Why Mormons Are Going to Hell And no, I do NOT hate Mormons. It is my hope that they will see the true light and get out of their cults and into salvation! Years ago I lived in the Phoenix, Arizona area and I met a crusty old Marine who asked me if I knew why there were so many Mormons in the Phoenix area. I told him, "No, why are there?" He replied, "They know where they're going in the hereafter, and they came here to get used to the heat." Case closed. Actually, it goes even deeper. This is hidden camera footage of a Mormon temple ritual. If you were looking for the movie, “We will go down”, starring University of Utah alum and award winning adult film star, Christie Stevens, you’ve come to the wrong place. This is just hidden camera footage of part of a secret Mormon cult ceremony recorded in a Mormon temple in Arizona in 2016. Sorry. This video shows the part of the Mormon temple endowment ceremony commonly referred to as "the instructions at the veil". Mormons believe that they will be required to give Masonic handgrips before entering the Celestial Kingdom (aka Heaven) to the angels that stand as sentinels. Only Mormon adults are allowed to participate in this ceremony. In fact, a vast majority of Mormons under the age of 18 have no clue what adults do in their temples. They're told it's "too sacred to talk about". Mormon Jesus is not our Jesus. This is what separates them from REAL Christian believers. Maybe we need to let them know they can't take it with them and they don't take credit cards in hell? They also don't serve breakfast in hell. Here is where Mormons, Roman Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, and all other cults go wrong, and it insures they will spend eternity in hell. Revelation 22: 18-21 18. For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book

https://www.thecollegefix.com/university-of-oklahoma-scrubs-some-black-only-events-while-still-discriminating-federal-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=university-of-oklahoma-scrubs-some-black-only-events-while-still-discriminating-federal-lawsuit

https://medforth.biz/uk-university-tells-staff-to-teach-that-whiteness-and-heterosexuality-are-a-problem-in-push-to-diversify-and-decolonise-curriculum/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/15/diversity-university-of-liverpool-woke-decolonise-history

University of New South Wales Study Higher Fruit Consumption Reduces and protection against the Depression with cognition and is where is associated with depression in younger adults, and depression in older adults, so anyway, but not vegetable.

"Mostly peaceful," right? I mean, they’re supporting a terrorist organisation, so this isn’t entirely surprising... https://redstatenation.com/breaking-news-terrorists-take-hostages-in-california-university-overnight-here-are-the-details-videos/

The Hill a publication now owned by Nextar Media Group, recently published the pièce de résistance of Putin/Russia hate pieces. “The ruinous reign of Vladimir the Terrible” is authored by one of the top political scientists in the world, Alexander J. Motyl. His other mission in life is to teach Russophobia to Rutgers University students. The synthesis of Nextar, Motyl, and the Western elitist’s logic system is the entropy ruining humanity for good. https://journal-neo.su/2024/06/10/if-it-looks-like-a-duck-and-quacks-like-a-duck-it-could-be-a-nazi/

President Joe Biden claims he was a professor at University of Pennsylvania where he taught, in his constitutional law class, that no one during the Civil War could own a cannon and later states that Americans will need F-15 fighter jets if they really fear government tyranny. What are your thoughts? https://pomf2.lain.la/f/9zrqdklv.mp4

According to the official "science," the claims made in the study generated too much "publicity," which is how the ball got rolling to get the paper retracted. 𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙛𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨, they rocked the boat too much to be allowed to persist in the scientific literature. Stockholm University basically forced Dr. Jiang, the study's lead author, to retract it against his will. https://newstarget.com/2024-06-09-stockholm-university-retracts-study-covid-vaccines-cancer.html

Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, per Yale Law Professor https://rumble.com/v508yni-supreme-court-may-prevent-irreparable-harm-to-trump-per-yale-law-professor.html Michael Shellenberger - Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, Says Influential Yale Law Professor . Liberal Constitutional law scholar Jed Rubenfeld says New York “hush money” case may violate Trump’s constitutional rights and that he would appeal to federal courts Over the last week, America’s leading legal scholars and journalists have explained that former president Donald Trump is now a convicted felon. A jury found Trump guilty of many crimes, including falsifying business records and interfering in an election. But according to an influential constitutional law scholar at Yale University, legal scholars and journalists got the story all wrong. Trump is not, in fact, a convicted felon. SEE VIDEO HERE - https://rumble.com/v501ur0-yale-law-profs-brilliant-plan-for-trump-legal-team-to-overturn-guilty-verdi.html “You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you,” explains Yale’s Jed Rubenfeld, “And the judge still has the power… to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal.” Rubenfeld acknowledges that “it's very likely that Judge [Juan] Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing, July 11.” But Trump’s lawyers can still sue New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Rubenfeld, “and ask the judge — the federal judge — for an emergency temporary restraining order, halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here.” Rubenfeld made his remarks in a video, and I reached him by phone. He elaborated on how the Supreme Court could rule on the case. “If Trump’s lawyers file in a federal district court, they would ask for TRO, Temporary Restraining Order, on an emergency basis,” he told Public. “The court would set a briefing schedule and ask for ‘hurry up’ schedule by July 11. If the court said, ‘No, we’re not issuing a TRO,’ you could appeal to the court of appeals. And then, whatever that court did, you could appeal to the Supreme Court.” Said Rubenfeld, “You could even go over the circuit court to the Supreme Court.” Rubenfeld is a law professor and does not work for the Trump campaign. He is most famous for his liberal positions on issues like affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Rosenfeld expressed concern over three potential violations of the Constitution by the New York state court. First, a felony conviction could cause “irreparable harm” to Trump and his effort to become president. Second, it could have been a case of “selective prosecution” by Bragg, who campaigned on convicting Trump. Third, the court may have violated Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights, which is that the accused must know what they are being accused of....