• Outrageous Tyrant Cops Violate a Homeless Vet & His Service Dog

    "Panhandling" is a PROTECTED ACTIVITY under the us constitution!
    #SCOTUS has ruled on it and it is a VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION to criminalize panhandling.... So this cop is violating her #Oath, and the City is acting UNLAWFULLY

    They need to be sued into bankruptcy!

    https://youtu.be/iyslFHMW9l8
    Outrageous Tyrant Cops Violate a Homeless Vet & His Service Dog "Panhandling" is a PROTECTED ACTIVITY under the us constitution! #SCOTUS has ruled on it and it is a VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION to criminalize panhandling.... So this cop is violating her #Oath, and the City is acting UNLAWFULLY They need to be sued into bankruptcy! https://youtu.be/iyslFHMW9l8
    0 Comments 0 Shares 293 Views
  • RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! ... Today, Tuesday, November 14th, from 7-8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Survival's Driving Force'; 'The Cancer on College Campuses'; Netanyahu's warning to America; Mayorkas Resolution of Impeachment; Biden considering giving Iran access to another $10 billion; and the SCOTUS new Code of Conduct. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50 pm EST with show beginning at 7pm EST.
    RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! ... Today, Tuesday, November 14th, from 7-8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Survival's Driving Force'; 'The Cancer on College Campuses'; Netanyahu's warning to America; Mayorkas Resolution of Impeachment; Biden considering giving Iran access to another $10 billion; and the SCOTUS new Code of Conduct. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50 pm EST with show beginning at 7pm EST.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 885 Views
  • #SCOTUS To Review #Trump-Era #BumpStock Ban - #2a #2ashallnotbeinfringed - https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-review-trump-era-bump-stock-ban
    #SCOTUS To Review #Trump-Era #BumpStock Ban - #2a #2ashallnotbeinfringed - https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-review-trump-era-bump-stock-ban
    WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM
    Supreme Court To Review Trump-Era 'Bump Stock' Ban
    "The bump stock ban case is about whether the ATF's interpretation of the definition of a "machinegun" is correct..."
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 514 Views
  • #RestoreTheMilitia
    In a Blow to #DueProcess, #SCOTUS Gives #Police the Green Light to Misidentify, Arrest and Jail Innocent Americans https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/in_a_blow_to_due_process_safeguards_supreme_court_refuses_to_hold_police_accountable_for_misidentifying_arresting_and_jailing_an_innocent_man
    #RestoreTheMilitia In a Blow to #DueProcess, #SCOTUS Gives #Police the Green Light to Misidentify, Arrest and Jail Innocent Americans https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/in_a_blow_to_due_process_safeguards_supreme_court_refuses_to_hold_police_accountable_for_misidentifying_arresting_and_jailing_an_innocent_man
    WWW.RUTHERFORD.ORG
    Supreme Court Gives Cops the Green Light to Wrongfully Arrest and Jail Innocent Americans
    Thanks to the Supreme Court, you can be mistaken for someone else, wrongly arrested, and jailed by police, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 1070 Views
  • Trooper PITS the WRONG CAR - Then it Gets WORSE

    A GANG of violent #Criminals authorized by morons who desire to be "protected" by people who don't "protect" anyone!

    The #Police have NO DUTY TO PROTECT YOU and #SCOTUS has said so. What they do have a duty to do is to GENERATE REVENUE!

    They desire to relieve you of your hard earned money!
    They desire control over you!

    I know they are called "Public Servants"but in their minds,
    they are "Public MASTERS." YOUR MASTER!

    POLICY ENFORCERS WHO ENDANGER THE ENTIRE PUBLIC!
    More dangerous than any #Criminal!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfU0tYMj-T4
    Trooper PITS the WRONG CAR - Then it Gets WORSE A GANG of violent #Criminals authorized by morons who desire to be "protected" by people who don't "protect" anyone! The #Police have NO DUTY TO PROTECT YOU and #SCOTUS has said so. What they do have a duty to do is to GENERATE REVENUE! They desire to relieve you of your hard earned money! They desire control over you! I know they are called "Public Servants"but in their minds, they are "Public MASTERS." YOUR MASTER! POLICY ENFORCERS WHO ENDANGER THE ENTIRE PUBLIC! More dangerous than any #Criminal! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfU0tYMj-T4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 389 Views
  • AMERICA IS FALTERING; SCOTUS IS WHY

    #SCOTUS rulings have violated the #Constitution!
    It is unacceptable!

    https://youtu.be/K3dPYQpmNAU
    AMERICA IS FALTERING; SCOTUS IS WHY #SCOTUS rulings have violated the #Constitution! It is unacceptable! https://youtu.be/K3dPYQpmNAU
    0 Comments 0 Shares 281 Views
  • Unhinged Cop Fired After This Video - Update and BodyCam

    VIDEO OF THE DAY HANDS DOWN!
    This video demonstrates that #Police ignore the law completely, and arrest / detain people based on their pathetic EGO and "Feelings"

    They TRIED to arrest this man, and DID ARREST HIM for several hours, KNOWINGLY infringing upon his Natural & Constitutional Rights in a punitive manner, BECAUSE HE DEMANDED RESPECT FROM A TYRANT!

    While I'm NOT a fan of his nail polish.....
    This guy has a pretty valid point!

    #Police seem to THINK that they are your "Masters" and that they have control over you when you have committed NO CRIME!

    Sorry piggies.... It don't work like that!
    The #FourthAmendment is pretty f*cking clear is it not?

    And #SCOTUS violated the #Constitution when they created "Terry vs Ohio" which UNLAWFULLY ALLOWS POLICE TO DETAIN PEOPLE AND THEN SEARCH THEM...
    When they are not guilty of a crime or even suspected of a crime!

    Terry vs Ohio wipes it's ass with the Constitution!
    Just like the illegitimate SCOTUS did when it passed this BS precedent!
    This should have been struck down / Reversed LONG AGO! But it hasn't!

    It's a blatant violation of your Inalienable Human Rights!

    These officers should ALL be PROSECUTED under
    18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights AND
    18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law....

    Because THAT IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INFRINGE UPON YOUR INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE "COLOR OF LAW"

    WHY do we never see this happening?
    Because it requires a #Corrupt "Federal Prosecutor" to file the charges!
    THERE ARE NO HONEST ONES!

    So the system MUST BE CHANGED so that CITIZENS can file these charges!
    Not only against Police, but against Judges and Politicians too!

    We need a COMMON LAW #COURT in America, where everyday Americans act as "Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, Executioner / Jailer"

    NO #BAR Association scumbags required!
    And this COMMON LAW COURT is where #Government needs to be tried for their crimes! No more "Investigating themselves" and "Prosecuting Themselves"

    We need every day, regular, non-government AMERICANS running these courts!
    A court where actual #Justice can be served! ON GOVERNMENT!

    Because the bottom line is that "government" in this country is just the MAFIA!
    They break all the laws they want, fail to prosecute themselves and their friends, as they drop the hammer on ANYONE who tries to expose them or stands in their way!

    We have had ENOUGH!
    It is time to rectify the situation!

    https://youtu.be/iyK0DhaIlTU
    Unhinged Cop Fired After This Video - Update and BodyCam VIDEO OF THE DAY HANDS DOWN! This video demonstrates that #Police ignore the law completely, and arrest / detain people based on their pathetic EGO and "Feelings" They TRIED to arrest this man, and DID ARREST HIM for several hours, KNOWINGLY infringing upon his Natural & Constitutional Rights in a punitive manner, BECAUSE HE DEMANDED RESPECT FROM A TYRANT! While I'm NOT a fan of his nail polish..... This guy has a pretty valid point! #Police seem to THINK that they are your "Masters" and that they have control over you when you have committed NO CRIME! Sorry piggies.... It don't work like that! The #FourthAmendment is pretty f*cking clear is it not? And #SCOTUS violated the #Constitution when they created "Terry vs Ohio" which UNLAWFULLY ALLOWS POLICE TO DETAIN PEOPLE AND THEN SEARCH THEM... When they are not guilty of a crime or even suspected of a crime! Terry vs Ohio wipes it's ass with the Constitution! Just like the illegitimate SCOTUS did when it passed this BS precedent! This should have been struck down / Reversed LONG AGO! But it hasn't! It's a blatant violation of your Inalienable Human Rights! These officers should ALL be PROSECUTED under 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights AND 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.... Because THAT IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INFRINGE UPON YOUR INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE "COLOR OF LAW" WHY do we never see this happening? Because it requires a #Corrupt "Federal Prosecutor" to file the charges! THERE ARE NO HONEST ONES! So the system MUST BE CHANGED so that CITIZENS can file these charges! Not only against Police, but against Judges and Politicians too! We need a COMMON LAW #COURT in America, where everyday Americans act as "Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, Executioner / Jailer" NO #BAR Association scumbags required! And this COMMON LAW COURT is where #Government needs to be tried for their crimes! No more "Investigating themselves" and "Prosecuting Themselves" We need every day, regular, non-government AMERICANS running these courts! A court where actual #Justice can be served! ON GOVERNMENT! Because the bottom line is that "government" in this country is just the MAFIA! They break all the laws they want, fail to prosecute themselves and their friends, as they drop the hammer on ANYONE who tries to expose them or stands in their way! We have had ENOUGH! It is time to rectify the situation! https://youtu.be/iyK0DhaIlTU
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1394 Views
  • Video: Tim Brown Editor #SonsOfLibertyMedia & Radio - The #SCOTUS Must Hear The Voice Of The People On Behalf Of These #Prisoners https://rumble.com/v3j8v84-the-supreme-court-must-hear-the-voice-of-the-people-on-behalf-of-these-pris.html
    Video: [timbrown] Editor #SonsOfLibertyMedia & Radio - The #SCOTUS Must Hear The Voice Of The People On Behalf Of These #Prisoners https://rumble.com/v3j8v84-the-supreme-court-must-hear-the-voice-of-the-people-on-behalf-of-these-pris.html
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 510 Views
  • County Police Try To VIOLATE Journalist's Constitutional Rights!
    MASSIVE Walk Of Shame!

    If YOU don't protect and defend your inalienable human rights, WHO WILL?

    It certainly won't be the #Police or the Corporate "government"

    Police cannot really be so dense as to pretend they do not understand the difference between "PRIVATE PROPERTY" AND "PUBLIC PROPERTY"

    Every time that a guy with a camera shows up on PUBLIC PROPERTY, paid for by TAXPAYERS and belonging to the PUBIC, they try to tell him that PUBLIC SERVANTS have the authority to "Ask him to leave" for any reason!

    This is NOT true! On PUBLIC PROPERTY a man must have committed a #Crime to be trespassed from PUBLIC PROPERTY. Or he had actually physically prevented them from conducting business. THAT is the law!

    But POLICE try to give PUBLIC SERVANTS the powers that only
    PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS have, which is the ability to ask ANYONE to leave the property for ANY REASON! They actually OWN the property though!

    "Public Property" is owned by the PUBLIC!
    Therefore, you cannot force members of the public to leave their own property!

    UNLESS they have committed an actual CRIME!

    Otherwise the government could tell black people to leave without cause!

    They could ask red headed people to leave!
    They could ask gay people to leave!

    And since those people are TAXPAYERS and members of the PUBLIC you cannot ask them to leave for exercising their inalienable human rights! 1st amendment

    This has been ruled on by #SCOTUS folks!
    And this same battle takes place all over the country EVERY DAY!

    Is it REALLY too much to expect that Police KNOW THE LAWS they are enforcing on people? This should be REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE tested on before graduating the academy! It's PATHETIC!

    And it's very hard for me to believe that these cops don't already know this stuff!

    https://youtu.be/NV-x5N-b1V0
    County Police Try To VIOLATE Journalist's Constitutional Rights! MASSIVE Walk Of Shame! If YOU don't protect and defend your inalienable human rights, WHO WILL? It certainly won't be the #Police or the Corporate "government" Police cannot really be so dense as to pretend they do not understand the difference between "PRIVATE PROPERTY" AND "PUBLIC PROPERTY" Every time that a guy with a camera shows up on PUBLIC PROPERTY, paid for by TAXPAYERS and belonging to the PUBIC, they try to tell him that PUBLIC SERVANTS have the authority to "Ask him to leave" for any reason! This is NOT true! On PUBLIC PROPERTY a man must have committed a #Crime to be trespassed from PUBLIC PROPERTY. Or he had actually physically prevented them from conducting business. THAT is the law! But POLICE try to give PUBLIC SERVANTS the powers that only PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS have, which is the ability to ask ANYONE to leave the property for ANY REASON! They actually OWN the property though! "Public Property" is owned by the PUBLIC! Therefore, you cannot force members of the public to leave their own property! UNLESS they have committed an actual CRIME! Otherwise the government could tell black people to leave without cause! They could ask red headed people to leave! They could ask gay people to leave! And since those people are TAXPAYERS and members of the PUBLIC you cannot ask them to leave for exercising their inalienable human rights! 1st amendment This has been ruled on by #SCOTUS folks! And this same battle takes place all over the country EVERY DAY! Is it REALLY too much to expect that Police KNOW THE LAWS they are enforcing on people? This should be REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE tested on before graduating the academy! It's PATHETIC! And it's very hard for me to believe that these cops don't already know this stuff! https://youtu.be/NV-x5N-b1V0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 810 Views
  • United States V. Rahimi: A Disturbing Strategy Against The #SecondAmendment Putting #SCOTUS In A Bind (Video) https://defenseofournation.com/uncategorized/united-states-v-rahimi-a-disturbing-strategy-putting-scotus-in-a-bind/
    United States V. Rahimi: A Disturbing Strategy Against The #SecondAmendment Putting #SCOTUS In A Bind (Video) https://defenseofournation.com/uncategorized/united-states-v-rahimi-a-disturbing-strategy-putting-scotus-in-a-bind/
    DEFENSEOFOURNATION.COM
    United States V. Rahimi: A disturbing strategy putting SCOTUS in a bind.
    [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhEKPfUnM7c[/embed] While everyone is paying attention to the Trump indictment soap opera, a stealth attack is being launched against the Second Amendment, the likes of which we may not be able to stop. Last week, I wrote about the UN Arms Treaty, and how many of the laws being pursued by the Biden Administration fall in line with many of the treaty's objectives. The existence of this treaty is terrible enough as it is. The stealth attack to which I am referring, however, has the potential to destroy the foundations of the Second Amendment while empowering the government to disarm anyone they deem to be a danger to society. Who might these people be? I think we all know the answer to that. Last year, SCOTUS ruled in NYSRPA V. Bruen, that all gun control must align with the nation's historical and traditional laws going back to the founding, and the plain text meaning of the Second Amendment. In other words, if there were no laws prohibiting people from carrying firearms, then any modern law that does so is to be deemed unconstitutional. They also ruled that the two-tiered test that weighed constitutional rights against public safety interests was to be thrown out. If the Second Amendment's plain text meaning covered a person's conduct, that conduct was protected by the Second Amendment. This ruling had gun owners across the country reeling with excitement as the belief rapidly spread that gun control was now a sitting duck. Despite the Bruen ruling, states across the country continue to push draconian gun laws, and several appellate courts have upheld so-called assault weapon bans because the Second Amendment doesn't protect dangerous and unusual weapons - so they argue. There have been some victories as several gun control laws have been shot down as a result of the Bruen ruling. One of these victories, however, may soon prove to be a disaster. If you have ever filled out an ATF 4473 to purchase a gun then you know that if you are subject to a restraining order, you are considered a prohibited person. To most people who are not avid 2A supporters, this makes sense. The problem with this law is that you are being denied your rights without due process. Once someone files a restraining order, and it is signed by a judge, you are prohibited from possessing a firearm. This, of course, is also the foundation for red flag laws. Except in these cases the individual in question is not informed that an order has been issued at all, they just show up and confiscate your guns. The difference between the two is under a red flag law, anyone can file a petition for any reason if they believe you are a danger to yourself or others. In February, following the Bruen guidelines, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that laws prohibiting people from owning firearms because of a restraining order were unconstitutional. The case revolved around an individual named Zackey Rahimi, who admittedly, was not exactly the model citizen. He had been accused of committing several acts of violence, some of which were with a firearm. The problem is that he was never convicted of a crime, aside from possessing a firearm while under a restraining order. If he was a dangerous individual, and I am not arguing he wasn't, he should have been arrested and put through the legal process for those issues, and if found guilty, legally barred from firearm possession. The restraining order was issued on accusations, not proof of, domestic violence. In America, we have the right to life and liberty, and our rights shall not be deprived without due process of law. So we've been told. This case has been appealed to the Supreme Court by Attorney General Merrick Garland. On the surface, it seems simple enough. There were no laws at the time of the founding which disarmed people based on accusations alone. Right? Not necessarily. Our nation has a rich history of disarming people deemed to pose a threat to the social order. Freed slaves, Natives, and Catholics were all categorically denied the right to bear arms because they were deemed to be dangerous. Why would Blacks, for example, be denied Second Amendment rights? Because there was a fear they would rebel. Despite the despicable, racist nature of these laws, the government is using them as the basis of their appeal arguing that the nation's dangerousness laws, which date back to the founding, legitimately apply to the modern use of restraining orders. The Fifth Circuit, acknowledging the existence of such laws, argued that they were meant to protect the social order from dangerous groups, not one individual from another. Therefore, the historical context analogy was thrown out, leading to the appeal. The Department of Justice is now making the same argument in front of the Supreme Court. The nation's historical laws revolving around disarming groups of people deemed to be dangerous are constitutional under the Bruen guidelines. Here is where it gets interesting, if not downright disturbing. SCOTUS is going to do one of two things. They will either declare these laws illegitimate because they were themselves, unconstitutional and bigoted, and we all live happily ever after. Or, they will side with the government for fear of not wanting to be perceived as letting dangerous people have access to guns. This would mean they accepted the government's position that these historical laws fall within the Bruen guidelines, and can be used as a context for gun control in the name of public safety. Which way do you think they will go? This is a brilliant strategy by the DOJ. One truly befitting of an Alkinsky-type radical because no matter what decision SCOTUS makes, they will either appear supportive of dangerous people owning guns, or unable to follow their own rules. If SCOTUS should side with the government we will have some serious issues. If laws disarming groups of people, because they were deemed to be dangerous, are accepted as a legitimate historical context, what would stop them from disarming anyone? Red flag laws would survive any constitutional scrutiny, and any group that went against the perceived social norm could be deemed a threat. What would happen during another round of Covid restrictions, or climate lockdowns? Would you be deemed a danger to yourself or others for refusing to wear a mask, get vaccinated, or stay inside when everyone else is complying? As far as the Democrats are concerned, all white people are racist white supremacists whom Biden has declared the biggest threat to the nation. Those words should not be taken lightly as they would disarm every one of us at the first opportunity. Don't ever forget that this document still exists, and it refers to anyone who is concerned about gun restrictions, illegal immigration, same-sex marriage, and excessive taxation as a potential right-wing extremist/domestic terrorist. Many rightwing extremist groups perceive recent gun control legislation as a threat to their right to bear arms and in response have increased weapons and ammunition stockpiling, as well as renewed participation in paramilitary training exercises. Such activity, combined with a heightened level of extremist paranoia, has the potential to facilitate criminal activity and violence. (Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment) Take that for what it's worth. Even if SCOTUS rules on the side of the Second Amendment, we still have the UN Arms Treaty, The Great Reset, and Agenda 2030 to contend with. Not to mention the rumors of more Covid restrictions. While many of us will not comply with this, we are vastly outnumbered by those who will. Oh well, such is the way.
    Angry
    1
    1 Comments 2 Shares 911 Views
More Results