What are the Problems with the Big Bang Theory? - Dr. Danny Faulkner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A016T3YBmxo&t=12s

WOW...the #demons are really loosing it!! Key adviser to Tim Walz demands 'overthrow' of United States! Insists under critical race theory the nation is 'irreversibly racist' and must be destroyed https://www.wnd.com/2024/11/key-adviser-to-tim-walz-demands-overthrow-of-united-states/

Trump Wins, Eliminates Federal Income Tax, Economy Booms – Martin Armstrong https://rumble.com/v5lb9e4-trump-wins-and-eliminates-federal-income-tax-martin-armstrong.html Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong is back with some important predictions in his last appearance before the 2024 Election. First, Armstrong’s Socrates computer is still predicting a Trump landslide. Socrates actually factors in cheating to make this “Trump Wins” call. Armstrong says, “In the 2020 Election, it came out the computer said it was 50/50. It did not show a huge landslide one way or another. They rigged it, but it was in Congress is where they did it. . . . There were seven states that were going to be challenged. . . . On January 6 (during the so-called insurrection at the capitol), the FBI has testified they could not even tell how many people they had there. . . . as soon as this happens, Pelosi calls emergency rules. When she did the emergency rules, she shut down any challenge to the seven states. . . . That’s how the 2020 Election was really rigged. . . . in 2024, the gap is too big this time. In 2020, the computer said it was tight. This one, I don’t think they can cheat that much to actually overthrow it.” If Trump does win, one of the huge changes going to be pushed is the elimination of federal income taxes. Let that sink in. When you hear Donald Trump say he is contemplating doing away with federal taxes, it is not some campaign promise that he intends to break. Armstrong says this is more than doable. When Trump says he can fix the economy, Armstrong contends eliminating federal income tax is a turbocharger for the American economy. Armstrong explains, “If you eliminate the income tax, what will happen is all these other companies that are in different countries are going to want to come here. It’s going to be the biggest economic boom in absolute history.” Is this why Trump keeps saying he can “fix the economy”? Armstrong says, “Oh yes. The U.S. will make more money than you can ever imagine. When I testified in front of Congress, I said at least lower the tax rate to 15% on corporates. . . . 15% is what Hong Kong was charging, and that was the only reason people were there. . . . We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.” Armstrong also talks about gold, who is really running the country and extreme civil unrest coming to America after the 2024 Election.

GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: SOME TOPICS ARE LONG TO EXPLAIN BUT I'LL TRY. CULTURAL MARXISM, IS ANOTHER THEORY ON HOW TO EVOLVE SLOWLY INTO COMMUNISM WITHOUT FAST AND VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS, LIKE THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OR THE CHINESE REVOLUTION. CULTURAL MARXISM WORKS BY THE PENETRATION IN EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY, INFILTRATING EDUCATION, RELIGIONS, POLITICAL PARTIES, BUSINESSES AND IN THE PROCESS GO CHANGING HISTORY BY INDOCTRINATING FUTURE GENERATIONS. THAT'S WHY THEY CHANGE TEXT BOOKS, ELIMINATE STATUES, CHANGE NAMES OF SCHOOLS, STREETS AND MILITARY BASES. TAKING CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS. CULTURAL MARXISM CAME TO AMERICA FROM THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL IN EUROPE THROUGH UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS LIKE HERBERT MARCUSE AND MANY OTHERS. CULTURAL MARXISM IN AMERICA STARTED AS "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS" AND EVOLVED INTO TODAY'S "WOKE" CULTURE. KAMALA IS A COMMUNIST. JUST LISTEN TO HER DEMONIZING "COLUMBUS DAY" AND THE EUROPEANS AND CHANGING THE NAME OF COLUMBUS DAY INTO "INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' DAY". THE EUROPEAN "CONQUISTADORS" WERE NOT SAINTS BUT THEY BROUGHT CIVILIZATION TO THE NEW WORLD. MANY OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES LIVED AT A LEVEL OF THE STONE AGE AND THOSE THAT WERE MORE 'CIVILIZED' AND BUILT PYRAMIDS LIKE THE AZTECS, MAYANS AND INCAS, WERE AT A LEVEL LOWER THAN ANCIENT EGYPT, THEY WERE SAVAGES THAT SACRIFICED HUMANS TO THEIR GODS. IT DOESN'T MATTER TO THE COMMUNISTS, FOR THEM, "COLUMBUS = BAD", "INDIANS = GOOD", NO MATTER WHAT THE REAL HISTORY IS.

Who’s on First & in What Percentage Application of Diverse “Other Insurance” Clauses Insurers Protected Insured and Litigated Their Differences Post 4920 Two insurance companies- Gemini and Zurich- asked the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal to determine what share of a $2 million settlement each is required to pay. The district court entered judgment for Gemini, ordering that Zurich pay $500,000 plus prejudgment interest. Both parties appealed, with Gemini seeking another $500,000 and Zurich challenging the award of prejudgment interest. In Gemini Insurance Company v. Zurich American Insurance Company, No. 22-13495, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (October 23, 2024) the competing “other insurance clauses” were resolved. FACTS After the death of Josue Vallejo, who was struck by a tractor-trailer operated by an employee of FSR Trucking, Inc two of three insurers disputed what proportion of the settlement each should pay. Zurich insured FSR, through its coverage of Commercial, for $1 million. Gemini also insured FSR for $3 million. The Vallejo claim settled for $3 million, of which Gemini contributed $2 million. Ryder’s insurance company, which is not a party to this appeal, contributed the other $1 million. Gemini and Zurich agree that they each owe a share of the $2 million, but dispute how much each one must pay. Under Gemini’s theory, they each owe $1 million. Under Zurich’s theory, they each owe their pro rata share, which is $500,000 for Zurich and $1.5 million for Gemini. The different theories of coverage turn on the application of the two policies’ “other insurance” clauses, which generally function to apportion coverage when there is overlapping insurance. Gemini argues that its policy is excess to Zurich’s, while Zurich argues that the policies attach at the same level and thus trigger pro rata contribution. Gemini sued Zurich for a declaratory judgment in its favor and an award of $1 million plus interest under claims of contractual subrogation or equitable subrogation/contribution. Zurich tendered $500,000 to Gemini to satisfy its pro rata share. Gemini, however, continued to litigate for the other $500,000 plus interest on the entire amount. Gemini appealed the District Court’s ruling in favor of Zurich and sought to obtain the other $500,000. ANALYSIS In Florida, where more than one insurer’s policy provides coverage for a loss, as the parties agree is the case here, it is appropriate to review the insurance contracts to see if the documents address the ‘ranking’ or contribution of other insurers. The Other Insurance Clauses Gemini’s “other insurance” clause provides: “This insurance is excess over and shall not contribute with any of the other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis. This condition will not apply to insurance specifically written as excess over this policy.” Zurich’s “other insurance” clause is slightly different. “When this Coverage Form and any other Coverage Form or policy covers on the same basis, either excess or primary, we will pay only our share. Our share is the proportion that the Limit of Insurance of our Coverage Form bears to the total of the limits of all the Coverage Forms and policies covering on the same basis. Interpretation of the “Other Insurance” Clauses Where two insurance policies contain excess insurance clauses the clauses are deemed mutually repugnant and both insurers become primary and share the loss on a pro rata basis in accordance with their policy limits. Zurich argued, and the district court agreed, that both policies contain excess clauses such as pro rata contribution results. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Gemini because when two policies containing conflicting “other insurance” or excess [uninsured/underinsured motorist] clauses. In sum an “other insurance” clause containing the phrase “we will pay the proportion of damages payable as excess” means that the clause was pro rata, even though it also characterized itself as an excess clause. Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit concluded both policies were primary. The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s resolution of the cross-motions for summary judgment with regard to the amount of contribution and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of Gemini for the principal amount of $1,000,000, with the understanding that Zurich has already paid half of that sum. Upon entry of the amended final judgment on remand, Gemini will be the prevailing party. When a verdict liquidates damages on a plaintiff’s out-of-pocket, pecuniary losses, plaintiff is entitled, as a matter of law, to prejudgment interest at the statutory rate from the date of that loss. The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s resolution of the cross-motions for summary judgment and remanded for the court to enter judgment in favor of Gemini in the principal amount of $1,000,000 understanding that Zurich has already paid $500,000. It also affirmed the award of prejudgment interest on the first $500,000 and direct the court to award Gemini prejudgment interest on the second $500,000 from February 7, 2019, until the date of the amended final judgment. ZALMA OPINION The three insurers of the defendant did the right thing by protecting the insured and then resolving their dispute over the share owed in court. Although insurance companies, generally, should not sue each other. “Other Insurance” clauses invariably raise disputes between insurers and often cause hardship to the insured. In this case Gemini, Zurich and an unnamed insurer put up the $3 million to settle and then Gemini and Zurich sued to clarify who owed what. The Eleventh Circuit found that the District Court was wrong because interpreting the competing “other insurance” clauses should have resulted in a finding that both Gemini and Zurich were primary insurers and each owed $1 million of the settlement and Zurich owed Gemini $500,000 plus interest. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

Interesting, but Immanuel Velikovsky had already offered an alternative that might explain this in the 1950s. That, he suggested, may have been an eruption from Saturn which led to a great rain on Earth... but if this were the case, would there not be more frozen water on the surface of the Moon? Surely it could not all have fallen on the Earth... or does this suggest that, at that moment in time, there was no Moon? Any hypothesis such as this (it is not a theory) tells us more about the limitations on (or indoctrination of) the thinking of the speaker than it does about a past reality. Astronomers seem to be obsessed with a surprisingly small repertoire of possible physical phenomena which do not take full account of what is actually available in the wider cosmos. Plus, if the Moon had already been orbiting the Earth when this alleged "collision" took place, it would have gone careering through the Solar System once Earth's gravitation field was disrupted... so, are they suggesting that afterwards, the Moon was somehow magically "recaptured"? Or was it simply not there yet, being captured during a later epoch? No matter how hard they try, the reformulation of hypotheses usually leads only to more contradictions down the line. The worst part, however, is that videos such as this function only as uncritical "repeaters" of pseudo-information - "pseudo" precisely because the "evidence" can only be indirect. These things are largely based on supposition, limited information and a pre-formed notion of how the universe works; the big surprise seems to be that, when you stand back and look at it, it seems to be based upon a surprisingly Newtonian, gravity-based model... and real "science" would be served better if they instead challenged the hypothesis. If "science" is merely a collection of unsupported hypotheses, we should not be surprised if the whole enterprise eventually collapses under the weight of contradictory evidence. Unfortunately, as I have said before, the trouble with this kind of hypothesis is that in our experience, time travels in only one direction, and we are not able to jump into a convenient time machine to travel back and confirm anything. What we have is only an "interpretation" through the rose-tinted lenses of the current dominant paradigm. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1779950362746428

Why “Crisis in Cosmology”? The Scientific Evidence Against The Big Bang contradictions between Big Bang theory and observations the Cosmo with new Technology. https://lppfusion.com/science/cosmic-connection/plasma-cosmology/the-growing-case-against-the-big-bang/

There is NO SUCH THING as a "Conspiracy Theory" EVERY "Conspiracy Theory" in the history of the world HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN TO BE A TRUE #CONSPIRACY Unlike the #Heliocentric THEORY, There's nothing "theoretical" about it! These are ACTUAL #Criminal Conspiracies! NOAA LibraryWeather and Climate Collections Weather Modification Project Reports Weather and Climate Collections Weather Modification Project Reports https://library.noaa.gov/weather-climate/weather-modification-project-reports

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/so-you-think-weather-modification-weaponization-are-a-conspiracy-theory-how-do-you-answer-congressional-documents-100-us-patents-related-to-weather-modification/

https://vladtepesblog.com/2024/10/03/north-carolina-citizens-are-victims-of-hanlons-razor-or-critical-economic-theory/