• What Is Denatured Alcohol?

    I wanted to share this with you for one simple reason....
    The scumbags you call "government" poisoned and KILLED over 10,000 people by adding toxins to alcohol!

    There is no legitimate purpose for this #Murder....
    Except that the Luciferian controllers WANT THAT TAX MONEY!

    "Damn drunks want to skip paying taxes when they catch a buzz, we'll just POISON THE UN-TAXED BOOZE and blind or kill people over a few pennies!"

    This goes all the way back to prohibition!
    At which time over 10,000 Americans were MURDERED by this Luciferian #Cult we call "government"

    But remember..... THEY WORK FOR YOU!!! ROFLMAO
    The guy they are poisoning! Yup, YOU are their "Boss"

    Last time I POISONED MY BOSS I got fired!
    (And rightly so)

    They talk about the intentional MURDER OF AMERICANS over unpaid tax as if it's justifiable, like it's just no big deal!

    These people are #Evil beyond description

    https://www.allthescience.org/what-is-denatured-alcohol.htm
    What Is Denatured Alcohol? I wanted to share this with you for one simple reason.... The scumbags you call "government" poisoned and KILLED over 10,000 people by adding toxins to alcohol! There is no legitimate purpose for this #Murder.... Except that the Luciferian controllers WANT THAT TAX MONEY! "Damn drunks want to skip paying taxes when they catch a buzz, we'll just POISON THE UN-TAXED BOOZE and blind or kill people over a few pennies!" This goes all the way back to prohibition! At which time over 10,000 Americans were MURDERED by this Luciferian #Cult we call "government" But remember..... THEY WORK FOR YOU!!! ROFLMAO The guy they are poisoning! Yup, YOU are their "Boss" Last time I POISONED MY BOSS I got fired! (And rightly so) They talk about the intentional MURDER OF AMERICANS over unpaid tax as if it's justifiable, like it's just no big deal! These people are #Evil beyond description https://www.allthescience.org/what-is-denatured-alcohol.htm
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 777 Views

  • From a friend
    **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …**

    **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …**

    **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …**

    ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”***

    ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024***

    ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”***

    ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.***

    ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.***

    ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.***

    ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.***

    ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.***

    ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.***

    ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.***

    ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.***

    ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.***

    ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.***

    ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.***

    ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.***

    ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’***

    ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’***

    ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’***

    ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’***

    ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.***

    ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:***

    ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’***

    ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’***

    ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.***

    ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?***

    ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.***

    ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.***

    ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.***

    ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.***

    ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.***

    ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:***

    ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’***

    ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’***

    ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.***

    ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.***

    ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.***

    ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.***

    ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:***

    ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’***

    ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.***

    ***The report explains:***

    ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’***

    ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.***

    ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.***

    ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.***

    ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”***

    ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.***

    ***Focused protection specifically says:***

    ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’***

    ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’***

    ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.***

    ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?***

    ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”***

    https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/

    **Here are some links to this article:**

    - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”***

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/

    - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings***
    ***Updated July 26, 2020"***

    https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    🚨🚨 From a friend **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …** **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …** **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …** ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”*** ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024*** ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”*** ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.*** ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.*** ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.*** ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.*** ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.*** ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.*** ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.*** ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.*** ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.*** ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.*** ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.*** ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.*** ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’*** ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’*** ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’*** ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’*** ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.*** ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:*** ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’*** ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’*** ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.*** ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?*** ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.*** ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.*** ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.*** ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.*** ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.*** ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:*** ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’*** ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’*** ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.*** ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.*** ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.*** ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.*** ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:*** ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’*** ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.*** ***The report explains:*** ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’*** ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.*** ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.*** ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.*** ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”*** ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.*** ***Focused protection specifically says:*** ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’*** ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’*** ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.*** ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?*** ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”*** https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/ **Here are some links to this article:** - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”*** https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/ - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings*** ***Updated July 26, 2020"*** https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking evidence of what happened, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list.
    Angry
    2
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 2K Views

  • Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped

    Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims

    Post 4921

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

    In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit.

    BACKGROUND

    GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault.

    GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor.

    Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted.

    In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims.

    After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action.

    DISCUSSION

    GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay.

    Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm.

    GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings.

    GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor.

    GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims.

    The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO.

    A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act.

    The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings.

    GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims Post 4921 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog. In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit. BACKGROUND GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault. GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor. Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted. In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims. After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action. DISCUSSION GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay. Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm. GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings. GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor. GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims. The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO. A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act. The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings. GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action. ZALMA OPINION The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 1K Views 0
  • Sorry, Antarctica is Closed

    You are PROHIBITED from independent exploration of #ANTARCTICA! WHY do you think that is???

    Sure... If you have a spare $30,000 or so, you CAN take a
    "guided tour" to one small peninsula of Antarctica...

    But you CANNOT just "go to Antarctica"

    And that is because Antarctica is NOT what you've been taught that it is! Have you ever heard the term "Arctic Circle"???

    It used to be called the ARCTIC CIRCLE because IT'S A CIRCLE that goes around the entire earth!

    Look it up, Antarctica is has the highest average elevation of
    ANY COUNTRY ON EARTH, and that is because it is the "Bank" of the world's oceans.

    In other words, if you look at the world's oceans like a pond....
    Antarctica is the BANK SURROUNDING THE POND!

    The "Arctic Circle"

    By the way.... During the height of the COLD WAR the US and Russia both signed the "Antarctic Treaty" prohibiting independent travel to Antarctica!

    And NO COUNTRY ON EARTH has ever tried to claim the land there! Don't you find this a little suspicious?

    https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/sorry-antarctica-is-closed:1
    Sorry, Antarctica is Closed You are PROHIBITED from independent exploration of #ANTARCTICA! WHY do you think that is??? Sure... If you have a spare $30,000 or so, you CAN take a "guided tour" to one small peninsula of Antarctica... But you CANNOT just "go to Antarctica" And that is because Antarctica is NOT what you've been taught that it is! Have you ever heard the term "Arctic Circle"??? It used to be called the ARCTIC CIRCLE because IT'S A CIRCLE that goes around the entire earth! Look it up, Antarctica is has the highest average elevation of ANY COUNTRY ON EARTH, and that is because it is the "Bank" of the world's oceans. In other words, if you look at the world's oceans like a pond.... Antarctica is the BANK SURROUNDING THE POND! The "Arctic Circle" By the way.... During the height of the COLD WAR the US and Russia both signed the "Antarctic Treaty" prohibiting independent travel to Antarctica! And NO COUNTRY ON EARTH has ever tried to claim the land there! Don't you find this a little suspicious? https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/sorry-antarctica-is-closed:1
    Haha
    1
    1 Reacties 0 aandelen 870 Views
  • U.S. Pentagon rendered helpless as foreign drones freely conduct surveillance on sensitive military sites

    Over the past four years, Chinese spy balloons and other foreign “UFO” drones have been conducting surveillance over sensitive military sites in the United States, the Pentagon confirms. However, the Pentagon says it cannot stop these fleets of unidentified drones due to federal laws prohibiting military action on U.S. soil. A recent report by the Wall Street Journal reveals that these aerial intruders have been surveilling key military locations, including the elite SEAL Team Six base and Naval Station Norfolk, the largest naval port in the world.
    https://www.newstarget.com
    U.S. Pentagon rendered helpless as foreign drones freely conduct surveillance on sensitive military sites Over the past four years, Chinese spy balloons and other foreign “UFO” drones have been conducting surveillance over sensitive military sites in the United States, the Pentagon confirms. However, the Pentagon says it cannot stop these fleets of unidentified drones due to federal laws prohibiting military action on U.S. soil. A recent report by the Wall Street Journal reveals that these aerial intruders have been surveilling key military locations, including the elite SEAL Team Six base and Naval Station Norfolk, the largest naval port in the world. https://www.newstarget.com
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 741 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/italy-bans-international-surrogacy-prohibiting-homosexuals-pedophiles-from-buying-children-abroad/
    https://medforth.biz/italy-bans-international-surrogacy-prohibiting-homosexuals-pedophiles-from-buying-children-abroad/
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 310 Views
  • There is no lower form of life on Earth than the "Jackboot Thug Pig"

    These violent Road #Pirates attack peace loving people
    who have harmed nobody, EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK!

    It's quite possible, that just like the "Blue Bloods" are descendants of the evil Nephilim, this group of "Blue Belly" cowards who pin a pentagram on their chest and violently attack peaceful people are also related to the Nephilim!

    These "Policy Enforcers" of the #Corporation of the United States HATE AMERICANS and have an "us vs them" attitude! This is just another FRONT GROUP for Luciferians
    MANY are Lucifer worshiping Freemasons

    These cowards DO NOT protect Americans, who we are told are their "Bosses" They instead brutalize, abuse, cage, and even KILL THEM!

    Know who they DO PROTECT???
    People like Bill Gates, the WHO, and Politicians who are committing #Genocide right before your eyes! They exist to PROTECT THE EVIL DOERS FROM YOU!

    Remember, these blue belly scumbags have their own "Fraternal Order of Police" where they go to worship dark forces, just like ALL OTHER "Fraternal Orders" do!

    Every last one of them are SWINE
    Unworthy of even being considered MEN!

    These are the COWARDS OF THE THIN BLUE LINE GANG!
    Pond Scum even seems desirable when put beside the Jackboot Thu Pig!

    Police CHECK EVERY BOX listed in Proverbs 6:16-19
    "Things that Yahuwah HATES"

    Pathetic #Traitors to their country and countrymen!
    "Police" truly are the "ENEMY OF EVERY AMERICAN!"

    They are "Policy Enforcers" for a #Criminal for-profit CORPORATION located offshorebmaking them literally the "Foreign Standing Army on US Soil" which is outright prohibited in the Constitution
    There is no lower form of life on Earth than the "Jackboot Thug Pig" These violent Road #Pirates attack peace loving people who have harmed nobody, EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK! It's quite possible, that just like the "Blue Bloods" are descendants of the evil Nephilim, this group of "Blue Belly" cowards who pin a pentagram on their chest and violently attack peaceful people are also related to the Nephilim! These "Policy Enforcers" of the #Corporation of the United States HATE AMERICANS and have an "us vs them" attitude! This is just another FRONT GROUP for Luciferians MANY are Lucifer worshiping Freemasons These cowards DO NOT protect Americans, who we are told are their "Bosses" They instead brutalize, abuse, cage, and even KILL THEM! Know who they DO PROTECT??? People like Bill Gates, the WHO, and Politicians who are committing #Genocide right before your eyes! They exist to PROTECT THE EVIL DOERS FROM YOU! Remember, these blue belly scumbags have their own "Fraternal Order of Police" where they go to worship dark forces, just like ALL OTHER "Fraternal Orders" do! Every last one of them are SWINE Unworthy of even being considered MEN! These are the COWARDS OF THE THIN BLUE LINE GANG! Pond Scum even seems desirable when put beside the Jackboot Thu Pig! Police CHECK EVERY BOX listed in Proverbs 6:16-19 "Things that Yahuwah HATES" Pathetic #Traitors to their country and countrymen! "Police" truly are the "ENEMY OF EVERY AMERICAN!" They are "Policy Enforcers" for a #Criminal for-profit CORPORATION located offshorebmaking them literally the "Foreign Standing Army on US Soil" which is outright prohibited in the Constitution
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 1K Views
  • I find it very interesting that Enoch used ANIMALS in describing some of his visions of the fallen angels. He told of the fallen breeding with MAN, and the result was producing " elephants, camels, and asses."

    The Book of Enoch Chapter 85.....

    6. I looked at and observed them; when behold, they all acted after the manner of horses, and began to approach the young cows, all of whom became pregnant, and brought forth elephants, camels, and asses.

    Ever heard of the Prohibition Party???
    Their symbols is the Camel

    Book of Enoch Chapter 85

    By Kaleena Fraga

    While researching another topic—New Yorkers who became president—we stumbled across a delicious (or perhaps dry) factoid to share.

    The Prohibition Party may seem like a throwback to the days of speakeasies and Jay Gatsby, but it’s actually the oldest third party in the United States. The Party has run a candidate in every election since 1872, and they already have a nominee for 2020—which, in some ways, makes them more prepared for the upcoming election than the Democrats.

    So what does the Prohibition Party stand for?

    As expected, the Prohibition Party’s platform emphasizes a disapproval of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and all “hard” drugs. It goes as far as to pledge support to farmers who switch from growing tobacco and grapes for wine to other crops.

    But that’s not all. The party believes in climate change and promises, “[cooperation] with other nations in mitigating its possible effects.” The party also notes that it “will not surrender our sovereignty in this, or any other regard.” It is strongly pro-life, supports a constitutional amendment that would give power of marriage to religious bodies only, endorses the NRA, and advocates for abolishing the Federal Reserve System.

    In 2016, the Prohibition Party received more than 5,000 votes, out of about 138 million ballots cast. Not a great year, but a vast improvement over the 2012 election—the party received 518 votes then. Since the party received only 208 votes in 2000, you could say they’re enjoying a new wave of support.

    Since it first ran a presidential candidate in 1872, the Prohibition Party has enjoyed peaks in popularity. Some are expected—as the Prohibition movement began to gain steam in the 1880s and into the turn of the century, the party received more than 200,000 votes (in 1888, 1892, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1912, and 1916). The year prohibition became law (1920) the party’s vote count dipped—to about 188,000—perhaps because prohibition passed in January, and the election did not take place until November.

    Chapter 85
    1. Again I looked attentively, 1 while sleeping, and surveyed heaven above.

    2. And behold a single star fell from heaven.

    3. Which being raised up, ate and fed among those cows.

    4. After that I perceived other large and black cows; and behold all of them changed their stalls and pastures, while their young began to lament one with another. Again I looked in my vision, and surveyed heaven; when behold I saw many stars which descended, and projected themselves from heaven to where the first star was,

    5. Into the midst of those young ones; while the cows were with them, feeding in the midst of them.

    6. I looked at and observed them; when behold, they all acted after the manner of horses, and began to approach the young cows, all of whom became pregnant, and brought forth elephants, camels, and asses.

    7. At these all the cows were alarmed and terrified; when they began biting with their teeth, swallowing, and striking with their horns.

    8. They began also to devour the cows; and behold all the children of the earth trembled, shook with terror at them, and suddenly fled away.


    https://history-first.com/2019/08/03/americas-oldest-third-party-the-prohibitionists/
    I find it very interesting that Enoch used ANIMALS in describing some of his visions of the fallen angels. He told of the fallen breeding with MAN, and the result was producing " elephants, camels, and asses." The Book of Enoch Chapter 85..... 6. I looked at and observed them; when behold, they all acted after the manner of horses, and began to approach the young cows, all of whom became pregnant, and brought forth elephants, camels, and asses. Ever heard of the Prohibition Party??? Their symbols is the Camel Book of Enoch Chapter 85 By Kaleena Fraga While researching another topic—New Yorkers who became president—we stumbled across a delicious (or perhaps dry) factoid to share. The Prohibition Party may seem like a throwback to the days of speakeasies and Jay Gatsby, but it’s actually the oldest third party in the United States. The Party has run a candidate in every election since 1872, and they already have a nominee for 2020—which, in some ways, makes them more prepared for the upcoming election than the Democrats. So what does the Prohibition Party stand for? As expected, the Prohibition Party’s platform emphasizes a disapproval of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and all “hard” drugs. It goes as far as to pledge support to farmers who switch from growing tobacco and grapes for wine to other crops. But that’s not all. The party believes in climate change and promises, “[cooperation] with other nations in mitigating its possible effects.” The party also notes that it “will not surrender our sovereignty in this, or any other regard.” It is strongly pro-life, supports a constitutional amendment that would give power of marriage to religious bodies only, endorses the NRA, and advocates for abolishing the Federal Reserve System. In 2016, the Prohibition Party received more than 5,000 votes, out of about 138 million ballots cast. Not a great year, but a vast improvement over the 2012 election—the party received 518 votes then. Since the party received only 208 votes in 2000, you could say they’re enjoying a new wave of support. Since it first ran a presidential candidate in 1872, the Prohibition Party has enjoyed peaks in popularity. Some are expected—as the Prohibition movement began to gain steam in the 1880s and into the turn of the century, the party received more than 200,000 votes (in 1888, 1892, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1912, and 1916). The year prohibition became law (1920) the party’s vote count dipped—to about 188,000—perhaps because prohibition passed in January, and the election did not take place until November. Chapter 85 1. Again I looked attentively, 1 while sleeping, and surveyed heaven above. 2. And behold a single star fell from heaven. 3. Which being raised up, ate and fed among those cows. 4. After that I perceived other large and black cows; and behold all of them changed their stalls and pastures, while their young began to lament one with another. Again I looked in my vision, and surveyed heaven; when behold I saw many stars which descended, and projected themselves from heaven to where the first star was, 5. Into the midst of those young ones; while the cows were with them, feeding in the midst of them. 6. I looked at and observed them; when behold, they all acted after the manner of horses, and began to approach the young cows, all of whom became pregnant, and brought forth elephants, camels, and asses. 7. At these all the cows were alarmed and terrified; when they began biting with their teeth, swallowing, and striking with their horns. 8. They began also to devour the cows; and behold all the children of the earth trembled, shook with terror at them, and suddenly fled away. https://history-first.com/2019/08/03/americas-oldest-third-party-the-prohibitionists/
    Like
    1
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 1K Views
  • 1962 THEY FOUND OUT, THAT THEY CANNOT BREAK THROUGH THE FIRMAMENT AND THEY WILL NOT FIND OUT WHAT IS

    The #Antarctic Treaty was put in place in 1959....

    This is where 12 countries unlawfully prohibited exploration below the
    60th parallel South, and began using their militaries to threaten anyone travelling that direction!

    Leaving YOU a prisoner in the area above the 60th parallel South!
    YOU ARE IN A PRISON!

    And for what???
    Penguins? My a**!

    These people, meaning ALL supposed "#Governments" are #Luciferians
    and their mission in life is to hide the existence of your Creator!

    What makes these people believe they have the right to tell ALL OF HUMANITY where they can and cannot go on this earth???

    These scumbags have no more rights than anyone else does!
    But through intimidation, fear, and military #Violence and coercion...
    They have done just that!

    They did the same thing at the North Pole before
    doing it below the 60th South Parallel

    Because they seem to believe they OWN YOU and can control your movements on the earth given to YOU by the Creator! What a bunch of scumbags!

    And the same goes for ANYONE who joins their military goon squads

    https://old.bitchute.com/video/IlimJ4qsNdeR/
    1962 THEY FOUND OUT, THAT THEY CANNOT BREAK THROUGH THE FIRMAMENT AND THEY WILL NOT FIND OUT WHAT IS The #Antarctic Treaty was put in place in 1959.... This is where 12 countries unlawfully prohibited exploration below the 60th parallel South, and began using their militaries to threaten anyone travelling that direction! Leaving YOU a prisoner in the area above the 60th parallel South! YOU ARE IN A PRISON! And for what??? Penguins? My a**! These people, meaning ALL supposed "#Governments" are #Luciferians and their mission in life is to hide the existence of your Creator! What makes these people believe they have the right to tell ALL OF HUMANITY where they can and cannot go on this earth??? These scumbags have no more rights than anyone else does! But through intimidation, fear, and military #Violence and coercion... They have done just that! They did the same thing at the North Pole before doing it below the 60th South Parallel Because they seem to believe they OWN YOU and can control your movements on the earth given to YOU by the Creator! What a bunch of scumbags! And the same goes for ANYONE who joins their military goon squads https://old.bitchute.com/video/IlimJ4qsNdeR/
    OLD.BITCHUTE.COM
    1962 they found out, that they cannot break through the firmament and they will not find out what is
    1962 they found out, that they cannot break through the firmament and they will not find out what is up there. The officiö narrative is, that they tested nuclear warheads but now seriously - they will lauch so many warheads with increasingly more po…
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 1K Views
  • https://gunsinthenews.com/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-the-city-of-dallas-for-unlawfully-prohibiting-firearms-from-the-texas-state-fair/
    https://gunsinthenews.com/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-the-city-of-dallas-for-unlawfully-prohibiting-firearms-from-the-texas-state-fair/
    GUNSINTHENEWS.COM
    Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues the City of Dallas for Unlawfully Prohibiting Firearms From the Texas State Fair - Guns in the News
    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office sent out the following press release late Thursday. We thank him for working swiftly to overturn this misguided ban and for protecting law-abiding Texans’ Second Amendment rights. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the City of Dallas and the State Fair of Texas for ...
    0 Reacties 0 aandelen 458 Views
Zoekresultaten
Sponsor

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here