12 Influencers Who Called for Violence Against Trump, Called Him an ‘Existential Threat to Democracy’ https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/09/16/climate-hate-12-actors-journalists-influencers-compared-trump-hitler-second-assassination-attempt/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=ODI0LU1IVC0zMDQAAAGVnnzPKHQ_VlL-bTB3ttF5t02oN4ag7j9E2EK7o6BZGvYkPUQTs6dOOxYYpKQrJA8V6uPt-zmteeM2aLL3_cvSbbvcHi_Ijf3rL3E-dQixssF-ZJKAyQ Ahead of the second assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, many influential actors, journalists, and influencers warned that Trump is an “existential threat” to democracy, compared him to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, and suggested he or his supporters should face violent attacks. Some continued attacking Trump even after the first assassination attempt July 13. The New Tolerance Campaign, a nonprofit watchdog aimed at confronting “intolerance double standards” practiced by “establishment institutions, civil rights groups, universities, and socially conscious brands,” compiled a list of extreme rhetoric against Trump that may have contributed to the second assassination attempt. “New Tolerance Campaign research has shown two kinds of consistent and consistently charged rhetoric surrounding President Trump: insistence that his reelection would lead to the collapse of the country, and calls for the former president’s death,” Gregory T. Angelo, New Tolerance Campaign’s president, told The Daily Signal in a written statement Monday. (New Tolerance Campaign has taken to exposing extremism on the Left, to balance the impact of left-leaning groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center.)

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/13/exclusive-donald-trump-kamala-harris-will-not-sit-with-any-real-journalists-only-a-soft-democrat-interview/

ALREADY HERE IN AMERICA... What is going in in Venezuela and how did rigged election destroy millions of lives? Venezuelans tragic downfall was all because they trusted their politicians and journalists.

They look like a bunch of upstanding migrants assimilating into our culture. While these people are a problem, the main enemy is the journalists right here, who knows that the illegals are animals yet they protect them. https://conservativeus.com/sky-news-reporter-defends-riots-receives-brutal-dose-of-reality-as-migrant-mob-takes-over-birmingham-protest-coverage-what-happens-next-resembles-a-war-movie-scene/

FULL EVENT: Trump Gives Fiery Interview At National Association Of Black Journalists Convention Q&A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNSGTxDC2WQ Earlier today, former President Trump had a fiery question and answer event at the National Association of Black Journalists Convention in Chicago.

GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: YESTERDAY,(7/31/24) PRESIDENT TRUMP HAD A RALLY IN HARRISBURG, PA AND HIS SPEECH WAS ONE OF THE BEST EVER (IN MY OPINION) BUT THAT IS NOT THE NEWS. EARLIER IN THE DAY, BEFORE THE RALLY, HE WAS INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN A QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS SESSION AT THE 'NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK JOURNALISTS' IN CHICAGO. HE HAD TO WAIT A LONG TIME BECAUSE THE SOUND EQUIPMENT WERE NOT WORKING PROPERLY. WHEN HIS PARTICIPATION FINALLY STARTED, HE WAS FACING QUESTIONS FROM 3 BLACK LADIES FROM DIFFERENT MEDIA COMPANIES. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HARRIS FAULKNER OF FOX NEWS, THE OTHERS WERE AGGRESSIVE, RUDE, NASTY, DISRESPECTFUL AND MISTREATED HIM. THE OPENING QUESTION WAS NOT A QUESTION BUT A LONG STATEMENT ATTACKING THE PERSON BEING INTERVIEWED. AS USUAL, PRESIDENT TRUMP HANDLED THE SITUATION WITH RESPECT AND DIGNITY BUT WITH CLARITY IN HIS ANSWERS, FLIPPING THE ARGUMENTS. PRESIDENT TRUMP IS NEVER SCARE OF GOING INTO THE LIONS' DEN AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF A HOSTILE PANEL OR A HOSTILE AUDIENCE. IN FACT, THEY ABRUPTLY CUT IT SHORT WHEN UNEXPECTEDLY THE MAIN PANELIST STOPPED THE QUESTIONING AND SAID IT WAS THE END. AGAIN, TRUMP LEFT THE PLACE AS THE WINNER OF THE ARGUMENTS. JUDGE FOR YOURSELF.

GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: I DON'T KNOW HOW TO START AND MAKE IT SHORT. COMMUNISM AND FASCISM ARE BOTH TOTALITARIAN CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS. IN COMMUNISM, THE GOVERNMENT OWNS THE MEDIA AND, OF COURSE, NEWS ARE THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE ABOUT WHATEVER THE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO INFORM. IN FASCISM, THE MEDIA MAY BE OWNED BY PRIVATE CITIZENS OR CORPORATIONS BUT STILL HEAVILY INFLUENCED AND GUIDED BY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES THAT REGULATE AND CONTROL THE FLOW OF INFORMATION. IT'S NO SECRET HOW AGENCIES LIKE THE C.I.A. AND THE F.B.I. HAVE BEEN TELLING SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS WHAT TO ALLOW AND WHAT TO CENSOR. LUCKILY, IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND INDEPENDENT MEDIA, SO THE TRUTH ALWAYS FILTRATE SOMEHOW TO REACH THE PUBLIC. WE HEAR NEWS ABOUT UKRAINE BUT WE NEVER SEE LIVE REPORTS FROM THE WAR ZONE. WE MAY OCCASIONALLY SEE SOME IMAGES OF DESTRUCTION BUT THE MEDIA WILL TELL US "IT WAS THE RUSSIANS COMMITTING GENOCIDE AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE". YESTERDAY WE REMEMBERED GONZALO LIRA, AN AMERICAN BLOGGER AND COMMENTATOR WHO WAS LIVING IN UKRAINE AND SAYING THINGS IN HIS PODCASTS THAT THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT DIDN'T LIKE. LIRA DIED UNDER GOVERNMENT CUSTODY IN A UKRAINIAN JAIL. TODAY, WE FEATURE EVA BARTLETT, A CANADIAN WAR CORRESPONDENT WHO HAVE BEEN REPORTING FROM THE WAR ZONE IN UKRAINE. ACTUALLY, SHE'S BEEN IN THE RUSSIAN SPEAKING PROVINCES OF UKRAINE THAT SEPARATED FROM THE KIEV GOVERNMENT AND JOINED RUSSIA. SHE SAID THAT IF SHE HAD BEEN IN THE AREA UNDER UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT CONTROL, SHE COULD'VE BEEN KILLED. THE UKRAINIAN NAZIS DO NOT HESITATE TO KILL JOURNALISTS. OF COURSE, YOU WON'T SEE EVA BARTLETT ON CNN, MSNBC OR FOX. JUST WATCH THE VIDEO.

https://americafirstreport.com/george-clooneys-foundation-to-issue-arrest-warrant-requests-for-journalists-who-say-nice-things-about-russia/

https://www.rebelnews.com/palestinian_journalists_holding_israeli_hostages_gaza_strip_hamas

Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, per Yale Law Professor https://rumble.com/v508yni-supreme-court-may-prevent-irreparable-harm-to-trump-per-yale-law-professor.html Michael Shellenberger - Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, Says Influential Yale Law Professor . Liberal Constitutional law scholar Jed Rubenfeld says New York “hush money” case may violate Trump’s constitutional rights and that he would appeal to federal courts Over the last week, America’s leading legal scholars and journalists have explained that former president Donald Trump is now a convicted felon. A jury found Trump guilty of many crimes, including falsifying business records and interfering in an election. But according to an influential constitutional law scholar at Yale University, legal scholars and journalists got the story all wrong. Trump is not, in fact, a convicted felon. SEE VIDEO HERE - https://rumble.com/v501ur0-yale-law-profs-brilliant-plan-for-trump-legal-team-to-overturn-guilty-verdi.html “You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you,” explains Yale’s Jed Rubenfeld, “And the judge still has the power… to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal.” Rubenfeld acknowledges that “it's very likely that Judge [Juan] Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing, July 11.” But Trump’s lawyers can still sue New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Rubenfeld, “and ask the judge — the federal judge — for an emergency temporary restraining order, halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here.” Rubenfeld made his remarks in a video, and I reached him by phone. He elaborated on how the Supreme Court could rule on the case. “If Trump’s lawyers file in a federal district court, they would ask for TRO, Temporary Restraining Order, on an emergency basis,” he told Public. “The court would set a briefing schedule and ask for ‘hurry up’ schedule by July 11. If the court said, ‘No, we’re not issuing a TRO,’ you could appeal to the court of appeals. And then, whatever that court did, you could appeal to the Supreme Court.” Said Rubenfeld, “You could even go over the circuit court to the Supreme Court.” Rubenfeld is a law professor and does not work for the Trump campaign. He is most famous for his liberal positions on issues like affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Rosenfeld expressed concern over three potential violations of the Constitution by the New York state court. First, a felony conviction could cause “irreparable harm” to Trump and his effort to become president. Second, it could have been a case of “selective prosecution” by Bragg, who campaigned on convicting Trump. Third, the court may have violated Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights, which is that the accused must know what they are being accused of....