MiG-31 vs. US B-1B ───── ⚫ ───── Russian Ministry of Defense said its forces in a MiG-31 intercepted US Air Force B-1B bombers near the Barents Sea border, preventing a breach. The incident is said to have occurred when Russian airspace control detected an approaching aircraft. A MiG-31 fighter was deployed to intercept and identify the targets, which were confirmed as US B-1B bombers. As the Russian fighter neared, the American bombers altered their course, avoiding infringement upon Russian airspace. ───── ⚫ ───── B-1B Lancer (American): Role: The B-1B Lancer is a strategic bomber designed for long-range, high-speed missions. Speed: It can reach speeds of up to Mach 1.2 (approximately 900 mph). Range: With in-flight refueling, it has an impressive intercontinental range. Payload: The B-1B can carry a variety of munitions, including nuclear and conventional bombs. Stealth: While not fully stealthy, it incorporates some low-observable features. Mission: It plays a crucial role in global strike missions and deterrence. Advantages: Versatility, long endurance, and significant payload capacity. ───── ⚫ ───── MiG-31 Foxhound (Russian): Role: The MiG-31 is an interceptor designed to protect airspace. Speed: It’s one of the fastest combat aircraft in service, capable of reaching speeds beyond Mach 2.8. Range: It has a long operational range. Payload: Primarily equipped with air-to-air missiles. Stealth: Not stealthy; relies on speed and altitude for defense. Mission: It excels at intercepting hostile aircraft. Advantages: High speed, altitude capability, and effective radar.

I came across this post on Reddit, in the community r/AskFeminists, which asks, "What misogyny have you experienced in leftist or progressive spaces?" https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/17w4j5g/comment/k9ve340/?context=3 I replied, "Misogyny I've observed among leftists/progressives, is all the catering and pandering to biological males who identify as females. There are now problems in females' sports with biological females being easily dominated, and sometimes even severely maimed, by their "transgender" opponents. No matter what hormone treatments or surgeries someone undergoes, their chromosomes and other parts of genetics cannot and will not change, including those genetic traits which give them an unfair advantage over someone else. Imagine a girl training in track and field, or whatever other sport, her whole life and becoming eligible for a college scholarship, only to lose her chance at that scholarship because of a biological boy (in other words, someone with unfair biological advantages) being allowed to compete against the girls. Or a biological woman becoming successful and reaching a high position in a male-dominated field, only for a "transgender" to receive the praise and recognition she earned. Odds are that "transgender" was never doubted or criticized for being a woman entering a male-dominated field. And, if you point out the fact that "transgender female" athletes will always have unfair advantages over biological females, chromosomes and genetics will never change, etc., you get called an ignorant transphobe, or verbally (sometimes even physically) attacked by leftists/progressives in other ways.” And I got a reply from the mod-team, “All top level comments, in any thread, must be given by feminists and must reflect a feminist perspective. Please refrain from posting further direct answers here - comment removed. We have zero tolerance for transphobia here.” Ugh...as has been stated before, truth is the new hate speech!

Daily Surge Tuesday ... -- Why Trump Leads All GOP Contenders … Not as Mystifying as Some Think -- Armed Staff vs School Resource Officers: Yep, One Has Obvious, Practical Advantages Over the Other dailysurge.com

-- Armed Staff vs School Resource Officers: Yep, One Has Obvious, Practical Advantages Over the Other https://dailysurge.com/2023/09/armed-staff-vs-school-resource-officers-yep-one-has-obvious-practical-advantages-over-the-other/