• https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nearly-40-of-cars-financed-since-2022-are-underwater/
    https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nearly-40-of-cars-financed-since-2022-are-underwater/
    REPUBLICBROADCASTING.ORG
    Nearly 40% Of Cars Financed Since 2022 Are Underwater
    source:?? zerohedge BY TYLER DURDEN MONDAY, NOV 18, 2024 – 11:45 AM The delayed day of reckoning has arrived for millions of Americans who purchased vehicles during the pandemic auto boom. Man???
    Haha
    1
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 94 Vue
  • Get premium molecular hydrogen water! Use promo code TIM and save $500 but only for a limited time during this Black Friday event! https://shop.holyhydrogen.com/TIM #Everyone
    Get premium molecular hydrogen water! Use promo code TIM and save $500 but only for a limited time during this Black Friday event! https://shop.holyhydrogen.com/TIM #Everyone
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 114 Vue
  • OUR DAILY OLDIES: A NEW YORK CLASSIC, WATERMELON MAN BY MONGO SANTAMARIA ORCHESTRA (CLICK ON THE LINK, NOT ON THE PHOTO)-----> https://wimkin.com/video/play/434525
    OUR DAILY OLDIES: A NEW YORK CLASSIC, WATERMELON MAN BY MONGO SANTAMARIA ORCHESTRA (CLICK ON THE LINK, NOT ON THE PHOTO)-----> https://wimkin.com/video/play/434525
    0 Commentaires 1 Parts 131 Vue
  • John Chapter Seven - Rivers Of Living Water

    https://pilgrimdevotions.com/john-chapter-seven-rivers-of-living-water/
    John Chapter Seven - Rivers Of Living Water https://pilgrimdevotions.com/john-chapter-seven-rivers-of-living-water/
    PILGRIMDEVOTIONS.COM
    John Chapter Seven – Rivers Of Living Water
    John 7:37–38 (ESV) 37 On the last day of the feast, the great day, Jesus stood up and cried out, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’ ”
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 88 Vue

  • Occam’s Razor

    Exclusion for Work Performed by Insured Defeats Claim for Construction Defects
    Post 4935

    Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gT_NsMHv, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gqkPHYbp and at https://lnkd.in/gEEXkUe3, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts.

    The question presented to the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals was whether a contractor’s CGL insurance policy covers general damage to a non-defective part of the contractor’s project resulting from a subcontractor’s defective work on a different part of that project.

    APPLICATION OF OCCAM’S RAZOR

    The analysis technique that proposes that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Applying Massachusetts law, the district court concluded that Admiral had no duty to defend Tocci in Admiral Insurance Company, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Great American Assurance Company v. Tocci Building Corporation, Tocci Residential LLC, John L. Tocci, Sr., No. 22-1462, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit (November 8, 2024) and Tocci appealed.

    From 2013 to 2016, Tocci was the construction manager for an apartment project owned by Toll JM EB Residential Urban Renewal LLC (“Toll”). There were several work quality issues and delays on the project, and Toll eventually terminated Tocci in March 2016 for alleged mismanagement of the project.

    Toll sued with allegations regarding instances of defective work leading to property damage. The allegations included defective work by Tocci’s subcontractors resulting in various instances of property damage to non-defective work on the project, including (1) damage to sheetrock resulting from faulty roof work; (2) mold formation resulting from inadequate sheathing and water getting into the building; and (3) damage to a concrete slab, wood framing, and underground pipes resulting from soil settlement due to improper backfill and soil compaction.

    DUTY TO DEFEND

    Tocci sought defense and indemnity coverage under the Admiral insurance policies. Admiral denied coverage.

    The district court granted Admiral’s motion on duty to defend because the damage alleged in Toll’s complaint did not qualify as “property damage” as defined in the policy because the allegations consisted entirely of damage at Tocci’s own project.

    ANALYSIS

    The First Circuit considered three steps to the coverage analysis: (1) Do the damages alleged in the action fall within the scope of coverage?; (2) if so, do the exclusions to coverage apply?; and (3) if so, do any exceptions to the exclusions apply?

    The First Circuit noted that there is a sharp split of authority on whether damage to non-defective work resulting from a subcontractor’s defective work constitutes “property damage” or is caused by an “occurrence.” The First Circuit decided to avoid the issues of what constitutes “property damage” by focusing on the exclusions which were sufficient to resolve the complete dispute.

    THE HOLDING

    There are two “Damage to Property” exclusions that provide that there is no coverage for “property damage” to: that particular part of real property on which you or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on your behalf are performing operations, if the ‘property damage’ arises out of those operations; or that particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired or replaced because “your work” was incorrectly performed on it.

    The First Circuit, applying Occam’s Razor, focused its analysis on the exclusion it concluded covers the allegations in the Toll complaint. Since the complaint alleges damage resulting from Tocci’s “incorrectly performed” work on the entire project “[t]hat particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired or replaced because ‘[Tocci’s] work’ was incorrectly performed on it” refers to the entirety of the project where Tocci was the general contractor charged with supervising and managing the project as a whole.

    Therefore, the First Circuit concluded that Admiral met its burden of establishing that the Toll action only alleges damage falling within the exclusion and that there was no exception to that exclusion that applied.

    ZALMA OPINION

    This is a case of a court applying Occam’s Razor, by picking an easy and obvious solution – the application of an exclusion – and avoiding the problem of different court rulings on coverage about “property damage” and “occurence.” Since the exclusion clearly applied there was no duty to defend.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

    Subscribe to my substack at https://lnkd.in/gmmzUVBy
    Occam’s Razor Exclusion for Work Performed by Insured Defeats Claim for Construction Defects Post 4935 Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gT_NsMHv, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gqkPHYbp and at https://lnkd.in/gEEXkUe3, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. The question presented to the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals was whether a contractor’s CGL insurance policy covers general damage to a non-defective part of the contractor’s project resulting from a subcontractor’s defective work on a different part of that project. APPLICATION OF OCCAM’S RAZOR The analysis technique that proposes that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Applying Massachusetts law, the district court concluded that Admiral had no duty to defend Tocci in Admiral Insurance Company, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Great American Assurance Company v. Tocci Building Corporation, Tocci Residential LLC, John L. Tocci, Sr., No. 22-1462, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit (November 8, 2024) and Tocci appealed. From 2013 to 2016, Tocci was the construction manager for an apartment project owned by Toll JM EB Residential Urban Renewal LLC (“Toll”). There were several work quality issues and delays on the project, and Toll eventually terminated Tocci in March 2016 for alleged mismanagement of the project. Toll sued with allegations regarding instances of defective work leading to property damage. The allegations included defective work by Tocci’s subcontractors resulting in various instances of property damage to non-defective work on the project, including (1) damage to sheetrock resulting from faulty roof work; (2) mold formation resulting from inadequate sheathing and water getting into the building; and (3) damage to a concrete slab, wood framing, and underground pipes resulting from soil settlement due to improper backfill and soil compaction. DUTY TO DEFEND Tocci sought defense and indemnity coverage under the Admiral insurance policies. Admiral denied coverage. The district court granted Admiral’s motion on duty to defend because the damage alleged in Toll’s complaint did not qualify as “property damage” as defined in the policy because the allegations consisted entirely of damage at Tocci’s own project. ANALYSIS The First Circuit considered three steps to the coverage analysis: (1) Do the damages alleged in the action fall within the scope of coverage?; (2) if so, do the exclusions to coverage apply?; and (3) if so, do any exceptions to the exclusions apply? The First Circuit noted that there is a sharp split of authority on whether damage to non-defective work resulting from a subcontractor’s defective work constitutes “property damage” or is caused by an “occurrence.” The First Circuit decided to avoid the issues of what constitutes “property damage” by focusing on the exclusions which were sufficient to resolve the complete dispute. THE HOLDING There are two “Damage to Property” exclusions that provide that there is no coverage for “property damage” to: that particular part of real property on which you or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on your behalf are performing operations, if the ‘property damage’ arises out of those operations; or that particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired or replaced because “your work” was incorrectly performed on it. The First Circuit, applying Occam’s Razor, focused its analysis on the exclusion it concluded covers the allegations in the Toll complaint. Since the complaint alleges damage resulting from Tocci’s “incorrectly performed” work on the entire project “[t]hat particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired or replaced because ‘[Tocci’s] work’ was incorrectly performed on it” refers to the entirety of the project where Tocci was the general contractor charged with supervising and managing the project as a whole. Therefore, the First Circuit concluded that Admiral met its burden of establishing that the Toll action only alleges damage falling within the exclusion and that there was no exception to that exclusion that applied. ZALMA OPINION This is a case of a court applying Occam’s Razor, by picking an easy and obvious solution – the application of an exclusion – and avoiding the problem of different court rulings on coverage about “property damage” and “occurence.” Since the exclusion clearly applied there was no duty to defend. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk Subscribe to my substack at https://lnkd.in/gmmzUVBy
    LNKD.IN
    Occam’s Razor
    Exclusion for Work Performed by Insured Defeats Claim for Construction Defects Post 4935 Posted on November 18, 2024 by Barry Zalma See the full video at https://rumble.com/v5po3z8-occams-razor.
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 424 Vue
  • Save your clothes! Save your hot water! Save electricity and save your money! LaundryPure cleans clothes better in cold water WITHOUT detergent! Get yours today! Use promo code TIM and save! https://www.healthytechs.com/laundry-pure #Everyone
    Save your clothes! Save your hot water! Save electricity and save your money! LaundryPure cleans clothes better in cold water WITHOUT detergent! Get yours today! Use promo code TIM and save! https://www.healthytechs.com/laundry-pure #Everyone
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 125 Vue
  • The Democrats are on warp speed to destroy our food, ranches, farms, air and water. By the time Trump takes office, AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED AND THE DEMORATS WILL BLAME TRUMP FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS
    THIS IS WHAT THE MEDIA IS WAITING FOR.
    The Democrats are on warp speed to destroy our food, ranches, farms, air and water. By the time Trump takes office, AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED AND THE DEMORATS WILL BLAME TRUMP FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS THIS IS WHAT THE MEDIA IS WAITING FOR.
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 217 Vue
  • Dead In The Water - Maritime Admiralty UCC

    EVERYONE is stuck "in the matrix" because a large percentage of the world's population simply REFUSE to educate themselves, and to throw off the brainwashing they have endured!

    These are the people who call you a "conspiracy theorist" just like the #CIA created the term for them to do because they don't want those people finding out the #Truth!

    The entire system is based on "Maritime Admiralty Law" and the ONLY REASON that you are within it's #Jurisdiction is because you have not challenged it and made your stand under COMMON LAW!

    COMMON LAW is the "Law of the LAND" (Like the Constitution)
    "Maritime Admiralty Law" is the "Law of the SEA" and Commerce!

    UCC etc.... BUT IT'S NOT APPLICABLE TO LIVING MEN & WOMEN!

    The criminals of the state created YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE, which is a "Legal Fiction".... A #Corporation... and that corporation falls under the jurisdiction of maritime law!

    BUT YOU DON'T!
    UNLESS you "represent yourself" as that legal fiction!
    Which everyone does because they know no better!

    And when you TRY to tell them they dismiss you
    and call you a conspiracy theorist or something worse!

    The knowledge of the ages IS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS!

    But you'll refuse to do any research whatsoever because
    YOU THINK THAT YOU KNOW IT ALL ALREADY!

    https://youtu.be/CZIRAEraPIA
    Dead In The Water - Maritime Admiralty UCC EVERYONE is stuck "in the matrix" because a large percentage of the world's population simply REFUSE to educate themselves, and to throw off the brainwashing they have endured! These are the people who call you a "conspiracy theorist" just like the #CIA created the term for them to do because they don't want those people finding out the #Truth! The entire system is based on "Maritime Admiralty Law" and the ONLY REASON that you are within it's #Jurisdiction is because you have not challenged it and made your stand under COMMON LAW! COMMON LAW is the "Law of the LAND" (Like the Constitution) "Maritime Admiralty Law" is the "Law of the SEA" and Commerce! UCC etc.... BUT IT'S NOT APPLICABLE TO LIVING MEN & WOMEN! The criminals of the state created YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE, which is a "Legal Fiction".... A #Corporation... and that corporation falls under the jurisdiction of maritime law! BUT YOU DON'T! UNLESS you "represent yourself" as that legal fiction! Which everyone does because they know no better! And when you TRY to tell them they dismiss you and call you a conspiracy theorist or something worse! The knowledge of the ages IS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS! But you'll refuse to do any research whatsoever because YOU THINK THAT YOU KNOW IT ALL ALREADY! https://youtu.be/CZIRAEraPIA
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 438 Vue
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/kate-shemirani-on-water-asthma-video/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/kate-shemirani-on-water-asthma-video/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Kate Shemirani: On Water & Asthma (Video) - The Washington Standard
    In this episode, nurse and nutritionist Kate Shemirani joins me in an enlightening education of what asthma is and what is behind it, and tips for why water aids in getting rid of it. We’ll also look to Scripture and how God Himself structured the waters and everything that was ...
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 134 Vue
  • https://settingbrushfires.com/kate-shemirani-on-water-asthma-video/
    https://settingbrushfires.com/kate-shemirani-on-water-asthma-video/
    SETTINGBRUSHFIRES.COM
    Kate Shemirani: On Water & Asthma (Video) - Setting Brushfires
    In this episode, nurse and nutritionist Kate Shemirani joins me in an enlightening education of what asthma is and what is behind it, and tips for why water aids in getting rid of it. We’ll also look to Scripture and how God Himself structured the waters and everything that was ...
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 132 Vue
Plus de résultats
Commandité

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here