• Evil reality-denying Democrats are delusional.

    https://conservativefiringline.com/delusional-democrat-ayanna-pressley-the-border-is-secure/
    Evil reality-denying Democrats are delusional. https://conservativefiringline.com/delusional-democrat-ayanna-pressley-the-border-is-secure/
    CONSERVATIVEFIRINGLINE.COM
    Delusional Democrat Ayanna Pressley: "The Border is Secure." ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
    Ayanna Pressley is a member of the so-called "Squad" of far leftist congressional members. She told CNN that the "border is secure."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 51 Views
  • https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nearly-half-of-democrats-believe-free-speech-should-be-legal-only-under-certain-circumstances/
    https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nearly-half-of-democrats-believe-free-speech-should-be-legal-only-under-certain-circumstances/
    REPUBLICBROADCASTING.ORG
    Nearly Half of Democrats Believe Free Speech Should Be Legal ‘Only Under Certain Circumstances’
    Source: Legal Insurrection “A bare majority of Democrats (53%) say speech should be legal under any circumstances, while 47% say it should be legal ‘only under certain circumstances.’” Almos…
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 58 Views
  • The 'Other' Trinity: America's Three Constitutions

    As the Democrats in Congress mull over the idea of increasing the size of the Supreme Court (the Constitution does not specify the number of justices) or of ending the filibuster (nowhere mentioned in the Constitution), it may be useful to think about the American political system in a broader way. A political majority has the legal right to change the number of Supreme Court justices, but there are other important factors than the letter of the Constitution. I want to briefly describe the three American “constitutions”: first, the actual written Constitution, ratified in 1787 and amended just 27 times over 234 years; second, what might be called the “small-c” constitution, the set of norms, habits and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life; and third, the ways the American people actually “constitute” their lives, more often outside the realm of civics, but which have to be taken into account by anyone wishing to lead or shape American life.
    We the people - the Big "C" constitution
    The Big "C" Constitution.(Shutterstock)
    The Formal Constitution

    The formal 1787 Constitution needs little description. There it is, 4,534 words, encapsulating the civic intentions of 55 white men who deliberated, debated, argued, and above all compromised for 115 days at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, windows closed, to hammer out “a more perfect union” for 3.9 million Americans, one in five a slave. No women were present, no African Americans free or enslaved, no Native Americans, no Jews or Muslims. The delegates, called by Jefferson an “assembly of demigods,” were all white privileged men. The Constitution established a new, stronger national government for the United States. It created two houses in Congress, and established minimum eligibility requirements for the president and for senators and members of the House of Representatives. It enumerated the powers of each of the three branches of government. It set procedures for ratifying a treaty, presidential vetoes of Congressional legislation, and the manner in which a veto could be overturned by a two-thirds vote in both houses. With, as they said in the 18th century, a long train of et ceteras.
    The small-c constitution is the set of norms, habits, and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life
    The “Small-c” Constitution


    The capital-C constitution was a general recipe for a new national government, but it did not descend into particulars on many important questions. It did not create a presidential cabinet, for example, but some such entity is hinted at in Article 2, Section 2, which says the president “may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.” George Washington established a four-member cabinet (State, War, Treasury, and Attorney General) a few months into his first term, and though some presidents have made much greater use of their cabinets than others, no subsequent president has dared to dispense with this American institution, now numbering 24 members. The capital-C Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to determine which laws were constitutional and which violated provisions of the Constitution (judicial review). Chief Justice John Marshall single-handedly instituted judicial review in 1803 in the famous case Marbury v. Madison, when he decided, without explicit Constitutional authority, that one clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void, and declared, in what amounts to a judicial declaration of independence, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” Thus, one of the central bulwarks of American civic life was not established in the capital-C Constitution, but it has achieved not just quasi-constitutional status in the United States but is so deeply rooted and uniformly accepted that nothing could possibly displace it now.
    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall_by_Henry_Inman,1832
    A 1932 portrait of the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall.(Shutterstock)
    The Constitution requires the president to advise Congress on the state of the union from time to time, but the annual ritual of the president riding up to Capitol Hill to address a joint session of Congress, with an endless series of standing ovations, special guests in the gallery, the Supreme Court justices all sitting in the front row, the joint chiefs of staff present and accounted for, belongs to the small-c constitution. Although Washington and John Adams delivered their annual messages personally before Congress, Thomas Jefferson broke that precedent before it could get deeply rooted in American civic life, because he thought it smelled of monarchy, and it wasn’t until Woodrow Wilson (1913) that the modern habit (now something of a political circus) was initiated, and rarely avoided since.

    Perhaps more to the point for the politics of 2021, the capital-C Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices. Congress gets to set the number through routine legislation. It could be nine, 19, or 90, and it has been set at six, five, seven, nine, and 10 in the course of American history. If the Democrats today forced through a court-packing bill raising the number of justices to 12, for example, they would not be violating the capital-C Constitution, which is silent on this question, but they would be violating what turns out to be a very deeply rooted and seemingly sacrosanct provision of the small-c constitution. This alone illustrates the immense power of the unratified small-c constitution. Even the Democrats who wish to reshape the balance of the Supreme Court by creating new positions they can fill with progressive justices sense that they are tiptoeing around a very important American taboo, as Franklin Roosevelt discovered in 1937, when he tried to raise the number of justices so that he could install individuals who would not strike down key provisions of the New Deal.
    New Deal and the campaign to pack the Supreme Court
    A political cartoon from 1937 illustrates the dust up around Franklin Roosevelt's effort to raise the number of Supreme Court justices in order to protect key provisions of the New Deal.
    The 'Other' Trinity: America's Three Constitutions As the Democrats in Congress mull over the idea of increasing the size of the Supreme Court (the Constitution does not specify the number of justices) or of ending the filibuster (nowhere mentioned in the Constitution), it may be useful to think about the American political system in a broader way. A political majority has the legal right to change the number of Supreme Court justices, but there are other important factors than the letter of the Constitution. I want to briefly describe the three American “constitutions”: first, the actual written Constitution, ratified in 1787 and amended just 27 times over 234 years; second, what might be called the “small-c” constitution, the set of norms, habits and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life; and third, the ways the American people actually “constitute” their lives, more often outside the realm of civics, but which have to be taken into account by anyone wishing to lead or shape American life. We the people - the Big "C" constitution The Big "C" Constitution.(Shutterstock) The Formal Constitution The formal 1787 Constitution needs little description. There it is, 4,534 words, encapsulating the civic intentions of 55 white men who deliberated, debated, argued, and above all compromised for 115 days at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, windows closed, to hammer out “a more perfect union” for 3.9 million Americans, one in five a slave. No women were present, no African Americans free or enslaved, no Native Americans, no Jews or Muslims. The delegates, called by Jefferson an “assembly of demigods,” were all white privileged men. The Constitution established a new, stronger national government for the United States. It created two houses in Congress, and established minimum eligibility requirements for the president and for senators and members of the House of Representatives. It enumerated the powers of each of the three branches of government. It set procedures for ratifying a treaty, presidential vetoes of Congressional legislation, and the manner in which a veto could be overturned by a two-thirds vote in both houses. With, as they said in the 18th century, a long train of et ceteras. The small-c constitution is the set of norms, habits, and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life The “Small-c” Constitution The capital-C constitution was a general recipe for a new national government, but it did not descend into particulars on many important questions. It did not create a presidential cabinet, for example, but some such entity is hinted at in Article 2, Section 2, which says the president “may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.” George Washington established a four-member cabinet (State, War, Treasury, and Attorney General) a few months into his first term, and though some presidents have made much greater use of their cabinets than others, no subsequent president has dared to dispense with this American institution, now numbering 24 members. The capital-C Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to determine which laws were constitutional and which violated provisions of the Constitution (judicial review). Chief Justice John Marshall single-handedly instituted judicial review in 1803 in the famous case Marbury v. Madison, when he decided, without explicit Constitutional authority, that one clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void, and declared, in what amounts to a judicial declaration of independence, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” Thus, one of the central bulwarks of American civic life was not established in the capital-C Constitution, but it has achieved not just quasi-constitutional status in the United States but is so deeply rooted and uniformly accepted that nothing could possibly displace it now. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall_by_Henry_Inman,1832 A 1932 portrait of the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall.(Shutterstock) The Constitution requires the president to advise Congress on the state of the union from time to time, but the annual ritual of the president riding up to Capitol Hill to address a joint session of Congress, with an endless series of standing ovations, special guests in the gallery, the Supreme Court justices all sitting in the front row, the joint chiefs of staff present and accounted for, belongs to the small-c constitution. Although Washington and John Adams delivered their annual messages personally before Congress, Thomas Jefferson broke that precedent before it could get deeply rooted in American civic life, because he thought it smelled of monarchy, and it wasn’t until Woodrow Wilson (1913) that the modern habit (now something of a political circus) was initiated, and rarely avoided since. Perhaps more to the point for the politics of 2021, the capital-C Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices. Congress gets to set the number through routine legislation. It could be nine, 19, or 90, and it has been set at six, five, seven, nine, and 10 in the course of American history. If the Democrats today forced through a court-packing bill raising the number of justices to 12, for example, they would not be violating the capital-C Constitution, which is silent on this question, but they would be violating what turns out to be a very deeply rooted and seemingly sacrosanct provision of the small-c constitution. This alone illustrates the immense power of the unratified small-c constitution. Even the Democrats who wish to reshape the balance of the Supreme Court by creating new positions they can fill with progressive justices sense that they are tiptoeing around a very important American taboo, as Franklin Roosevelt discovered in 1937, when he tried to raise the number of justices so that he could install individuals who would not strike down key provisions of the New Deal. New Deal and the campaign to pack the Supreme Court A political cartoon from 1937 illustrates the dust up around Franklin Roosevelt's effort to raise the number of Supreme Court justices in order to protect key provisions of the New Deal.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 209 Views
  • https://gellerreport.com/2023/09/watch-veterans-becomes-homeless-after-democrats-give-nursing-home-rooms-to-criminal-illegal-aliens.html/
    https://gellerreport.com/2023/09/watch-veterans-becomes-homeless-after-democrats-give-nursing-home-rooms-to-criminal-illegal-aliens.html/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 112 Views
  • https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-25-democrats-are-about-to-get-blindsided-by-voters-rejection.html
    https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-25-democrats-are-about-to-get-blindsided-by-voters-rejection.html
    WWW.NATURALNEWS.COM
    The Democrats are about to get BLINDSIDED by the voters’ wholesale REJECTION of their disastrous policies – NaturalNews.com
    Democrats are in for a beating in 2024, as they are about to get blindsided by voters’ rejection of their disastrous, failed policies. Importantly, Democrats are unable to anticipate the wholesale rejection they will receive, as they live in a bubble of self-reinforced gaslighting and propaganda, remaining oblivious to the reality that’s turning against them. […]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 88 Views
  • 90% of Democrats
    68% of Independents
    58% of Republicans
    https://www.brookings.edu/articles/for-covid-19-vaccinations-party-affiliation-matters-more-than-race-and-ethnicity/
    90% of Democrats 68% of Independents 58% of Republicans https://www.brookings.edu/articles/for-covid-19-vaccinations-party-affiliation-matters-more-than-race-and-ethnicity/
    WWW.BROOKINGS.EDU
    For COVID-19 vaccinations, party affiliation matters more than race and ethnicity | Brookings
    There's no reason to believe that these gaps in vaccination rates will disappear anytime soon.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 207 Views
  • When ever you saw Democrats kicking against somebody,check it very well that person is no longer in leftists ideology
    When ever you saw Democrats kicking against somebody,check it very well that person is no longer in leftists ideology
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 161 Views
  • The fascist face of the Democrat Party has been revealed. One-third say Americans "have too much freedom."

    https://conservativefiringline.com/democrats-unmasked-as-fascists-in-new-poll-one-third-say-americans-have-too-much-freedom/
    The fascist face of the Democrat Party has been revealed. One-third say Americans "have too much freedom." https://conservativefiringline.com/democrats-unmasked-as-fascists-in-new-poll-one-third-say-americans-have-too-much-freedom/
    CONSERVATIVEFIRINGLINE.COM
    Democrats Unmasked As Fascists In New Poll: One-Third Say Americans Have 'Too Much Freedom' ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
    A new Real Clear Politics poll says that just over one-third -- 34 percent -- of Democrats think Americans have too much freedom.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 184 Views
  • https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/23/losing-faith-religious-identification-among-democrats-crashes-20-points-in-20-years/
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/23/losing-faith-religious-identification-among-democrats-crashes-20-points-in-20-years/
    WWW.BREITBART.COM
    Religious Identification Among Democrats Crashes 20 Points in 20 Years
    The percentage of Democrats who identify as religious has dropped more than 20 points between 1999 and 2023, a recent Gallup survey found.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 68 Views
  • All around the country, people are challenging the unconstitutional laws and Amendments that the Uniparty (the Democrats, Republicans, Leftists, RINOs, DINOs, and the DS) put into place. This holds true for the unconstitutional Amendment stating that no Felon shall be able to own firearms.

    The rights in the constitution are God-Given to EVERYONE. Everyone has the right to self-defense. Take that away, and America becomes like the UK and the rest of Europe.
    All around the country, people are challenging the unconstitutional laws and Amendments that the Uniparty (the Democrats, Republicans, Leftists, RINOs, DINOs, and the DS) put into place. This holds true for the unconstitutional Amendment stating that no Felon shall be able to own firearms. The rights in the constitution are God-Given to EVERYONE. Everyone has the right to self-defense. Take that away, and America becomes like the UK and the rest of Europe.
    THERELOAD.COM
    Tenth Circuit Upholds Federal Gun Ban for Non-Violent Felons
    Convicted felons can be deprived of their right to own firearms whether or not they were convicted for a violent offense, a federal appeals court has ruled.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 306 Views
More Results
Sponsored