FORMER PFIZER EMPLOYEE CONFIRMS POISON GRAPHENE OXIDE IN VACCINE
Documents released from #Vaccine Manufacturers deleted #Chinese database
“My name is Fred Corbin. I’m a professional race car engineer. I have a background in nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons studies. And I also have civil engineering, aerospace engineering, and marine biology as core related subjects of study. I came here this afternoon, not only to represent the people of Barbados but to bring a certain educational perspective to what a tremendous amount of people have been asking me with the kind of background that I have in understanding what is actually going on. So I have one question, which I don’t want to respond to. I don’t really need a response to the question. And then I have a series of points I would like to back up that question with. And I’d like to address this question directly to the chief medical officer and my lady over there in the corner. I’d like to ask the chief medical officer please to provide evidence for the public education that describes the isolation of a SARS COV 2 virus directly from a sample taken from a deceased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material, ie monkey kidney cells, aka veero cells, liver cancer cells…
Addressing the situation where a lot of people believe that the SARS COV 2 is a novel coronavirus. SARS COV 2 is a subclade of the beta Coronavirus family. And how do we know this? Simply because we did cross referencing via the international (unintelligible) reviews, and then correlated those with actual genetic sequences and reviewed them against the patent records that were available, and it is apparent that the declaration of a novel Coronavirus is a fallacy. There are several coronaviruses sequences that have been uploaded, but there was not one single identified novel Coronavirus, none at all. Furthermore, patents and Coronavirus sequences were sought as early as 1999. Up until 1999 patenting of Coronavirus sequencing was uniquely isolated to Veterinary Science. The first vaccine patent for Coronavirus was sought by Pfizer and more specifically, the patenting of the s spike protein. The same thing we’ve allegedly only just discovered.” – Fred Corbin
“First patent application was filed January 28, 2000. 21 years ago. There is nothing new about this and in support of that, we have this document. This is the evidence supporting them. This is the evidence that shows there is no, that SARS is no naturally evolved virus. It’s not a naturally evolved virus. No one has ever produced is a safe and effective vaccine against a Coronavirus. It has never been done and it never will be done simply because it’s not possible. Therefore, I go on, the co-receptor-dependent facial psychic general method of action for those who don’t understand that. Okay, this is science talk. Okay, I’m following the science now. So bear with me. The general method of action for infectivity and pathogenicity. In other words, this is what makes it so deadly. Okay, SARS COV 2 appears to be specifically related to cumulative charge resulting from inserts placed on the surface of the spike receptor-binding domain. What does that tell you? This is a lab-engineered phenomenon. And how do we know that? We can back up that simply because we have a document produced and very kindly submitted to us by our friends in the CCP Intelligence Service who gave us this document where it says two mutations were critical for bat to human transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Coronavirus. This is where Astra Zeneca and some of the other vaccine manufacturers get their vector from. It’s just there’s one small problem, is that it outlines direct collusion between the Communist Chinese Party and who those who were building it. We recognize HKU4 spike, aiming to build its capacity to mediate viral entry into human cells. To this end, we introduce two single mutations. ‘WE’ introduced two single mutations. Not they, we. S76R and S76A into HKU4 spike. The S76R mutation was expected to restore the HPC model.” – Fred Corbin
“When I challenge you, with regard to your ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine, I had good reason to do so. Because I hold in my hands an internal document from Pfizer laboratories, which was given to us by a very special person who we have contact with, called reverse engineering, the source code of the BioNTech Pfizer, SARS COV 2 vaccine and this is very, very critical, because it outlines the chemical and the biological processes, which were very, very carefully manipulated, in order to be able to produce an mRNA that also contains a very, very dangerous toxin to the human body. Do you know what that toxin is? That toxin is called graphene oxide. And every single one of these vaccines in a 30-milligram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier powder particles within the mRNA sequence. 15 billion nanoparticles. And let me tell you how graphene oxide works when it gets into the body, because when the spike protein then binds itself to our blood cells and so on. Graphene oxide then starts to build a structure and this is why we have people with blood clots and we have people with heart failure, sudden heart failure and so on because graphenes oxide is building structure.” – Fred Corbin
“I just want to make sure that everybody understands that Barbados is actually a signatory to the Convention on the prohibition and development and production in the stockpiling of bacteriological and toxin weapons. And we signed that treaty on the 16th of July 1976. However, the patent databases that we’ve accessed proves that COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are in fact a bioweapon. And how do we support that? Because we have a copy of the mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases that tell us everything. Thank you very much.”
FORMER PFIZER EMPLOYEE CONFIRMS POISON GRAPHENE OXIDE IN VACCINE
Documents released from #Vaccine Manufacturers deleted #Chinese database
“My name is Fred Corbin. I’m a professional race car engineer. I have a background in nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons studies. And I also have civil engineering, aerospace engineering, and marine biology as core related subjects of study. I came here this afternoon, not only to represent the people of Barbados but to bring a certain educational perspective to what a tremendous amount of people have been asking me with the kind of background that I have in understanding what is actually going on. So I have one question, which I don’t want to respond to. I don’t really need a response to the question. And then I have a series of points I would like to back up that question with. And I’d like to address this question directly to the chief medical officer and my lady over there in the corner. I’d like to ask the chief medical officer please to provide evidence for the public education that describes the isolation of a SARS COV 2 virus directly from a sample taken from a deceased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material, ie monkey kidney cells, aka veero cells, liver cancer cells…
Addressing the situation where a lot of people believe that the SARS COV 2 is a novel coronavirus. SARS COV 2 is a subclade of the beta Coronavirus family. And how do we know this? Simply because we did cross referencing via the international (unintelligible) reviews, and then correlated those with actual genetic sequences and reviewed them against the patent records that were available, and it is apparent that the declaration of a novel Coronavirus is a fallacy. There are several coronaviruses sequences that have been uploaded, but there was not one single identified novel Coronavirus, none at all. Furthermore, patents and Coronavirus sequences were sought as early as 1999. Up until 1999 patenting of Coronavirus sequencing was uniquely isolated to Veterinary Science. The first vaccine patent for Coronavirus was sought by Pfizer and more specifically, the patenting of the s spike protein. The same thing we’ve allegedly only just discovered.” – Fred Corbin
“First patent application was filed January 28, 2000. 21 years ago. There is nothing new about this and in support of that, we have this document. This is the evidence supporting them. This is the evidence that shows there is no, that SARS is no naturally evolved virus. It’s not a naturally evolved virus. No one has ever produced is a safe and effective vaccine against a Coronavirus. It has never been done and it never will be done simply because it’s not possible. Therefore, I go on, the co-receptor-dependent facial psychic general method of action for those who don’t understand that. Okay, this is science talk. Okay, I’m following the science now. So bear with me. The general method of action for infectivity and pathogenicity. In other words, this is what makes it so deadly. Okay, SARS COV 2 appears to be specifically related to cumulative charge resulting from inserts placed on the surface of the spike receptor-binding domain. What does that tell you? This is a lab-engineered phenomenon. And how do we know that? We can back up that simply because we have a document produced and very kindly submitted to us by our friends in the CCP Intelligence Service who gave us this document where it says two mutations were critical for bat to human transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Coronavirus. This is where Astra Zeneca and some of the other vaccine manufacturers get their vector from. It’s just there’s one small problem, is that it outlines direct collusion between the Communist Chinese Party and who those who were building it. We recognize HKU4 spike, aiming to build its capacity to mediate viral entry into human cells. To this end, we introduce two single mutations. ‘WE’ introduced two single mutations. Not they, we. S76R and S76A into HKU4 spike. The S76R mutation was expected to restore the HPC model.” – Fred Corbin
“When I challenge you, with regard to your ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine, I had good reason to do so. Because I hold in my hands an internal document from Pfizer laboratories, which was given to us by a very special person who we have contact with, called reverse engineering, the source code of the BioNTech Pfizer, SARS COV 2 vaccine and this is very, very critical, because it outlines the chemical and the biological processes, which were very, very carefully manipulated, in order to be able to produce an mRNA that also contains a very, very dangerous toxin to the human body. Do you know what that toxin is? That toxin is called graphene oxide. And every single one of these vaccines in a 30-milligram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier powder particles within the mRNA sequence. 15 billion nanoparticles. And let me tell you how graphene oxide works when it gets into the body, because when the spike protein then binds itself to our blood cells and so on. Graphene oxide then starts to build a structure and this is why we have people with blood clots and we have people with heart failure, sudden heart failure and so on because graphenes oxide is building structure.” – Fred Corbin
“I just want to make sure that everybody understands that Barbados is actually a signatory to the Convention on the prohibition and development and production in the stockpiling of bacteriological and toxin weapons. And we signed that treaty on the 16th of July 1976. However, the patent databases that we’ve accessed proves that COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are in fact a bioweapon. And how do we support that? Because we have a copy of the mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases that tell us everything. Thank you very much.”
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek