GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: I DON'T KNOW HOW TO START AND MAKE IT SHORT. COMMUNISM AND FASCISM ARE BOTH TOTALITARIAN CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS. IN COMMUNISM, THE GOVERNMENT OWNS THE MEDIA AND, OF COURSE, NEWS ARE THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE ABOUT WHATEVER THE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO INFORM. IN FASCISM, THE MEDIA MAY BE OWNED BY PRIVATE CITIZENS OR CORPORATIONS BUT STILL HEAVILY INFLUENCED AND GUIDED BY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES THAT REGULATE AND CONTROL THE FLOW OF INFORMATION. IT'S NO SECRET HOW AGENCIES LIKE THE C.I.A. AND THE F.B.I. HAVE BEEN TELLING SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS WHAT TO ALLOW AND WHAT TO CENSOR. LUCKILY, IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND INDEPENDENT MEDIA, SO THE TRUTH ALWAYS FILTRATE SOMEHOW TO REACH THE PUBLIC. WE HEAR NEWS ABOUT UKRAINE BUT WE NEVER SEE LIVE REPORTS FROM THE WAR ZONE. WE MAY OCCASIONALLY SEE SOME IMAGES OF DESTRUCTION BUT THE MEDIA WILL TELL US "IT WAS THE RUSSIANS COMMITTING GENOCIDE AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE". YESTERDAY WE REMEMBERED GONZALO LIRA, AN AMERICAN BLOGGER AND COMMENTATOR WHO WAS LIVING IN UKRAINE AND SAYING THINGS IN HIS PODCASTS THAT THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT DIDN'T LIKE. LIRA DIED UNDER GOVERNMENT CUSTODY IN A UKRAINIAN JAIL. TODAY, WE FEATURE EVA BARTLETT, A CANADIAN WAR CORRESPONDENT WHO HAVE BEEN REPORTING FROM THE WAR ZONE IN UKRAINE. ACTUALLY, SHE'S BEEN IN THE RUSSIAN SPEAKING PROVINCES OF UKRAINE THAT SEPARATED FROM THE KIEV GOVERNMENT AND JOINED RUSSIA. SHE SAID THAT IF SHE HAD BEEN IN THE AREA UNDER UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT CONTROL, SHE COULD'VE BEEN KILLED. THE UKRAINIAN NAZIS DO NOT HESITATE TO KILL JOURNALISTS. OF COURSE, YOU WON'T SEE EVA BARTLETT ON CNN, MSNBC OR FOX. JUST WATCH THE VIDEO.

Climate change indoctrination is happening because thousands of journalists are being directly funded to promote the lies, No level of compliance to their agenda will ever satisfy these hollow entities. To them, you'll always be a useless feeder overpopulating the planet and using too much carbon. Your children and children's children will always be a threat because their quests for depopulation and dominion over the Earth are aligned with Satan. https://newstarget.com/2024-06-16-satanic-billionaires-funding-journalists-promote-global-net-zero-depopulation-agenda.html

#Politics #fjb Watch: Deranged #JoeBiden Threatens to Throw Journalist’s Phone Before Aides Intervene https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-deranged-biden-threatens-to-throw-journalists-phone-before-aides-intervene/

https://americafirstreport.com/george-clooneys-foundation-to-issue-arrest-warrant-requests-for-journalists-who-say-nice-things-about-russia/

The report also includes such prominent American politicians and journalists as Sen. JD Vance, Sen. Rand Paul, Rep. Matt Gaetz, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Rep. Jim Jordan, and Col. Douglas Macgregor. https://ronpaulinstitute.org/us-backed-ukrainian-publication-releases-new-enemies-list-including-donald-trump-ron-paul-ron-paul-institute-hundreds-more/

https://www.rebelnews.com/palestinian_journalists_holding_israeli_hostages_gaza_strip_hamas

Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, per Yale Law Professor https://rumble.com/v508yni-supreme-court-may-prevent-irreparable-harm-to-trump-per-yale-law-professor.html Michael Shellenberger - Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, Says Influential Yale Law Professor . Liberal Constitutional law scholar Jed Rubenfeld says New York “hush money” case may violate Trump’s constitutional rights and that he would appeal to federal courts Over the last week, America’s leading legal scholars and journalists have explained that former president Donald Trump is now a convicted felon. A jury found Trump guilty of many crimes, including falsifying business records and interfering in an election. But according to an influential constitutional law scholar at Yale University, legal scholars and journalists got the story all wrong. Trump is not, in fact, a convicted felon. SEE VIDEO HERE - https://rumble.com/v501ur0-yale-law-profs-brilliant-plan-for-trump-legal-team-to-overturn-guilty-verdi.html “You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you,” explains Yale’s Jed Rubenfeld, “And the judge still has the power… to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal.” Rubenfeld acknowledges that “it's very likely that Judge [Juan] Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing, July 11.” But Trump’s lawyers can still sue New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Rubenfeld, “and ask the judge — the federal judge — for an emergency temporary restraining order, halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here.” Rubenfeld made his remarks in a video, and I reached him by phone. He elaborated on how the Supreme Court could rule on the case. “If Trump’s lawyers file in a federal district court, they would ask for TRO, Temporary Restraining Order, on an emergency basis,” he told Public. “The court would set a briefing schedule and ask for ‘hurry up’ schedule by July 11. If the court said, ‘No, we’re not issuing a TRO,’ you could appeal to the court of appeals. And then, whatever that court did, you could appeal to the Supreme Court.” Said Rubenfeld, “You could even go over the circuit court to the Supreme Court.” Rubenfeld is a law professor and does not work for the Trump campaign. He is most famous for his liberal positions on issues like affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Rosenfeld expressed concern over three potential violations of the Constitution by the New York state court. First, a felony conviction could cause “irreparable harm” to Trump and his effort to become president. Second, it could have been a case of “selective prosecution” by Bragg, who campaigned on convicting Trump. Third, the court may have violated Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights, which is that the accused must know what they are being accused of....

Behind the scenes video in Gaza shows a group of journalists filming a staged video with a young boy, playing the role of an air strike victim. After the cameras stop rolling, the men laugh and lift the boy up as he breaks out in a smile. https://pomf2.lain.la/f/nuzn5f2v.mp4

In the wake of the FDA settling a lawsuit brought against it for wantonly and aggressively smearing ivermectin, the agency has deleted its postings. That’s good, but we shouldn’t forget how egregiously it mischaracterized the drug, ignored copious evidence in its favor, and portrayed its proponents as dangerous crackpots. Prescribers who advocated for alternate treatments like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine were mocked online by America’s “trusted journalists” as being part of a “right-wing conspiracy” and labeled “hucksters.” Those who didn’t demure to the Covid mRNA or other Big Pharma treatment narratives were banned, fired, and spoken harshly about around the world and into the reaches of the stratosphere in what seemed like coordinated messaging. https://brownstone.org/articles/medical-elites-disgrace-over-ivermectin/

https://medforth.biz/bbc-journalists-fear-being-branded-racist-for-covering-negatives-of-immigration-report/