• A metal song that is not overly happy. Trouble showing Christ after his time in Gethsemane. It is emotional.

    https://youtu.be/Ul5Vb9bJPDQ?list=OLAK5uy_n3EsYTs8XPUfkru9Q_zE-nvSFM_C-VGpQ
    A metal song that is not overly happy. Trouble showing Christ after his time in Gethsemane. It is emotional. https://youtu.be/Ul5Vb9bJPDQ?list=OLAK5uy_n3EsYTs8XPUfkru9Q_zE-nvSFM_C-VGpQ
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 334 Views

  • From a friend
    **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …**

    **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …**

    **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …**

    ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”***

    ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024***

    ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”***

    ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.***

    ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.***

    ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.***

    ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.***

    ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.***

    ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.***

    ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.***

    ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.***

    ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.***

    ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.***

    ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.***

    ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.***

    ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’***

    ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’***

    ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’***

    ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’***

    ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.***

    ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:***

    ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’***

    ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’***

    ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.***

    ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?***

    ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.***

    ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.***

    ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.***

    ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.***

    ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.***

    ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:***

    ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’***

    ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’***

    ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.***

    ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.***

    ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.***

    ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.***

    ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:***

    ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’***

    ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.***

    ***The report explains:***

    ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’***

    ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.***

    ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.***

    ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.***

    ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”***

    ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.***

    ***Focused protection specifically says:***

    ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’***

    ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’***

    ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.***

    ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?***

    ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”***

    https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/

    **Here are some links to this article:**

    - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”***

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/

    - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings***
    ***Updated July 26, 2020"***

    https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    🚨🚨 From a friend **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …** **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …** **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …** ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”*** ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024*** ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”*** ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.*** ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.*** ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.*** ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.*** ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.*** ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.*** ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.*** ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.*** ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.*** ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.*** ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.*** ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.*** ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’*** ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’*** ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’*** ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’*** ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.*** ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:*** ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’*** ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’*** ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.*** ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?*** ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.*** ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.*** ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.*** ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.*** ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.*** ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:*** ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’*** ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’*** ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.*** ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.*** ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.*** ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.*** ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:*** ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’*** ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.*** ***The report explains:*** ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’*** ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.*** ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.*** ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.*** ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”*** ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.*** ***Focused protection specifically says:*** ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’*** ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’*** ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.*** ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?*** ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”*** https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/ **Here are some links to this article:** - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”*** https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/ - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings*** ***Updated July 26, 2020"*** https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking evidence of what happened, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list.
    Angry
    2
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 2K Views
  • Paralogisms are essentially distortions of logical thought processes that lead to incorrect conclusions, e.g., by misrepresenting or discrediting evidence or facts. Paramoralisms are moral substitutions, making evil seem good, and good evil. This can take the form of “paranormal indignation,” which is emotionally infectious and can turn people against the innocent or the virtuous. Both methods block an average person’s mind from being able to perceive the truth.

    https://ponerology.substack.com/p/twenty-five-predatory-tactics
    Paralogisms are essentially distortions of logical thought processes that lead to incorrect conclusions, e.g., by misrepresenting or discrediting evidence or facts. Paramoralisms are moral substitutions, making evil seem good, and good evil. This can take the form of “paranormal indignation,” which is emotionally infectious and can turn people against the innocent or the virtuous. Both methods block an average person’s mind from being able to perceive the truth. https://ponerology.substack.com/p/twenty-five-predatory-tactics
    PONEROLOGY.SUBSTACK.COM
    Twenty-Five Predatory Tactics
    From Karen Mitchell's persistent predatory personality model
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 651 Views
  • Any physician (whether pro-life or pro-choice) who has the best welfare and interests of their female patients at heart will not neglect to warn them of the risks to their physical, mental, and emotional health should they insist on murdering their unborn child; risks they need not have to face if they would at least give their child up for adoption if they don’t think they are able to raise and care for the child themselves.
    https://www.lifenews.com/2023/12/29/obgyn-confirms-abortion-harms-women/
    Any physician (whether pro-life or pro-choice) who has the best welfare and interests of their female patients at heart will not neglect to warn them of the risks to their physical, mental, and emotional health should they insist on murdering their unborn child; risks they need not have to face if they would at least give their child up for adoption if they don’t think they are able to raise and care for the child themselves. https://www.lifenews.com/2023/12/29/obgyn-confirms-abortion-harms-women/
    WWW.LIFENEWS.COM
    OBGYN Confirms "Abortion Harms Women" - LifeNews.com
    On Dec. 13, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would hear a case to challenge the FDA’s actions to remove commonsense safeguards for women and girls who take the chemical abortion drugs mifepristone and misoprostol. It was filed by my organization, three others and four doctors via our Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys. On Dec. 13, the U.S. Supreme Court […]
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 613 Views
  • How to avoid manipulation
    Manipulation can be sneaky, but you can work to avoid it with these strategies:

    Know the signs: People who manipulate often exhibit similar types of behaviors. Watch out for people who are overly friendly, make empty promises, or try to make you feel guilty,

    Be aware of your emotions: Most manipulation methods involve evoking strong emotions. “People who use manipulation often play on your emotions, but remember that you can’t let them control how you feel,”

    Stay calm: It can be important to have self-control and not lose your cool when dealing with manipulative people. “Don’t let them rattle you or get under your skin,” Draughn explained.
    Avoid personalizing: Even though manipulation can be hurtful, try to internalize that this behavior has nothing to do with you. “Manipulation has more to do with the other person and their inability to meet their own needs in a healthy way,”

    Listen: While it doesn’t feel good when someone attempts to manipulate you, being confrontational can inflame the situation. Drake suggested trying to listen with empathy so that you can identify their needs or wants.

    Respect your boundaries: After listening to the other person and feeling that you’re being manipulated, it’s important to hold healthy limits and boundaries in check. “If you respond respectfully, yet assertively, and [don’t] give in to the manipulation, over time, they will generally see you as someone their tactics don’t work on and will move on,”

    Tell someone you trust: It can be emotionally draining and hurtful to deal with someone who’s manipulative. Talking with a close friend or family member about what you’re experiencing can be healing. “Close friends and family can often give you great feedback and advice, and it’s helpful to have a listening ear when dealing with someone who manipulates,”
    https://psychcentral.com/health/tactics-manipulators-use-to-win-and-confuse-you#stages-of-manipulation
    How to avoid manipulation Manipulation can be sneaky, but you can work to avoid it with these strategies: Know the signs: People who manipulate often exhibit similar types of behaviors. Watch out for people who are overly friendly, make empty promises, or try to make you feel guilty, Be aware of your emotions: Most manipulation methods involve evoking strong emotions. “People who use manipulation often play on your emotions, but remember that you can’t let them control how you feel,” Stay calm: It can be important to have self-control and not lose your cool when dealing with manipulative people. “Don’t let them rattle you or get under your skin,” Draughn explained. Avoid personalizing: Even though manipulation can be hurtful, try to internalize that this behavior has nothing to do with you. “Manipulation has more to do with the other person and their inability to meet their own needs in a healthy way,” Listen: While it doesn’t feel good when someone attempts to manipulate you, being confrontational can inflame the situation. Drake suggested trying to listen with empathy so that you can identify their needs or wants. Respect your boundaries: After listening to the other person and feeling that you’re being manipulated, it’s important to hold healthy limits and boundaries in check. “If you respond respectfully, yet assertively, and [don’t] give in to the manipulation, over time, they will generally see you as someone their tactics don’t work on and will move on,” Tell someone you trust: It can be emotionally draining and hurtful to deal with someone who’s manipulative. Talking with a close friend or family member about what you’re experiencing can be healing. “Close friends and family can often give you great feedback and advice, and it’s helpful to have a listening ear when dealing with someone who manipulates,” https://psychcentral.com/health/tactics-manipulators-use-to-win-and-confuse-you#stages-of-manipulation
    PSYCHCENTRAL.COM
    7 Manipulation Tactics to Know
    Manipulation can be hard to spot. But by learning what to look for, you may be able to protect yourself from manipulation tactics before they start.
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 891 Views
  • In this video, we dive deep into how childhood experiences impact our adult relationships. Whether it's attachment styles, emotional responses, or how we handle conflict, the roots often trace back to our formative years. Join us as we explore key insights into recognizing these patterns and healing from past wounds to build healthier connections in the present.

    Topics covered:

    - Childhood attachment and its influence on relationships
    - Recognizing emotional triggers from the past
    - Practical steps to heal and move forward
    - How therapy can support this journey
    - Let’s embark on the path of healing and growth together

    What is Marble Wellness?

    Marble Wellness is a mental health therapy practice serving the Greater St. Louis area including, West County, Kirkwood, University City, Ladue, Clayton, Frontenac, O'Fallon, Wentzville, and Lake St. Louis. Our skilled therapists can also provide online therapy in Missouri for clients all over the state.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6_XDCnxzzc
    In this video, we dive deep into how childhood experiences impact our adult relationships. Whether it's attachment styles, emotional responses, or how we handle conflict, the roots often trace back to our formative years. Join us as we explore key insights into recognizing these patterns and healing from past wounds to build healthier connections in the present. 🔑 Topics covered: - Childhood attachment and its influence on relationships - Recognizing emotional triggers from the past - Practical steps to heal and move forward - How therapy can support this journey - Let’s embark on the path of healing and growth together What is Marble Wellness? Marble Wellness is a mental health therapy practice serving the Greater St. Louis area including, West County, Kirkwood, University City, Ladue, Clayton, Frontenac, O'Fallon, Wentzville, and Lake St. Louis. Our skilled therapists can also provide online therapy in Missouri for clients all over the state. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6_XDCnxzzc
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 1K Views
  • The Most Frighteningly Deranged Figure of WW2 - The Jungle King
    Herman Perry’s heart hammered against his ribcage. He was cornered. Officer Harold Cady and two imposing US servicemen loomed before him, their silhouettes stark against the dense Burmese jungle. Perry’s mind raced as he confronted the grim reality of being taken back into the depths of the notorious Ledo military Stockade.

    Delirious on poppy, emotionally shattered, and driven by a fierce determination to evade the nightmarish conditions of the Stockade at any cost, Perry did the unthinkable and trained his rifle on Cady. To Perry, the thought of returning to that forced-labor, malaria-ridden hell, where he and other prisoners languished at the bottom of the pecking order, was inconceivable. In a broken shriek, Perry said: (QUOTE) “Get back!... Get Back!”

    Cady stepped forward anyway. Perry was shaking now, begging: (QUOTE) “Lieutenant, don’t come up on me.”

    Having fled the Stockade after his 90-day sentence for insubordination was unjustly extended, Perry now felt the oppressive weight of the sweltering jungle air, its humidity squeezing out the last remnants of sense he had left. As tears spilled down his face, he fired once, then one more time, and ran into the maddening embrace of the jungle towards a terrifying head-hunter tribe. The Greatest and most insane manhunt of World War 2 was on, and Perry would become a Jungle King…
    The Most Frighteningly Deranged Figure of WW2 - The Jungle King Herman Perry’s heart hammered against his ribcage. He was cornered. Officer Harold Cady and two imposing US servicemen loomed before him, their silhouettes stark against the dense Burmese jungle. Perry’s mind raced as he confronted the grim reality of being taken back into the depths of the notorious Ledo military Stockade. Delirious on poppy, emotionally shattered, and driven by a fierce determination to evade the nightmarish conditions of the Stockade at any cost, Perry did the unthinkable and trained his rifle on Cady. To Perry, the thought of returning to that forced-labor, malaria-ridden hell, where he and other prisoners languished at the bottom of the pecking order, was inconceivable. In a broken shriek, Perry said: (QUOTE) “Get back!... Get Back!” Cady stepped forward anyway. Perry was shaking now, begging: (QUOTE) “Lieutenant, don’t come up on me.” Having fled the Stockade after his 90-day sentence for insubordination was unjustly extended, Perry now felt the oppressive weight of the sweltering jungle air, its humidity squeezing out the last remnants of sense he had left. As tears spilled down his face, he fired once, then one more time, and ran into the maddening embrace of the jungle towards a terrifying head-hunter tribe. The Greatest and most insane manhunt of World War 2 was on, and Perry would become a Jungle King…
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 870 Views
  • Irondequoit Police Chief Scott Peters describes the horrifying scene of the slain family of 4 who were m*rdered in their home by an illegal from the Dominican Republic.
    "This was a horrific scene. In over 32 years of doing this job, I haven't seen anything like it."
    https://13wham.com/news/local/never-seen-anything-like-it-irondequoit-police-chief-emotional-over-family-found-killed-scott-peters-sebastian-ubaldo-moreno-fraime-ubaldo-evangeline-ubaldo-moreno-marangely-moreno-santiago
    Irondequoit Police Chief Scott Peters describes the horrifying scene of the slain family of 4 who were m*rdered in their home by an illegal from the Dominican Republic. "This was a horrific scene. In over 32 years of doing this job, I haven't seen anything like it." https://13wham.com/news/local/never-seen-anything-like-it-irondequoit-police-chief-emotional-over-family-found-killed-scott-peters-sebastian-ubaldo-moreno-fraime-ubaldo-evangeline-ubaldo-moreno-marangely-moreno-santiago
    13WHAM.COM
    'Never seen anything like it': Irondequoit police chief emotional over family found killed
    Irondequoit, N.Y. (WHAM) Police became emotional Monday when revealing the identities of a family of four found dead in their burning home over the weekend.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 312 Views
  • -- 10 Commandments Vs. Social Emotional Learning … How’s That Work Out?
    https://surgecolumns331790116.wordpress.com/2024/09/09/10-commandments-vs-social-emotional-learning-hows-that-work-out/
    -- 10 Commandments Vs. Social Emotional Learning … How’s That Work Out? https://surgecolumns331790116.wordpress.com/2024/09/09/10-commandments-vs-social-emotional-learning-hows-that-work-out/
    SURGECOLUMNS331790116.WORDPRESS.COM
    10 Commandments Vs. Social Emotional Learning … How’s That Work Out?
    By Linda Harvey Striker Summary: SEL (social emotional learning) is all the rage in American public schools nowadays. Would this fad survive examination by the Ten Commandments? It seems not – so t…
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 271 Views
  • INSANITY As philosophy, and the emotionalism-based cause of most personal & societal problems
    #PUREgynocentricSpiritualism
    https://youtu.be/_Jlyrn0llIE?si=ESHvUDHOROytlm-a
    INSANITY As philosophy, and the emotionalism-based cause of most personal & societal problems #PUREgynocentricSpiritualism https://youtu.be/_Jlyrn0llIE?si=ESHvUDHOROytlm-a
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 573 Views
Resultados de la búsqueda
Patrocinados

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here