• Remember when the media took control of the 2004 election and the audit was done by a school, MIT, that accepts money from foreign countries in exchange for information transference? The need for outside companies to conduct these audits for these exact reasons. We missed it the first time. Let's not make that mistake again and know the repercussions of not speaking up and allowing it to come and go. We all make mistakes, don't let it be for nothing. Their is two parties, but its not red and blue. Its "them" and it's "you" #freedomofspeech #america #freedom #usa #firstamendment #1stamendment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies#:~:text=A%20study%20performed%20by%20the,the%20official%20count%2C%20and%20thus%20%22
    Remember when the media took control of the 2004 election and the audit was done by a school, MIT, that accepts money from foreign countries in exchange for information transference? The need for outside companies to conduct these audits for these exact reasons. We missed it the first time. Let's not make that mistake again and know the repercussions of not speaking up and allowing it to come and go. We all make mistakes, don't let it be for nothing. Their is two parties, but its not red and blue. Its "them" and it's "you" #freedomofspeech #america #freedom #usa #firstamendment #1stamendment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies#:~:text=A%20study%20performed%20by%20the,the%20official%20count%2C%20and%20thus%20%22
    2004 United States election voting controversies
    During the 2004 United States elections, concerns were raised about various aspects of the voting process, including whether voting had been made accessible to all those entitled to vote, whether ineligible voters were registered, whether voters were registered multiple times, and whether the votes cast had been correctly counted. More controversial was the charge that these issues might have affected the reported outcome of the presidential election, in which the incumbent, Republican President George W. Bush, defeated the Democratic challenger, Senator John Kerry. Despite the existing controversies, Kerry conceded the election the following day on November 3. There was generally less attention paid to the Senate and House elections and to various state races, but some of them were also questioned, especially the gubernatorial election in Washington, which was decided by less than 0.01% and involved several recounts and lawsuits. The final recount also reversed the outcome of this election. Specific issues concerning the voting process ...
    4
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Crisis in Accountability:

    At the core of every ill and injustice befalling society one can find at its roots a lack of #Accountability. Especially of those elected or appointed to public office. The Founding Fathers actually envisioned this problem. They enshrined in the #1stAmendment with the freedom of the press, and the right petition the government to redress grievances. They also mandated in #ArticleVI the #OathofOffice as a requirement to hold office or operate with the authority of government. This was intended to insure loyalty to the Constitution and place limits on the use of government power. All of these are failing.

    The media, where they are free to publish all that they wish have opted to be political. Holding accountable only that which does not fit their agenda and ignoring every other offense or injustice. Even inventing information not held in fact. Very little authentic ethical journalism.

    On the redress of grievances, there seems to have little interest in many quarters for justice. Citizens are treated as chattel. To be manipulated and used regardless of the promise made in the Constitution to "secure the Blessing of Liberty". How many can remember a time when those elected to public office or government and its bureaucracies were held liable with the burden of their inequities?

    The Oath to the Constitution should be the most solemn promise made by a public servant. It was designed to affirm trust in the institutions established. There are laws at every level requiring the oath. However, with possible exception of the UCMJ none of the laws proscribe what a violation of the oath entails nor any punishment for its violation. It has become a pro forma exercise holding no accountability.

    Thus we find ourselves with a government not accountable to the people.

    #TheCrisisInAccountability, #RedressGrievances, #TheMedia

    https://www.azquotes.com/vangogh-image-quotes/41/77/Quotation-Thomas-Paine-A-body-of-men-holding-themselves-accountable-to-nobody-ought-41-77-41.jpg
    The Crisis in Accountability: At the core of every ill and injustice befalling society one can find at its roots a lack of #Accountability. Especially of those elected or appointed to public office. The Founding Fathers actually envisioned this problem. They enshrined in the #1stAmendment with the freedom of the press, and the right petition the government to redress grievances. They also mandated in #ArticleVI the #OathofOffice as a requirement to hold office or operate with the authority of government. This was intended to insure loyalty to the Constitution and place limits on the use of government power. All of these are failing. The media, where they are free to publish all that they wish have opted to be political. Holding accountable only that which does not fit their agenda and ignoring every other offense or injustice. Even inventing information not held in fact. Very little authentic ethical journalism. On the redress of grievances, there seems to have little interest in many quarters for justice. Citizens are treated as chattel. To be manipulated and used regardless of the promise made in the Constitution to "secure the Blessing of Liberty". How many can remember a time when those elected to public office or government and its bureaucracies were held liable with the burden of their inequities? The Oath to the Constitution should be the most solemn promise made by a public servant. It was designed to affirm trust in the institutions established. There are laws at every level requiring the oath. However, with possible exception of the UCMJ none of the laws proscribe what a violation of the oath entails nor any punishment for its violation. It has become a pro forma exercise holding no accountability. Thus we find ourselves with a government not accountable to the people. #TheCrisisInAccountability, #RedressGrievances, #TheMedia https://www.azquotes.com/vangogh-image-quotes/41/77/Quotation-Thomas-Paine-A-body-of-men-holding-themselves-accountable-to-nobody-ought-41-77-41.jpg
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • Diamond and Silk response to Jim Crow Joe Speech in PA

    Do you understand that the US #Government is #Censoring it's citizen's FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH?

    AND their 1stAmendment Rights to attend church!

    It is about time to show these elected #Criminals that THE PEOPLE run this f*cking country!!! NOT the #Communist pricks in #Congress!



    https://rumble.com/vk5oui-diamond-and-silk-response-to-jim-crow-joe-speech-in-pa.html
    Diamond and Silk response to Jim Crow Joe Speech in PA Do you understand that the US #Government is #Censoring it's citizen's FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH? AND their 1stAmendment Rights to attend church! It is about time to show these elected #Criminals that THE PEOPLE run this f*cking country!!! NOT the #Communist pricks in #Congress! https://rumble.com/vk5oui-diamond-and-silk-response-to-jim-crow-joe-speech-in-pa.html
    RUMBLE.COM
    Diamond and Silk response to Jim Crow Joe Speech in PA
    Diamond and Silk response to Jim Crow Joe Speech in PA
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Why isn't Trump on GAB???

    Like most other #Republican MORONS who are not on GAB there are people who claim #TRUTH and #Criticism amounts to "anti-Semitic"

    It's NOT OKAY for Republicans to censor TRUTH any more than it's okay for Democrats to censor people!!!

    #FreeSpeech is about the #1stAmendment!
    #GAB supports free speech, providing it is "legal speech"

    Some people don't care about actual free speech, they want SOMEBODY SILENCED! It won't ever happen on GAB!

    I've heard for years that GAB is anti-Semitic............ but I have been there for 3 years and have never came across anyone who was a problem!

    Having said that........criticizing a Jew or Israel is NOT being anti-Semitic!
    It seems that many people think that disagreeing with Jews or Israel is some kind of mortal sin............ HEY, they are just people just like me, nobody jumps up and down every time someone disagrees with me!!!

    There is a big difference in being an anti-Semite and pointing out Jewish hypocrisy! When you mention a Jewish person in a way that is not 100% positive many Republicans will jump on you like a Democrat when you talk about trans-people!

    Jews are no more special than I am, they can handle free speech

    https://tv.gab.com/channel/trunews/view/why-isnt-trump-on-gab-60bfdb2a41166810234d8809
    Why isn't Trump on GAB??? Like most other #Republican MORONS who are not on GAB there are people who claim #TRUTH and #Criticism amounts to "anti-Semitic" It's NOT OKAY for Republicans to censor TRUTH any more than it's okay for Democrats to censor people!!! #FreeSpeech is about the #1stAmendment! #GAB supports free speech, providing it is "legal speech" Some people don't care about actual free speech, they want SOMEBODY SILENCED! It won't ever happen on GAB! I've heard for years that GAB is anti-Semitic............ but I have been there for 3 years and have never came across anyone who was a problem! Having said that........criticizing a Jew or Israel is NOT being anti-Semitic! It seems that many people think that disagreeing with Jews or Israel is some kind of mortal sin............ HEY, they are just people just like me, nobody jumps up and down every time someone disagrees with me!!! There is a big difference in being an anti-Semite and pointing out Jewish hypocrisy! When you mention a Jewish person in a way that is not 100% positive many Republicans will jump on you like a Democrat when you talk about trans-people! Jews are no more special than I am, they can handle free speech https://tv.gab.com/channel/trunews/view/why-isnt-trump-on-gab-60bfdb2a41166810234d8809
    0 Comments 0 Shares


  • Supreme Court Rulings: What is Written And Forgotten, and What the Public is Told

    The public is often told by "Journalists" what a SCOTUS decision is and means. There are many nuances and gems hidden in those decisions that never make it into public awareness. This landmark ruling is an example.

    West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) - The Pledge of Allegiance Case

    Excerpts from the Opinion by Justice Robert H. Jackson

    "Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard."

    "It seems trite but necessary to say that the First Amendment to our Constitution was designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. Authority here is to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority."

    "But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."

    "If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us."

    #SupremeCourtOpinion, #1stAmendment, #1A

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/319/624%26gt%3B
    Supreme Court Rulings: What is Written And Forgotten, and What the Public is Told The public is often told by "Journalists" what a SCOTUS decision is and means. There are many nuances and gems hidden in those decisions that never make it into public awareness. This landmark ruling is an example. West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) - The Pledge of Allegiance Case Excerpts from the Opinion by Justice Robert H. Jackson "Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard." "It seems trite but necessary to say that the First Amendment to our Constitution was designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. Authority here is to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority." "But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order." "If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us." #SupremeCourtOpinion, #1stAmendment, #1A https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/319/624%26gt%3B
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Are We in a New Government System??? H.R. 1 <<< "For the People Act" Has nothing to do with the people and is Complete change of our governing system and Corporate Welfare. $1.9 Trillion dollars for the Elite,Politicians, and EU style Censorship. #Election #1stamendment #Corruption https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/democrats-hr1-for-people-unconstitutional-rep-byron-donalds
    Are We in a New Government System??? H.R. 1 <<< "For the People Act" Has nothing to do with the people and is Complete change of our governing system and Corporate Welfare. $1.9 Trillion dollars for the Elite,Politicians, and EU style Censorship. #Election #1stamendment #Corruption https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/democrats-hr1-for-people-unconstitutional-rep-byron-donalds
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Rep. Byron Donalds: Dems' For the People Act is really just for Democrats – here's why
    H.R. 1, also known as the For the People Act, is the Democrats' latest attempt to disregard the Constitution in their ruthless power grab in the form of "election reform."
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • #garygatehouse #purge #communistdemocrats #freedomofspeech #1stamendment
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/republicans-removed-virginia-house-committees-on-first-day-legislative-session
    #garygatehouse #purge #communistdemocrats #freedomofspeech #1stamendment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/republicans-removed-virginia-house-committees-on-first-day-legislative-session
    WWW.WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM
    Three Republicans removed from Virginia House committees on first day of legislative session
    On the opening day of Virginia’s legislative session, House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn, D-Fairfax, removed three Republicans from their committee roles because they sent a letter to Vice President Mike Pence urging him to nullify the commonwealth’s presidential election results.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • #garygatehouse #freedomofspeech #america #iloveamerica #communistdemocrats #presidentrump #leftist #secretagentman #washingtondc #congress #1stamendment
    https://secretagentdude.blogspot.com/2021/01/reprobate-communist-chuck-schumer-says.html
    #garygatehouse #freedomofspeech #america #iloveamerica #communistdemocrats #presidentrump #leftist #secretagentman #washingtondc #congress #1stamendment https://secretagentdude.blogspot.com/2021/01/reprobate-communist-chuck-schumer-says.html
    SECRETAGENTDUDE.BLOGSPOT.COM
    REPROBATE COMMUNIST CHUCK SCHUMER SAYS TRUMP A PATHOLOGICAL DICTATOR THAT USES PATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES
    REPROBATE COMMUNIST CHUCK SCHUMER SAYS TRUMP A PATHOLOGICAL DICTATOR THAT USES PATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES CHUCK SCHUMER NEVER HELD A REAL ...
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • The Crisis in Accountability: Prologue

    At the core of every ill and injustice befalling society one can find at its roots a lack of #Accountability. Especially of those elected or appointed to public office. The Founding Fathers actually envisioned this problem. They enshrined in the #1stAmendment with the freedom of the press, and the right petition the government to redress grievances. They also mandated in #ArticleVI the #OathofOffice as a requirement to hold office or operate with the authority of government. This was intended to insure loyalty to the Constitution and place limits on the use of government power. All of these are failing.

    The media where they are free to publish all that they wish. They have opted to be political. Holding only that which does not fit their agenda accountable and ignoring every other offense or injustice. Even inventing information not held in fact. Very little authentic ethical journalism. It cannot be about being informative.

    On the redress of grievances, the government seems to have little interest in many quarters for justice. Citizens are treated as chattel. To be manipulated and used regardless of the promise made in the Constitution to "secure the Blessings of Liberty". How many can remember a time when government was held with the burden of their inequities?

    The Oath to the Constitution should be the most solemn promise made by a public servant. It was designed to affirm trust in the institutions established. There are laws at every level requiring the oath. However, with possible exception of the UCMJ none of the laws proscribe what a violation of the oath entails nor any punishment for its violation. It has become a pro forma exercise holding no accountability.

    Thus we find ourselves with a government not accountable to the people.

    #TheCrisisInAccountability, #RedressGrievances, #TheMedia

    https://www.azquotes.com/vangogh-image-quotes/41/77/Quotation-Thomas-Paine-A-body-of-men-holding-themselves-accountable-to-nobody-ought-41-77-41.jpg

    https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
    The Crisis in Accountability: Prologue At the core of every ill and injustice befalling society one can find at its roots a lack of #Accountability. Especially of those elected or appointed to public office. The Founding Fathers actually envisioned this problem. They enshrined in the #1stAmendment with the freedom of the press, and the right petition the government to redress grievances. They also mandated in #ArticleVI the #OathofOffice as a requirement to hold office or operate with the authority of government. This was intended to insure loyalty to the Constitution and place limits on the use of government power. All of these are failing. The media where they are free to publish all that they wish. They have opted to be political. Holding only that which does not fit their agenda accountable and ignoring every other offense or injustice. Even inventing information not held in fact. Very little authentic ethical journalism. It cannot be about being informative. On the redress of grievances, the government seems to have little interest in many quarters for justice. Citizens are treated as chattel. To be manipulated and used regardless of the promise made in the Constitution to "secure the Blessings of Liberty". How many can remember a time when government was held with the burden of their inequities? The Oath to the Constitution should be the most solemn promise made by a public servant. It was designed to affirm trust in the institutions established. There are laws at every level requiring the oath. However, with possible exception of the UCMJ none of the laws proscribe what a violation of the oath entails nor any punishment for its violation. It has become a pro forma exercise holding no accountability. Thus we find ourselves with a government not accountable to the people. #TheCrisisInAccountability, #RedressGrievances, #TheMedia https://www.azquotes.com/vangogh-image-quotes/41/77/Quotation-Thomas-Paine-A-body-of-men-holding-themselves-accountable-to-nobody-ought-41-77-41.jpg https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
    2
    5 Comments 1 Shares
  • Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (c)(1, 2) grants "platforms" broad discretion. What is the real question here? Are users of a platform "entitled" to the use of that platform? Are they paying for that use (buying, exchanging value for value) or is it offered gratis to any who wishes to use it? Is the platform provider "obligated" to offer the service? Under the 1st Amendment, citizens "Are Entitled" to express (say/have) any opinion they wish (generally). Does the 1st Amendment guarantee the right to be heard, not be offended, or disagreed with? Each "Platform" is like private property where they are offering free use of a whistle. The private property owner gets to decide who comes in to use that whistle. Do we want government to regulate that private property and how the whistle will be used? How is government doing now with all the authorities it does have? "Who is John Galt?"
    #Section230, #1A, #1stAmendment, #Regulation #WhoIsJohnGalt

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
    Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (c)(1, 2) grants "platforms" broad discretion. What is the real question here? Are users of a platform "entitled" to the use of that platform? Are they paying for that use (buying, exchanging value for value) or is it offered gratis to any who wishes to use it? Is the platform provider "obligated" to offer the service? Under the 1st Amendment, citizens "Are Entitled" to express (say/have) any opinion they wish (generally). Does the 1st Amendment guarantee the right to be heard, not be offended, or disagreed with? Each "Platform" is like private property where they are offering free use of a whistle. The private property owner gets to decide who comes in to use that whistle. Do we want government to regulate that private property and how the whistle will be used? How is government doing now with all the authorities it does have? "Who is John Galt?" #Section230, #1A, #1stAmendment, #Regulation #WhoIsJohnGalt https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
    0 Comments 0 Shares
No data to show
No data to show
No data to show
No data to show
No data to show
Sponsored