Recent Updates
  • Garvey and Squint
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F00m_ERgpPY
    Garvey and Squint https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F00m_ERgpPY
    0 Comments 0 Shares 73 Views
  • Smarter than the average Democrat!
    Smarter than the average Democrat!
    Angry
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 43 Views
  • Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 34 Views
  • Will western Europe be destroyed by the Campi Flegri Super Volcano?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1B0GBnycK4
    Will western Europe be destroyed by the Campi Flegri Super Volcano? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1B0GBnycK4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 57 Views
  • In search of
    A fiscally conservative democrat!
    In search of A fiscally conservative democrat!
    WWW.NTU.ORG
    Rates Congress
    Every year National Taxpayers Union (NTU) rates U.S. Representatives and Senators on their actual votes—every vote that affects taxes, spending, and debt. Unlike most organizations that publish ratings, we refuse to play the “rating game” of focusing on only a handful of congressional votes on selected issues. The NTU voting study is the fairest and most accurate guide available on congressional spending. NTU has no partisan ax to grind. All members of Congress are treated the same regardless of political affiliation. Our only constituency is the overburdened American taxpayer. Grades are given impartially, based on the Taxpayer Score. Taxpayer Score The Taxpayer Score measures the strength of support for reducing wasteful government spending, opposing higher taxes, and often opposing burdensome regulations that can stifle U.S. economic growth. In general, a higher score is better because it means a member of Congress voted to spend less money. The Taxpayer Score can range between zero and 100. We do not expect anyone to score a 100, nor has any legislator ever scored a perfect 100—without missing a single vote—in the decades-long history of the comprehensive NTU scoring system. A high score does not mean that the member of Congress was opposed to all spending or all programs. High-scoring members have indicated that they would vote for many programs if the amount of spending were lower or if the spending were offset by cuts elsewhere in the budget. Indeed, a member who still wants to increase spending on some programs can achieve a high score if he or she votes for offsetting cuts. A zero score would indicate that the member of Congress approved every spending increase and opposed every pro-taxpayer reform. [%NTURatesCongress%] Click here for the PDF publication of NTU Rates Congress for the second session of the 117th Congress. To view the list of votes used to establish the NTU Ratings, click here. Senate @font-face{ font-family:"Times New Roman"; } @font-face{ font-family:"宋体"; } @font-face{ font-family:"SimSun"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Wingdings"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Calibri"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Arial"; } p.MsoNormal{ mso-style-name:Normal; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-bidi-font-family:'Times New Roman'; } span.10{ font-family:'Times New Roman'; } span.msoIns{ mso-style-type:export-only; mso-style-name:""; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single; color:blue; } span.msoDel{ mso-style-type:export-only; mso-style-name:""; text-decoration:line-through; color:red; } table.MsoNormalTable{ mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-padding-alt:0.0000pt 5.4000pt 0.0000pt 5.4000pt; mso-para-margin:0pt; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:10.0000pt; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400; } @page{mso-page-border-surround-header:no; mso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}@page Section0{ margin-top:90.0000pt; margin-bottom:90.0000pt; margin-left:72.0000pt; margin-right:72.0000pt; size:841.9000pt 595.3000pt; layout-grid:18.0000pt; mso-page-orientation:landscape; mso-header-margin:36.0000pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0000pt; } div.Section0{page:Section0;} Alaska Kentucky Nevada Murkowski Lisa 50% C McConnell Mitch 52% C Cortez Masto Catherine 16% F Sullivan Daniel 75% B- Paul Randal 95% A Rosen Jacky 18% F State Average 63% State Average 74% State Average 17% Alabama Louisiana New York Shelby Richard 67%* C+ Cassidy William 62% C Schumer Charles N/A Tuberville Thomas Hawley 87% B+ Kennedy John 77% B- Gillibrand Kirsten 14% F State Average 77% State Average 70% State Average 14% Arkansas Massachusetts Ohio Boozman John 75% B- Warren Elizabeth 12% F Brown Sherrod 14% F Cotton Thomas 75% B- Markey Edward 12% F Portman Robert 54% C State Average 75% State Average 12% State Average 34% Arizona Maryland Oklahoma Sinema Kyrsten 22% D Cardin Benjamin 13% F Inhofe James 70%* C+ Kelly Mark 18% F Van Hollen Christopher 14% F Lankford James 90% A State Average 20% State Average 14% State Average 80% California Maine Oregon Feinstein Dianne 14% F Collins Susan 42% C- Wyden Ronald 16% F Padilla Alejandro 13% F King Angus 15% F Merkley Jeffrey 13% F State Average 14% State Average 29% State Average 15% Colorado Michigan Pennsylvania Bennet Michael 12% F Stabenow Deborah 13% F Casey Robert 13% F Hickenlooper John 15% F Peters Gary 13% F Toomey Patrick 91% A 14% State Average 13% State Average 52% Connecticut Minnesota Rhode Island Blumenthal Richard 12% F Klobuchar Amy 16% F Reed John 13% F Murphy Christopher 13% F Smith Tina 15% F Whitehouse Sheldon 12% F State Average 13% State Average 16% State Average 13% Delaware Missouri South Carolina Carper Thomas 14% F Blunt Roy 50%* C Graham Lindsey 52% C Coons Christopher 13% F Hawley Josh 82% B Scott Timothy 85% B+ State Average 14% State Average 66% State Average 69% Florida Mississippi South Dakota Rubio Marco 83% B Wicker Roger 53% C Thune John 74% C+ Scott Richard 86% B+ Hyde-Smith Cindy 72% C+ Rounds Michael 69% C+ State Average 85% State Average 63% State Average 72% Georgia Montana Tennessee Ossoff Jon 12% F Tester Jon 20% F Blackburn Marsha 91% A Warnock Raphael 12% F Daines Steven 81% B Hagerty William 80% B State Average 12% State Average 51% State Average 86% Hawaii North Carolina Texas Schatz Brian 13% F Burr Richard 71%* C+ Cornyn John 62% C Hirono Mazie 14% F Tillis Thomas 69% C+ Cruz Ted 86% B+ State Average 14% State Average 70% State Average 74% Iowa North Dakota Utah Grassley Chuck 70% C+ Hoeven John 83% B Lee Michael 95% A Ernst Joni 76% B- Cramer Kevin 81%* B Romney Willard 74% C+ State Average 73% State Average 82% State Average 85% Idaho Nebraska Virginia Crapo Michael 87% B+ Fischer Debra 84% B Warner Mark 15% F Risch James 87% B+ Sasse Benjamin 75% B- Kaine Timothy 15% F State Average 87% State Average 80% State Average 15% Illinois New Hampshire Vermont Durbin Richard 13% F Shaheen Jeanne 15% F Leahy Patrick 13%* F Duckworth Ladda 13% F Hassan Margaret 16% F Sanders Bernard 11% F State Average 13% State Average 16% State Average 12% Indiana New Jersey Washington Young Todd 60% C Menendez Robert 12% F Murray Patricia 14% F Braun Mike 88% B+ Booker Cory 12% F Cantwell Maria 14% F State Average 74% State Average 12% State Average 14% Kansas New Mexico Wisconsin Moran Gerald 57% C Heinrich Martin 13% F Johnson Ron 91% A Marshall Roger 85% B+ Lujan Ben 13% F Baldwin Tammy 11% F State Average 71% State Average 13% State Average 51% West Virginia Manchin Joseph 21% F Capito Shelley 52% C State Average 37% Wyoming Barrasso John 78%* B- Lummis Cynthia 92% A State Average 85% House @font-face{ font-family:"Times New Roman"; } @font-face{ font-family:"宋体"; } @font-face{ font-family:"SimSun"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Wingdings"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Calibri"; } @font-face{ font-family:"Arial"; } p.MsoNormal{ mso-style-name:Normal; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-bidi-font-family:'Times New Roman'; } span.10{ font-family:'Times New Roman'; } span.msoIns{ mso-style-type:export-only; mso-style-name:""; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single; color:blue; } span.msoDel{ mso-style-type:export-only; mso-style-name:""; text-decoration:line-through; color:red; } table.MsoNormalTable{ mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-padding-alt:0.0000pt 5.4000pt 0.0000pt 5.4000pt; mso-para-margin:0pt; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:10.0000pt; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400; } @page{mso-page-border-surround-header:no; mso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}@page Section0{ margin-top:90.0000pt; margin-bottom:90.0000pt; margin-left:72.0000pt; margin-right:72.0000pt; size:841.9000pt 595.3000pt; layout-grid:18.0000pt; mso-page-orientation:landscape; mso-header-margin:36.0000pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0000pt; } div.Section0{page:Section0;} Alaska Indiana Ohio Peltola Mary N/A N/A Pence Gregory 77% B- Jordan James 87% B+ State Average N/A N/A Banks Jim 74% C+ Davidson Warren 80% B Alabama Hollingsworth Trey 68%* C+ Gibbs Bob 69% C+ Brooks Morris 83% B Baird James 67% C+ Latta Robert 68% C+ Moore Felix 82% B Walorski Jackie 66%** C+ Wenstrup Brad 67% C+ Palmer Gary 76% B- Spartz Victoria 65% C+ Carey Mike 65% C+ Aderholt Robert 66% C+ Bucshon Larry 64% C Balderson Troy 64% C Carl Jerry 64% C Carson Andre 8% F Chabot Steve 61% C Rogers Michael 64% C Mrvan Frank 7% F Johnson William 58% C Sewell Terrycina 7% F State Average 55% Turner Michael 54% C State Average 63% Kansas Joyce David 49% C- Arkansas Estes Ron 81% B Gonzalez Anthony 49% C- Westerman Bruce 72% C+ Mann Tracey 80% B Beatty Joyce 11% F Crawford Rick 71% C+ Laturner Jacob 67% C+ Brown Shontel 10% F Hill James 64% C Davids Sharice 7% F Ryan Timothy 8% F Womack Stephen 57% C State Average 59% Kaptur Marcy 7% F State Average 66% Kentucky State Average 50% Arizona Massie Thomas 85% B+ Oklahoma Biggs Andy 87% B+ Comer James 77% B- Hern Kevin 84% B Gosar Paul 86% B+ Guthrie Brett 66% C+ Mullin Mark 75% B- Schweikert David 81% B Barr Andy 65% C+ Lucas Frank 64% C Lesko Debbie 81% B Rogers Harold 61% C Bice Stephanie 62% C Grijalva Raul 11% F Yarmuth John 14% F Cole Thomas 53% C Gallego Ruben 8% F State Average 61% State Average 68% Kirkpatrick Ann 8% F Louisiana Oregon Stanton Greg 7% F Higgins Clay 84% B Bentz Cliff 73% C+ O'Halleran Tom 7% F Johnson Mike 76% B- Schrader Kurt 18% F State Average 42% Scalise Stephen 72% C+ Blumenauer Earl 15% F California Graves Garret 66% C+ DeFazio Peter 14% F McClintock Thomas 82% B Letlow Julia 65% C+ Bonamici Suzanne 13% F LaMalfa Douglas 69% C+ Carter Troy 7% F State Average 27% McCarthy Kevin 69% C+ State Average 62% Pennsylvania Issa Darrell 66% C+ Massachusetts Perry Scott 90% A Conway Connie 65%** C+ Pressley Ayanna 17% F Smucker Lloyd 72% C+ Steel Michelle 63% C McGovern James 16% F Joyce John 69% C+ Calvert Kenneth 60% C Auchincloss Jake 12% F Keller Fred 69% C+ Garcia Michael 58% C Clark Katherine 11% F Kelly George 67% C+ Obernolte Jay 57% C Trahan Lori 11% F Meuser Daniel 67% C+ Kim Young 56% C Moulton Seth 10% F Thompson Glenn 62% C Valadao David 55% C Keating William 9% F Reschenthaler Guy 61% C Gomez Jimmy 16% F Lynch Stephen 8% F Fitzpatrick Brian 26% D Lee Barbara 15% F Neal Richard 8% F Doyle Michael 14% F Barragan Nanette 14% F State Average 11% Dean Madeleine 10% F Khanna Rohit 14% F Maryland Houlahan Christina 10% F Lowenthal Alan 14% F Harris Andrew 80% B Boyle Brendan 9% F Cardenas Antonio 13% F Raskin Jamin 13% F Scanlon Mary 9% F Porter Katherine 13% F Mfume Kweisi 11% F Wild Susan 9% F Takano Mark 13% F Sarbanes John 10% F Evans Dwight 8% F DeSaulnier Mark 13% F Hoyer Steny 9% F Cartwright Matthew 8% F Vargas Juan 13% F Ruppersberger Charles 7% F Lamb Conor 7% F Speier Karen 12% F Trone David 7% F State Average 37% Chu Judy 11% F Brown Anthony 6% F Rhode Island Lieu Ted 11% F State Average 18% Cicilline David 9% F Napolitano Grace 11% F Maine Langevin James 7% F Sanchez Linda 11% F Golden Jared 12% F State Average 8% Schiff Adam 11% F Pingree Chellie 10% F South Carolina Huffman Jared 11% F State Average 11% Norman Ralph 91% A Waters Maxine 11% F Michigan Duncan Jeffrey 79% B- Jacobs Sara 11% F Huizenga William 76% B- Timmons William 75% B- Carbajal Salud 10% F McClain Lisa 74% C+ Rice Tom 72% C+ Eshoo Anna 10% F Moolenaar John 71% C+ Wilson Addison 69% C+ Matsui Doris 10% F Walberg Timothy 70% C+ Mace Nancy 68% C+ Sherman Bradley 10% F Bergman Jack 61% C Clyburn James 8% F Thompson Michael 10% F Meijer Peter 50% C State Average 66% Garamendi John 10% F Upton Frederick 39% D South Dakota Lofgren Susan 10% F Tlaib Rashida 18% F Johnson Dustin 65% C+ Bera Amerish 10% F Levin Andy 14% F State Average 65% Bass Karen 10% F Kildee Daniel 12% F Tennessee Aguilar Peter 9% F Dingell Deborah 11% F Burchett Tim 86% B+ Panetta Jimmy 9% F Lawrence Brenda 11% F Rose John 80% B Swalwell Eric 9% F Stevens Haley 9% F Harshbarger Diana 78% B- McNerney Gerald 9% F Slotkin Elissa 8% F Green Mark 78% B- Peters Scott 9% F State Average 37% Kustoff David 72% C+ Torres Norma 9% F Minnesota Desjarlais Scott 71% C+ Brownley Julia 8% F Fischbach Michelle 72% C+ Fleischmann Charles 67% C+ Correa Jose 8% F Emmer Thomas 69% C+ Cohen Stephen 15% F Roybal-Allard Lucille 8% F Stauber Pete 68% C+ Cooper Jim 10% F Costa James 8% F Omar Ilhan 17% F State Average 62% Harder Josh 7% F McCollum Betty 8% F Texas Levin Michael 7% F Phillips Dean 8% F Roy Charles 89% B+ Ruiz Raul 7% F Craig Angela 7% F Taylor Nicholas 86% B+ Pelosi Nancy Finstad Brad N/A N/A Nehls Troy 85% B+ State Average 22% State Average 36% Cloud Michael 84% B Colorado Missouri Gooden Lance 84% B Boebert Lauren 90% A Long William 73% C+ Jackson Ronny 84% B Buck Kenneth 89% B+ Smith Jason 72% C+ Gohmert Louie 83% B Lamborn Douglas 73% C+ Luetkemeyer Blaine 70% C+ Weber Randy 80% B Crow Jason 9% F Hartzler Vicky 70%* C+ Babin Brian 79% B- Degette Diana 9% F Graves Samuel 69% C+ Williams Roger 79% B- Neguse A 9% F Wagner Ann 65% C+ Arrington Jodey 78% B- Perlmutter Ed 9% F Bush Cori 19% F Van Duyne Beth 77% B- State Average 41% Cleaver Emanuel 9% F Fallon Patrick 77% B- Connecticut State Average 56% Burgess Michael 76% B- Hayes Jahana 12% F Mississippi Pfluger August 76% B- Himes James 12% F Kelly Trent 74% C+ Crenshaw Daniel 70% C+ DeLauro Rosa 9% F Guest Michael 74% C+ Sessions Peter 69% C+ Courtney Joseph 7% F Palazzo Steven 68% C+ Carter John 68% C+ Larson John 7% F Thompson Bennie 8% F Ellzey Jake 66% C+ State Average 9% State Average 56% Brady Kevin 64%* C Delaware Montana Granger Kay 63% C Blunt Rochester Lisa 8% F Rosendale Matthew 87% B+ Gonzales Anthony 60% C State Average 8% State Average 87% Flores Mayra 59%** C Florida North Carolina McCaul Michael 57% C Steube William 85% B+ Bishop Dan 90% A Castro Joaquin 11% F Donalds Byron 80% B Cawthorn David 74% C+ Johnson Eddie Bernice 11% F Cammack Kathryn 77% B- Murphy Gregory 71% C+ Gonzalez Vicente 11% F Gaetz Matthew 75% B- Rouzer David 70% C+ Escobar Veronica 10% F Webster Daniel 75% B- Foxx Virginia 70% C+ Green Al 10% F Franklin Clifford 74% C+ Budd Theodore 69%* C+ Doggett Lloyd 10% F Mast Brian 72% C+ McHenry Patrick 66% C+ Garcia Sylvia 10% F Buchanan Vern 71% C+ Hudson Richard 62% C Cuellar Henry 9% F Posey William 71% C+ Price David 9% F Fletcher Elizabeth 9% F Bilirakis Gus 70% C+ Adams Alma 8% F Jackson Lee Sheila 9% F Dunn Neal 67% C+ Ross Deborah 8% F Veasey Marc 7% F Waltz Michael 66% C+ Butterfield G K 8% F Allred Colin 7% F Rutherford John 63% C Manning Kathy 6% F State Average 53% Gimenez Carlos 60% C State Average 47% Utah Diaz-Balart Mario 60% C North Dakota Moore Blake 68% C+ Salazar Maria Elvira 52% C Armstrong Kelly 67% C+ Owens Burgess 68% C+ Murphy Stephanie 16% F State Average 67% Stewart Chris 68% C+ Frankel Lois 10% F Nebraska Curtis John 67% C+ Cherfilus-McCormick Sheila 9% F Smith Adrian 72% C+ State Average 68% Castor Katherine 8% F Flood Michael 65%** C+ Virginia Lawson Alfred 7% F Bacon Donald 55% C Good Bob 89% B+ Soto Darren 7% F State Average 64% Cline Benjamin 79% B- Wasserman Schultz Deborah 7% F New Hampshire Griffith Morgan 74% C+ Wilson Frederica 7% F Kuster Ann 7% F Wittman Rob 68% C+ Deutch Theodore 7%* F Pappas Christopher 7% F Beyer Donald 10% F Demings Valdez 6% F State Average 7% Connolly Gerald 9% F Crist Charles 4%* F New Jersey Luria Elaine 7% F State Average 45% Van Drew Jeff 75% B- Scott Robert 7% F Georgia Smith Christopher 56% C Spanberger Abigail 7% F Hice Jody 90% A Watson Coleman Bonnie 15% F McEachin Aston Donald 7% F Greene Marjorie 88% B+ Pallone Frank 13% F Wexton Jennifer 6% F Clyde Andrew 86% B+ Payne Donald 11% F State Average 33% Loudermilk Barry 80% B Malinowski Tom 10% F Vermont Ferguson Anderson 75% B- Kim Andrew 9% F Welch Peter 15% F Allen Richard 73% C+ Sires Albio 8% F State Average 15% Scott Austin 71% C+ Gottheimer Josh 7% F Washington Carter Earl 70% C+ Sherrill Rebecca 7% F McMorris Rodgers Cathy 72% C+ Williams Nikema 13% F Norcross Donald 7% F Newhouse Daniel 58% C Johnson Henry 11% F Pascrell William 7% F Herrera Beutler Jaime 51% C Bourdeaux Carolyn 10% F State Average 19% Jayapal Pramila 15% F McBath Lucia 8% F New Mexico Larsen Rick 10% F Scott David 7% F Herrell Stella 76% B- Delbene Suzan 9% F Bishop Sanford 6% F Leger Fernandez Teresa 11% F Kilmer Derek 9% F State Average 49% Stansbury Melanie 10% F Smith Adam 9% F Hawaii State Average 32% Strickland Marilyn 8% F Kahele Kaiali'I 6% F Nevada Schrier Kim 7% F Case Ed 6% F Amodei Mark 63% C State Average 25% State Average 6% Titus Alice 9% F Wisconsin Iowa Horsford Steven 8% F Tiffany Thomas 83% B Feenstra Randall 66% C+ Lee Susie 7% F Grothman Glenn 76% B- Hinson Ashley 60% C State Average 22% Fitzgerald Scott 73% C+ Miller-Meeks Mariannette 56% C New York Steil Bryan 68% C+ Axne Cynthia 7% F Zeldin Lee 73%* C+ Gallagher Mike 64% C State Average 47% Tenney Claudia 68% C+ Pocan Mark 16% F Idaho Stefanik Elise 66% C+ Moore Gwendolynne 12% F Fulcher Russell 80% B Garbarino Andrew 56% C Kind Ronald 9% F Simpson Michael 61% C Malliotakis Nicole 54% C State Average 50% State Average 71% Jacobs Christopher 51% C West Virginia Illinois Katko John 33% D Mooney Alexander 77% B- Miller Mary 80% B Ocasio-Cortez Alexandria 22% D Miller Carol 69% C+ LaHood Darin 73% C+ Bowman Jamaal 17% F McKinley David 57%* C Bost Michael 64% C Clarke Yvette 14% F State Average 68% Davis Rodney 57% C Rice Kathleen 14% F Wyoming Kinzinger Adam 38%* D Espaillat Adriano 13% F Cheney Liz 60%* C Garcia Jesus 17% F Jones Mondaire 13% F State Average 60% Newman Marie 14% F Maloney Carolyn 13% F Schakowsky Janice 13% F Nadler Jerrold 13% F Kelly Robin 12% F Meng Grace 11% F Rush Bobby 11% F Tonko Paul 11% F Foster Bill 10% F Torres Ritchie 11% F Davis Danny 10% F Jeffries Hakeem 11% F Underwood Lauren 9% F Velazquez Nydia 11% F Quigley Michael 9% F Meeks Gregory 9% F Casten Sean 9% F Higgins Brian 8% F Schneider Bradley 7% F Suozzi Thomas 7% F Krishnamoorthi Raja 7% F Morelle Joseph 7% F Bustos Cheryl 6% F Maloney Sean Patrick 6% F State Average 25% Ryan Pat N/A Sempolinski Joe N/A State Average 24% NTU’s federal budget experts assigned a weight to each roll call vote in the House and Senate. A low weight was assigned to votes that had relatively smaller effects on the size of the federal budget and federal deficits, the scale and scope of federal tax revenues, or the size and scope of the regulatory state. A high weight, on the other hand, was assigned to votes with the most significant effect on federal spending, deficits, taxes, or the size and scope of the regulatory state Consideration was given to the longer-term effects of a vote on future fiscal policy, even if relatively few tax or deficit-financed dollars might be immediately at stake. Scores were computed by dividing the weighted total of votes cast against higher spending or taxes (or for lower spending or taxes) by the weighted total number of spending and tax issues on which the member of Congress voted. Average scores for each state were also computed using the weighted total of votes cast by each state delegation. In computing these scores, we included only those votes on which the member actually voted for or against a bill, resolution, or amendment. Announced positions and absences were excluded. Additionally, because some members either missed votes frequently, cast certain votes to permit the usage of procedural tools, or otherwise abstained from voting yes or no, their scores may not accurately reflect spending attitudes. The members falling into this category are noted. We analyzed every roll call vote taken in the Second Session of the 117th Congress and selected all votes that could significantly affect the amounts of federal taxes, spending, debt, or regulatory impact. A total of 75 Senate and 172 House votes were selected. We included votes cast on appropriations bills, authorization bills, budget resolutions, tax bills, amendments, and certain procedural and policy votes that could affect the burden on taxpayers. Votes that simply shifted equal amounts of spending from one area to another were excluded. Also excluded were unanimous votes and votes where there was a significant difference of opinion on how to vote to reduce or control the size of government.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 65 Views
  • Heads Roll at the RNC!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoSpH_4EXD4
    Heads Roll at the RNC! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoSpH_4EXD4
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 132 Views
  • "This democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century,"
    https://reason.com/2014/05/15/be-antigovernment-and-proud/
    "This democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century," https://reason.com/2014/05/15/be-antigovernment-and-proud/
    REASON.COM
    This Is the Number of Innocent People Murdered by Governments. Are You Anti-State Yet?
    Being antigovernment is the logical result of taking a close look at the state and its bloody works.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 182 Views

  • Vermin Establishment
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5jqcuMiZ44
    Vermin Establishment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5jqcuMiZ44
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 108 Views
  • The Mongolian Candidate
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpeHAqRh0RA
    The Mongolian Candidate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpeHAqRh0RA
    0 Comments 0 Shares 106 Views
  • Caught Red-Handed: See Video Proof of Fauci Endorsing #GainOfFunction Research

    https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=60f89ac3b4c876043c590ee6
    0 Comments 0 Shares 57 Views
More Stories