https://tv.gab.com/channel/shannonalexander/view/gab-vs-gettr-61eb649d8f25889e2084c1e0

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/21/new-jersey-healthcare-workers-must-get-booster-face-being-fired/ From NFIB v. OSHA (2022) decision. Except instead of mandating vaccines, can the regulation used to require vaccination be used to stop them. Consider that the 'Vaccines' being untested for safety might pose a greater danger than the virus. which takes the decision back to an OSHA regulation. 29 U. S. C. §651 “that employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from Cite as: 595 U. S. ____ (2022) new hazards,” and (2) that the “emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger.” Quote extracted from the NFIB v. OSHA Decision. "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf"

Jan 6 protestors are being held and dying (without bail) for essentially taking selfies in the capitol building. Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." There was no evidence of rebellion on Jan. 6 and the only violence perpetrated was by law enforcement. Interestingly, illegal aliens invading the United States are granted in effect Habeas Corpus but peaceful demonstrators are not. For the record. This is the only line in the Constitution that even mentions "public Safety". 6th Amendment "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." 5th Amendment "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." 8th Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. 14th Amendment, Section 1 All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. If there was ever a reason to demand and the right of Habeas Corpus it is in the ability to make a legal defense guaranteed by the Bill of Rights without government interference. One should never be held indefinitely. Especially without trial, grand jury indictment or without legal representation. Title 18, Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law All court case (stare decisis) precedence on Habeas Corpus needs to be reviewed and challenged. This is fundamental to maintenance of justice. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/video-crowd-boos-yells-need-rino-dan-crenshaw-gives-lame-excuse-hasnt-helped-jan-6th-detainees-says-performance/?utm_source=Gab&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

How many EUA's does it take to rescind the EUA's? The reason there are all these Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) solutions is because there is a created 'Perception' that there is no 'Therapy' for COVID-19. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have been attacked and disavowed because they are a 'Therapy' solution that is sold generically. EUA's allow the traditional safety studies to be bypassed. It is a cost savings for the pharmaceuticals. They can get product to market without the traditional safety protocols and trial regimes. The EUA also provides liability protection. Thus violating the 1st Amendment "to petition the government for a redress of grievances". Translated: Identifying 'safe' therapy for COVID-19 should effectively rescind the EUA's. Historically. FDA has pulled every drug that has resulted in up to 25 deaths. Why are the mRNA gene therapy drugs still available under EUA? Shouldn't a physician still need to approve the use of these gene therapy's given how dangerous they are? It is EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION. Not general public use. From the linked FDA website: During a public health emergency, the FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are NO ADEQUATE, APPROVED, 'AND' AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES. Also Note: "UNAPPROVED medical products, or UNAPPROVED uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases" Why hasn't Ivermectin or Hydroxychoroquine been granted an EUA for COVID-19? https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/faqs-emergency-use-authorizations-euas-medical-devices-during-covid-19-pandemic #Vaccines, #Mandates, #EUA, #Invermectin, #Hydroxychloroquine

COVID-19: Missing on all the dialog on herd immunity and immunity generated from having recovered from contracting the virus is general natural immunity. From the Article: “Our team also tested uninfected healthy individuals and found SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in more than 50 percent of them. This could be due to cross-reactive immunity obtained from exposure to other coronaviruses, such as those causing the common cold, or presently unknown animal coronaviruses. It is important to understand if this could explain why some individuals are able to better control the infection,” said Professor Antonio Bertoletti, from Duke-NUS’ Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) program, who is the corresponding author of this study. https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-uncover-evidence-that-a-level-of-pre-existing-covid-19-sars-cov-2-immunity-is-present-in-the-general-population/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z

COVID-19: Missing on all the dialog on herd immunity and immunity generated from having recovered from contracting the virus is general natural immunity. From the Article Below: “Our team also tested uninfected healthy individuals and found SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in more than 50 percent of them. This could be due to cross-reactive immunity obtained from exposure to other coronaviruses, such as those causing the common cold, or presently unknown animal coronaviruses. It is important to understand if this could explain why some individuals are able to better control the infection,” said Professor Antonio Bertoletti, from Duke-NUS’ Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) program, who is the corresponding author of this study. https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-uncover-evidence-that-a-level-of-pre-existing-covid-19-sars-cov-2-immunity-is-present-in-the-general-population/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z #COVID, #NaturalImmunity

Should every state in the union (Republic) adopt Ohio's stance on medical rights for its citizens? Also related is the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution. Something to discuss with your state elected officials at every level. Article I, Section 21 | Preservation of the freedom to choose health care and health care coverage Ohio Constitution Article I Bill of Rights Effective: 2011 (A) No federal, state, or local law or rule shall compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in a health care system. (B) No federal, state, or local law or rule shall prohibit the purchase or sale of health care or health insurance. (C) No federal, state, or local law or rule shall impose a penalty or fine for the sale or purchase of health care or health insurance. (D) This section does not affect laws or rules in effect as of March 19, 2010; affect which services a health care provider or hospital is required to perform or provide; affect terms and conditions of government employment; or affect any laws calculated to deter fraud or punish wrongdoing in the health care industry. (E) As used in this Section, (1) "Compel" includes the levying of penalties or fines. (2) "Health care system" means any public or private entity or program whose function or purpose includes the management of, processing of, enrollment of individuals for, or payment for, in full or in part, health care services, health care data, or health care information for its participants. (3) "Penalty or fine" means any civil or criminal penalty or fine, tax, salary or wage withholding or surcharge or any named fee established by law or rule by a government established, created, or controlled agency that is used to punish or discourage the exercise of rights protected under this section. "https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-constitution/number-not-found/section-1.21" "https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/ninth_amendment" "https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment"

The Crisis in Accountability: At the core of every ill and injustice befalling society one can find at its roots a lack of #Accountability. Especially of those elected or appointed to public office. The Founding Fathers actually envisioned this problem. They enshrined in the #1stAmendment with the freedom of the press, and the right petition the government to redress grievances. They also mandated in #ArticleVI the #OathofOffice as a requirement to hold office or operate with the authority of government. This was intended to insure loyalty to the Constitution and place limits on the use of government power. All of these are failing. The media, where they are free to publish all that they wish have opted to be political. Holding accountable only that which does not fit their agenda and ignoring every other offense or injustice. Even inventing information not held in fact. Very little authentic ethical journalism. On the redress of grievances, there seems to have little interest in many quarters for justice. Citizens are treated as chattel. To be manipulated and used regardless of the promise made in the Constitution to "secure the Blessing of Liberty". How many can remember a time when those elected to public office or government and its bureaucracies were held liable with the burden of their inequities? The Oath to the Constitution should be the most solemn promise made by a public servant. It was designed to affirm trust in the institutions established. There are laws at every level requiring the oath. However, with possible exception of the UCMJ none of the laws proscribe what a violation of the oath entails nor any punishment for its violation. It has become a pro forma exercise holding no accountability. Thus we find ourselves with a government not accountable to the people. #TheCrisisInAccountability, #RedressGrievances, #TheMedia https://www.azquotes.com/vangogh-image-quotes/41/77/Quotation-Thomas-Paine-A-body-of-men-holding-themselves-accountable-to-nobody-ought-41-77-41.jpg