• There is a woman or I would rather call her a superheroine named "Jane Bürgermeister" who already back in 2009 EXACTLY predicted what would happen from 2020 to now, she described EXACTLY what would happen and described exactly what really happened so far from 2020 to now, please read the last sentence again if you did not understand what I just said. Please note that of course her predictions referred to the 2009 swine flu "pandemic", but what she described back then is EXACTLY what happened since 2020, just to make sure that you understand me correctly:
    https://achern-weiss-bescheid.de/2022/02/03/jane-burgermeister-heute-verschollen-spricht-2009-von-den-dingen-die-wir-heute-erleben
    It is unfortunate that many or most of you cannot speak german, but this is exactly what she says in this video, I listened to it myself.
    At least I found a ca. 6 minute clip from the german video which has (quite crappy, but sufficient) english subtitles:
    https://odysee.com/@TruthPills:5/jane-burgermeister:8
    detailing a small part of her german video. The subtitle translation itself is relatively sh*tty, but for the most part correct, of course it also contains "the usual" errors and omissions by whoever was the translator.
    There is also an english followup video from 2010 which miraculously somehow survived at Google (Youtube) (?!) to this very day:
    https://anonym.to/?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-HL1Dy-Fgc&t=2s
    Please also read the following text to find out what happened next:
    https://lettersfromvienna.substack.com/p/jane-to-the-rescue
    Here you can read a general article about Jane Bürgermeister, which does not say very much unfortunately and which does not repeat her exact predictions she gave in the german video I mentioned above:
    https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/Jane_B%C3%BCrgermeister
    Here a more detailed article about Jane Bürgermeister:
    https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2351638/posts
    At least these are some other english sources of information regarding her. I guess a lot of stuff, if not most about her, was scrubbed from the Internet, especially her blog(s) and internet sites.
    Seems like she and a few other individual heros like her (like Mr. Wolfgang Wodarg, at least as far as I heard) saved us from the planned swine flu "vaccination" genocide of 2009 (which was planned to happen exactly as the 2020 coronavirus "pandemic") and therefore gained us 11 years. Unfortunately now we have to endure all this sh*t with 11 years delay.
    Please note that in the german video she very briefly talks about "microchips" which were, according to her, supposed to be contained in the "vaccination" (in the 2009 "vaccination" already!), I personally would doubt this, as it seems that the technology was not advanced enough back then and is probably not advanced enough now, but as I am no expert in this field, I cannot confirm or deny it.
    If you can dig up more english information about M(r)s Jane Bürgermeister, please compile it and share it!!!
    Please share and distribute this information, as this is clear proof that all this was planned for a long, long time already!!!
    #coronavirus #covid19 #covid-19 #covid #janebürgermeister #janeburgermeister
    There is a woman or I would rather call her a superheroine named "Jane Bürgermeister" who already back in 2009 EXACTLY predicted what would happen from 2020 to now, she described EXACTLY what would happen and described exactly what really happened so far from 2020 to now, please read the last sentence again if you did not understand what I just said. Please note that of course her predictions referred to the 2009 swine flu "pandemic", but what she described back then is EXACTLY what happened since 2020, just to make sure that you understand me correctly: https://achern-weiss-bescheid.de/2022/02/03/jane-burgermeister-heute-verschollen-spricht-2009-von-den-dingen-die-wir-heute-erleben It is unfortunate that many or most of you cannot speak german, but this is exactly what she says in this video, I listened to it myself. At least I found a ca. 6 minute clip from the german video which has (quite crappy, but sufficient) english subtitles: https://odysee.com/@TruthPills:5/jane-burgermeister:8 detailing a small part of her german video. The subtitle translation itself is relatively sh*tty, but for the most part correct, of course it also contains "the usual" errors and omissions by whoever was the translator. There is also an english followup video from 2010 which miraculously somehow survived at Google (Youtube) (?!) to this very day: https://anonym.to/?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-HL1Dy-Fgc&t=2s Please also read the following text to find out what happened next: https://lettersfromvienna.substack.com/p/jane-to-the-rescue Here you can read a general article about Jane Bürgermeister, which does not say very much unfortunately and which does not repeat her exact predictions she gave in the german video I mentioned above: https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/Jane_B%C3%BCrgermeister Here a more detailed article about Jane Bürgermeister: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2351638/posts At least these are some other english sources of information regarding her. I guess a lot of stuff, if not most about her, was scrubbed from the Internet, especially her blog(s) and internet sites. Seems like she and a few other individual heros like her (like Mr. Wolfgang Wodarg, at least as far as I heard) saved us from the planned swine flu "vaccination" genocide of 2009 (which was planned to happen exactly as the 2020 coronavirus "pandemic") and therefore gained us 11 years. Unfortunately now we have to endure all this sh*t with 11 years delay. Please note that in the german video she very briefly talks about "microchips" which were, according to her, supposed to be contained in the "vaccination" (in the 2009 "vaccination" already!), I personally would doubt this, as it seems that the technology was not advanced enough back then and is probably not advanced enough now, but as I am no expert in this field, I cannot confirm or deny it. If you can dig up more english information about M(r)s Jane Bürgermeister, please compile it and share it!!! Please share and distribute this information, as this is clear proof that all this was planned for a long, long time already!!! #coronavirus #covid19 #covid-19 #covid #janebürgermeister #janeburgermeister
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2999 Views
  • Business Owners Make These Common Bookkeeping & Financial Mistakes

    It's possible that most of us in the industry regard bookkeeping as a chore. Others consider it as the territory of accountants and other financial practitioners and will almost certainly refer to it as something they want to get out of the way as quickly as possible.



    However, whether you opt to handle your own accounting or outsource the process to a professional bookkeeper or business, it is critical that you do not overlook this important task and re-check your books properly and on a regular basis. Regular & thorough examination of your books will guarantee that:



    ● Everything has been documented, & no omissions have occurred; it is easy to forget to input anything, and a thorough check will ensure that nothing has been overlooked.



    ● There have been no mistakes, and even a minor inaccuracy can throw every calculation off; it is far preferable to catch it early before it is replicated across the entire collection of volumes.



    ● There is no theft or embezzlement going on. Although you most likely have complete faith in everyone with whom you deal, it is better to be cautious than sorry; a frequent review of your financial records will alert you to any misuse of cash.



    ● You make the greatest use of the financial information they hold; understanding what is going on with the books enables you to make completely informed financial decisions.



    Freshwatertax's CPAs and tax specialists have over 20 years of combined expertise in tax, accounting, auditing, and financial services. Every member of our cpa in lithia team is an expert in one of the following areas: taxes, accounting, or auditing.



    We are genuinely proud of our services & our capacity to acquire the information and abilities required to meet the unique requirements of our small and large businesses. Call 1-(917)-744-1175 for a free consultation.

    https://freshwatertax.com/cpa-in-lithia
    Business Owners Make These Common Bookkeeping & Financial Mistakes It's possible that most of us in the industry regard bookkeeping as a chore. Others consider it as the territory of accountants and other financial practitioners and will almost certainly refer to it as something they want to get out of the way as quickly as possible. However, whether you opt to handle your own accounting or outsource the process to a professional bookkeeper or business, it is critical that you do not overlook this important task and re-check your books properly and on a regular basis. Regular & thorough examination of your books will guarantee that: ● Everything has been documented, & no omissions have occurred; it is easy to forget to input anything, and a thorough check will ensure that nothing has been overlooked. ● There have been no mistakes, and even a minor inaccuracy can throw every calculation off; it is far preferable to catch it early before it is replicated across the entire collection of volumes. ● There is no theft or embezzlement going on. Although you most likely have complete faith in everyone with whom you deal, it is better to be cautious than sorry; a frequent review of your financial records will alert you to any misuse of cash. ● You make the greatest use of the financial information they hold; understanding what is going on with the books enables you to make completely informed financial decisions. Freshwatertax's CPAs and tax specialists have over 20 years of combined expertise in tax, accounting, auditing, and financial services. Every member of our cpa in lithia team is an expert in one of the following areas: taxes, accounting, or auditing. We are genuinely proud of our services & our capacity to acquire the information and abilities required to meet the unique requirements of our small and large businesses. Call 1-(917)-744-1175 for a free consultation. https://freshwatertax.com/cpa-in-lithia
    FRESHWATERTAX.COM
    Best Rated CPA Firm Lithia, FL | Fresh Water Tax
    Find out the Best CPA in Lithia, FL, to keep business transactions in order. Freshwatertax CPA is your #1 accountant for all accounting needs based out of Lithia, FL. We do tax prep and business help in Lithia, Florida, and beyond.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1638 Views
  • WHO BROKE the NUREMBERG CODE???

    Let’s start with those already now identified:

    1. The CDC.
    2. The WHO.
    3. The governments of all those countries who mandated masks, tests and/or injections.
    4. The vaccinators/medics/doctors/nurses/paramedics
    5. The schools
    6. The Hospitals
    7. The Health trusts
    8. The Health departments
    9. Most corporations
    10. Scientists who advised the above.
    11. MPs/government ministers
    12. The Unions
    13. Shops
    14. Transport systems
    15. The police
    16. The army
    17. Anyone who conspired, aided and abetted, or was complicit in assisting any of the above.
    I’m exhausted just from writing that list….
    It’s so depressing to realise that so many members of our society are CLUELESS about the Nuremberg Code, the Nuremberg Trials and the Rule of Law.
    IGNORANCE of the LAW is NO DEFENCE
    All those in breach of the Nuremberg Code WILL be held liable for their actions and omissions in imposing/mandating/directions/policies/statements/advertising etc in relation to tests, masks and injections
    WHO BROKE the NUREMBERG CODE??? Let’s start with those already now identified: 1. The CDC. 2. The WHO. 3. The governments of all those countries who mandated masks, tests and/or injections. 4. The vaccinators/medics/doctors/nurses/paramedics 5. The schools 6. The Hospitals 7. The Health trusts 8. The Health departments 9. Most corporations 10. Scientists who advised the above. 11. MPs/government ministers 12. The Unions 13. Shops 14. Transport systems 15. The police 16. The army 17. Anyone who conspired, aided and abetted, or was complicit in assisting any of the above. I’m exhausted just from writing that list…. It’s so depressing to realise that so many members of our society are CLUELESS about the Nuremberg Code, the Nuremberg Trials and the Rule of Law. IGNORANCE of the LAW is NO DEFENCE All those in breach of the Nuremberg Code WILL be held liable for their actions and omissions in imposing/mandating/directions/policies/statements/advertising etc in relation to tests, masks and injections
    0 Comments 0 Shares 411 Views
  • JUST as back in 1976 SWINE FLU, the LIES... THE OMISSIONS, THE EVIL THIS GOVERNMENT WILL AND HAS DONE!

    * * ‘The Vaccine causes the virus to be more dangerous’…
    https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/steve-bannon-interviews-dr-robert-malone/
    JUST as back in 1976 SWINE FLU, the LIES... THE OMISSIONS, THE EVIL THIS GOVERNMENT WILL AND HAS DONE! * * ‘The Vaccine causes the virus to be more dangerous’… https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/steve-bannon-interviews-dr-robert-malone/
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 112 Views
  • Auditors Find Omissions, Inconsistencies and Anomalies With Maricopa County Ballots | Facts Matter

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me7OFIwjwx4
    Auditors Find Omissions, Inconsistencies and Anomalies With Maricopa County Ballots | Facts Matter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me7OFIwjwx4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 125 Views
  • The Anti-New York Times.

    An "Almost Daily" Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions, Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Headlines

    "We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"

    https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-05032021.html
    The Anti-New York Times. An "Almost Daily" Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions, Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Headlines "We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!" https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-05032021.html
    WWW.REALHISTORYCHAN.COM
    Meet Klaus Schwab of the "World Economic Forum"
    Through the years, Schwab's WEF meetings -- similar to those of the infamous Bilderberg Group -- have been attended by or supported by every "elite" scum-of-the-Earth Globalist one can shake a hammer & sickle at.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 148 Views
  • https://www.intelligence.gov/index.php/ic-on-the-record-database/results/1008-release-of-documents-related-to-the-temporary-retention,-use,-and-disclosure-of-unlawful-fisa-
    September 11, 2020
    https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/120919-examination.pdf
    https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FISC%20Declassifed%20Order%2016-1182%2017-52%2017-375%2017-679%20%20200123.pdf
    Specifically, 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2) and 1827(a)(2) criminalizes the intentional use and disclosure of information acquired
    by unauthorized electronic surveillance or physical search that was conducted under the color of a FISA authorization.
    In prior opinions, however, the FISC recognized a limited exception to the language of 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2), for “actions
    that are necessary to mitigate or prevent the very harms at which [this section] is addressed,” such as instances where use
    or disclosure may be “necessary to avoid similar instances of overcollections.” ODNI previously reviewed and released to the
    public these earlier FISC decisions, which are available here and here .
    https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-10.pdf
    https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-11.pdf
    https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1306313553616556036 Catherine Herridge
    Sep 16
    #FISA Recently released opinion from FISA court contains noteworthy disclosures. It lays out ground rules for using information
    from “unlawful" surveillance @carterwpage
    for FOIA, civil litigation by Page, IG + Durham. "The government acknowledges that there were material omissions + the Court has
    found violations of the government's duty of candor in ALL FOUR (my emphasis) applications." All 4 fisa warrants had violations.
    If any evidence gathered during that surveillance was used for any of mueller's convictions, those convictions should be overturned.
    https://www.intelligence.gov/index.php/ic-on-the-record-database/results/1008-release-of-documents-related-to-the-temporary-retention,-use,-and-disclosure-of-unlawful-fisa- September 11, 2020 https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/120919-examination.pdf https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FISC%20Declassifed%20Order%2016-1182%2017-52%2017-375%2017-679%20%20200123.pdf Specifically, 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2) and 1827(a)(2) criminalizes the intentional use and disclosure of information acquired by unauthorized electronic surveillance or physical search that was conducted under the color of a FISA authorization. In prior opinions, however, the FISC recognized a limited exception to the language of 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2), for “actions that are necessary to mitigate or prevent the very harms at which [this section] is addressed,” such as instances where use or disclosure may be “necessary to avoid similar instances of overcollections.” ODNI previously reviewed and released to the public these earlier FISC decisions, which are available here and here . https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-10.pdf https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-11.pdf https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1306313553616556036 Catherine Herridge Sep 16 #FISA Recently released opinion from FISA court contains noteworthy disclosures. It lays out ground rules for using information from “unlawful" surveillance @carterwpage for FOIA, civil litigation by Page, IG + Durham. "The government acknowledges that there were material omissions + the Court has found violations of the government's duty of candor in ALL FOUR (my emphasis) applications." All 4 fisa warrants had violations. If any evidence gathered during that surveillance was used for any of mueller's convictions, those convictions should be overturned.
    Release of Court Opinion Related to the Temporary Retention, Use, and Disclosure of Unlawful FISA Collection
    Release of Court Opinion Related to the Temporary Retention, Use, and Disclosure of Unlawful FISA Collection   September 11, 2020 Today, the ODNI...
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 1 Shares 157 Views
  • We identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional
    errors in the Woods Procedures. These errors and omissions resulted from case agents providing wrong or incomplete
    information to OI and failing to flag important issues for discussion. While we did not find documentary or
    testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the part of the case agents who assisted OI in preparing the
    applications, or the agents and supervisors who performed the Woods Procedures, we also did not receive satisfactory
    explanations for the errors or problems we identified.
    https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/statement-us-attorney-john-h-durham
    “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into
    the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information
    from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other
    persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our
    investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s
    conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
    We identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures. These errors and omissions resulted from case agents providing wrong or incomplete information to OI and failing to flag important issues for discussion. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the part of the case agents who assisted OI in preparing the applications, or the agents and supervisors who performed the Woods Procedures, we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for the errors or problems we identified. https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/statement-us-attorney-john-h-durham “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 128 Views
  • https://oig.justice.gov/
    https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
    As more fully described in Chapter Five, based upon the information known to the FBI in October 2016, the first
    application contained the following seven significant inaccuracies and omissions:
    1. Omitted information the FBI had obtained from another U.S. government agency detailing its prior relationship with
    Page, including that Page had been approved as an "operational contact" for the other agency from 2008 to 2013, and that
    Page had provided information to the other agency concerning his prior contacts with certain Russian intelligence
    officers, one of which overlapped with facts asserted in the FISA application ;
    2. Included a source characterization statement asserting that Steele's prior reporting had been "corroborated and used
    in criminal proceedings," which overstated the significance of Steele's past reporting and was not approved by Steele's
    handling agent, as required by the Woods Procedures;
    3. Omitted information relevant to the reliability of Person 1, a key Steele sub-source (who was attributed with
    providing the information in Report 95 and some of the information in Reports 80 and 102 relied upon in the
    application), namely that ( 1) Steele himself told members of the Crossfire Hurricane team that Person 1 was a "boaster"
    and an "egoist" and " may engage in some embellishment" and (2) ...sentence redacted
    4. Asserted that the FBI had assessed that Steele did not directly provide to the press information in the September 23
    Yahoo News article based on the premise that Steele had told the FBI that he only shared his election-related research
    with the FBI and Fusion GPS, his client; this premise was incorrect and contradicted by documentation in the Woods
    File- Steele had told the FBI that he also gave his information to the State Department;
    5. Omitted Papadopoulos's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in September 2016 denying that anyone
    associated with the Trump campaign was collaborating with Russia or with outside groups like Wikileaks in the release of
    emails;
    6. Omitted Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in August 2016 that Page had " literally never met"
    or "said one word to" Paul Manafort and that Manafort had not responded to any of Page's emails; if true, those statements
    were in tension with claims in Report 95 that Page was participating in a conspiracy with Russia by acting as an
    intermediary for Manafort on behalf of the Trump campaign; and
    7. Included Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in October 2016 that the FBI believed supported its
    theory that Page was an agent of Russia but omitted other statements Page made that were inconsistent with its theory,
    including denying having met with Sechin and Divyekin, or even knowing who Divyekin was; if true, those statements
    contradicted the claims in Report 94 that Page had met secretly with Sechin and Divyekin about future cooperation with
    Russia and shared derogatory information about candidate Clinton.
    None of these inaccuracies and omissions were brought to the attention of OI before the last FISA application was filed
    in June 2017. Consequently, these failures were repeated in all three renewal applications. Further, as we discuss later,
    we identified 10 additional significant errors in the renewal applications.
    https://oig.justice.gov/ https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf As more fully described in Chapter Five, based upon the information known to the FBI in October 2016, the first application contained the following seven significant inaccuracies and omissions: 1. Omitted information the FBI had obtained from another U.S. government agency detailing its prior relationship with Page, including that Page had been approved as an "operational contact" for the other agency from 2008 to 2013, and that Page had provided information to the other agency concerning his prior contacts with certain Russian intelligence officers, one of which overlapped with facts asserted in the FISA application ; 2. Included a source characterization statement asserting that Steele's prior reporting had been "corroborated and used in criminal proceedings," which overstated the significance of Steele's past reporting and was not approved by Steele's handling agent, as required by the Woods Procedures; 3. Omitted information relevant to the reliability of Person 1, a key Steele sub-source (who was attributed with providing the information in Report 95 and some of the information in Reports 80 and 102 relied upon in the application), namely that ( 1) Steele himself told members of the Crossfire Hurricane team that Person 1 was a "boaster" and an "egoist" and " may engage in some embellishment" and (2) ...sentence redacted 4. Asserted that the FBI had assessed that Steele did not directly provide to the press information in the September 23 Yahoo News article based on the premise that Steele had told the FBI that he only shared his election-related research with the FBI and Fusion GPS, his client; this premise was incorrect and contradicted by documentation in the Woods File- Steele had told the FBI that he also gave his information to the State Department; 5. Omitted Papadopoulos's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in September 2016 denying that anyone associated with the Trump campaign was collaborating with Russia or with outside groups like Wikileaks in the release of emails; 6. Omitted Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in August 2016 that Page had " literally never met" or "said one word to" Paul Manafort and that Manafort had not responded to any of Page's emails; if true, those statements were in tension with claims in Report 95 that Page was participating in a conspiracy with Russia by acting as an intermediary for Manafort on behalf of the Trump campaign; and 7. Included Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in October 2016 that the FBI believed supported its theory that Page was an agent of Russia but omitted other statements Page made that were inconsistent with its theory, including denying having met with Sechin and Divyekin, or even knowing who Divyekin was; if true, those statements contradicted the claims in Report 94 that Page had met secretly with Sechin and Divyekin about future cooperation with Russia and shared derogatory information about candidate Clinton. None of these inaccuracies and omissions were brought to the attention of OI before the last FISA application was filed in June 2017. Consequently, these failures were repeated in all three renewal applications. Further, as we discuss later, we identified 10 additional significant errors in the renewal applications.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 193 Views
  • 25 OCTOBER (1868)

    Sins of omission

    ‘Yet they obeyed not, nor inclined their ear, but walked every one in the imagination of their evil heart: therefore I will bring upon them all the words of this covenant, which I commanded them to do; but they did them not.’ Jeremiah 11:8
    SUGGESTED FURTHER READING (Spurgeon): Matthew 25:14–30

    Consider what God thinks of omissions. Saul was ordered to kill the Amalekites and not to let one escape. He saved Agag and the best of the cattle, and for that, though he had positively done nothing but simply stayed his hand, the Lord put him away from being king over Israel. Ahab was commanded to kill Benhadad on account of innumerable cruelties. Benhadad was taken captive, but Ahab treated him with great leniency and, because he let him go, the result was that Ahab’s life would go for his life. Non-obedience ruined Ahab.

    Our Lord Jesus Christ was the gentlest of all men, and yet there was one miracle which had a degree of vengeance in it; what was that? He stood under a fig tree, saw there leaves but no fruit and said, ‘Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever’, as if to show that fruitless things provoked his anger, not so much brambles which bear their thorns, but fig trees which ought to bear figs and do not. Remember the parable of the talents. The man with one talent was condemned not for squandering his Lord’s money, but because he had not increased it. So in God’s opinion not doing good is sufficient to condemn men, even if they have not committed positive evil.

    When the Holy Spirit convinces men of sin, what is the special sin which he reveals? Adultery? Robbery? No, a sin of omission—‘of sin, because they believe not on me’. Omitting to trust in Jesus is the master sin of which the Holy Spirit convicts the world. Remember that solemn question in Hebrews 2:3—‘how shall we escape if we’ what? Swear? Frequent the tavern? No, ‘if we neglect so great salvation’? Lifelong neglect of salvation involves us in danger from which there is no escape.

    FOR MEDITATION: Unbelievers express surprise at the foolish things Christians refuse to do (1 Peter 4:4). The Lord Jesus Christ expresses sadness at the wise things unbelievers refuse to do (Matthew 23:37–38), such as receiving him and trusting in him for salvation (John 1:11; 3:18). To fail to do what we know to be right is sin (James 4:17).


    C. H. Spurgeon and Terence Peter Crosby, 365 Days with Spurgeon (Volume 3), (Leominster, UK: Day One Publications, 2005), 306.
    25 OCTOBER (1868) Sins of omission ‘Yet they obeyed not, nor inclined their ear, but walked every one in the imagination of their evil heart: therefore I will bring upon them all the words of this covenant, which I commanded them to do; but they did them not.’ Jeremiah 11:8 SUGGESTED FURTHER READING (Spurgeon): Matthew 25:14–30 Consider what God thinks of omissions. Saul was ordered to kill the Amalekites and not to let one escape. He saved Agag and the best of the cattle, and for that, though he had positively done nothing but simply stayed his hand, the Lord put him away from being king over Israel. Ahab was commanded to kill Benhadad on account of innumerable cruelties. Benhadad was taken captive, but Ahab treated him with great leniency and, because he let him go, the result was that Ahab’s life would go for his life. Non-obedience ruined Ahab. Our Lord Jesus Christ was the gentlest of all men, and yet there was one miracle which had a degree of vengeance in it; what was that? He stood under a fig tree, saw there leaves but no fruit and said, ‘Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever’, as if to show that fruitless things provoked his anger, not so much brambles which bear their thorns, but fig trees which ought to bear figs and do not. Remember the parable of the talents. The man with one talent was condemned not for squandering his Lord’s money, but because he had not increased it. So in God’s opinion not doing good is sufficient to condemn men, even if they have not committed positive evil. When the Holy Spirit convinces men of sin, what is the special sin which he reveals? Adultery? Robbery? No, a sin of omission—‘of sin, because they believe not on me’. Omitting to trust in Jesus is the master sin of which the Holy Spirit convicts the world. Remember that solemn question in Hebrews 2:3—‘how shall we escape if we’ what? Swear? Frequent the tavern? No, ‘if we neglect so great salvation’? Lifelong neglect of salvation involves us in danger from which there is no escape. FOR MEDITATION: Unbelievers express surprise at the foolish things Christians refuse to do (1 Peter 4:4). The Lord Jesus Christ expresses sadness at the wise things unbelievers refuse to do (Matthew 23:37–38), such as receiving him and trusting in him for salvation (John 1:11; 3:18). To fail to do what we know to be right is sin (James 4:17). C. H. Spurgeon and Terence Peter Crosby, 365 Days with Spurgeon (Volume 3), (Leominster, UK: Day One Publications, 2005), 306.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 124 Views
More Results
Sponsored

We are, so far, 80% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here