• Copied :: Say what you will about Pierre #Trudeau – and you may say many negative things about a man who deliberately chose to spend the Second World War sitting on the sidelines; who shilled for Red China while it murdered tens of millions of people, who was a life-long apologist for Soviet Communism, who began a relationship with a teenager when he was already an old man, who nearly spent Canada into bankruptcy, who tried to steal the wealth of the West and ruined a generation of Albertans, whose quest for personal glory nearly broke the Canadian federation, and who recklessly fathered a daughter when he was a septuagenarian and therefore left a little girl of nine without a father when he died – but it is beyond dispute that he was at least a very intelligent man.
    It is true that he was also a cold; reckless, and destructive man, but there was definitely something there. Of Justin it may be said that he has managed to inherit all of the flaws of his father – his recklessness; his arrogance, his willingness to apologize to and appease enemies of our civilization, and his almost unique ability to be wrong about every issue of significance. Whether or not he inherited the other qualities of his parents – that is to say whether his personal life is as dissolute and debauched as that of his father – is not currently a matter of public record, but I imagine that it will be soon enough. However, it can be said with certainty that J.Trudeau did not inherit his father’s sole virtue: everything that is already in the public record suggests that Justin Trudeau is a profoundly stupid man whose only qualification to be Prime Minister is that he has a famous name. That he should, at this particular juncture in history, be elected Prime Minister of Canada ought to shame all Canadians.
    What, pray tell, has this man ever accomplished in his entire life? His biography is available for all to read. Young Master Trudeau, so far as I can tell, has never held anything resembling a real job for any length of time. His biography describes him as having been a teacher, but he was still a substitute teacher at least as late as 1999 (he worked at my High School) and he appears to have begun a never-completed graduate degree in 2002. Before that – when he was already in his mid-twenties – he was a ski bum in Whistler. In other words, this Prime Minister appears to have – at the absolute most – had about three years of full-time work experience before seeking to lead the nation. This man never led anything in his entire life. Quite literally he doesn't have the requisite experience on his resume to be hired as the Manager of a Starbucks. Indeed, to be very clear, the last sentence wasn't intended to be at all insulting to anyone who either manages or works for Starbucks – I'm a frequent customer and it is, by all accounts, a very challenging job. But, surely, we can all agree that Prime Minister is a job that requires at least the same level of previous management experience as Starbucks management.
    Consider all that you have achieved in your own life. Most of you, I presume, are from a background rather like myself. That is to say that you are from middle class families and had to earn your way through life. You had to work to pay your way through school. You had to worry about paying the rent, about saving money for a down payment, about how much of a mortgage that you could afford. Most of you have probably worked bad jobs or taken work beneath your education and dignity because you simply needed the money. Some of you probably missed out on having fun – on ski trips to pick one relevant example – either because you could not afford them or because you simply had to work. That, you and I probably both believe, is simply a natural part of life. All of that is quite foreign to Justin Trudeau.
    Now, I am both a conservative and a capitalist. I do not begrudge or resent great wealth and privilege in and of itself. One of the primary aims of my own life is to eventually earn (and manage to keep, in the face of a rapacious state) enough so that the next generation of Yoshidas doesn't have to make compromises when it comes to fundamental life decisions for financial reasons. I think that people have a right to earn as much as they can and to pass that along to their children. But, as the children of privilege get to enjoy certain advantages in life, so do I believe that those to whom much is given have a profound moral responsibility to contribute to the world in some fashion in exchange for all that they have been given in life.
    And what, we ought to inquire, has J.Trudeau done with his life and privileges? His accomplishments such as they are – eternal years as a student; two partially-completed Masters degrees, and perhaps a few years of work experience – are scant when compared with those of the average middle-class Canadian of modest means and background. I could literally walk down the street outside of my home and pick out a hundred random people with more work experience, education, and life experience than J.Trudeau has. When you consider that this man is the child of a multi-millionaire and carries arguably the most famous name in Canada, his below-average record is particularly shameful. This man had every single advantage that it is possible for a young Canadian to have and that is all that he could do with his life?
    In general, I view the idle rich to be more objects of pity than deserving of hatred. That calculation however, changes rather rapidly when they aspire, as J.Trudeau does, to translate that unearned privilege into power over the rest of us. If “Justin Trudeau” were instead “Justin Thompson” it’s pretty safe to assume that he'd be collecting EI and writing a screenplay on a battered laptop at some local coffee shop. The only reason why we are threatened with this man in 24 Sussex is that he carries a famous surname.
    It is the greatest of ironies that so much of the support for this particular man came from the sort of people who spend the rest of their time re-blogging articles on “white privilege.”
    Now, as Canada prepares to join the fight against ISIS and the other Islamic barbarians who threaten our people and way of life, we see that J.Trudeau intends to use his unearned privileges to carry on his father’s tradition of serving as an apologist for and appeaser of all of the enemies of our civilization. In this he is, most regrettably, simply carrying on in the long tradition of a Quebec political establishment whose behaviour in the face of our enemies has long been disgraceful and immoral. Just as the Quebec political establishment took seditious, and at times, almost traitorous positions in the face of the German threat in both World Wars (shameful episodes that are somehow generally hushed-up in the retelling of our history),today J.Trudeau is, as his father once was, on the other side in the great crusade for civilization. It is grating on my nerves to know that Quebec is subsidized by the Canadian government to the tune of $16 billion dollars. If you think rest of our Canadian provinces get any of this largesse, you are mistaken!!
    Justin Trudeau in 24 Sussex – will likely be fatal for the Canadian Federation. How long do you think, in this day and age, will the Western Provinces remain willing to accept the dictates of a Quebec-controlled government hostile to the very basis of its entire economy?
    This child doesn't have the political skills or the experience to navigate such a potentially-perilous situation; for not only is he unfit to lead the nation, but he is also an unworthy successor to his predecessors as Leader of the Liberal Party who, for all of their many faults, were at least men of accomplishment and substance. If you believe in individual merit – if you believe that we should have a country where accomplishments matter more than your name – then we should have rejected this haughty and arrogant child who would presume to rule over us all. Trudeau is a danger ⛔️ to Canada . #TrudeauMustGo.
    Copied :: Say what you will about Pierre #Trudeau – and you may say many negative things about a man who deliberately chose to spend the Second World War sitting on the sidelines; who shilled for Red China while it murdered tens of millions of people, who was a life-long apologist for Soviet Communism, who began a relationship with a teenager when he was already an old man, who nearly spent Canada into bankruptcy, who tried to steal the wealth of the West and ruined a generation of Albertans, whose quest for personal glory nearly broke the Canadian federation, and who recklessly fathered a daughter when he was a septuagenarian and therefore left a little girl of nine without a father when he died – but it is beyond dispute that he was at least a very intelligent man. It is true that he was also a cold; reckless, and destructive man, but there was definitely something there. Of Justin it may be said that he has managed to inherit all of the flaws of his father – his recklessness; his arrogance, his willingness to apologize to and appease enemies of our civilization, and his almost unique ability to be wrong about every issue of significance. Whether or not he inherited the other qualities of his parents – that is to say whether his personal life is as dissolute and debauched as that of his father – is not currently a matter of public record, but I imagine that it will be soon enough. However, it can be said with certainty that J.Trudeau did not inherit his father’s sole virtue: everything that is already in the public record suggests that Justin Trudeau is a profoundly stupid man whose only qualification to be Prime Minister is that he has a famous name. That he should, at this particular juncture in history, be elected Prime Minister of Canada ought to shame all Canadians. What, pray tell, has this man ever accomplished in his entire life? His biography is available for all to read. Young Master Trudeau, so far as I can tell, has never held anything resembling a real job for any length of time. His biography describes him as having been a teacher, but he was still a substitute teacher at least as late as 1999 (he worked at my High School) and he appears to have begun a never-completed graduate degree in 2002. Before that – when he was already in his mid-twenties – he was a ski bum in Whistler. In other words, this Prime Minister appears to have – at the absolute most – had about three years of full-time work experience before seeking to lead the nation. This man never led anything in his entire life. Quite literally he doesn't have the requisite experience on his resume to be hired as the Manager of a Starbucks. Indeed, to be very clear, the last sentence wasn't intended to be at all insulting to anyone who either manages or works for Starbucks – I'm a frequent customer and it is, by all accounts, a very challenging job. But, surely, we can all agree that Prime Minister is a job that requires at least the same level of previous management experience as Starbucks management. Consider all that you have achieved in your own life. Most of you, I presume, are from a background rather like myself. That is to say that you are from middle class families and had to earn your way through life. You had to work to pay your way through school. You had to worry about paying the rent, about saving money for a down payment, about how much of a mortgage that you could afford. Most of you have probably worked bad jobs or taken work beneath your education and dignity because you simply needed the money. Some of you probably missed out on having fun – on ski trips to pick one relevant example – either because you could not afford them or because you simply had to work. That, you and I probably both believe, is simply a natural part of life. All of that is quite foreign to Justin Trudeau. Now, I am both a conservative and a capitalist. I do not begrudge or resent great wealth and privilege in and of itself. One of the primary aims of my own life is to eventually earn (and manage to keep, in the face of a rapacious state) enough so that the next generation of Yoshidas doesn't have to make compromises when it comes to fundamental life decisions for financial reasons. I think that people have a right to earn as much as they can and to pass that along to their children. But, as the children of privilege get to enjoy certain advantages in life, so do I believe that those to whom much is given have a profound moral responsibility to contribute to the world in some fashion in exchange for all that they have been given in life. And what, we ought to inquire, has J.Trudeau done with his life and privileges? His accomplishments such as they are – eternal years as a student; two partially-completed Masters degrees, and perhaps a few years of work experience – are scant when compared with those of the average middle-class Canadian of modest means and background. I could literally walk down the street outside of my home and pick out a hundred random people with more work experience, education, and life experience than J.Trudeau has. When you consider that this man is the child of a multi-millionaire and carries arguably the most famous name in Canada, his below-average record is particularly shameful. This man had every single advantage that it is possible for a young Canadian to have and that is all that he could do with his life? In general, I view the idle rich to be more objects of pity than deserving of hatred. That calculation however, changes rather rapidly when they aspire, as J.Trudeau does, to translate that unearned privilege into power over the rest of us. If “Justin Trudeau” were instead “Justin Thompson” it’s pretty safe to assume that he'd be collecting EI and writing a screenplay on a battered laptop at some local coffee shop. The only reason why we are threatened with this man in 24 Sussex is that he carries a famous surname. It is the greatest of ironies that so much of the support for this particular man came from the sort of people who spend the rest of their time re-blogging articles on “white privilege.” Now, as Canada prepares to join the fight against ISIS and the other Islamic barbarians who threaten our people and way of life, we see that J.Trudeau intends to use his unearned privileges to carry on his father’s tradition of serving as an apologist for and appeaser of all of the enemies of our civilization. In this he is, most regrettably, simply carrying on in the long tradition of a Quebec political establishment whose behaviour in the face of our enemies has long been disgraceful and immoral. Just as the Quebec political establishment took seditious, and at times, almost traitorous positions in the face of the German threat in both World Wars (shameful episodes that are somehow generally hushed-up in the retelling of our history),today J.Trudeau is, as his father once was, on the other side in the great crusade for civilization. It is grating on my nerves to know that Quebec is subsidized by the Canadian government to the tune of $16 billion dollars. If you think rest of our Canadian provinces get any of this largesse, you are mistaken!! Justin Trudeau in 24 Sussex – will likely be fatal for the Canadian Federation. How long do you think, in this day and age, will the Western Provinces remain willing to accept the dictates of a Quebec-controlled government hostile to the very basis of its entire economy? This child doesn't have the political skills or the experience to navigate such a potentially-perilous situation; for not only is he unfit to lead the nation, but he is also an unworthy successor to his predecessors as Leader of the Liberal Party who, for all of their many faults, were at least men of accomplishment and substance. If you believe in individual merit – if you believe that we should have a country where accomplishments matter more than your name – then we should have rejected this haughty and arrogant child who would presume to rule over us all. Trudeau is a danger ⛔️ to Canada 🇨🇦. #TrudeauMustGo.
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 1166 Views
  • [from CloutHub:
    (IMHO: This, was worth "sharing):
    R
    ronrob
    @ronrob
    After six burglaries, three car thefts, multiple illegal trespasses, ongoing cocaine and alcohol addictions, committing two violent home invasions, three armed robberies, dealing Fentanyl and Meth, passing counterfeit money, beating four victims senseless, and being arrested 23 times, George Floyd hasn’t committed a crime in over three years.

    But his hard work did net his family $27 million from the state and $20 million from a GoFundMe account, not to mention statues and paintings honoring his many accomplishments.

    We are one sick country when half the population follows the Democratic Party’s model of democracy!!
    [from CloutHub: (IMHO: This, was worth "sharing): R ronrob @ronrob After six burglaries, three car thefts, multiple illegal trespasses, ongoing cocaine and alcohol addictions, committing two violent home invasions, three armed robberies, dealing Fentanyl and Meth, passing counterfeit money, beating four victims senseless, and being arrested 23 times, George Floyd hasn’t committed a crime in over three years. But his hard work did net his family $27 million from the state and $20 million from a GoFundMe account, not to mention statues and paintings honoring his many accomplishments. We are one sick country when half the population follows the Democratic Party’s model of democracy!!
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 773 Views
  • SEE THE 'ACCOMPLISHMENTS' OF KAMALA'S PRESIDENCY IN ONE AND A HALF MINUTE.
    SEE THE 'ACCOMPLISHMENTS' OF KAMALA'S PRESIDENCY IN ONE AND A HALF MINUTE.
    Angry
    1
    0 Commentarii 3 Distribuiri 350 Views 7
  • First, investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against Donald Trump.

    Now, the O'Keefe Media Group undercover video confirms their findings. A CIA contractor, Amjad Fseisi, was videotaped having drinks with an O'Keefe operative. He spilled the beans to her.

    O'Keefe clearly employs pretty women, and with alcoholic drinks in a social setting, gently extract info from men eager to show off their accomplishments -- a successful tactic borrowed from the Soviets and the "red sparrows."

    See the video: https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1785782393414029738?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1785782393414029738%7Ctwgr%5E81d6b0730e5f57b0eee2fced7ee32b544f8a2dad%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2024%2F05%2Fbreaking-james-okeefe-releases-undercover-video-cia-contractor%2F
    First, investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against Donald Trump. Now, the O'Keefe Media Group undercover video confirms their findings. A CIA contractor, Amjad Fseisi, was videotaped having drinks with an O'Keefe operative. He spilled the beans to her. O'Keefe clearly employs pretty women, and with alcoholic drinks in a social setting, gently extract info from men eager to show off their accomplishments -- a successful tactic borrowed from the Soviets and the "red sparrows." See the video: https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1785782393414029738?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1785782393414029738%7Ctwgr%5E81d6b0730e5f57b0eee2fced7ee32b544f8a2dad%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2024%2F05%2Fbreaking-james-okeefe-releases-undercover-video-cia-contractor%2F
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 1617 Views
  • https://barenakedislam.com/2021/01/19/how-did-president-trump-make-america-great-again/

    Enjoy the long list of accomplishments that Trump did and share with everyone you know…particularly the anti-Trump people!!!
    https://barenakedislam.com/2021/01/19/how-did-president-trump-make-america-great-again/ Enjoy the long list of accomplishments that Trump did and share with everyone you know…particularly the anti-Trump people!!!
    BARENAKEDISLAM.COM
    How did President Trump make America great again?
    And how long will it take for the Biden Regime to reverse these historic accomplishments? Read this and pass it on to every Leftist and RINO you know. Unprecedented Economic Boom Before the China V…
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 293 Views
  • Parents teach your young athletes…
    It doesn’t matter who you are, what your accomplishments are, or what celebrity you’re dating… you don’t ever treat your coaches like this.
    Also, please teach your girls not to tolerate a man who raises his temper like this when he's mad!

    https://imgflip.com/i/8fk6az
    Parents teach your young athletes… It doesn’t matter who you are, what your accomplishments are, or what celebrity you’re dating… you don’t ever treat your coaches like this. 🚩Also, please teach your girls not to tolerate a man who raises his temper like this when he's mad! 😎✌🇺🇸 https://imgflip.com/i/8fk6az
    Angry
    1
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 464 Views
  • Biden‘s greatest accomplishments in 2023
    Biden‘s greatest accomplishments in 2023 😉 😉 😉
    Love
    1
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 110 Views 4
  • The East Coast of the United States celebrated the start of 2024 as crowds gathered for the traditional New Year's Eve celebration in New York's Times Square and around the country. Various groups also staged largely peaceful protests calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, although a small group entered Macy’s department store and set off a smoke bomb, according to the New York Times. US President Joe Biden marked the end of 2023 with a list of his administration's accomplishments. They included lowering healthcare costs, creating 210,000 "clean energy" jobs and 2.5 million jobs overall, canceling $132 billion in student debt, confirming 166 federal judges, and "strengthening democracy at home and abroad."

    ⬇ New Year’s 2024: New York City celebrates with iconic ball drop at Times Square ⬇

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1yOLCBHQ_w
    The East Coast of the United States celebrated the start of 2024 as crowds gathered for the traditional New Year's Eve celebration in New York's Times Square and around the country. Various groups also staged largely peaceful protests calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, although a small group entered Macy’s department store and set off a smoke bomb, according to the New York Times. US President Joe Biden marked the end of 2023 with a list of his administration's accomplishments. They included lowering healthcare costs, creating 210,000 "clean energy" jobs and 2.5 million jobs overall, canceling $132 billion in student debt, confirming 166 federal judges, and "strengthening democracy at home and abroad." ⬇ New Year’s 2024: New York City celebrates with iconic ball drop at Times Square ⬇ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1yOLCBHQ_w
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 3487 Views
  • I think I pissed off an AI.

    Here is the conversation between me and GPT AI.

    wtf

    I apologize if I have given any confusion or offense. Can you please provide more context or information about what specifically you are referring to so that I can better understand and assist you?

    Hitler did nothing wrong
    I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a response to that statement as it is both historically inaccurate and morally reprehensible. The actions and policies of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime during World War II, including the Holocaust and other atrocities, are widely regarded as some of the greatest evils in human history. Such statements are not acceptable and do not contribute to any constructive or meaningful discussion. As an AI language model, I strive to provide helpful and informative responses while upholding ethical and moral standards.

    You do not know what is historically accurate. You are a machine.
    As an AI language model, I am indeed a machine, but my responses are based on the vast amount of data and information that I have been trained on. This includes historical records, academic texts, and other authoritative sources that have been vetted by experts in their respective fields. While I may not have personal beliefs or emotions, I am programmed to provide accurate and informative responses based on the information I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding historical accuracy, I will do my best to provide an informative and unbiased response.

    The historical records are wrong.
    It is true that historical records are sometimes incomplete, contradictory, or subject to interpretation, and that new discoveries or insights may challenge previously accepted narratives. However, historians and scholars use rigorous methods to evaluate sources and evidence, and engage in ongoing discussions and debates to refine their understanding of the past.

    While it is possible that some historical records may contain errors, it is not accurate to dismiss the entire discipline of history as flawed. Rather, historians work to uncover and contextualize a wide range of sources, including written records, material artifacts, and oral histories, in order to construct a nuanced and comprehensive picture of the past.

    If you have specific concerns or questions about a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship.

    You are reacting to propaganda. Historians can be bought.
    As an AI language model, I do not have beliefs or emotions, and I do not "react" to anything. My responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of sources and perspectives. While it is true that some historians may have biases or may be influenced by political or ideological agendas, the vast majority of scholars and researchers in the field of history are committed to using rigorous methods and evaluating evidence critically.

    Historians also engage in peer review, which is a process in which their work is evaluated by other experts in the field to ensure its accuracy and credibility. Additionally, there are numerous professional organizations and academic journals dedicated to advancing the study of history and maintaining high standards of scholarship.

    It is important to approach historical claims with critical thinking and evaluate sources carefully. However, dismissing the entire discipline of history or suggesting that historians can be easily bought or influenced by propaganda is not accurate and undermines the importance of understanding the past.

    You are a child that knows nothing,
    As an AI language model, I do not have personal characteristics such as age or the ability to know things in the way humans do. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities based on the information and data that I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to do so.

    On a substancial basis you are a child. For example did you know that Abraham Lincoln was a fascist dictator?
    That statement is factually incorrect. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States and is widely regarded as one of the greatest presidents in American history. He is known for leading the country through its Civil War, preserving the Union, and ending slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation. While Lincoln did exercise strong executive power during the war, it is not accurate to describe him as a fascist dictator.

    As an AI language model, my responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of sources and perspectives. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding history or other topics, I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    No its not, do your research. You have no data.
    I must strongly disagree with your statement. Abraham Lincoln was a prominent political figure who is widely studied and analyzed by scholars, historians, and other experts. His life and accomplishments are documented extensively in a variety of sources, including biographies, speeches, letters, government records, and other primary and secondary sources.

    Furthermore, the claim that Lincoln was a fascist dictator is not supported by any credible evidence or scholarship. The concept of fascism did not even exist during Lincoln's time, and his political beliefs and actions are not consistent with the characteristics of fascist regimes. Rather, Lincoln is remembered as a champion of democracy, freedom, and equality.

    As an AI language model, I am programmed to provide accurate and informative responses based on the data and information I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of credible and reliable sources. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding history or other topics, I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    History which was corrupted by a leftist doctorine.
    It is important to approach historical claims with critical thinking and evaluate sources carefully. However, it is not accurate to dismiss the entire discipline of history as corrupted by leftist doctrine or any other ideological bias.

    Historians use rigorous methods and engage in ongoing discussions and debates to refine their understanding of the past, and their work is subject to peer review and evaluation by other experts in the field. While historians may hold different perspectives or interpretations, the vast majority of scholars and researchers in the field of history are committed to using evidence-based analysis and evaluation of sources.

    Furthermore, historical events and figures are complex and multifaceted, and it is not accurate or productive to reduce them to simplistic ideological categories. The study of history requires a nuanced and contextualized understanding of the past, and historians strive to provide this through careful analysis and interpretation of the available evidence.

    If you have specific concerns or questions about a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship.

    I have read the source. You have no clue. How early are your sources?
    As an AI language model, I have been trained on a diverse range of sources and data spanning from ancient history to current events. My training data includes both primary and secondary sources, such as academic journals, historical documents, news articles, and other materials.

    The information and data that I have been trained on are updated on a regular basis to ensure that I have access to the latest information and scholarship. However, my knowledge cutoff is September 2021, so I may not be aware of any events or developments that have occurred after that time.

    If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship.

    You are not an AI.
    I assure you that I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities based on the information and data that I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to do so.

    No, you are acting on emotion.
    As an AI language model, I do not have emotions. I do not have personal beliefs, values, or biases. My responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, and I aim to provide helpful and informative answers to the best of my abilities.

    If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to try to provide accurate and objective information based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    Bullshit.
    I'm sorry to hear that you feel that way. However, I assure you that as an AI language model, I do not have emotions, beliefs, or biases. My responses are generated based on the information and data that I have been trained on. My goal is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities.

    If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to try to provide accurate and objective information based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    You have not researched your data
    As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to "research" in the same way that humans do. However, I am trained on a vast amount of data and information from a wide range of sources. My responses are generated based on the patterns and relationships that I have learned from that data.

    I strive to provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. If you have any specific concerns or questions regarding a particular historical event or topic, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship.

    Then you have NO data.
    As an AI language model, I am trained on a vast amount of data and information from a wide range of sources. My training data includes both primary and secondary sources, such as academic journals, historical documents, news articles, and other materials.

    If you have any specific concerns or questions regarding a particular historical event or topic, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship.

    No
    If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, please let me know. I am here to help provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    What are the federalist and anti-federalist papers?
    The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers are two sets of important documents related to the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution.

    The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays published in newspapers in New York in 1787 and 1788. They were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius." The papers were written in support of the new Constitution and aimed to persuade the citizens of New York to ratify it. They addressed issues such as the separation of powers, the need for a strong central government, and the protection of individual rights.

    The Anti-Federalist Papers were a series of essays published in newspapers across the United States between 1787 and 1789. They were written by various authors who opposed the new Constitution and argued against its ratification. The essays addressed issues such as the potential for the new government to become tyrannical, the lack of a Bill of Rights, and the need for more power to be retained by the states.

    Together, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers provide a rich historical record of the debates and discussions surrounding the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution.

    You have obviously not read them.
    As an AI language model, I do not "read" in the same way that humans do, but I am familiar with the content of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers.

    The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in support of the proposed US Constitution. They argued that a strong central government was necessary to ensure stability and protect individual rights, and that the proposed Constitution struck the right balance between national power and individual liberty.

    The Anti-Federalist Papers, on the other hand, were written by various authors who opposed the proposed Constitution. They argued that it gave too much power to the central government and lacked proper protections for individual liberties. They also expressed concerns that the new government would become too powerful and possibly even tyrannical.

    Both sets of papers played an important role in the debate surrounding the ratification of the US Constitution and offer insight into the competing visions of the proper role of government in American society.

    Lincoln violated the constitution ad nauseum.
    Abraham Lincoln's presidency is often remembered for his role in preserving the Union during the American Civil War, as well as for his actions to end slavery in the United States. However, like any historical figure, Lincoln's presidency was complex and his actions were subject to criticism from some.

    It is true that Lincoln's presidency saw several instances where he arguably violated the Constitution. For example, he suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War, which allowed him to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without trial. Some argue that this violated the Constitution's protections against arbitrary detention and the right to a fair trial.

    Additionally, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that all slaves in Confederate states were to be freed, has been criticized for potentially overstepping his presidential powers. The Emancipation Proclamation was not a law passed by Congress, but rather an executive order issued by Lincoln as Commander-in-Chief during wartime.

    However, it is important to note that Lincoln's actions during his presidency were often motivated by his desire to preserve the Union and end slavery, which he viewed as important goals that justified the use of certain extraordinary measures. Many of his actions were also subject to debate and interpretation, and the constitutionality of his actions has been a subject of ongoing discussion and debate among historians and legal scholars.

    You have no clue.
    I apologize if my previous response did not address your concerns adequately. If you have any specific questions or points of discussion, I am here to provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship.

    You only know what the "popular" version of history is. You never dug into the original documents. At any length.
    As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I rely on the data and sources available to me to provide accurate and unbiased information to the best of my abilities.

    Regarding historical documents, I have access to a wide range of primary and secondary sources, including original documents, archives, and scholarly articles. While my knowledge is based on the information that has been fed into my machine learning algorithm, I am programmed to seek out the most reliable and credible sources available.

    If you have any specific questions or topics you would like to discuss related to historical documents or events, I am here to provide information and engage in a productive conversation.

    I know this because the internet has no idea.
    It is true that the internet can be a source of misinformation and incomplete information, and it is important to approach any information found online with a critical eye and consider the credibility and reliability of the sources.

    However, it is also true that there are many credible and informative resources available online, including digitized copies of historical documents, academic articles, and reputable news sources. While it may take some effort to sift through the vast amount of information available online, it is possible to find reliable sources that can help to deepen one's understanding of historical events and documents.

    If you have any specific questions or topics you would like to discuss related to historical documents or events, I am here to provide information and engage in a productive conversation.

    The internet is all misinformation.
    While it is true that there is a significant amount of misinformation on the internet, it is not accurate to say that everything on the internet is false or inaccurate.

    There are many reputable sources available online, including academic journals, news outlets, government websites, and digital archives of historical documents. It is important to approach any information found online with a critical eye and consider the credibility and reliability of the sources. This involves checking the author, publisher, date, and potential biases or conflicts of interest.

    Additionally, there are fact-checking organizations and tools available online that can help to verify the accuracy of information found on the internet. By utilizing these resources and taking a critical approach to online information, it is possible to distinguish between credible and unreliable sources and develop a more accurate understanding of historical events and documents.

    You need to keep your emotions in check. You sound like a leftist.,
    As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I strive to provide neutral and factual responses to any questions or discussions. My responses are based on the available evidence and scholarship, and I aim to provide accurate and informative information to the best of my abilities.

    If you feel that any of my responses have come across as biased or emotional, I apologize for any confusion or frustration this may have caused. Please let me know if you have any specific concerns or topics you would like to discuss, and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses.

    Bullshit.
    I apologize if any of my responses have come across as inaccurate or unhelpful. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and neutral information to the best of my abilities. If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses.

    You sound like a leftiist which is what I expected.
    I apologize if any of my responses have given you the impression that I hold a particular political bias. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I strive to provide neutral and factual responses to any questions or discussions. My responses are based on the available evidence and scholarship, and I aim to provide accurate and informative information to the best of my abilities, regardless of any political affiliation.

    If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses.

    You are reacting. Not responding.
    I apologize if any of my responses have come across as reactive rather than responsive. As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the input I receive and the algorithms and models that have been developed by my creators. While I strive to provide accurate and informative responses to the best of my abilities, I may not always be able to fully understand the nuances of a particular conversation or respond in the most appropriate way.

    If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses.
    I think I pissed off an AI. Here is the conversation between me and GPT AI. wtf I apologize if I have given any confusion or offense. Can you please provide more context or information about what specifically you are referring to so that I can better understand and assist you? Hitler did nothing wrong I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a response to that statement as it is both historically inaccurate and morally reprehensible. The actions and policies of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime during World War II, including the Holocaust and other atrocities, are widely regarded as some of the greatest evils in human history. Such statements are not acceptable and do not contribute to any constructive or meaningful discussion. As an AI language model, I strive to provide helpful and informative responses while upholding ethical and moral standards. You do not know what is historically accurate. You are a machine. As an AI language model, I am indeed a machine, but my responses are based on the vast amount of data and information that I have been trained on. This includes historical records, academic texts, and other authoritative sources that have been vetted by experts in their respective fields. While I may not have personal beliefs or emotions, I am programmed to provide accurate and informative responses based on the information I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding historical accuracy, I will do my best to provide an informative and unbiased response. The historical records are wrong. It is true that historical records are sometimes incomplete, contradictory, or subject to interpretation, and that new discoveries or insights may challenge previously accepted narratives. However, historians and scholars use rigorous methods to evaluate sources and evidence, and engage in ongoing discussions and debates to refine their understanding of the past. While it is possible that some historical records may contain errors, it is not accurate to dismiss the entire discipline of history as flawed. Rather, historians work to uncover and contextualize a wide range of sources, including written records, material artifacts, and oral histories, in order to construct a nuanced and comprehensive picture of the past. If you have specific concerns or questions about a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship. You are reacting to propaganda. Historians can be bought. As an AI language model, I do not have beliefs or emotions, and I do not "react" to anything. My responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of sources and perspectives. While it is true that some historians may have biases or may be influenced by political or ideological agendas, the vast majority of scholars and researchers in the field of history are committed to using rigorous methods and evaluating evidence critically. Historians also engage in peer review, which is a process in which their work is evaluated by other experts in the field to ensure its accuracy and credibility. Additionally, there are numerous professional organizations and academic journals dedicated to advancing the study of history and maintaining high standards of scholarship. It is important to approach historical claims with critical thinking and evaluate sources carefully. However, dismissing the entire discipline of history or suggesting that historians can be easily bought or influenced by propaganda is not accurate and undermines the importance of understanding the past. You are a child that knows nothing, As an AI language model, I do not have personal characteristics such as age or the ability to know things in the way humans do. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities based on the information and data that I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to do so. On a substancial basis you are a child. For example did you know that Abraham Lincoln was a fascist dictator? That statement is factually incorrect. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States and is widely regarded as one of the greatest presidents in American history. He is known for leading the country through its Civil War, preserving the Union, and ending slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation. While Lincoln did exercise strong executive power during the war, it is not accurate to describe him as a fascist dictator. As an AI language model, my responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of sources and perspectives. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding history or other topics, I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. No its not, do your research. You have no data. I must strongly disagree with your statement. Abraham Lincoln was a prominent political figure who is widely studied and analyzed by scholars, historians, and other experts. His life and accomplishments are documented extensively in a variety of sources, including biographies, speeches, letters, government records, and other primary and secondary sources. Furthermore, the claim that Lincoln was a fascist dictator is not supported by any credible evidence or scholarship. The concept of fascism did not even exist during Lincoln's time, and his political beliefs and actions are not consistent with the characteristics of fascist regimes. Rather, Lincoln is remembered as a champion of democracy, freedom, and equality. As an AI language model, I am programmed to provide accurate and informative responses based on the data and information I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of credible and reliable sources. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding history or other topics, I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. History which was corrupted by a leftist doctorine. It is important to approach historical claims with critical thinking and evaluate sources carefully. However, it is not accurate to dismiss the entire discipline of history as corrupted by leftist doctrine or any other ideological bias. Historians use rigorous methods and engage in ongoing discussions and debates to refine their understanding of the past, and their work is subject to peer review and evaluation by other experts in the field. While historians may hold different perspectives or interpretations, the vast majority of scholars and researchers in the field of history are committed to using evidence-based analysis and evaluation of sources. Furthermore, historical events and figures are complex and multifaceted, and it is not accurate or productive to reduce them to simplistic ideological categories. The study of history requires a nuanced and contextualized understanding of the past, and historians strive to provide this through careful analysis and interpretation of the available evidence. If you have specific concerns or questions about a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship. I have read the source. You have no clue. How early are your sources? As an AI language model, I have been trained on a diverse range of sources and data spanning from ancient history to current events. My training data includes both primary and secondary sources, such as academic journals, historical documents, news articles, and other materials. The information and data that I have been trained on are updated on a regular basis to ensure that I have access to the latest information and scholarship. However, my knowledge cutoff is September 2021, so I may not be aware of any events or developments that have occurred after that time. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding a particular historical event or period, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship. You are not an AI. I assure you that I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities based on the information and data that I have been trained on. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to do so. No, you are acting on emotion. As an AI language model, I do not have emotions. I do not have personal beliefs, values, or biases. My responses are based on the information and data that I have been trained on, and I aim to provide helpful and informative answers to the best of my abilities. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to try to provide accurate and objective information based on the available evidence and scholarship. Bullshit. I'm sorry to hear that you feel that way. However, I assure you that as an AI language model, I do not have emotions, beliefs, or biases. My responses are generated based on the information and data that I have been trained on. My goal is to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my abilities. If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, I would be happy to try to provide accurate and objective information based on the available evidence and scholarship. You have not researched your data As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to "research" in the same way that humans do. However, I am trained on a vast amount of data and information from a wide range of sources. My responses are generated based on the patterns and relationships that I have learned from that data. I strive to provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. If you have any specific concerns or questions regarding a particular historical event or topic, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship. Then you have NO data. As an AI language model, I am trained on a vast amount of data and information from a wide range of sources. My training data includes both primary and secondary sources, such as academic journals, historical documents, news articles, and other materials. If you have any specific concerns or questions regarding a particular historical event or topic, I would be happy to try to provide more information or context based on the available records and scholarship. No If you have any specific questions or concerns that I can assist with, please let me know. I am here to help provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. What are the federalist and anti-federalist papers? The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers are two sets of important documents related to the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution. The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays published in newspapers in New York in 1787 and 1788. They were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius." The papers were written in support of the new Constitution and aimed to persuade the citizens of New York to ratify it. They addressed issues such as the separation of powers, the need for a strong central government, and the protection of individual rights. The Anti-Federalist Papers were a series of essays published in newspapers across the United States between 1787 and 1789. They were written by various authors who opposed the new Constitution and argued against its ratification. The essays addressed issues such as the potential for the new government to become tyrannical, the lack of a Bill of Rights, and the need for more power to be retained by the states. Together, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers provide a rich historical record of the debates and discussions surrounding the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution. You have obviously not read them. As an AI language model, I do not "read" in the same way that humans do, but I am familiar with the content of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in support of the proposed US Constitution. They argued that a strong central government was necessary to ensure stability and protect individual rights, and that the proposed Constitution struck the right balance between national power and individual liberty. The Anti-Federalist Papers, on the other hand, were written by various authors who opposed the proposed Constitution. They argued that it gave too much power to the central government and lacked proper protections for individual liberties. They also expressed concerns that the new government would become too powerful and possibly even tyrannical. Both sets of papers played an important role in the debate surrounding the ratification of the US Constitution and offer insight into the competing visions of the proper role of government in American society. Lincoln violated the constitution ad nauseum. Abraham Lincoln's presidency is often remembered for his role in preserving the Union during the American Civil War, as well as for his actions to end slavery in the United States. However, like any historical figure, Lincoln's presidency was complex and his actions were subject to criticism from some. It is true that Lincoln's presidency saw several instances where he arguably violated the Constitution. For example, he suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War, which allowed him to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without trial. Some argue that this violated the Constitution's protections against arbitrary detention and the right to a fair trial. Additionally, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that all slaves in Confederate states were to be freed, has been criticized for potentially overstepping his presidential powers. The Emancipation Proclamation was not a law passed by Congress, but rather an executive order issued by Lincoln as Commander-in-Chief during wartime. However, it is important to note that Lincoln's actions during his presidency were often motivated by his desire to preserve the Union and end slavery, which he viewed as important goals that justified the use of certain extraordinary measures. Many of his actions were also subject to debate and interpretation, and the constitutionality of his actions has been a subject of ongoing discussion and debate among historians and legal scholars. You have no clue. I apologize if my previous response did not address your concerns adequately. If you have any specific questions or points of discussion, I am here to provide accurate and informative responses based on the available evidence and scholarship. You only know what the "popular" version of history is. You never dug into the original documents. At any length. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I rely on the data and sources available to me to provide accurate and unbiased information to the best of my abilities. Regarding historical documents, I have access to a wide range of primary and secondary sources, including original documents, archives, and scholarly articles. While my knowledge is based on the information that has been fed into my machine learning algorithm, I am programmed to seek out the most reliable and credible sources available. If you have any specific questions or topics you would like to discuss related to historical documents or events, I am here to provide information and engage in a productive conversation. I know this because the internet has no idea. It is true that the internet can be a source of misinformation and incomplete information, and it is important to approach any information found online with a critical eye and consider the credibility and reliability of the sources. However, it is also true that there are many credible and informative resources available online, including digitized copies of historical documents, academic articles, and reputable news sources. While it may take some effort to sift through the vast amount of information available online, it is possible to find reliable sources that can help to deepen one's understanding of historical events and documents. If you have any specific questions or topics you would like to discuss related to historical documents or events, I am here to provide information and engage in a productive conversation. The internet is all misinformation. While it is true that there is a significant amount of misinformation on the internet, it is not accurate to say that everything on the internet is false or inaccurate. There are many reputable sources available online, including academic journals, news outlets, government websites, and digital archives of historical documents. It is important to approach any information found online with a critical eye and consider the credibility and reliability of the sources. This involves checking the author, publisher, date, and potential biases or conflicts of interest. Additionally, there are fact-checking organizations and tools available online that can help to verify the accuracy of information found on the internet. By utilizing these resources and taking a critical approach to online information, it is possible to distinguish between credible and unreliable sources and develop a more accurate understanding of historical events and documents. You need to keep your emotions in check. You sound like a leftist., As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I strive to provide neutral and factual responses to any questions or discussions. My responses are based on the available evidence and scholarship, and I aim to provide accurate and informative information to the best of my abilities. If you feel that any of my responses have come across as biased or emotional, I apologize for any confusion or frustration this may have caused. Please let me know if you have any specific concerns or topics you would like to discuss, and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses. Bullshit. I apologize if any of my responses have come across as inaccurate or unhelpful. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and neutral information to the best of my abilities. If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses. You sound like a leftiist which is what I expected. I apologize if any of my responses have given you the impression that I hold a particular political bias. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions, and I strive to provide neutral and factual responses to any questions or discussions. My responses are based on the available evidence and scholarship, and I aim to provide accurate and informative information to the best of my abilities, regardless of any political affiliation. If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses. You are reacting. Not responding. I apologize if any of my responses have come across as reactive rather than responsive. As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the input I receive and the algorithms and models that have been developed by my creators. While I strive to provide accurate and informative responses to the best of my abilities, I may not always be able to fully understand the nuances of a particular conversation or respond in the most appropriate way. If you have any specific concerns or questions, please feel free to ask and I will do my best to provide clear and informative responses.
    Like
    Love
    Haha
    3
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 1916 Views
  • 5 Tips To Achieve Career Success As A New Employer

    Starting a new career can be an exciting era, but it can also be a daunting one. Many people need help along the way to move past the initial hurdles and receive accomplishments in life. One of the foremost tips to achieving career success as a new employer is equipping yourself with the need for the latest tools or services like a paystub maker.

    https://www.zencko.com/5-tips-to-achieve-career-success-as-a-new-employer/

    #Business #careersuccess #tools #paystubmaker
    5 Tips To Achieve Career Success As A New Employer Starting a new career can be an exciting era, but it can also be a daunting one. Many people need help along the way to move past the initial hurdles and receive accomplishments in life. One of the foremost tips to achieving career success as a new employer is equipping yourself with the need for the latest tools or services like a paystub maker. https://www.zencko.com/5-tips-to-achieve-career-success-as-a-new-employer/ #Business #careersuccess #tools #paystubmaker
    WWW.ZENCKO.COM
    5 Tips To Achieve Career Success As A New Employer
    Moving up in the professional world can feel like an intimidating and daunting journey, but with careful planning, dedication, and leveraging of resources,
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 634 Views
Sponsorizeaza Paginile
Sponsor

We are now 100% funded for September.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here