• William Shatner ATTACKS woke LANGUAGE POLICE as they CANCEL STAR TREK!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9Kr2j6cFqk
    On January 29, the 92-year-old Shatner sounded off regarding a woke EU “guide” that would banish words used in the early-days opening of the television series – a “guide” that suggests “phasering-out” lines such as, “To boldly go where no man has gone before!” Supplying screen-shots on X from the original Sun.co.uk article that tells readers about this EU language “tool kit,” Mr. Shatner took a low-key, sincere approach to the information he had read. And it’s information that easily could cause many sensible people a lot of vexation. Paramount is avoiding using or featuring in any way their most ICONIC character, William Shatner's Capitan Kirk! William Shatner took shots at Paramount over the handling of the Star Trek franchise and the erasure of the most beloved character in Star Trek history, Captain Kirk. Prompted by a question from X user Herostraous, asking, “But will we ever see Captain Kirk again?” William Shatner took a recent Paramount+ Star Trek Originals promotional image, with a poster with every captain from every Star Trek show on the image, but oddly, Captain Kirk is missing. William Shatner wrote along with the image, “All you have to do is look at the Paramount+ graphics to answer that question.” His answer sparked outrage from fans, chief among them pop culture experts Nerdrotic, Doomcock, and The Critical Drinker. Nerdrotic posted, “This is a crime against Star Trek.” Doomock said, “This is a travesty. Captain Kirk is the heart of Star Trek and without Captain Kirk, the whole thing is a SHAM. God bless #WilliamShatner and the immortal character he created. My childhood hero. Thank you for all the joy you brought me, Bill. You’re the best.” However, the discussion didn’t stop there as another fan asked William Shatner, “Has anyone at Paramount come out with an official explanation for this MASSIVE FLUB?” Shatner replied once more, taking more shots at Paramount over their handling of the series, stating, “It’s not the first time it’s been going on for years. It makes no difference to me that a group who think they are “enlightened” (or whatever they think they are) obviously feels threatened by the Kirk character. It’s a character from a 1960’s TV show- get over it.”
    William Shatner ATTACKS woke LANGUAGE POLICE as they CANCEL STAR TREK! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9Kr2j6cFqk On January 29, the 92-year-old Shatner sounded off regarding a woke EU “guide” that would banish words used in the early-days opening of the television series – a “guide” that suggests “phasering-out” lines such as, “To boldly go where no man has gone before!” Supplying screen-shots on X from the original Sun.co.uk article that tells readers about this EU language “tool kit,” Mr. Shatner took a low-key, sincere approach to the information he had read. And it’s information that easily could cause many sensible people a lot of vexation. Paramount is avoiding using or featuring in any way their most ICONIC character, William Shatner's Capitan Kirk! William Shatner took shots at Paramount over the handling of the Star Trek franchise and the erasure of the most beloved character in Star Trek history, Captain Kirk. Prompted by a question from X user Herostraous, asking, “But will we ever see Captain Kirk again?” William Shatner took a recent Paramount+ Star Trek Originals promotional image, with a poster with every captain from every Star Trek show on the image, but oddly, Captain Kirk is missing. William Shatner wrote along with the image, “All you have to do is look at the Paramount+ graphics to answer that question.” His answer sparked outrage from fans, chief among them pop culture experts Nerdrotic, Doomcock, and The Critical Drinker. Nerdrotic posted, “This is a crime against Star Trek.” Doomock said, “This is a travesty. Captain Kirk is the heart of Star Trek and without Captain Kirk, the whole thing is a SHAM. God bless #WilliamShatner and the immortal character he created. My childhood hero. Thank you for all the joy you brought me, Bill. You’re the best.” However, the discussion didn’t stop there as another fan asked William Shatner, “Has anyone at Paramount come out with an official explanation for this MASSIVE FLUB?” Shatner replied once more, taking more shots at Paramount over their handling of the series, stating, “It’s not the first time it’s been going on for years. It makes no difference to me that a group who think they are “enlightened” (or whatever they think they are) obviously feels threatened by the Kirk character. It’s a character from a 1960’s TV show- get over it.”
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 152 Visualizações
  • DO POLICE SWEAR AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION?

    Sure they do, they are REQUIRED to do it before they can become a #Police officer.

    The problem is they've never READ the #Constitution,
    so how are they supposed to "Protect and Defend" it???
    I'm serious here.

    This is a good read
    And for once, it's not just me saying it! LOL

    Excerpt
    While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it.

    https://police-brutality.usattorneys.com/do-police-swear-an-oath-to-the-constitution/#:~:text=State%20and%20local%20police%20generally%20swear%20an%20oath,office%20on%20which%20I%20am%20about%20to%20enter.
    DO POLICE SWEAR AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION? Sure they do, they are REQUIRED to do it before they can become a #Police officer. The problem is they've never READ the #Constitution, so how are they supposed to "Protect and Defend" it??? I'm serious here. This is a good read And for once, it's not just me saying it! LOL Excerpt While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it. https://police-brutality.usattorneys.com/do-police-swear-an-oath-to-the-constitution/#:~:text=State%20and%20local%20police%20generally%20swear%20an%20oath,office%20on%20which%20I%20am%20about%20to%20enter.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 185 Visualizações
  • The #Truth is the TRUTH whether you like it or not!

    #Police have only ONE real job!
    And that is to "Protect and defend the Constitution and the PEOPLE of the United States and their property!

    PERIOD!

    Nobody said shit about "Officer Safety"
    Their JOB and sworn duty, that they swear an #Oath to do is to...
    "Protect and defend the Constitution"

    Which includes "Protecting and Defending the
    Inalienable Human Rights of EVERY AMERICAN"

    You know.... protect those pesky Americans that Police keep shooting 47 times in the back for "Officer Safety" reasons

    "Officer Safety" is a code for "Be a tyrant and a coward"
    NOBODY'S LIFE MATTERS BUT YOUR OWN!

    Police take a dangerous job.....
    They are SUPPOSED to know this going into it!

    Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should an American who has NOT been convicted of a crime be shot by Police for ANY REASON short of them AIMING A FIREARM AT THAT COP!

    Filling Americans full of holes for pulling up their pants is unacceptable! As is claiming "I saw him reaching for something"

    UNLESS SHOTS HAVE BEEN FIRED AT POLICE
    they have ZERO LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY to even draw their weapon.

    Their JOB is to PROTECT the Americans
    they continue MURDERING in the name of "Officer Safety"

    You panty waist little PUNKS!
    You have BODY ARMOR on, a gun, a taser, and YHWH only knows what else! WHY in Heaven's name are scared like a little bitch?

    MAYBE it's because YOU KNOW how #Evil your behavior is!
    MAYBE it's because you spend your days trying to CAGE the people you swore an oath to protect!

    MAYBE you are scared because you know that you DESERVE to be put down like the rabid, tyrant dog you are.....

    Or MAYBE it's because the #Luciferians who run the CORPORATION you work for have trained you to be an ENEMY of all of mankind....

    And somewhere deep down you KNOW
    that is exactly what you have become!

    I have a suggestion for you ALL
    GO READ THE SOLEMN OATH YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD
    before you were allowed to become a Police Officer

    Read every word of it!
    If you cannot recite the Constitution,
    HOW CAN YOU PROTECT AND DEFEND IT?

    Oath.
    State and local police generally swear an oath to the United States Constitution, as civil service or uniformed service officers, stating: “I, officer name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

    Language may include “… to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States [and of your state] against all enemies, foreign or domestic” so that state agencies are specifically named. This oath may be tested in an officer’s personal and professional life as evidenced by the increases in police brutality claims nationwide.

    Constitutional framework.
    While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it.

    Federal law.
    Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to local, state, or federal law enforcement or military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens. Every state has a similar law.

    If officers were to act in accordance with the oath they take when being sworn into civil service positions, the incidence of police misconduct and brutality might be decreased, in consideration of criminal prosecution for violations of U.S. Constitutional law that include police action against a citizen’s:

    4thAmendment right to be free from unreasonable government searches and seizures;
    8thAmendment right for inmates to live free from cruel and unusual punishments;
    14thAmendment right to live free from excessive force while detained by the police.
    Police brutality attorneys are well-versed in constitutional law and are often a good resource when citizens feel that a law officer has acted with brutality or in a way that constitutes misconduct against the oath they swore to uphold as police
    The #Truth is the TRUTH whether you like it or not! #Police have only ONE real job! And that is to "Protect and defend the Constitution and the PEOPLE of the United States and their property! PERIOD! Nobody said shit about "Officer Safety" Their JOB and sworn duty, that they swear an #Oath to do is to... "Protect and defend the Constitution" Which includes "Protecting and Defending the Inalienable Human Rights of EVERY AMERICAN" You know.... protect those pesky Americans that Police keep shooting 47 times in the back for "Officer Safety" reasons "Officer Safety" is a code for "Be a tyrant and a coward" NOBODY'S LIFE MATTERS BUT YOUR OWN! Police take a dangerous job..... They are SUPPOSED to know this going into it! Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should an American who has NOT been convicted of a crime be shot by Police for ANY REASON short of them AIMING A FIREARM AT THAT COP! Filling Americans full of holes for pulling up their pants is unacceptable! As is claiming "I saw him reaching for something" UNLESS SHOTS HAVE BEEN FIRED AT POLICE they have ZERO LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY to even draw their weapon. Their JOB is to PROTECT the Americans they continue MURDERING in the name of "Officer Safety" You panty waist little PUNKS! You have BODY ARMOR on, a gun, a taser, and YHWH only knows what else! WHY in Heaven's name are scared like a little bitch? MAYBE it's because YOU KNOW how #Evil your behavior is! MAYBE it's because you spend your days trying to CAGE the people you swore an oath to protect! MAYBE you are scared because you know that you DESERVE to be put down like the rabid, tyrant dog you are..... Or MAYBE it's because the #Luciferians who run the CORPORATION you work for have trained you to be an ENEMY of all of mankind.... And somewhere deep down you KNOW that is exactly what you have become! I have a suggestion for you ALL GO READ THE SOLEMN OATH YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD before you were allowed to become a Police Officer Read every word of it! If you cannot recite the Constitution, HOW CAN YOU PROTECT AND DEFEND IT? Oath. State and local police generally swear an oath to the United States Constitution, as civil service or uniformed service officers, stating: “I, officer name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. Language may include “… to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States [and of your state] against all enemies, foreign or domestic” so that state agencies are specifically named. This oath may be tested in an officer’s personal and professional life as evidenced by the increases in police brutality claims nationwide. Constitutional framework. While the Constitutional framework addresses the exercises of power permitted under it, it has been assuming more powers that are not constitutionally-based in response to public demands for “action” to specific instances. Without the adaptation of spelled out amendments, these requested powers may not be legitimate and serve purposes that were never intended by the original legislation, based in part on the mechanisms of court outcomes that may be biased. As an officer of the law, any order received that is contrary to the Constitution of the U.S. or of your State is illegal. Compliance with such an order is not required, but may be and probably is illegal, and the issuance of such an order may be a crime, which obligates a law enforcement officer to make an arrest of the person issuing it. Federal law. Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to local, state, or federal law enforcement or military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens. Every state has a similar law. If officers were to act in accordance with the oath they take when being sworn into civil service positions, the incidence of police misconduct and brutality might be decreased, in consideration of criminal prosecution for violations of U.S. Constitutional law that include police action against a citizen’s: 4thAmendment right to be free from unreasonable government searches and seizures; 8thAmendment right for inmates to live free from cruel and unusual punishments; 14thAmendment right to live free from excessive force while detained by the police. Police brutality attorneys are well-versed in constitutional law and are often a good resource when citizens feel that a law officer has acted with brutality or in a way that constitutes misconduct against the oath they swore to uphold as police
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 394 Visualizações
  • Hold on! I'm not here to answer any questions.
    https://imgflip.com/i/7he53w
    Hold on! I'm not here to answer any questions. https://imgflip.com/i/7he53w
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 95 Visualizações 5
  • I have a question for everyone. Are you familiar with the digital smart meters that are being proposed for installation on homes? I recently received a visit from a representative, but chose not to answer the door. Instead, I contacted the number provided on the card. The individual I spoke with informed me that I have the option to opt out of having the smart meter installed. However, when I inquired whether this was a voluntary decision or if it would become mandatory in the future, they were unable to provide a clear answer. I am seeking more information on this matter and would appreciate any insights or knowledge that others may have on the subject.
    I have a question for everyone. Are you familiar with the digital smart meters that are being proposed for installation on homes? I recently received a visit from a representative, but chose not to answer the door. Instead, I contacted the number provided on the card. The individual I spoke with informed me that I have the option to opt out of having the smart meter installed. However, when I inquired whether this was a voluntary decision or if it would become mandatory in the future, they were unable to provide a clear answer. I am seeking more information on this matter and would appreciate any insights or knowledge that others may have on the subject.
    3 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 114 Visualizações
  • Low-calorie Sweetener Linked To Significant Increase in Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke https://www.infowars.com/posts/low-calorie-sweetener-linked-to-significant-increase-in-risk-of-heart-attack-and-stroke/
    Low-calorie Sweetener Linked To Significant Increase in Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke https://www.infowars.com/posts/low-calorie-sweetener-linked-to-significant-increase-in-risk-of-heart-attack-and-stroke/
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 118 Visualizações
  • https://x.com/sweetiegoat1776/status/1799413541562388804
    https://x.com/sweetiegoat1776/status/1799413541562388804
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 87 Visualizações
  • Retail Bloodbath: More Than 2,600 Store Closings Have Been Announced So Far In 2024.
    Retail stores are being shut down at a staggering rate all over the country. If we stay on the pace that we are on, the total number of stores closed in 2024 will be nearly 40 percent higher than the total number of stores closed in 2023. That is what you call a crisis! Meanwhile, banks are shuttering hundreds of branches from coast to coast, and a “restaurant apocalypse” is sweeping across the nation.

    https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/
    Retail Bloodbath: More Than 2,600 Store Closings Have Been Announced So Far In 2024. Retail stores are being shut down at a staggering rate all over the country. If we stay on the pace that we are on, the total number of stores closed in 2024 will be nearly 40 percent higher than the total number of stores closed in 2023. That is what you call a crisis! Meanwhile, banks are shuttering hundreds of branches from coast to coast, and a “restaurant apocalypse” is sweeping across the nation. https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 271 Visualizações
  • THERE IS NO USE QUESTIONING THESE PEOPLE THEY JUST SAY THEY CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION... IT'S LIKE TAKING THE 5TH WITHOUT TAKING THE 5TH...
    Chistopher Wray is trash.
    THERE IS NO USE QUESTIONING THESE PEOPLE THEY JUST SAY THEY CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION... IT'S LIKE TAKING THE 5TH WITHOUT TAKING THE 5TH... Chistopher Wray is trash.
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 65 Visualizações 0
  • #JoeBiden’s New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified For This Answer Alone - #fjb - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/bidens-new-judicial-nominee-should-be-disqualified-for-this-answer-alone/
    #JoeBiden’s New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified For This Answer Alone - #fjb - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/bidens-new-judicial-nominee-should-be-disqualified-for-this-answer-alone/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Biden's New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified for This Answer Alone - The Washington Standard
    One of the most ridiculous features of our age of absurdity is that there is actually a controversy over what a woman is. But first Biden’s Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson refused back in 2022 to define what a woman is, offering the excuse that she was not a ...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 146 Visualizações
Páginas Impulsionadas
Patrocinado

After a successful May, we are now funded 54% for June. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here