• Absolutely it is!

    This is a fantastic documentary that could be 110% better if it's creators were aware of (Or did not hide) the FACT that the earth is an ENCLOSED SYSTEM, and is FLAT & STATIONARY! If you believe in what your bible tells you, I want you to open to PAGE 1, GENESIS 1, and read down to verse 10!

    YHWH "separated the waters from the waters."

    Genesis 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

    Genesis 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

    There are several misleading parts within this documentary, like when the man claims that during creation "We now have a water ball in space."

    WHERE IS THAT IN THE TEXT???

    No folks, "space" does not exist, #NASA is a Satanic organization of deception, and the earth is FLAT and STATIONARY just like the bible tells you it is! COUNT THE NUMBER OF TIMES YOUR BIBLE SAYS "The earth shall not be moved"
    Go and count them!

    Count how many times your bible says the earth has "foundations."

    This documentary would be perfect if it told the TRUTH about our earth being a flat and stationary PLANE and the Sun, Moon, and stars are "Lights in the sky"
    (within the firmament) just like the bible tells us it is.

    I respect the creators of this documentary, they could just be brainwashed into believing in "Space" and all of that nonsense, just like the rest of us were! But I have found that Hollywood and "Science so-called" always uses deception in this area.

    There is no demonstrable "curvature" to the earth's surface. This ALONE proves without a shadow of a doubt that the earth is flat! Don't believe me? I challenge you to "Prove the #Globe" you believe in!

    That is what I tried to do, and is why now I know the TRUTH.... That there is no proof to the claim the earth is a sphere! It's all a Satanic LIE. It is likely "The great delusion" spoken of in your bible! Have a blessed day and READ YOUR BIBLE! Go check out Rob Skiba's "Testing the Globe" website, there is a lot of information there!

    Most importantly though...
    PRAISE YHWH and admire His perfect Creation!
    A living Testament to His greatness and power!

    Walk in His statutes and be humble!

    https://youtu.be/UM82qxxskZE
    Absolutely it is! This is a fantastic documentary that could be 110% better if it's creators were aware of (Or did not hide) the FACT that the earth is an ENCLOSED SYSTEM, and is FLAT & STATIONARY! If you believe in what your bible tells you, I want you to open to PAGE 1, GENESIS 1, and read down to verse 10! YHWH "separated the waters from the waters." Genesis 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. Genesis 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. There are several misleading parts within this documentary, like when the man claims that during creation "We now have a water ball in space." WHERE IS THAT IN THE TEXT??? No folks, "space" does not exist, #NASA is a Satanic organization of deception, and the earth is FLAT and STATIONARY just like the bible tells you it is! COUNT THE NUMBER OF TIMES YOUR BIBLE SAYS "The earth shall not be moved" Go and count them! Count how many times your bible says the earth has "foundations." This documentary would be perfect if it told the TRUTH about our earth being a flat and stationary PLANE and the Sun, Moon, and stars are "Lights in the sky" (within the firmament) just like the bible tells us it is. I respect the creators of this documentary, they could just be brainwashed into believing in "Space" and all of that nonsense, just like the rest of us were! But I have found that Hollywood and "Science so-called" always uses deception in this area. There is no demonstrable "curvature" to the earth's surface. This ALONE proves without a shadow of a doubt that the earth is flat! Don't believe me? I challenge you to "Prove the #Globe" you believe in! That is what I tried to do, and is why now I know the TRUTH.... That there is no proof to the claim the earth is a sphere! It's all a Satanic LIE. It is likely "The great delusion" spoken of in your bible! Have a blessed day and READ YOUR BIBLE! Go check out Rob Skiba's "Testing the Globe" website, there is a lot of information there! Most importantly though... PRAISE YHWH and admire His perfect Creation! A living Testament to His greatness and power! Walk in His statutes and be humble! https://youtu.be/UM82qxxskZE
    0 Comments 0 Shares 266 Views
  • Moonbat-crazy individuals have low IQ, they're so far gone, they can't even see the truth.
    Moonbat-crazy individuals have low IQ, they're so far gone, they can't even see the truth.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 117 Views
  • TDS is a syndrome that affects Moonbat-crazy individuals, making them believe in lies.
    TDS is a syndrome that affects Moonbat-crazy individuals, making them believe in lies.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 173 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/dispute-over-migration-and-tradition-austrian-kindergarten-replaces-st-martin-with-moon-bear/
    https://medforth.biz/dispute-over-migration-and-tradition-austrian-kindergarten-replaces-st-martin-with-moon-bear/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 181 Views
  • Interesting, but Immanuel Velikovsky had already offered an alternative that might explain this in the 1950s. That, he suggested, may have been an eruption from Saturn which led to a great rain on Earth... but if this were the case, would there not be more frozen water on the surface of the Moon? Surely it could not all have fallen on the Earth... or does this suggest that, at that moment in time, there was no Moon?

    Any hypothesis such as this (it is not a theory) tells us more about the limitations on (or indoctrination of) the thinking of the speaker than it does about a past reality. Astronomers seem to be obsessed with a surprisingly small repertoire of possible physical phenomena which do not take full account of what is actually available in the wider cosmos.

    Plus, if the Moon had already been orbiting the Earth when this alleged "collision" took place, it would have gone careering through the Solar System once Earth's gravitation field was disrupted... so, are they suggesting that afterwards, the Moon was somehow magically "recaptured"? Or was it simply not there yet, being captured during a later epoch?

    No matter how hard they try, the reformulation of hypotheses usually leads only to more contradictions down the line. The worst part, however, is that videos such as this function only as uncritical "repeaters" of pseudo-information - "pseudo" precisely because the "evidence" can only be indirect. These things are largely based on supposition, limited information and a pre-formed notion of how the universe works; the big surprise seems to be that, when you stand back and look at it, it seems to be based upon a surprisingly Newtonian, gravity-based model... and real "science" would be served better if they instead challenged the hypothesis. If "science" is merely a collection of unsupported hypotheses, we should not be surprised if the whole enterprise eventually collapses under the weight of contradictory evidence.

    Unfortunately, as I have said before, the trouble with this kind of hypothesis is that in our experience, time travels in only one direction, and we are not able to jump into a convenient time machine to travel back and confirm anything. What we have is only an "interpretation" through the rose-tinted lenses of the current dominant paradigm.

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1779950362746428
    Interesting, but Immanuel Velikovsky had already offered an alternative that might explain this in the 1950s. That, he suggested, may have been an eruption from Saturn which led to a great rain on Earth... but if this were the case, would there not be more frozen water on the surface of the Moon? Surely it could not all have fallen on the Earth... or does this suggest that, at that moment in time, there was no Moon? Any hypothesis such as this (it is not a theory) tells us more about the limitations on (or indoctrination of) the thinking of the speaker than it does about a past reality. Astronomers seem to be obsessed with a surprisingly small repertoire of possible physical phenomena which do not take full account of what is actually available in the wider cosmos. Plus, if the Moon had already been orbiting the Earth when this alleged "collision" took place, it would have gone careering through the Solar System once Earth's gravitation field was disrupted... so, are they suggesting that afterwards, the Moon was somehow magically "recaptured"? Or was it simply not there yet, being captured during a later epoch? No matter how hard they try, the reformulation of hypotheses usually leads only to more contradictions down the line. The worst part, however, is that videos such as this function only as uncritical "repeaters" of pseudo-information - "pseudo" precisely because the "evidence" can only be indirect. These things are largely based on supposition, limited information and a pre-formed notion of how the universe works; the big surprise seems to be that, when you stand back and look at it, it seems to be based upon a surprisingly Newtonian, gravity-based model... and real "science" would be served better if they instead challenged the hypothesis. If "science" is merely a collection of unsupported hypotheses, we should not be surprised if the whole enterprise eventually collapses under the weight of contradictory evidence. Unfortunately, as I have said before, the trouble with this kind of hypothesis is that in our experience, time travels in only one direction, and we are not able to jump into a convenient time machine to travel back and confirm anything. What we have is only an "interpretation" through the rose-tinted lenses of the current dominant paradigm. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1779950362746428
    0 Comments 0 Shares 933 Views
  • The Super Hunter’s Moon in the constellation Pisces crosses the sky tonight with the planets Saturn, Neptune, Uranus, and Jupiter. This is the third of four supermoons for 2024, and the closest approach to Earth; the final supermoon for this year arrives on November 15th. #SuperHuntersMoon #HuntersMoon #HuntersSupermoon #Supermoon2024 #Supermoon #Moon #Perigee #AutumnalEquinox #Spooky #Astronomy
    The Super Hunter’s Moon in the constellation Pisces crosses the sky tonight with the planets Saturn, Neptune, Uranus, and Jupiter. This is the third of four supermoons for 2024, and the closest approach to Earth; the final supermoon for this year arrives on November 15th. #SuperHuntersMoon #HuntersMoon #HuntersSupermoon #Supermoon2024 #Supermoon #Moon #Perigee #AutumnalEquinox #Spooky #Astronomy
    0 Comments 0 Shares 943 Views
  • ‘Bubble has burst’: Sky News host blasts Kamala Harris as 'honeymoon ends'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M88PQv29vpE
    ‘Bubble has burst’: Sky News host blasts Kamala Harris as 'honeymoon ends' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M88PQv29vpE
    Haha
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 163 Views
  • Jupiter's icy moons has blasted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida
    NASA's exploration of Jupiter's moons, particularly the Galilean moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto), has been a focus of planetary science for many years. One of the most significant missions was the Galileo spacecraft, which was launched on October 18, 1989, and arrived at Jupiter in 1995.
    Jupiter's icy moons has blasted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida NASA's exploration of Jupiter's moons, particularly the Galilean moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto), has been a focus of planetary science for many years. One of the most significant missions was the Galileo spacecraft, which was launched on October 18, 1989, and arrived at Jupiter in 1995.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 461 Views
  • WHERE DO YOU THINK THAT 200 BILLION DOLLARS WENT?
    “If you really went to the moon & spent $200 Billion dollars you would never destroy the technology”

    Not only did they destroy it - NASA also lost all the original footage.
    WHERE DO YOU THINK THAT 200 BILLION DOLLARS WENT? “If you really went to the moon & spent $200 Billion dollars you would never destroy the technology” Not only did they destroy it - NASA also lost all the original footage.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 412 Views 2
  • OUR DAILY OLDIES: IT'S BEEN SUCH A LONG TIME AGO, THAT I DONT REMEMBER EXACTLY IF THIS IS FROM THE LATE 60s OR THE EARLY 70s BUT I STILL LIKE THE SONG. DANCING IN THE MOONLIGHT BY KING HARVEST. ENJOY IT!
    OUR DAILY OLDIES: IT'S BEEN SUCH A LONG TIME AGO, THAT I DONT REMEMBER EXACTLY IF THIS IS FROM THE LATE 60s OR THE EARLY 70s BUT I STILL LIKE THE SONG. DANCING IN THE MOONLIGHT BY KING HARVEST. ENJOY IT!
    Love
    1
    0 Comments 2 Shares 373 Views 4
More Results
Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here