https://rumble.com/v517x9b-house-moves-to-hold-attorney-general-merrick-garland-in-contempt-for-withho.html

DO POLICE SWEAR AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION? Sure they do, they are REQUIRED to do it before they can become a #Police officer. The problem is they've never READ the #Constitution, so how are they supposed to "Protect and Defend" it??? I'm serious here. This is a good read And for once, it's not just me saying it! LOL Excerpt While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it. https://police-brutality.usattorneys.com/do-police-swear-an-oath-to-the-constitution/#:~:text=State%20and%20local%20police%20generally%20swear%20an%20oath,office%20on%20which%20I%20am%20about%20to%20enter.

The #Truth is the TRUTH whether you like it or not! #Police have only ONE real job! And that is to "Protect and defend the Constitution and the PEOPLE of the United States and their property! PERIOD! Nobody said shit about "Officer Safety" Their JOB and sworn duty, that they swear an #Oath to do is to... "Protect and defend the Constitution" Which includes "Protecting and Defending the Inalienable Human Rights of EVERY AMERICAN" You know.... protect those pesky Americans that Police keep shooting 47 times in the back for "Officer Safety" reasons "Officer Safety" is a code for "Be a tyrant and a coward" NOBODY'S LIFE MATTERS BUT YOUR OWN! Police take a dangerous job..... They are SUPPOSED to know this going into it! Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should an American who has NOT been convicted of a crime be shot by Police for ANY REASON short of them AIMING A FIREARM AT THAT COP! Filling Americans full of holes for pulling up their pants is unacceptable! As is claiming "I saw him reaching for something" UNLESS SHOTS HAVE BEEN FIRED AT POLICE they have ZERO LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY to even draw their weapon. Their JOB is to PROTECT the Americans they continue MURDERING in the name of "Officer Safety" You panty waist little PUNKS! You have BODY ARMOR on, a gun, a taser, and YHWH only knows what else! WHY in Heaven's name are scared like a little bitch? MAYBE it's because YOU KNOW how #Evil your behavior is! MAYBE it's because you spend your days trying to CAGE the people you swore an oath to protect! MAYBE you are scared because you know that you DESERVE to be put down like the rabid, tyrant dog you are..... Or MAYBE it's because the #Luciferians who run the CORPORATION you work for have trained you to be an ENEMY of all of mankind.... And somewhere deep down you KNOW that is exactly what you have become! I have a suggestion for you ALL GO READ THE SOLEMN OATH YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD before you were allowed to become a Police Officer Read every word of it! If you cannot recite the Constitution, HOW CAN YOU PROTECT AND DEFEND IT? Oath. State and local police generally swear an oath to the United States Constitution, as civil service or uniformed service officers, stating: “I, officer name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. Language may include “… to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States [and of your state] against all enemies, foreign or domestic” so that state agencies are specifically named. This oath may be tested in an officer’s personal and professional life as evidenced by the increases in police brutality claims nationwide. Constitutional framework. While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it. Federal law. Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to local, state, or federal law enforcement or military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens. Every state has a similar law. If officers were to act in accordance with the oath they take when being sworn into civil service positions, the incidence of police misconduct and brutality might be decreased, in consideration of criminal prosecution for violations of U.S. Constitutional law that include police action against a citizen’s: 4thAmendment right to be free from unreasonable government searches and seizures; 8thAmendment right for inmates to live free from cruel and unusual punishments; 14thAmendment right to live free from excessive force while detained by the police. Police brutality attorneys are well-versed in constitutional law and are often a good resource when citizens feel that a law officer has acted with brutality or in a way that constitutes misconduct against the oath they swore to uphold as police

Here is the Corder version of my new video announcing that I am going on a month-long break to help my church sell fireworks. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe, like, comment, and share! #ttor #update #announcement #fireworks #vlog https://corder.tv/video/.7Wv7

Here is the Rumble version of my new video announcing that I am going on a month-long break to help my church sell fireworks. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe, like, comment, and share! #ttor #update #announcement #fireworks #vlog https://rumble.com/v50otjr-i-am-going-on-break-to-do-fireworks.html

Here is the BitChute version of my new video announcing that I am going on a month-long break to help my church sell fireworks. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe, like, comment, and share! #ttor #update #announcement #fireworks #vlog https://www.bitchute.com/video/vAt1IQnmkjRc/

Here is the YouTube version of my new video announcing that I am going on a month-long break to help my church sell fireworks. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe, like, comment, and share! #ttor #update #announcement #fireworks #vlog https://youtu.be/sjSPuOOzwn8

Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, per Yale Law Professor https://rumble.com/v508yni-supreme-court-may-prevent-irreparable-harm-to-trump-per-yale-law-professor.html Michael Shellenberger - Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, Says Influential Yale Law Professor . Liberal Constitutional law scholar Jed Rubenfeld says New York “hush money” case may violate Trump’s constitutional rights and that he would appeal to federal courts Over the last week, America’s leading legal scholars and journalists have explained that former president Donald Trump is now a convicted felon. A jury found Trump guilty of many crimes, including falsifying business records and interfering in an election. But according to an influential constitutional law scholar at Yale University, legal scholars and journalists got the story all wrong. Trump is not, in fact, a convicted felon. SEE VIDEO HERE - https://rumble.com/v501ur0-yale-law-profs-brilliant-plan-for-trump-legal-team-to-overturn-guilty-verdi.html “You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you,” explains Yale’s Jed Rubenfeld, “And the judge still has the power… to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal.” Rubenfeld acknowledges that “it's very likely that Judge [Juan] Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing, July 11.” But Trump’s lawyers can still sue New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Rubenfeld, “and ask the judge — the federal judge — for an emergency temporary restraining order, halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here.” Rubenfeld made his remarks in a video, and I reached him by phone. He elaborated on how the Supreme Court could rule on the case. “If Trump’s lawyers file in a federal district court, they would ask for TRO, Temporary Restraining Order, on an emergency basis,” he told Public. “The court would set a briefing schedule and ask for ‘hurry up’ schedule by July 11. If the court said, ‘No, we’re not issuing a TRO,’ you could appeal to the court of appeals. And then, whatever that court did, you could appeal to the Supreme Court.” Said Rubenfeld, “You could even go over the circuit court to the Supreme Court.” Rubenfeld is a law professor and does not work for the Trump campaign. He is most famous for his liberal positions on issues like affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Rosenfeld expressed concern over three potential violations of the Constitution by the New York state court. First, a felony conviction could cause “irreparable harm” to Trump and his effort to become president. Second, it could have been a case of “selective prosecution” by Bragg, who campaigned on convicting Trump. Third, the court may have violated Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights, which is that the accused must know what they are being accused of....

Driver Makes Cop Talk To His Attorney I don't mind plugging ANY APP that helps to #Educate Americans about the #Criminals they will encounter conducting #Piracy operations on American roadways The very FIRST thing you must comprehend is that these criminals believe themselves to "be the good guys" as they ruin the lives of innocent Americans, and relieve them of their hard earned money! These are nothing more than modern day #Pirate scumbags! If #Justice existed in this country, every last one of these criminals would be inside of one of the cages they are constantly trying to put YOU into! It's nothing that some rope and an oak tree will not remedy...... We just need to acknowledge the FACT that what they do is criminal And it is Criminal If there were 3 Americans about to be put into a cage, and YOU could release ONE of them... which one would it be??? The first guy is a drug dealer and a crackhead The second is a murderer The third is a #Police Officer It's really TOO EASY of a choice! I would naturally release the drug dealer / crackhead! Because out of the three, he is the ONLY one who has harmed nobody! You could argue that he "harmed himself" but that's NOT a crime! You could argue that "he harms the people who buy his drugs...... But that is untrue.... They harmed themselves by choosing to use drugs! NOBODY can force YOU to use drugs! That is your decision 100%! We ALL know that the murderer and the Police Officer have BOTH harmed other people financially or physically, or both! Those things ARE #Crimes! So stop being a sheeple.... And realize who the ACTUAL CRIMINALS are! https://youtu.be/kBf6VZb4si8

THREE COPS LIED; SHE WENT TO JAIL FOR 6 MONTHS - BODY CAM VINDICATION! READ THE TEXT OF THIS FEDERAL LAW!!! And then I want you to explain to me exactly HOW Federal #Prosecutors manage to keep their jobs AND not be charged under the same statute for aiding and abetting the crime by NOT filing charges against these #Criminals with a badge!!! This makes the PROSECUTOR complicit in the crime and the coverup! It should carry the DEATH PENALTY for any prosecutor failing to charge the crime 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty. Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions. AND THIS ONE TOO..... MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus. Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies. https://www.bitchute.com/video/YeydrP6AXf0/