It seems to be a really big issue with the Atheists..... They will claim "It requires no #Faith to be an #Atheist!" "We are simply saying that we don't believe YOUR explanation!" But actually.... It DOES require Faith! Because there is a large body of #Evidence supporting people's belief in the Most High... and they are choosing to disregard that evidence, in most cases, in favor of an explanation like.... ‘From Absolutely Nothing:’ The Logical Extension Of Atheism The logical conclusion of atheism is the belief that there was once Absolutely Nothing. For a very, very long time, Absolutely Nothing did absolutely nothing. But one day, without warning, Absolutely Nothing created Everything, for no apparent reason. It did this in a magical explosion which came from Absolutely Nothing. For a very long time after this, the Everything that came from Absolutely Nothing was completely dead. The Dead Everything just drifted around, randomly clumping together, eventually forming stars and planets, solar systems and galaxies, powerful black holes and beautiful gas nebulae. Absolutely Nothing taught it how to do this. On Earth, the Dead Everything formed itself into oceans and islands, stunningly beautiful mountain ranges, magnificent waterfalls, deep valleys, monumental glaciers and warm tropical beaches. Absolutely Nothing taught the Dead Everything that used to be nothing how to do this. But there was no life. Dead Everything was completely dead. Not a single living cell. Not a blade of grass. Not the smallest microbe in the ocean. Just dead, inanimate matter. But then another magical thing happened. One day, without warning, for no reason whatsoever, Dead Everything magically created living cells. We have no idea how Dead Everything did this, because we still can’t do this today, despite all our technology and the accumulated wisdom of our greatest scientific minds. The Dead Everything must have been extremely clever, probably because it was taught by Absolutely Nothing. We also don’t know why Dead Everything isn’t still creating living cells from dead matter today. Perhaps Absolutely Nothing originally told Dead Everything how to do it, but now Dead Everything has forgotten. Anyway, the magical living cells, created by Dead Everything had no intelligence of their own, yet they eventually formed themselves into grass and trees, fish and birds, insects and reptiles, and mammals of all shapes and sizes. Absolutely Nothing told the magical living cells how to do this. Absolutely Nothing did this by creating a highly complex biological coding, called DNA, that it placed inside every living cell. This is a coded set of instructions more complex than the most sophisticated computers mankind has ever built. Absolutely Nothing eventually gave every living cell a complete set of these instructions, involving literally billions of lines of specific biological code, telling each cell how to grow into all the different lifeforms that we see today. Absolutely Nothing told some living cells how to eventually grow into Atheists. Atheists believe in Absolutely Nothing. They have told the rest of us how Absolutely Nothing created Dead Everything in the beginning and how Absolutely Nothing then magically created the living world that we see around us today. We don’t know how Atheists learned about all this, since they weren’t there in the beginning when all of this supposedly happened. Perhaps Absolutely Nothing told them. Atheists have also told the rest of us that when we die, we go to Absolutely Nothing and turn into Absolutely Nothing ourselves. This is very exciting news! In the meantime, this understanding of our origins and eventual destiny gives us meaning and purpose. Since we now know that we came from Absolutely Nothing and will return to Absolutely Nothing, we can live our whole lives for Absolutely Nothing. Our ethics and morals are based upon Absolutely Nothing, and we serve Absolutely Nothing faithfully. Thank goodness for Atheism. Atheists. And they mock Christian beliefs! Anything you say...... **Smile and Nod** Personally.... I don't really care WHAT you believe! But when you attack my beliefs I feel the need to point out the flaws in your own

Interplanetary Magnetospheres serve as protective bubbles around planets like Uranus the 80s data confirm, that stream out from the Sun in the solar wind. NASA Learning more about how magnetospheres work and is important for understanding our own planets

Whenever Saturn and Neptune form a conjunction, the world gets weird. And they’re about to conjoin again. In this episode, we look at previous conjunctions of these planets and see how each time we’ve seen strange events that shaped the psycho-spiritual undercurrents of the times in important ways. In particular, we’ve seen important events in the history of ufology. This video features a bonus section exclusively for WAR members on the relation between Saturn-Neptune conjunctions and fallen angels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDN2yBK4VZg

Another Jump in Astrophysics: Early Galaxies Challenging Dark Matter Models, The field of astrophysics has always been rife with surprising discoveries, and the latest findings from cutting-edge telescope data are no exception. Recent observations have cast doubt on some long-held assumptions about the formation of the early universe, leading scientists to question whether our current cosmological models, including the standard ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, truly represent the intricacies of cosmic evolution. A Glimpse into Early Galaxies Data from advanced telescopes, like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has shown that early galaxies, formed less than a billion years after the Big Bang, were much larger and more luminous than previously believed possible. According to traditional models, galaxies were expected to grow more gradually, accruing mass and light over billions of years. The revelation that such massive and bright galaxies existed so early in the universe’s history has prompted a reevaluation of the ΛCDM model. The Standard ΛCDM Model: A Quick Overview The ΛCDM model is a mathematical framework that has long been the backbone of Big Bang cosmology. It consists of three main components: A cosmological constant (Λ): This represents dark energy, an enigmatic force driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. Cold dark matter (CDM): Hypothetical matter that does not emit or interact with electromagnetic radiation, explaining the unseen mass that affects gravitational forces on large scales. Ordinary matter: The familiar atoms and particles that make up stars, planets, and everything else visible in the universe. This model is referred to as the standard model of cosmology because it is the simplest and most comprehensive framework that has so far provided a reasonable explanation for a wide range of astronomical observations, from the cosmic microwave background to the distribution of galaxies. Early Challenges and New Theories However, the discovery of unexpectedly large and bright early galaxies implies that our models might be missing key details about the dynamics of the early universe. If galaxies formed so rapidly after the Big Bang, alternative explanations may be necessary. These might include modifications to our understanding of gravitational interactions on cosmic scales or the introduction of new interactions between particles that do not fit into the current ΛCDM framework. Some astrophysicists are exploring models that propose dark matter behaves differently in the presence of extreme conditions, while others suggest entirely new mechanisms that accelerate the process of galaxy formation. These theories challenge the conventional narrative by suggesting that dark matter might not be a universal constant, or that additional factors, such as modified gravity theories, might come into play. The Future of Cosmological Exploration As these observations continue to be studied and debated, it is clear that our current cosmological models may need to be updated or expanded to align with this unexpected data. The insights gained from the JWST and similar telescopes will undoubtedly continue to push the boundaries of our understanding, leading to new theories that could redefine our comprehension of the universe’s origins and its early development. The journey of discovery is far from over, and the universe, as always, holds more mysteries yet to be revealed. Whether these findings lead to small adjustments in the ΛCDM model or prompt the development of entirely new paradigms, one thing is certain: astrophysics is entering an exciting new chapter.

The Vega star system is one of the most studied in astronomy due to its proximity, brightness, and unique characteristics that challenge our understanding of planet formation and stellar evolution. Located just 25 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Lyra, Vega is a blue-white star and the fifth-brightest star visible in our night sky. Here's a breakdown of the most intriguing features of the Vega system: 1. Dust Disk Discovery Infrared Excess: In the 1980s, the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) discovered an excess of infrared radiation from Vega, indicating a dust disk around the star. This disk emits infrared radiation as dust particles are heated by Vega's light, suggesting an early model of a protoplanetary or debris disk. Smooth Disk: Unlike other systems like Fomalhaut, Vega’s disk is remarkably smooth, lacking the gaps and rings typically associated with planets disturbing the dust. This smoothness implies that Vega may lack substantial planetary influences or that planets there may be few and more challenging to detect. 2. Potential "Hot Neptune" Astronomers have hypothesized that Vega might host a hot Neptune—a large planet orbiting close to the star, with a mass similar to that of Uranus or Neptune. If present, this planet could slightly perturb the disk, though not enough to create the pronounced structures seen in other systems. 3. Asteroid Belt Analogy Collapse Observations suggest that Vega may contain a large asteroid belt similar to our Solar System's, with a spread-out disk of rocky material. This possible asteroid belt might add to the dust observed around Vega and could provide insights into the early formation phases of planetary systems. 4. Historical and Cultural Significance Former Pole Star: Around 14,000 years ago, Earth's axis pointed toward Vega, making it the northern pole star until approximately 12,000 BC. The star held great significance for ancient civilizations due to its prominence. Name and Mythology: The name "Vega," originally spelled "Wega," comes from the Arabic "Al Nasr al Waki," meaning "Swooping Eagle." Vega is a cornerstone of the Summer Triangle, a prominent asterism for northern hemisphere skywatchers, along with Altair and Deneb. 5. Milestones in Astronomy First Stellar Spectrum: Vega was the first star to have its spectrum recorded in 1850, helping astronomers study stellar composition and temperature. Early Photographic Milestone: It was also the second star, after the Sun, to be photographed, marking a major step in astronomical imaging. 6. Variable Star Characteristics Vega is classified as a Delta Scuti variable, with slight pulsations that cause small changes in its brightness over time. Although minimal, these fluctuations provide valuable data for stellar research and challenge Vega's historic role as a "constant" in brightness. 7. Future Research and Exploration With its dust disk and potential hot Neptune, Vega remains a prime target for studying alternative pathways in planetary system evolution. Optical spectroscopy allows astronomers to analyze parameters such as star formation rates and chemical composition, shedding light on the processes within Vega's disk and its potential for planet formation. 8. Vega's characteristics—its smooth disk, possible planetary companions, and cultural prominence—continue to intrigue astronomers. Future missions and telescopes may reveal more about this iconic star system, potentially uncovering planets or additional features that reshape our understanding of how stars and planetary systems evolve.

Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun, has been heavily bombarded by meteorites throughout its history, similar to other rocky planets in our solar system. Its surface is covered with impact craters, some of which are quite large and ancient. Due to Mercury’s lack of a significant atmosphere, incoming meteorites do not burn up, resulting in frequent and intense impacts. Notable examples include: Caloris Basin: One of the largest known impact craters in the solar system, the Caloris Basin spans about 1,550 kilometers (960 miles). It was likely formed by an asteroid impact during Mercury's early history. Kuiper Crater: A relatively small but well-preserved crater, named after the astronomer Gerard Kuiper, is about 60 kilometers (37 miles) in diameter. Hokusai Crater: Another large crater on Mercury, measuring 114 kilometers (71 miles) in diameter, with bright rays of ejected material extending over much of the planet. Mercury's surface is thought to have experienced more impacts than Earth's, Mars', or Venus' due to its proximity to the Sun, which pulls in more meteoroids and comets. These impacts have significantly shaped the planet's geological history and surface evolution. Tonynetone

The Super Hunter’s Moon in the constellation Pisces crosses the sky tonight with the planets Saturn, Neptune, Uranus, and Jupiter. This is the third of four supermoons for 2024, and the closest approach to Earth; the final supermoon for this year arrives on November 15th. #SuperHuntersMoon #HuntersMoon #HuntersSupermoon #Supermoon2024 #Supermoon #Moon #Perigee #AutumnalEquinox #Spooky #Astronomy

Barnard's Star the closest single star to the Sun, located about 6 light-years away in the constellation Ophiuchus. It is a red dwarf star, significantly smaller and dimmer than the Sun. While the Alpha Centauri system, which is about 4.37 light-years away, is closer, Barnard's Star holds the title for the closest solitary star. In 2018, an international team of astronomers announced the discovery of a planet orbiting Barnard's Star, known as Barnard's Star b. This planet has a minimum mass around 3.2 times that of Earth, making it a super-Earth, and it orbits its star very closely—completing one orbit in about 233 Earth days. Its close proximity to the star places it in a cold region far from the habitable zone, as Barnard's Star is much cooler than the Sun. As for the possibility of more planets, additional studies and observations are ongoing, and it's possible that future research could reveal more about the system.

NOW THEY WANT US TO BELIEVE IN COTTON CANDY PLANETS LOL. NASA IS FULL OF SH*T! YES, they are! https://old.bitchute.com/video/w5wiPE9vonjQ/

Small stars may host bigger planets than previously thought, so the gap between the largest planets and the smallest stars is under Studying them to helps in understanding the processes of star formation and the properties of objects that are too small to ignite into stars but too large to be considered planets.