDDEN DETAILS FROM THE DEBATE.

AND NOW IT'S ALL OVER THE INTERNET...LOL Free speech?? They bounced the guy out of the room when he was pointing out facts. If that weasel was legit, he would have answered the guys questions or debated him. Instead, they escorted the man asking questions out.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that plant-based products can be labeled with terms traditionally associated with meat, such as "steak," "meatballs," or "sausages." This decision is based on the fact that there is no significant risk of consumers being misled about the nature of the products, as long as the labeling is clear and transparent. The case reflects a broader debate about the labeling of plant-based food products in a context where demand for vegan or vegetarian alternatives is growing. The Court upheld that terms like "steak" or "sausage" are not exclusively reserved for meat products, as long as the description is clear and not misleading to consumers. This ruling has significant implications for the food industry, as it legitimizes the use of familiar names for plant-based products, facilitating their integration into the market and addressing growing environmental and health concerns related to meat consumption.