• VIDEO - HOW DID NAZISM RETURNED TO UKRAINE? BY 1654, UKRAINE WAS A LITTLE KINGDOM IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE IN EASTERNMOST EUROPE. THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE MADE IT BIGGER WITH THE RUSSIAN TZARS ADDING TERRITORY. BASICALLY, UKRAINE AND RUSSIA ARE THE SAME, SAME ORIGINS, SAME PEOPLE, SAME CULTURE AND SAME LANGUAGE. AFTER THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917, UKRAINE BECAME ONE OF THE SOVIET REPUBLICS THAT FORMED THE SOVIET UNION. THE SOVIET UNION ADDED MORE RUSSIAN TERRITORY TO THE SOVIET REPUBLIC OF UKRAINE. AFTER WORLD WAR 2, STALIN GAVE UKRAINE MORE LAND TAKEN FROM HITLER AND EVEN IN 1954, THE SOVIET LEADER NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV CEDED CRIMEA TO UKRAINE. CRIMEA IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR RUSSIA, BEING THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE RUSSIAN NAVY BLACK SEE FLEET, BUT IN 1954 IT DIDN'T MATTER, UKRAINE WAS PART OF THE SOVIET UNION AND CRIMEA REMAINED SOVIET. UKRAINE IS SOMEHOW TWO COUNTRIES: THE EASTERN HALF IS RUSSIAN SPEAKING AND THE PEOPLE ARE RUSSIANS BUT IN THE WESTERN UKRAINE, THE LANGUAGE IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT AND PEOPLE FEEL MORE "EUROPEAN". HITLER INVADED RUSSIA FROM THE WEST BY UKRAINIAN TERRITORY. WESTERN UKRAINIANS RECEIVED THE NAZIS AS 'LIBERATORS' AND COOPERATED WITH HITLER. AFTER VICTORY OVER NAZISM, HITLER'S IDEOLOGY STAYED IN UKRAINE BUT UNDERGROUND. WHEN THE SOVIET UNION DISINTEGRATED IN 1991, UKRAINE BECAME AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY BUT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO REMAIN NEUTRAL, AS A BUFFER ZONE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE COUNTRIES OF NATO. UKRAINE WOULD NOT BE PART OF NATO OR THE EUROPEAN UNION. IN 2014, UNDER OBAMA, THERE WAS A SOROS' (C.I.A. & U.S.) INSPIRED AND FUNDED "COLOR REVOLUTION" IN UKRAINE, NAZIS CAME OUT OF THE CLOSET, THE NEW GOVERNMENT TRIED TO ERADICATE EVERY FOOTPRINT OF RUSSIAN CULTURE FROM UKRAINE, INCLUDING THE USE OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND THE BANNING OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH. RUSSIAN SPEAKING PEOPLE WERE SUBJECT OF TORTURE AND IMPRISONMENT. RUSSIAN PEOPLE IN THE EAST, REVOLTED AGAINST THE KIEV GOVERNMENT IN A SECESSION MOVEMENT AND CIVIL WAR. EVENTUALLY, RUSSIA ENTERED THE WAR TO RETAKE WHAT WAS RUSSIA BEFORE, RECOGNIZING THE REBEL REGIONS AS PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND DOING A REFERENDUM TO RETURN CRIMEA UNDER RUSSIAN SOVEREIGNTY. YOU ALREADY KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY.
    VIDEO - HOW DID NAZISM RETURNED TO UKRAINE? BY 1654, UKRAINE WAS A LITTLE KINGDOM IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE IN EASTERNMOST EUROPE. THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE MADE IT BIGGER WITH THE RUSSIAN TZARS ADDING TERRITORY. BASICALLY, UKRAINE AND RUSSIA ARE THE SAME, SAME ORIGINS, SAME PEOPLE, SAME CULTURE AND SAME LANGUAGE. AFTER THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917, UKRAINE BECAME ONE OF THE SOVIET REPUBLICS THAT FORMED THE SOVIET UNION. THE SOVIET UNION ADDED MORE RUSSIAN TERRITORY TO THE SOVIET REPUBLIC OF UKRAINE. AFTER WORLD WAR 2, STALIN GAVE UKRAINE MORE LAND TAKEN FROM HITLER AND EVEN IN 1954, THE SOVIET LEADER NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV CEDED CRIMEA TO UKRAINE. CRIMEA IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR RUSSIA, BEING THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE RUSSIAN NAVY BLACK SEE FLEET, BUT IN 1954 IT DIDN'T MATTER, UKRAINE WAS PART OF THE SOVIET UNION AND CRIMEA REMAINED SOVIET. UKRAINE IS SOMEHOW TWO COUNTRIES: THE EASTERN HALF IS RUSSIAN SPEAKING AND THE PEOPLE ARE RUSSIANS BUT IN THE WESTERN UKRAINE, THE LANGUAGE IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT AND PEOPLE FEEL MORE "EUROPEAN". HITLER INVADED RUSSIA FROM THE WEST BY UKRAINIAN TERRITORY. WESTERN UKRAINIANS RECEIVED THE NAZIS AS 'LIBERATORS' AND COOPERATED WITH HITLER. AFTER VICTORY OVER NAZISM, HITLER'S IDEOLOGY STAYED IN UKRAINE BUT UNDERGROUND. WHEN THE SOVIET UNION DISINTEGRATED IN 1991, UKRAINE BECAME AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY BUT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO REMAIN NEUTRAL, AS A BUFFER ZONE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE COUNTRIES OF NATO. UKRAINE WOULD NOT BE PART OF NATO OR THE EUROPEAN UNION. IN 2014, UNDER OBAMA, THERE WAS A SOROS' (C.I.A. & U.S.) INSPIRED AND FUNDED "COLOR REVOLUTION" IN UKRAINE, NAZIS CAME OUT OF THE CLOSET, THE NEW GOVERNMENT TRIED TO ERADICATE EVERY FOOTPRINT OF RUSSIAN CULTURE FROM UKRAINE, INCLUDING THE USE OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND THE BANNING OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH. RUSSIAN SPEAKING PEOPLE WERE SUBJECT OF TORTURE AND IMPRISONMENT. RUSSIAN PEOPLE IN THE EAST, REVOLTED AGAINST THE KIEV GOVERNMENT IN A SECESSION MOVEMENT AND CIVIL WAR. EVENTUALLY, RUSSIA ENTERED THE WAR TO RETAKE WHAT WAS RUSSIA BEFORE, RECOGNIZING THE REBEL REGIONS AS PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND DOING A REFERENDUM TO RETURN CRIMEA UNDER RUSSIAN SOVEREIGNTY. YOU ALREADY KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY.
    Sad
    1
    0 Comentários 2 Compartilhamentos 863 Visualizações 14
  • ... and if the possibility of secession is real, who will go first?
    ... and if the possibility of secession is real, who will go first?
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 225 Visualizações
  • SECESSION: WE DON'T NEED PERMISSION TO GIVE THE
    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AN ULTIMATUM!

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/sUaWUCIfPD2Q/
    SECESSION: WE DON'T NEED PERMISSION TO GIVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AN ULTIMATUM! https://www.bitchute.com/video/sUaWUCIfPD2Q/
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 473 Visualizações
  • There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant.
    https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03

    BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History.

    As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one.

    Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it.

    In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that:

    Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison?

    Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests).

    Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters.
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant. https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03 BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History. As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one. Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it. In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison? Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests). Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters. https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 5KB Visualizações
  • Secession for the United States? | Democracy Down

    You know what???
    "AT" is coming around!

    Now he needs to understand that the "United States" is a foreign owned #Corporation located offshore, that has used #Fraud and brainwashing and "Assumed Consent" to deceive people into being slaves via "CONTRACT"

    THEN he'd have it!
    There is no part of this corporation OR it's institutions that is not fraudulent!

    Every state and Local "government" is a corporation!
    The "Courts" are a controlled part of the corporation, overseen by the #BAR Association

    #Police work for the corporation!
    The federal government is just the "Corporate Headquarters" of the corporation...
    And all these other entities are it's subsidiary corporations!

    As soon as EVERYONE wakes up to this FACT maybe we can rectify the situation...
    The easy way or the hard way, it needs to be done!

    https://youtu.be/b0Q6mXnUm3o
    Secession for the United States? | Democracy Down You know what??? "AT" is coming around! Now he needs to understand that the "United States" is a foreign owned #Corporation located offshore, that has used #Fraud and brainwashing and "Assumed Consent" to deceive people into being slaves via "CONTRACT" THEN he'd have it! There is no part of this corporation OR it's institutions that is not fraudulent! Every state and Local "government" is a corporation! The "Courts" are a controlled part of the corporation, overseen by the #BAR Association #Police work for the corporation! The federal government is just the "Corporate Headquarters" of the corporation... And all these other entities are it's subsidiary corporations! As soon as EVERYONE wakes up to this FACT maybe we can rectify the situation... The easy way or the hard way, it needs to be done! https://youtu.be/b0Q6mXnUm3o
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2KB Visualizações
  • A text meme about the problem with another secession in the #UnitedStatesofAmerica http://www.paulshishkoffjr.com/shish-on-politics/the-problem-with-secession-in-the-united-states
    A text meme about the problem with another secession in the #UnitedStatesofAmerica http://www.paulshishkoffjr.com/shish-on-politics/the-problem-with-secession-in-the-united-states
    WWW.PAULSHISHKOFFJR.COM
    The Problem with Secession in the United States
    A text meme about the problems with secession in the United States.
    Like
    1
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3KB Visualizações
  • China announces military exercises around Taiwan

    According to the information provided by the army, they are organizing "combat readiness patrols" and exercises in the island's northern, southern, and eastern air spaces from April 8 to 10.

    In addition, Senior Colonel Shi Yi, a spokesperson of the PLA, assured that this is a strong warning to the "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces and their collusion with outside forces and a necessary move to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    https://breakingthenews.net/Article/China-announces-military-exercises-around-Taiwan/59783586
    China announces military exercises around Taiwan According to the information provided by the army, they are organizing "combat readiness patrols" and exercises in the island's northern, southern, and eastern air spaces from April 8 to 10. In addition, Senior Colonel Shi Yi, a spokesperson of the PLA, assured that this is a strong warning to the "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces and their collusion with outside forces and a necessary move to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity. https://breakingthenews.net/Article/China-announces-military-exercises-around-Taiwan/59783586
    BREAKINGTHENEWS.NET
    China announces military exercises around Taiwan
    The Eastern Theater Command of China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) announced on Saturday it will conduct military exercises around Taiwan. According to the information provided by the army,...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações
  • Whitlock called for secession or some sort of national divorce from the communist left. We cannot co-exist with people who think they are gods and are lawless. We saw that Tuesday with Soros-backed DA Bragg in New York.
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/new-california-provides-solution-for-tucker-carlson-jason-whitlock-and-americans-wanting-to-split-from-the-insane-radical-and-communist-left/
    Whitlock called for secession or some sort of national divorce from the communist left. We cannot co-exist with people who think they are gods and are lawless. We saw that Tuesday with Soros-backed DA Bragg in New York. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/new-california-provides-solution-for-tucker-carlson-jason-whitlock-and-americans-wanting-to-split-from-the-insane-radical-and-communist-left/
    Like
    2
    2 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações
  • With video. Jason Whitlock is right. The status quo cannot continue. https://conservativefiringline.com/jason-whitlock-to-tucker-carlson-time-for-secession-or-national-divorce-between-red-and-blue-states-video/
    With video. Jason Whitlock is right. The status quo cannot continue. https://conservativefiringline.com/jason-whitlock-to-tucker-carlson-time-for-secession-or-national-divorce-between-red-and-blue-states-video/
    CONSERVATIVEFIRINGLINE.COM
    Jason Whitlock To Tucker Carlson: Time For Secession Or National Divorce Between Red And Blue States (Video) ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
    Jason Whitlock told Tucker Carlson that it's time for either secession or national divorce, as the nation is too divided to continue.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações
  • https://vdare.com/articles/stupid-party-except-for-trump-betrays-atlanta-s-buckhead-secessionists-but-it-can-t-stop-white-americans-from-protecting-themselves-forever
    https://vdare.com/articles/stupid-party-except-for-trump-betrays-atlanta-s-buckhead-secessionists-but-it-can-t-stop-white-americans-from-protecting-themselves-forever
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 848 Visualizações
Páginas impulsionada
Patrocinado

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here