• Have you seen this?

    The Supreme Court is CONSIDERING Taking Up a 2020 Election Case.

    The suit is accusing the entire House, Biden, and Mike Pence of TREASON.

    This is a big deal, right?

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf?fbclid=IwAR31BuQbwJ-4yJNiV5jJCC9sHy2xK0lmBCNyHWPqlC8D6WRPHfzFKykc_us

    Have you seen this? The Supreme Court is CONSIDERING Taking Up a 2020 Election Case. The suit is accusing the entire House, Biden, and Mike Pence of TREASON. This is a big deal, right? https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf?fbclid=IwAR31BuQbwJ-4yJNiV5jJCC9sHy2xK0lmBCNyHWPqlC8D6WRPHfzFKykc_us
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • 20-1530 West Virginia v. EPA

    Here is the ACTUAL #SCOTUS Ruling that says federal agencies DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE AIR!!!

    Every person in the United States needs to obtain a copy!
    ALL REGULATION OF EMISSIONS ARE ILLEGAL!

    SCOTUS made the ruling in black and white!
    So just STOP allowing #Government to continue regulating the sh*t out of EVERYTHING!

    They do NOT have the authority!
    #Congress does NOT have authority either!

    But our government is wholly and totally ILLEGITIMATE and it's time to rid ourselves of these #Criminals once and for all!

    Every "Agenda" they have is an anti-human #Satanic agenda!
    Time to PUT THEM DOWN like old yeller!

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
    20-1530 West Virginia v. EPA Here is the ACTUAL #SCOTUS Ruling that says federal agencies DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE AIR!!! Every person in the United States needs to obtain a copy! ALL REGULATION OF EMISSIONS ARE ILLEGAL! SCOTUS made the ruling in black and white! So just STOP allowing #Government to continue regulating the sh*t out of EVERYTHING! They do NOT have the authority! #Congress does NOT have authority either! But our government is wholly and totally ILLEGITIMATE and it's time to rid ourselves of these #Criminals once and for all! Every "Agenda" they have is an anti-human #Satanic agenda! Time to PUT THEM DOWN like old yeller! https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • https://metatalknews.substack.com/p/getting-clear-on-the-law-pt-2?r=polbe&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
    #TopConstitutionalLawyer
    #supremecourtofCanada
    https://metatalknews.substack.com/p/getting-clear-on-the-law-pt-2?r=polbe&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web #TopConstitutionalLawyer #supremecourtofCanada
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://metatalknews.substack.com/p/spirit-rising?sd=pf #supremecourtdecision #mandateoverturned
    https://metatalknews.substack.com/p/spirit-rising?sd=pf #supremecourtdecision #mandateoverturned
    METATALKNEWS.SUBSTACK.COM
    Spirit Rising
    Thanks for reading Meta Talk News! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Lefty Group Shut Down DC Offering Twitter Bounties on Pinning the Public Locations of the 6 Supreme Court Justices Who Overturned Roe v Wade

    Obviously taking the suggested tactic of the moron Marxine Waters to heart, the lefty group Shut Down DC is offering a $50 bounty for anyone who gives them the public location of any of the 6 Supreme Court Justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade last month.

    If the Justice is still in the location pinned after 30 minutes, the bounty jumps to $200.
    Obviously this is about the same kind of harassment that forced Justice Kavanaugh to exit out the back door of a Morton Steak House after loud mouthed protestors showed up at the front of the restaurant he was dining at. https://bit.ly/3yXXNwU

    Twitter is doing nothing about the offer even though their policies prohibit users from encouraging harassment.

    Where is law enforcement in these instances?

    Why are these demonstrators permitted to stalk these Justices and create a public display disturbing the peace?

    The one-way policy of hypocrisy makes a joke of law enforcement these days. Only those on the left are permitted to break the law without any measure of control.

    All else are punished beyond the letter of the law as we continue to see with the Jan 6th political prisoners.

    What a travesty! No wonder police get no respect these days.

    #roevwade #supremecourt #twitter #leftist
    Lefty Group Shut Down DC Offering Twitter Bounties on Pinning the Public Locations of the 6 Supreme Court Justices Who Overturned Roe v Wade Obviously taking the suggested tactic of the moron Marxine Waters to heart, the lefty group Shut Down DC is offering a $50 bounty for anyone who gives them the public location of any of the 6 Supreme Court Justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade last month. If the Justice is still in the location pinned after 30 minutes, the bounty jumps to $200. Obviously this is about the same kind of harassment that forced Justice Kavanaugh to exit out the back door of a Morton Steak House after loud mouthed protestors showed up at the front of the restaurant he was dining at. https://bit.ly/3yXXNwU Twitter is doing nothing about the offer even though their policies prohibit users from encouraging harassment. Where is law enforcement in these instances? Why are these demonstrators permitted to stalk these Justices and create a public display disturbing the peace? The one-way policy of hypocrisy makes a joke of law enforcement these days. Only those on the left are permitted to break the law without any measure of control. All else are punished beyond the letter of the law as we continue to see with the Jan 6th political prisoners. What a travesty! No wonder police get no respect these days. #roevwade #supremecourt #twitter #leftist
    BIT.LY
    Lefty group ShutDownDC offering $200 bounty for intel on SCOTUS justices
    ShutDownDC is offering a cash reward for anyone who gives them the location of the six Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • You Think the Left Hated Clarence Thomas Before? His Concurrence Has Their Heads Turning and Spewing Green Vomit

    In his concurrence on the Roe decision, Clarence Thomas said:

    - “in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’...we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” https://bit.ly/3yKvGB3

    Huh, Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell?

    The Obergefell case?

    Obergefell is the 2015 5-4 decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

    Jim Obergefell, now running for a seat in the Ohio state House commented on Thomas on Friday noting in a statement that he is

    - “a Supreme Court justice appointed by humans, he is not the Supreme Deity.”

    Uh, excuse me but isn't that what the people who practice biologically, unnatural unions do, but think they know more than the Creator?

    Of course, they reject any notion of a Creator and so that doesn't really count, so most of them likely believe.

    Except biological reality globally tends to reject their man-generated concept that goes against all natural human reality.

    But hey, Thomas is the Deity now?

    Is same-sex marriage next on the list? We shall see.

    #samesexmarriage #gaymarriage #clarencethomas #roevwade #supremecourt
    You Think the Left Hated Clarence Thomas Before? His Concurrence Has Their Heads Turning and Spewing Green Vomit In his concurrence on the Roe decision, Clarence Thomas said: - “in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’...we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” https://bit.ly/3yKvGB3 Huh, Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell? The Obergefell case? Obergefell is the 2015 5-4 decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. Jim Obergefell, now running for a seat in the Ohio state House commented on Thomas on Friday noting in a statement that he is - “a Supreme Court justice appointed by humans, he is not the Supreme Deity.” Uh, excuse me but isn't that what the people who practice biologically, unnatural unions do, but think they know more than the Creator? Of course, they reject any notion of a Creator and so that doesn't really count, so most of them likely believe. Except biological reality globally tends to reject their man-generated concept that goes against all natural human reality. But hey, Thomas is the Deity now? Is same-sex marriage next on the list? We shall see. #samesexmarriage #gaymarriage #clarencethomas #roevwade #supremecourt
    BIT.LY
    Clarence Thomas Says Why Stop at Abortion When We Can Undo the Entire 20th Century
    We knew LGBTQ rights were under attack. The Supreme Court just confirmed it.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Report: 10-Year-Old Ohio Rape Victim Traveled To Indiana For Abortion; Was Six Weeks Pregnant
    #10YearOld #Ohio #RapeVictim #Abortion #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS
    Report: 10-Year-Old Ohio Rape Victim Traveled To Indiana For Abortion; Was Six Weeks Pregnant #10YearOld #Ohio #RapeVictim #Abortion #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS
    THESECONDNEWS.COM
    Report: 10-Year-Old Ohio Rape Victim Traveled To Indiana For Abortion; Was Six Weeks Pregnant
    The devastating effects of the US Supreme Court’s abortion decision have come to light in the case of a 10-year-old Ohio child rape victim who was six weeks pregnant, ineligible for an abortion in her home state, and forced to fly to Indiana for the surgery. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate 1973’s Roe
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • According to Justice Kagan's Dissent (and part-time Prophet) Parts of the East Coast Could Be Swallowed by the Ocean

    On the recent EPA decision Kagan noted:

    - "If the current rate of emissions continues, children born this year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard swallowed by the ocean,"

    - "Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most pressing environmental challenge of our time," https://fxn.ws/3yft6By

    So, yeah get out your rubber boots and purchase that row boat 'cause the flood is coming.

    Then again, she may just have been referring to the beaches along the Jersey shoreline where the water ebbs in and ebbs out continuously, "swallowing up part of the beach"

    - I think they call it surf, but don't quote me on that.

    #globalwarming #climatechange #supremecourt #epa #justicekagan
    According to Justice Kagan's Dissent (and part-time Prophet) Parts of the East Coast Could Be Swallowed by the Ocean On the recent EPA decision Kagan noted: - "If the current rate of emissions continues, children born this year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard swallowed by the ocean," - "Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most pressing environmental challenge of our time," https://fxn.ws/3yft6By So, yeah get out your rubber boots and purchase that row boat 'cause the flood is coming. Then again, she may just have been referring to the beaches along the Jersey shoreline where the water ebbs in and ebbs out continuously, "swallowing up part of the beach" - I think they call it surf, but don't quote me on that. #globalwarming #climatechange #supremecourt #epa #justicekagan
    FXN.WS
    Justice Kagan warns parts of East Coast could be 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent in EPA case
    Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned of the dangers of climate change in her dissenting opinion issued in the case West Virginia v. EPA.
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • Full Text of the Roe v Wade Supreme Court Overturn FYI

    So much misrepresentation on this issue.

    Just including a link to it for those who wish to see the facts rather than the media and politicians misrepresentations. https://bit.ly/3a83ezw

    Very early in the text it reads:

    "Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives."

    You can read the full text if you like, but that paragraph alone makes the point quite clearly.

    - The recent decision banned NOTHING.

    - All it did was return the issue to the states to decide.

    P.S. - Also handy, just in case you need to shut up the leftist who is wallowing in misrepresentations spoon-fed by the media and politicians.

    #roevwade #supremecourt #abortiondecision #roedescision
    Full Text of the Roe v Wade Supreme Court Overturn FYI So much misrepresentation on this issue. Just including a link to it for those who wish to see the facts rather than the media and politicians misrepresentations. https://bit.ly/3a83ezw Very early in the text it reads: "Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives." You can read the full text if you like, but that paragraph alone makes the point quite clearly. - The recent decision banned NOTHING. - All it did was return the issue to the states to decide. P.S. - Also handy, just in case you need to shut up the leftist who is wallowing in misrepresentations spoon-fed by the media and politicians. #roevwade #supremecourt #abortiondecision #roedescision
    BIT.LY
    Read: The Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade
    Read the decision overturning the landmark 1973 court case that established the constitutional right to an abortion.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Supreme Court Allows Biden Decision to End the Trump "Remain in Mexico" Policy

    Yep, the Supreme Court once again abandons the citizens in favor of globalist policy.

    Trump's border policy required asylum seekers coming across our Southern border to reside in Mexico awaiting their immigration hearings. https://washex.am/3y5Wbzs

    Biden v. Texas challenged that policy.
    The SC, in a 5-4 ruled that the Biden administration acted properly when it sought to end the policy and is permitting it.

    We can expect even more illegal immigrant flow across the borders which are already under assault.
    The decision once again shows that the conservative label for SC Justices is pretty much meaningless.

    Roberts, as usual sided with the liberals, as did Brett Kavanaugh.

    The dissenting Justices were Gorsuch, Thomas, Coney Barrett and Alito.

    Alito wrote in his dissent that the administration is releasing:

    - "into this country untold numbers of aliens who are very likely to be removed if they show up for their removal hearings."

    - "This practice violates the clear terms of the law, but the court looks the other way,"

    The anti-Federalists had it right over 225 years ago during the ratification hearings when Judge Robert Yates, writing as Brutus, noted that:

    - the Supreme Court would become a source of massive abuse because they were beyond the control of “both the people and the legislature.”

    - without true constitutional grounds for rulings, the Court would create them “by their own decisions,” through manipulating the meanings of arguably vague clauses.

    - The court would interpret the Constitution according to its alleged “spirit” rather than according to its words (as enumerated rights, spelled out in the Tenth Amendment, would require). https://bit.ly/3ueVLFX

    And once again, the Justice system betrays the citizens.

    #supremecourt #illegalimmigration #border #bidenbordercrisis
    Supreme Court Allows Biden Decision to End the Trump "Remain in Mexico" Policy Yep, the Supreme Court once again abandons the citizens in favor of globalist policy. Trump's border policy required asylum seekers coming across our Southern border to reside in Mexico awaiting their immigration hearings. https://washex.am/3y5Wbzs Biden v. Texas challenged that policy. The SC, in a 5-4 ruled that the Biden administration acted properly when it sought to end the policy and is permitting it. We can expect even more illegal immigrant flow across the borders which are already under assault. The decision once again shows that the conservative label for SC Justices is pretty much meaningless. Roberts, as usual sided with the liberals, as did Brett Kavanaugh. The dissenting Justices were Gorsuch, Thomas, Coney Barrett and Alito. Alito wrote in his dissent that the administration is releasing: - "into this country untold numbers of aliens who are very likely to be removed if they show up for their removal hearings." - "This practice violates the clear terms of the law, but the court looks the other way," The anti-Federalists had it right over 225 years ago during the ratification hearings when Judge Robert Yates, writing as Brutus, noted that: - the Supreme Court would become a source of massive abuse because they were beyond the control of “both the people and the legislature.” - without true constitutional grounds for rulings, the Court would create them “by their own decisions,” through manipulating the meanings of arguably vague clauses. - The court would interpret the Constitution according to its alleged “spirit” rather than according to its words (as enumerated rights, spelled out in the Tenth Amendment, would require). https://bit.ly/3ueVLFX And once again, the Justice system betrays the citizens. #supremecourt #illegalimmigration #border #bidenbordercrisis
    WASHEX.AM
    Supreme Court allows Biden to end Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy
    The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Joe Biden's decision to end the Trump-era "Remain in Mexico" immigration policy, which required asylum-seekers coming from the southern border to reside in Mexico while awaiting immigration hearings, did not violate federal immigration law.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Results
Sponsored