• Trans rights are ‘greatest assault of my lifetime’ on women’s rights, says JK Rowling
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/29/jk-rowling-transgender-assault-womens-rights-book-essay/

    JK Rowling said she spoke up about transgender issues because she believes she is witnessing “the greatest assault of my lifetime” on women’s rights and would have “felt ashamed for the rest of my days if I hadn’t”.

    The 58-year-old Harry Potter author has previously been criticised for her staunch views on gender identity, but has always strongly denied accusations of transphobia.

    She explained her belief in protecting women’s sex-based rights in an essay which features in The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht – a forthcoming book on Scotland’s battle for women’s rights.

    “I’d come to believe that the socio-political movement insisting ‘trans women are women’ was neither kind nor tolerant, but in fact profoundly misogynistic, regressive, dangerous in some of its objectives and nakedly authoritarian in its tactics,” Rowling said, in an extract published in The Times.
    Trans rights are ‘greatest assault of my lifetime’ on women’s rights, says JK Rowling https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/29/jk-rowling-transgender-assault-womens-rights-book-essay/ JK Rowling said she spoke up about transgender issues because she believes she is witnessing “the greatest assault of my lifetime” on women’s rights and would have “felt ashamed for the rest of my days if I hadn’t”. The 58-year-old Harry Potter author has previously been criticised for her staunch views on gender identity, but has always strongly denied accusations of transphobia. She explained her belief in protecting women’s sex-based rights in an essay which features in The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht – a forthcoming book on Scotland’s battle for women’s rights. “I’d come to believe that the socio-political movement insisting ‘trans women are women’ was neither kind nor tolerant, but in fact profoundly misogynistic, regressive, dangerous in some of its objectives and nakedly authoritarian in its tactics,” Rowling said, in an extract published in The Times.
    WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK
    Trans rights are ‘greatest assault of my lifetime’ on women’s rights, says JK Rowling
    Harry Potter author explains her beliefs in an essay for The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht, a new book on Scotland’s battle for women’s rights
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 476 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/trudeau-says-infamous-remarks-calling-unvaccinated-racist-and-misogynist-were-taken-out-of-context/
    https://medforth.biz/trudeau-says-infamous-remarks-calling-unvaccinated-racist-and-misogynist-were-taken-out-of-context/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 454 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/the-medias-great-trans-cover-up-a-misogynistic-homophobic-mens-rights-campaign/
    https://medforth.biz/the-medias-great-trans-cover-up-a-misogynistic-homophobic-mens-rights-campaign/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1177 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/the-medias-great-trans-cover-up-a-misogynistic-homophobic-mens-rights-campaign/
    https://medforth.biz/the-medias-great-trans-cover-up-a-misogynistic-homophobic-mens-rights-campaign/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1187 Views
  • As we know, Islam allows men to marry non-Muslims but forbids women to do so, because the kids are required (or at least expected) to follow their father's religion. Not only is this misogynistic and hypocritical, but it also contradicts the claim that "Islam is a religion of peace," because if that truly was the case a Muslim woman's lover and kids would be accepted no matter what.
    A couple other reasons (more like excuses) I've been given for this double-standard, is because "the man is the head of the household, and a Muslim household must not be headed by a non-Muslim (so much for gender equality if the man is the head of the household merely because of XY chromosomes, and is toxic because it reinforces their belief that Muslims are above everyone else)" and "it's to protect the woman, because a non-Muslim husband might abuse her and/or force her to do things which are un-Islamic." So in other words, all non-Muslim men are automatically untrustworthy, and a Muslim man being negatively influenced and led astray by a non-Muslim wife...totally not possible. SMH! I've also been told that if a Muslim man abuses and mistreats his wife, he's going against the teachings of Islam. That's a big fat lie if I ever heard one! Then again, the Quran encourages its followers to lie and deceive.
    Anyway, even though Islam requires (or highly expects) kids to follow their father's religion, it turns out mothers tend to have more influence. Which makes sense, considering that mothers typically spend more time with the children. In fact, here's a Reddit post I came across which discusses this exact "problem."
    https://www.reddit.com/r/MuslimLounge/comments/14lavv9/why_do_i_see_a_lot_of_children_of_a_muslim_father/
    PS - Aren't most of the comments just plain sickening? But again, Islam brainwashes (and even threatens) its followers.
    As we know, Islam allows men to marry non-Muslims but forbids women to do so, because the kids are required (or at least expected) to follow their father's religion. Not only is this misogynistic and hypocritical, but it also contradicts the claim that "Islam is a religion of peace," because if that truly was the case a Muslim woman's lover and kids would be accepted no matter what. A couple other reasons (more like excuses) I've been given for this double-standard, is because "the man is the head of the household, and a Muslim household must not be headed by a non-Muslim (so much for gender equality if the man is the head of the household merely because of XY chromosomes, and is toxic because it reinforces their belief that Muslims are above everyone else)" and "it's to protect the woman, because a non-Muslim husband might abuse her and/or force her to do things which are un-Islamic." So in other words, all non-Muslim men are automatically untrustworthy, and a Muslim man being negatively influenced and led astray by a non-Muslim wife...totally not possible. SMH! I've also been told that if a Muslim man abuses and mistreats his wife, he's going against the teachings of Islam. That's a big fat lie if I ever heard one! Then again, the Quran encourages its followers to lie and deceive. Anyway, even though Islam requires (or highly expects) kids to follow their father's religion, it turns out mothers tend to have more influence. Which makes sense, considering that mothers typically spend more time with the children. In fact, here's a Reddit post I came across which discusses this exact "problem." https://www.reddit.com/r/MuslimLounge/comments/14lavv9/why_do_i_see_a_lot_of_children_of_a_muslim_father/ PS - Aren't most of the comments just plain sickening? But again, Islam brainwashes (and even threatens) its followers.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2171 Views
  • Turns out the creep is a Democrat…but I thought it was Republics who are misogynists?

    "Governor Vetoes Bipartisan Bill Protecting Women’s Sports"
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/governor-vetoes-bipartisan-bill-protecting-womens-sports
    Turns out the creep is a Democrat…but I thought it was Republics who are misogynists? "Governor Vetoes Bipartisan Bill Protecting Women’s Sports" https://www.dailywire.com/news/governor-vetoes-bipartisan-bill-protecting-womens-sports
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1339 Views
  • The Blackface-in-Chief continues to march Canada off the edge of a cliff, serving his globalist masters and dividing the nation --- By labelling anyone who counters the official narrative as .......... Racists, misogynists and conspiracy theorists
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/r05jhBs1ICE/
    The Blackface-in-Chief continues to march Canada off the edge of a cliff, serving his globalist masters and dividing the nation --- By labelling anyone who counters the official narrative as .......... Racists, misogynists and conspiracy theorists https://www.bitchute.com/video/r05jhBs1ICE/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 551 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/tyrant-justin-trudeau-lies-under-oath-claims-he-did-not-call-unvaccinated-people-racists-and-misogynists-but-video-proves-otherwise/
    https://medforth.biz/tyrant-justin-trudeau-lies-under-oath-claims-he-did-not-call-unvaccinated-people-racists-and-misogynists-but-video-proves-otherwise/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 558 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/tyrant-justin-trudeau-lies-under-oath-claims-he-did-not-call-unvaccinated-people-racists-and-misogynists-but-video-proves-otherwise/
    https://medforth.biz/tyrant-justin-trudeau-lies-under-oath-claims-he-did-not-call-unvaccinated-people-racists-and-misogynists-but-video-proves-otherwise/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 551 Views
  • Re: The Inquiry:
    THE CONVOY isn’t under investigation.
    THE GOVERNMENT IS.
    The truckers came because of government overreach. They came because of unjustified lockdowns and measures. They came because the government tore families apart, because the government dehumanized the people who made informed medical decisions for their own bodies. Truckers came because people were losing their jobs, because the Canadian Charter of Rights was being trampled on.
    Then the government literally trampled their own citizens. Brutalized them. Imprisoned them. Froze bank accounts. Seized assets.
    INVOKED THE EMERGENCY MEASURES ACT—->used for war.
    The prime minister ignored a whole group of his own citizens. He called them racists, misogynists, extremists, he asked how long they should be tolerated for. He got cVd every time he was challenged.
    He would NOT come to the table.
    THIS, is what’s under investigation.
    Not the truckers who fed the city (literally), who lowered the crime rate in the downtown core, who cleaned garbage and shoveled where the city did nothing, who hugged and loved and yes honked. Who got the attention of the WORLD. Who inspired hope for millions, who brought Canadians together who thought they were alone, who gave doctors and medical professionals being silenced a platform, who saved countless lives of people who’d been sinking into absolute despair…..
    THE TRUCKERS ARE NOT BEING INVESTIGATED HERE.
    THE GOVERNMENT IS.
    Copy and paste
    This should be seen every day
    Re: The Inquiry: THE CONVOY isn’t under investigation. THE GOVERNMENT IS. The truckers came because of government overreach. They came because of unjustified lockdowns and measures. They came because the government tore families apart, because the government dehumanized the people who made informed medical decisions for their own bodies. Truckers came because people were losing their jobs, because the Canadian Charter of Rights was being trampled on. Then the government literally trampled their own citizens. Brutalized them. Imprisoned them. Froze bank accounts. Seized assets. INVOKED THE EMERGENCY MEASURES ACT—->used for war. The prime minister ignored a whole group of his own citizens. He called them racists, misogynists, extremists, he asked how long they should be tolerated for. He got cVd every time he was challenged. He would NOT come to the table. THIS, is what’s under investigation. Not the truckers who fed the city (literally), who lowered the crime rate in the downtown core, who cleaned garbage and shoveled where the city did nothing, who hugged and loved and yes honked. Who got the attention of the WORLD. Who inspired hope for millions, who brought Canadians together who thought they were alone, who gave doctors and medical professionals being silenced a platform, who saved countless lives of people who’d been sinking into absolute despair….. THE TRUCKERS ARE NOT BEING INVESTIGATED HERE. THE GOVERNMENT IS. Copy and paste This should be seen every day
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1955 Views
More Results
Sponsored

After a successful May, we are now funded 54% for June. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here