• #ClimateChange and #GlobaklWarming is a #HOAX!
    You have mentally ill people around the world claiming that CO2 is causing this BS "Climate Change" yet these same people generally have NO IDEA how much CO2 is even in our atmosphere! It's a mere 0.04% by the way, very little

    CO2 is a gas of LIFE!
    It is what humans exhale after breathing in oxygen...
    And in PERFECT BALANCE the plants BREATHE IN CO2 AND EXHALE OXYGEN!

    It's a perfect system. Yet, we have zealots bent on #Eugenics who want to kill us all...
    and if not KILL, they definitely want to CONTROL everyone! Their fictional
    "Climate Change" narrative is designed to give them
    FULL CONTROL OVER THE EARTH AND EVERYONE IN IT!

    These #Criminals will do whatever it takes to gain control over all of mankind!
    And that includes spraying TOXINS into our skies, poisoning the entire agricultural system, all men and women, and even the water!

    These lunatics have been trying to accomplish this #Evil plan for over 150 years!
    And it is time they are STOPPED!

    These morons have no more rights to this earth than we do....
    And there are BILLIONS OF US opposed to poisoning our earth and ourselves!

    It's about time that we start acting like it!
    These people belong in PRISON

    Here's the short list of LIES we have been told about how
    "Climate is going to kill us all" PURELY FICTION AND LIES!

    Scientists seeking funding and journalists seeking an audience agree: panic sells.

    “Global cooling is going to kills us all!” “No, wait: global warming is going to kill us all!”

    Here's the list - an amazing chronology of the last 120 years of scare-mongering on climate

    1895 - Geologists Think theWorld May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895

    1902 - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times

    1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912

    1923 - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune

    1923 - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post

    1924 - MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924

    1929 - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming?

    1932 - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World

    1933 - America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933

    1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.”

    1938 - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

    1938 - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune

    1939 - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post

    1952 - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962

    1954 - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report

    1954 - Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine

    1959 - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times

    1969 - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969

    1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)

    1970 - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post

    1974 - Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine

    1974 - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –Washington Post

    1974 - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger

    1974 - “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times

    Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age

    1975 - Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975

    1975 - “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine

    1976 - “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – U.S. News and World Report

    1981 - Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times

    1988 - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote andHis superior’s objection for context

    1989 -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Discover magazine, October 1989

    1990 - “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – Senator Timothy Wirth

    1993 - “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – U.S. News and World Report

    1998 - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998

    2001 - “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001

    2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003

    2006 - “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006

    2006 – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” —Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT

    2006 – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —Philip Stott, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the University of London

    2006 - “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” –Senator James Inhofe, Monday, September 25, 2006

    2007- “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – Dr. Tim Ball, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007

    2008 – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – Dr. John S. Theon, retired Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA, see above for Hansen quotes

    You can find this article by searching : American Thinker August 4, 2014
    "120 years of climate scares"

    It's time to tell these liars and eugenicists that the jig is up!
    And their little HOAX is over!

    Just look at the lunacy these people are printing!




    It’s Time to Engineer the Sky

    Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/its-time-to-engineer-the-sky/
    #ClimateChange and #GlobaklWarming is a #HOAX! You have mentally ill people around the world claiming that CO2 is causing this BS "Climate Change" yet these same people generally have NO IDEA how much CO2 is even in our atmosphere! It's a mere 0.04% by the way, very little CO2 is a gas of LIFE! It is what humans exhale after breathing in oxygen... And in PERFECT BALANCE the plants BREATHE IN CO2 AND EXHALE OXYGEN! It's a perfect system. Yet, we have zealots bent on #Eugenics who want to kill us all... and if not KILL, they definitely want to CONTROL everyone! Their fictional "Climate Change" narrative is designed to give them FULL CONTROL OVER THE EARTH AND EVERYONE IN IT! These #Criminals will do whatever it takes to gain control over all of mankind! And that includes spraying TOXINS into our skies, poisoning the entire agricultural system, all men and women, and even the water! These lunatics have been trying to accomplish this #Evil plan for over 150 years! And it is time they are STOPPED! These morons have no more rights to this earth than we do.... And there are BILLIONS OF US opposed to poisoning our earth and ourselves! It's about time that we start acting like it! These people belong in PRISON Here's the short list of LIES we have been told about how "Climate is going to kill us all" PURELY FICTION AND LIES! Scientists seeking funding and journalists seeking an audience agree: panic sells. “Global cooling is going to kills us all!” “No, wait: global warming is going to kill us all!” Here's the list - an amazing chronology of the last 120 years of scare-mongering on climate 1895 - Geologists Think theWorld May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895 1902 - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times 1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912 1923 - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune 1923 - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post 1924 - MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924 1929 - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming? 1932 - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World 1933 - America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933 1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.” 1938 - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 1938 - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune 1939 - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post 1952 - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962 1954 - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report 1954 - Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine 1959 - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times 1969 - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969 1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation) 1970 - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post 1974 - Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine 1974 - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –Washington Post 1974 - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger 1974 - “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age 1975 - Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975 1975 - “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine 1976 - “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – U.S. News and World Report 1981 - Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times 1988 - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote andHis superior’s objection for context 1989 -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Discover magazine, October 1989 1990 - “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – Senator Timothy Wirth 1993 - “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – U.S. News and World Report 1998 - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998 2001 - “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001 2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003 2006 - “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006 2006 – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” —Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT 2006 – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —Philip Stott, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the University of London 2006 - “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” –Senator James Inhofe, Monday, September 25, 2006 2007- “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – Dr. Tim Ball, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007 2008 – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – Dr. John S. Theon, retired Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA, see above for Hansen quotes You can find this article by searching : American Thinker August 4, 2014 "120 years of climate scares" It's time to tell these liars and eugenicists that the jig is up! And their little HOAX is over! Just look at the lunacy these people are printing! It’s Time to Engineer the Sky Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/its-time-to-engineer-the-sky/
    WWW.SCIENTIFICAMERICAN.COM
    It's Time to Engineer the Sky
    Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3K Visualizações
  • So.... You say "We NEED "government" to maintain law and order"

    Where does "Law and Order" come from?
    The #Criminals who call themselves #Police??? That is a joke!

    Do you know the REAL JOB OF POLICE??? It is to protect the #Pedophiles, thieves, and murderers FROM THE PEOPLE!

    If we did not have Police there WOULD BE "Law and Order"
    If you are a pedophile and touch my child I kill you...
    There is nobody who will "Arrest me for it"

    If you poison 6 billion people with lethal injections, those people hunt you down and inject YOU with your own poison! PROBLEM SOLVED

    But as it stands, the "Police" who enforce that "Law and Order" you speak of,
    they exist to PROTECT THE CRIMINALS!

    And to be quite honest, in nearly all cases....
    Police themselves ARE THE CRIMINALS!

    Except they are criminals who WILL NEVER FACE JUSTICE!

    Just like the Politicians and Bill Gates, Pfizer and the rest, they are a
    "PROTECTED CLASS OF CRIMINALS" that Police, the courts, and all of "government" WILL protect from ever facing the justice they deserve!

    The old west was an anarchy
    FREE PEOPLE wore pistols on their hip and handled business

    Those same people hired a sheriff to aid them in this....
    If he became corrupt those same people could FIRE HIM AT WILL

    For ANY REASON and without a long drawn out, BS process and waste of time

    Police and government exist for ONE REASON!
    That is to keep YOU a #Slave who pays them 1/2 of every dollar you earn and to PROTECT THE CRIMINALS FROM YOU!

    Because personally, If I would not end up in prison for it....
    I'd be out there GETTING SOME "LAW & ORDER"

    I'd be speaking to some scumbags who are responsible for poisoning half of the planet! I would not be anyone's slave either!

    Nor would I be forced to pay worthless criminals half of my paycheck!

    Government Explained
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUS1m5MSt9k
    So.... You say "We NEED "government" to maintain law and order" Where does "Law and Order" come from? The #Criminals who call themselves #Police??? That is a joke! Do you know the REAL JOB OF POLICE??? It is to protect the #Pedophiles, thieves, and murderers FROM THE PEOPLE! If we did not have Police there WOULD BE "Law and Order" If you are a pedophile and touch my child I kill you... There is nobody who will "Arrest me for it" If you poison 6 billion people with lethal injections, those people hunt you down and inject YOU with your own poison! PROBLEM SOLVED But as it stands, the "Police" who enforce that "Law and Order" you speak of, they exist to PROTECT THE CRIMINALS! And to be quite honest, in nearly all cases.... Police themselves ARE THE CRIMINALS! Except they are criminals who WILL NEVER FACE JUSTICE! Just like the Politicians and Bill Gates, Pfizer and the rest, they are a "PROTECTED CLASS OF CRIMINALS" that Police, the courts, and all of "government" WILL protect from ever facing the justice they deserve! The old west was an anarchy FREE PEOPLE wore pistols on their hip and handled business Those same people hired a sheriff to aid them in this.... If he became corrupt those same people could FIRE HIM AT WILL For ANY REASON and without a long drawn out, BS process and waste of time Police and government exist for ONE REASON! That is to keep YOU a #Slave who pays them 1/2 of every dollar you earn and to PROTECT THE CRIMINALS FROM YOU! Because personally, If I would not end up in prison for it.... I'd be out there GETTING SOME "LAW & ORDER" I'd be speaking to some scumbags who are responsible for poisoning half of the planet! I would not be anyone's slave either! Nor would I be forced to pay worthless criminals half of my paycheck! Government Explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUS1m5MSt9k
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1K Visualizações
  • While I can appreciate PART of the video, the demonization of Anarchy turned me off. VOLUNTARISM (Anarchy) is perfectly capable of hiring a sheriff, look at the old west, THAT was anarchy!

    When the Sheriff turned out to be a crook, you FIRED HIM that very day. And replaced him. NOBODY has the right to "Rule" over ME!

    Anarchy simply means "without government" And demonizing it, while pretending the organized crime we NOW HAVE is better, is simply not honest

    Anarchy or VOLUNTARISM states very simply, "Do no harm"
    Live FREE, do whatever you like providing it does NOT infringe upon another!

    If you DO infringe upon another.... He deals with you how he sees fit!
    Rape my daughter.... I BECOME JUDGE AND JURY AND EXECUTIONER!

    Steal my stuff? SAME THING!

    It is the non-aggression principle in practice!

    DO NO HARM TO OTHERS, that means financial harm, property harm, or personal harm. If you DO HARM ANOTHER, maty the Most High help you!

    Because you just put a man YOU WRONGED deciding your fate!
    Anarchy is the ONLY SANE way to go!

    You can still form towns, hire sheriffs, even a mayor.....
    But they answer IMMEDIATELY to the people, who have FULL & TOTAL CONTROL

    Claiming that you NEED someone to "Rule You" is the mentality of a #Slave!

    https://youtu.be/KFXuGIpsdE0
    While I can appreciate PART of the video, the demonization of Anarchy turned me off. VOLUNTARISM (Anarchy) is perfectly capable of hiring a sheriff, look at the old west, THAT was anarchy! When the Sheriff turned out to be a crook, you FIRED HIM that very day. And replaced him. NOBODY has the right to "Rule" over ME! Anarchy simply means "without government" And demonizing it, while pretending the organized crime we NOW HAVE is better, is simply not honest Anarchy or VOLUNTARISM states very simply, "Do no harm" Live FREE, do whatever you like providing it does NOT infringe upon another! If you DO infringe upon another.... He deals with you how he sees fit! Rape my daughter.... I BECOME JUDGE AND JURY AND EXECUTIONER! Steal my stuff? SAME THING! It is the non-aggression principle in practice! DO NO HARM TO OTHERS, that means financial harm, property harm, or personal harm. If you DO HARM ANOTHER, maty the Most High help you! Because you just put a man YOU WRONGED deciding your fate! Anarchy is the ONLY SANE way to go! You can still form towns, hire sheriffs, even a mayor..... But they answer IMMEDIATELY to the people, who have FULL & TOTAL CONTROL Claiming that you NEED someone to "Rule You" is the mentality of a #Slave! https://youtu.be/KFXuGIpsdE0
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 664 Visualizações
  • Inside the World's Largest Doomsday Bunker Community
    An Epic Humanitarian Project the size Of A city:
    575 private bunkers with space for thousands in one of North America's safest locations: The decommissioned US Army Black Hills Ordnance Depot at Igloo, South Dakota; south of Edgemont, SD.

    Mankind has a continuing obsession with end of the world prophecies and judgement day. Any visible or invisible threat to life kicks our survival instincts into gear and we want to take action. The market capitalizes on this fear and pushes innovation and products that both feed and satisfy survivalism. I visited the Terra Vivos survival shelters in South Dakota last month.

    This former US Army Base was constructed in 1942 and was called the Black Hills Ordnance Depot. It served as an explosives and munitions storage and maintenance facility. The bunkers measure 27 feet in width and 60 to 80 feet in length. The foundation is made of 2 to 3 feet of reinforced concrete. The walls are 12 inches thick and have a trench running down the sides. The interior space is 13 feet tall at their highest point. This entire survival shelter project is headed by Robert Vicino who has a background in manufacturing and real estate. His son, Dante Vicino gave us a tour of the Terra Vivos site and took us to some unfinished and completed bunkers.

    The bunkers are completely off the grid. To make them livable, you have to consider 4 main utilities. Water, Sewage, Energy, Internet Access. They are structurally sound, so you don’t have to add any additional support or reinforcement. Soil in the area is stable unlike the clayey soil in Texas, so most of the 82 year old foundations are in great shape and don't have any cracks. The curved interior walls are made of board-formed concrete. You can still see the beautiful wood grain etched into the concrete. Working remotely is no longer an issue. Thermal mass of the 12 inch thick concrete walls store heat or thermal energy during the day and slowly release it at night when it’s cooler. It can be turned into a self-sufficient town with a supermarket, hardware store, bars and restaurants. I see a lot of similarities to Marfa which is a small desert city in West Texas. Marfa was also a military town in the 1940s but it was converted into a cultural hub by Donald Judd, a minimalist artist from New York City.

    It’s an over-ambitious plan. Out of the 800 bunkers on site, the Vivos company wants to convert 575 of them. So far, only 50 have been purchased. The lease plan prevents you from ever owning your bunker. The wildlife like cows and deer that roam the site often climb on top of the bunkers causing erosion of the soil and grass, and exposing the concrete. Since it’s not “underground” it’s not as safe as other survival shelters that are buried 3 to 10 feet underground. The company is catering to a small group of people. They warn of nuclear war, bioterrorism, anarchy, electro-magnetic pulses, solar flares, super volcanoes, etc. If they marketed their bunkers as a way to protect family, life and belongings, it might be more popular with a larger group of people. Remote location. In the event of a disaster, you’d need a private plane to take you to Provo, South Dakota. It only works as a survival shelter if you are permanently living there. The nearest hardware store is in Hot Springs, about 45 minutes to an hour away. Vicino’s contractors designed layouts, but I wasn’t impressed with the quality of their work. Contamination of the subsurface soil and water supply is a concern to some residents in the area. Long term effects of living in a concrete box with no sunlight are also problematic.

    It’s an exciting project with a lot of potential if a significant number of individuals move to the area. I don’t know what category these bunkers fit into. It’s not a luxury survival shelter, it’s not in a super-secure, secret location, it’s not conveniently located near a major city unless you consider Rapid City a major city; and it’s not underground. At best, it is an earth sheltered home or bungalow. I’m wary of it turning into a thriving community, unless their marketing strategy changes.
    https://rumble.com/v5gidwh-inside-the-worlds-largest-doomsday-bunker-community.html
    Inside the World's Largest Doomsday Bunker Community An Epic Humanitarian Project the size Of A city: 575 private bunkers with space for thousands in one of North America's safest locations: The decommissioned US Army Black Hills Ordnance Depot at Igloo, South Dakota; south of Edgemont, SD. Mankind has a continuing obsession with end of the world prophecies and judgement day. Any visible or invisible threat to life kicks our survival instincts into gear and we want to take action. The market capitalizes on this fear and pushes innovation and products that both feed and satisfy survivalism. I visited the Terra Vivos survival shelters in South Dakota last month. This former US Army Base was constructed in 1942 and was called the Black Hills Ordnance Depot. It served as an explosives and munitions storage and maintenance facility. The bunkers measure 27 feet in width and 60 to 80 feet in length. The foundation is made of 2 to 3 feet of reinforced concrete. The walls are 12 inches thick and have a trench running down the sides. The interior space is 13 feet tall at their highest point. This entire survival shelter project is headed by Robert Vicino who has a background in manufacturing and real estate. His son, Dante Vicino gave us a tour of the Terra Vivos site and took us to some unfinished and completed bunkers. The bunkers are completely off the grid. To make them livable, you have to consider 4 main utilities. Water, Sewage, Energy, Internet Access. They are structurally sound, so you don’t have to add any additional support or reinforcement. Soil in the area is stable unlike the clayey soil in Texas, so most of the 82 year old foundations are in great shape and don't have any cracks. The curved interior walls are made of board-formed concrete. You can still see the beautiful wood grain etched into the concrete. Working remotely is no longer an issue. Thermal mass of the 12 inch thick concrete walls store heat or thermal energy during the day and slowly release it at night when it’s cooler. It can be turned into a self-sufficient town with a supermarket, hardware store, bars and restaurants. I see a lot of similarities to Marfa which is a small desert city in West Texas. Marfa was also a military town in the 1940s but it was converted into a cultural hub by Donald Judd, a minimalist artist from New York City. It’s an over-ambitious plan. Out of the 800 bunkers on site, the Vivos company wants to convert 575 of them. So far, only 50 have been purchased. The lease plan prevents you from ever owning your bunker. The wildlife like cows and deer that roam the site often climb on top of the bunkers causing erosion of the soil and grass, and exposing the concrete. Since it’s not “underground” it’s not as safe as other survival shelters that are buried 3 to 10 feet underground. The company is catering to a small group of people. They warn of nuclear war, bioterrorism, anarchy, electro-magnetic pulses, solar flares, super volcanoes, etc. If they marketed their bunkers as a way to protect family, life and belongings, it might be more popular with a larger group of people. Remote location. In the event of a disaster, you’d need a private plane to take you to Provo, South Dakota. It only works as a survival shelter if you are permanently living there. The nearest hardware store is in Hot Springs, about 45 minutes to an hour away. Vicino’s contractors designed layouts, but I wasn’t impressed with the quality of their work. Contamination of the subsurface soil and water supply is a concern to some residents in the area. Long term effects of living in a concrete box with no sunlight are also problematic. It’s an exciting project with a lot of potential if a significant number of individuals move to the area. I don’t know what category these bunkers fit into. It’s not a luxury survival shelter, it’s not in a super-secure, secret location, it’s not conveniently located near a major city unless you consider Rapid City a major city; and it’s not underground. At best, it is an earth sheltered home or bungalow. I’m wary of it turning into a thriving community, unless their marketing strategy changes. https://rumble.com/v5gidwh-inside-the-worlds-largest-doomsday-bunker-community.html
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 3K Visualizações
  • Millions of Brits Rise Up Against Gov’t Plan To Eliminate Natives by 2030
    https://rumble.com/v59kp3h-millions-of-brits-rise-up-against-govt-plan-to-eliminate-natives-by-2030.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20People%27s%20Voice

    British citizens are rising up in huge numbers against the globalist ruling class determined to take away their rights and normalize the gross injustices of the globalist agenda.

    Following the brutal stabbing of 11 young girls at a Taylor Swift dance party, the fully infiltrated British government have decided to punish those who are protesting against open borders, declaring a state of emergency to unveil chilling new authoritarian powers to crush dissent and punish ordinary people.

    There is anarchy on the streets of England as we speak, as the people continue rising up demanding justice, and the media continues to suppress the scale of events.
    Millions of Brits Rise Up Against Gov’t Plan To Eliminate Natives by 2030 https://rumble.com/v59kp3h-millions-of-brits-rise-up-against-govt-plan-to-eliminate-natives-by-2030.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20People%27s%20Voice British citizens are rising up in huge numbers against the globalist ruling class determined to take away their rights and normalize the gross injustices of the globalist agenda. Following the brutal stabbing of 11 young girls at a Taylor Swift dance party, the fully infiltrated British government have decided to punish those who are protesting against open borders, declaring a state of emergency to unveil chilling new authoritarian powers to crush dissent and punish ordinary people. There is anarchy on the streets of England as we speak, as the people continue rising up demanding justice, and the media continues to suppress the scale of events.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1K Visualizações
  • https://americafirstreport.com/retail-theft-is-wildly-out-of-control-all-over-america-and-it-will-only-get-worse-as-society-descends-into-anarchy/
    https://americafirstreport.com/retail-theft-is-wildly-out-of-control-all-over-america-and-it-will-only-get-worse-as-society-descends-into-anarchy/
    AMERICAFIRSTREPORT.COM
    Retail Theft Is Wildly Out of Control All Over America and It Will Only Get Worse as Society Descends Into Anarchy
    (The Economic Collapse Blog)—We are right in the middle of a tsunami of shoplifting that never seems to end, and
    0 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 1K Visualizações
  • https://medforth.biz/anarchy-in-the-uk-squatters-take-over-13-million-london-pub-owned-by-celebrity-chef-gordon-ramsay/
    https://medforth.biz/anarchy-in-the-uk-squatters-take-over-13-million-london-pub-owned-by-celebrity-chef-gordon-ramsay/
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1K Visualizações
  • https://rumble.com/v3wzamt-larken-rose-the-end-of-the-state-and-his-new-film-the-jones-plantation.html
    Larken Rose - The End of the State & his new film, The Jones Plantation.
    Betsy and Larken discuss Larken's new film, The Jones Plantation, and its allegorical nature for the first 22 minutes, then the JUICE begins. If the film interests you, you'll enjoy the first 22 minutes. However, if you want to skip to the discussion of anarchy as a very possible future, skip to minute 22.
    We discuss how the end of the state isn't just an idea anymore. Since it has entered the realm of discussions, it's only a matter of time 'til statism goes the way of the institution of slavery.
    Larken's light-hearted way of enlightening the world about self-governance and the beauty of anarchy is so refreshing and articulate.
    "Violent aggression is never okay and that means government is never legitimate." - Larken Rose
    "If you advocate government of any size, any flavor, in one way or another you're advocating violent aggression against innocent people." - Larken Rose
    Larken's advice: Take on the role that no one rules you and be willing to take responsibility.
    https://rumble.com/v3wzamt-larken-rose-the-end-of-the-state-and-his-new-film-the-jones-plantation.html Larken Rose - The End of the State & his new film, The Jones Plantation. Betsy and Larken discuss Larken's new film, The Jones Plantation, and its allegorical nature for the first 22 minutes, then the JUICE begins. If the film interests you, you'll enjoy the first 22 minutes. However, if you want to skip to the discussion of anarchy as a very possible future, skip to minute 22. We discuss how the end of the state isn't just an idea anymore. Since it has entered the realm of discussions, it's only a matter of time 'til statism goes the way of the institution of slavery. Larken's light-hearted way of enlightening the world about self-governance and the beauty of anarchy is so refreshing and articulate. "Violent aggression is never okay and that means government is never legitimate." - Larken Rose "If you advocate government of any size, any flavor, in one way or another you're advocating violent aggression against innocent people." - Larken Rose Larken's advice: Take on the role that no one rules you and be willing to take responsibility.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2K Visualizações
  • ACTUALLY....... The old West was an #Anarchy! Instead of the #Police being "above the law" like they are these days, and their only job protecting #Criminals guilty of #Genocide....

    In the old West we had #Sheriffs, who served at the leisure of WE THE PEOPLE. And should they turn out to be Criminals like the Police today.... THE PEOPLE (Who paid them) simply FIRED THEM and hired a new sheriff!

    Same goes with the mayor! The difference in Anarchy and our system??? In our current system the Police PROTECT THE CRIMINALS AND MASS MURDERERS FROM "We the People," assuring that they can continue murdering, robbing, and generally screwing over the masses! Give me anarchy ANY DAY!

    You know.......
    Back then ANYONE could bring charges against a CRIMINAL!
    Instead of waiting to see if THE CRIMINALS WILL FILE CHARGES ON THEMSELVES!
    ACTUALLY....... The old West was an #Anarchy! Instead of the #Police being "above the law" like they are these days, and their only job protecting #Criminals guilty of #Genocide.... In the old West we had #Sheriffs, who served at the leisure of WE THE PEOPLE. And should they turn out to be Criminals like the Police today.... THE PEOPLE (Who paid them) simply FIRED THEM and hired a new sheriff! Same goes with the mayor! The difference in Anarchy and our system??? In our current system the Police PROTECT THE CRIMINALS AND MASS MURDERERS FROM "We the People," assuring that they can continue murdering, robbing, and generally screwing over the masses! Give me anarchy ANY DAY! You know....... Back then ANYONE could bring charges against a CRIMINAL! Instead of waiting to see if THE CRIMINALS WILL FILE CHARGES ON THEMSELVES!
    Haha
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2K Visualizações
  • ABOUT TAYLOR SWIFT (ALMOST)

    He's right... compartmentalization works!
    Is "EVERYONE IN ON IT?"

    Of course not.... but the tranny Taylor Swift is a Satanist POS

    everything isn't about statism vs anarchy!

    #Luciferians do Luciferian sh*t!
    And it's time for the "mass culling"

    So there ARE a lot of people "in on it"
    In particular Freemasons, Jesuits, and Luciferians!

    They ARE "in on it"
    Many of them are expendable though!

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/P1igz_jImhA/
    ABOUT TAYLOR SWIFT (ALMOST) He's right... compartmentalization works! Is "EVERYONE IN ON IT?" Of course not.... but the tranny Taylor Swift is a Satanist POS everything isn't about statism vs anarchy! #Luciferians do Luciferian sh*t! And it's time for the "mass culling" So there ARE a lot of people "in on it" In particular Freemasons, Jesuits, and Luciferians! They ARE "in on it" Many of them are expendable though! https://www.bitchute.com/video/P1igz_jImhA/
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3K Visualizações
Páginas Impulsionadas
Patrocinado

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here