• Novak Djokovic showing his Christian cross after his victory https://old.bitchute.com/video/Brxf7KPtlO78/
    Novak Djokovic showing his Christian cross after his victory https://old.bitchute.com/video/Brxf7KPtlO78/
    OLD.BITCHUTE.COM
    Novak Djokovic showing his Christian cross after his victory
    Source https://x.com/i/status/1855369505142428129 Expose the Globalists tyranny https://expose1984.com Proof that the pandemic was planned https://stopworldcontrol.com/ Lien vers le site web de balance la babouche archivé https://expose1984.…
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 164 Просмотры
  • The Northern Virginia Astronomy Club hosted its annual Star Gaze outreach event at C.M. Crockett Park on Saturday, featuring Astronomy Bingo, a sky tour, telescopes on the observing field after sunset, and lectures by Woody Davis, Alan Goldberg, and Paul Derby. #StarGaze2024 #StarGaze #NOVAC #Virginia #NightSky #Astronomy
    The Northern Virginia Astronomy Club hosted its annual Star Gaze outreach event at C.M. Crockett Park on Saturday, featuring Astronomy Bingo, a sky tour, telescopes on the observing field after sunset, and lectures by Woody Davis, Alan Goldberg, and Paul Derby. #StarGaze2024 #StarGaze #NOVAC #Virginia #NightSky #Astronomy
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 627 Просмотры
  • The Wreck That Saved America From a Massive Radioactive Attack
    June 23, 1944. In the darkness of the mid-Atlantic, 850 nautical miles west of the Cape Verde Islands, the Japanese submarine I-52 slices through the water. The 356-foot vessel, commanded by Lieutenant Commander Kameo Uno, carries a cargo set to alter the course of the war.

    I-52's cavernous hold contains 2.2 tons of gold bars, payment for Nazi Germany's most advanced technology. More crucially, 1,700 pounds of uranium oxide lie in wait - the potential core of a dirty bomb. War secrets, cutting-edge radar equipment, and even an Enigma machine complete the precious cargo, all destined to unlock German military innovation.

    Near midnight, an American airman aboard a Grumman TBF-1C Avenger detects a surface contact on his half-functional radar. Lieutenant Commander Jesse D. Taylor, piloting the lead aircraft, responds immediately. Flares burst from his Avenger, bathing the ocean below in harsh light.

    Caught in the sudden illumination, I-52 plunges beneath the waves. Taylor dives, unleashing a barrage of depth charges that explode off the submarine's starboard side. As the crew of I-52 fights to control their descent, Taylor circles overhead, preparing to deploy one more weapon - a cutting-edge device to seal the submarine's fate…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KWZcM66rP0
    The Wreck That Saved America From a Massive Radioactive Attack June 23, 1944. In the darkness of the mid-Atlantic, 850 nautical miles west of the Cape Verde Islands, the Japanese submarine I-52 slices through the water. The 356-foot vessel, commanded by Lieutenant Commander Kameo Uno, carries a cargo set to alter the course of the war. I-52's cavernous hold contains 2.2 tons of gold bars, payment for Nazi Germany's most advanced technology. More crucially, 1,700 pounds of uranium oxide lie in wait - the potential core of a dirty bomb. War secrets, cutting-edge radar equipment, and even an Enigma machine complete the precious cargo, all destined to unlock German military innovation. Near midnight, an American airman aboard a Grumman TBF-1C Avenger detects a surface contact on his half-functional radar. Lieutenant Commander Jesse D. Taylor, piloting the lead aircraft, responds immediately. Flares burst from his Avenger, bathing the ocean below in harsh light. Caught in the sudden illumination, I-52 plunges beneath the waves. Taylor dives, unleashing a barrage of depth charges that explode off the submarine's starboard side. As the crew of I-52 fights to control their descent, Taylor circles overhead, preparing to deploy one more weapon - a cutting-edge device to seal the submarine's fate… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KWZcM66rP0
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 1Кб Просмотры
  • America's Unexpected WW2 Panzer Annihilator
    South Korea plunged into chaos with the sudden invasion from the North, an unexpected turn that threw the nation and its American allies into a harrowing retreat. Overwhelmed by the Communist onslaught, the Allied forces faced an army of tens of thousands of infantry, artillery, and, critically, tanks led by the Soviet-made T-34s, a tank that epitomized armored dominance on the battlefield.

    In stark contrast, the only immediate armored response from the U.S. Far East Command came in the form of the World War 2-era M24 Chaffee. This compact light tank, tipping the scales at just over 18 tons and armed with a mere 75-millimeter gun, stood as the solitary option to confront the enemy's advance. Designed primarily for reconnaissance and infantry support, the Chaffee, with its lighter armor and armament, was not suited for head-on clashes with the Soviet behemoths.

    On July 10, 1950, a decisive moment unfolded as a unit of Chaffees encountered the enemy’s T-34 tanks for the first time. Leveraging their agility, the Chaffee crews went on the offensive. The initial exchange of fire saw the Chaffees’ rounds bouncing harmlessly off the T-34s' armor, but the American tanks pressed on, maneuvering to get within effective range.

    As the battle heated up, two Chaffees were hit and destroyed, a stark reminder of the risks they were taking. Then, in a moment teetering on the edge of disaster, as a T-34 lined up its shot on another Chaffee, an unexpected explosion changed everything.

    When the smoke began to clear, it was revealed that this was the result of a cunning flanking maneuver. The Chaffee's maneuverability and the crew's tactical ingenuity had turned the tables. Emerging from behind the enemy lines, the flanking Chaffees had caught the T-34s off guard.

    In the heat of battle, the Chaffee showed that age and power are not the sole determinants of effectiveness, revealing hidden aces through innovative tactics.
    America's Unexpected WW2 Panzer Annihilator South Korea plunged into chaos with the sudden invasion from the North, an unexpected turn that threw the nation and its American allies into a harrowing retreat. Overwhelmed by the Communist onslaught, the Allied forces faced an army of tens of thousands of infantry, artillery, and, critically, tanks led by the Soviet-made T-34s, a tank that epitomized armored dominance on the battlefield. In stark contrast, the only immediate armored response from the U.S. Far East Command came in the form of the World War 2-era M24 Chaffee. This compact light tank, tipping the scales at just over 18 tons and armed with a mere 75-millimeter gun, stood as the solitary option to confront the enemy's advance. Designed primarily for reconnaissance and infantry support, the Chaffee, with its lighter armor and armament, was not suited for head-on clashes with the Soviet behemoths. On July 10, 1950, a decisive moment unfolded as a unit of Chaffees encountered the enemy’s T-34 tanks for the first time. Leveraging their agility, the Chaffee crews went on the offensive. The initial exchange of fire saw the Chaffees’ rounds bouncing harmlessly off the T-34s' armor, but the American tanks pressed on, maneuvering to get within effective range. As the battle heated up, two Chaffees were hit and destroyed, a stark reminder of the risks they were taking. Then, in a moment teetering on the edge of disaster, as a T-34 lined up its shot on another Chaffee, an unexpected explosion changed everything. When the smoke began to clear, it was revealed that this was the result of a cunning flanking maneuver. The Chaffee's maneuverability and the crew's tactical ingenuity had turned the tables. Emerging from behind the enemy lines, the flanking Chaffees had caught the T-34s off guard. In the heat of battle, the Chaffee showed that age and power are not the sole determinants of effectiveness, revealing hidden aces through innovative tactics.
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 1Кб Просмотры
  • Monstrous Bullets Vaporize Targets Before They Even See It Coming
    As the arms race intensified, few could have anticipated the astonishing evolution of modern weaponry. Today, we delve into four groundbreaking munitions that redefine lethality on the battlefield.

    In 1956, the Air Force unveiled the Lockheed F-104A Starfighter at Edwards Air Force Base, astonishing onlookers with its slender wings and incredible 1,500 miles per hour speed. However, it was a mysterious bump on the fuselage that truly captured attention — the introduction of the M61 Vulcan machine gun. With a jaw-dropping firing rate of 6,000 rounds per minute, this weapon revolutionized aerial combat, blending nearly a century of technological evolution with modern firepower.

    As global tensions escalate, the German Bundeswehr has embraced the MANTIS, a rapid-response auto-defense system. Capable of firing 1,000 rounds in just one minute, this state-of-the-art arsenal can obliterate incoming threats with a response time of just 4.5 seconds. In a world of escalating warfare, the MANTIS stands as a formidable shield for Germany and its allies.

    Meanwhile, the controversial Raufoss Mk 211 .50-caliber round has emerged as a topic of heated debate. Known for its unparalleled destructive capabilities, this multipurpose ammunition poses a dilemma for military leaders: should such devastating firepower be utilized, or is it too dangerous in populated areas? The whispers surrounding its potential on the battlefield continue to grow, fueling discussions on the ethics of warfare.

    Lastly, we spotlight the groundbreaking EXACTO bullet, a self-steering innovation that could transform the role of snipers. Developed by DARPA, this remarkable round navigates environmental challenges with astonishing accuracy, giving soldiers the power to engage distant targets safely and effectively.
    https://youtu.be/j0B9cV_bIDY?si=4oOuF_OLrjvQ7YuL
    Monstrous Bullets Vaporize Targets Before They Even See It Coming As the arms race intensified, few could have anticipated the astonishing evolution of modern weaponry. Today, we delve into four groundbreaking munitions that redefine lethality on the battlefield. In 1956, the Air Force unveiled the Lockheed F-104A Starfighter at Edwards Air Force Base, astonishing onlookers with its slender wings and incredible 1,500 miles per hour speed. However, it was a mysterious bump on the fuselage that truly captured attention — the introduction of the M61 Vulcan machine gun. With a jaw-dropping firing rate of 6,000 rounds per minute, this weapon revolutionized aerial combat, blending nearly a century of technological evolution with modern firepower. As global tensions escalate, the German Bundeswehr has embraced the MANTIS, a rapid-response auto-defense system. Capable of firing 1,000 rounds in just one minute, this state-of-the-art arsenal can obliterate incoming threats with a response time of just 4.5 seconds. In a world of escalating warfare, the MANTIS stands as a formidable shield for Germany and its allies. Meanwhile, the controversial Raufoss Mk 211 .50-caliber round has emerged as a topic of heated debate. Known for its unparalleled destructive capabilities, this multipurpose ammunition poses a dilemma for military leaders: should such devastating firepower be utilized, or is it too dangerous in populated areas? The whispers surrounding its potential on the battlefield continue to grow, fueling discussions on the ethics of warfare. Lastly, we spotlight the groundbreaking EXACTO bullet, a self-steering innovation that could transform the role of snipers. Developed by DARPA, this remarkable round navigates environmental challenges with astonishing accuracy, giving soldiers the power to engage distant targets safely and effectively. https://youtu.be/j0B9cV_bIDY?si=4oOuF_OLrjvQ7YuL
    0 Комментарии 1 Поделились 2Кб Просмотры
  • https://www.thetrumpet.com/30174-germanys-military-innovation-spotlighted
    https://www.thetrumpet.com/30174-germanys-military-innovation-spotlighted
    WWW.THETRUMPET.COM
    Germany’s Military Innovation Spotlighted
    Germany’s world-renowned arms industry is getting some new additions.
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 257 Просмотры
  • Inside the World's Largest Doomsday Bunker Community
    An Epic Humanitarian Project the size Of A city:
    575 private bunkers with space for thousands in one of North America's safest locations: The decommissioned US Army Black Hills Ordnance Depot at Igloo, South Dakota; south of Edgemont, SD.

    Mankind has a continuing obsession with end of the world prophecies and judgement day. Any visible or invisible threat to life kicks our survival instincts into gear and we want to take action. The market capitalizes on this fear and pushes innovation and products that both feed and satisfy survivalism. I visited the Terra Vivos survival shelters in South Dakota last month.

    This former US Army Base was constructed in 1942 and was called the Black Hills Ordnance Depot. It served as an explosives and munitions storage and maintenance facility. The bunkers measure 27 feet in width and 60 to 80 feet in length. The foundation is made of 2 to 3 feet of reinforced concrete. The walls are 12 inches thick and have a trench running down the sides. The interior space is 13 feet tall at their highest point. This entire survival shelter project is headed by Robert Vicino who has a background in manufacturing and real estate. His son, Dante Vicino gave us a tour of the Terra Vivos site and took us to some unfinished and completed bunkers.

    The bunkers are completely off the grid. To make them livable, you have to consider 4 main utilities. Water, Sewage, Energy, Internet Access. They are structurally sound, so you don’t have to add any additional support or reinforcement. Soil in the area is stable unlike the clayey soil in Texas, so most of the 82 year old foundations are in great shape and don't have any cracks. The curved interior walls are made of board-formed concrete. You can still see the beautiful wood grain etched into the concrete. Working remotely is no longer an issue. Thermal mass of the 12 inch thick concrete walls store heat or thermal energy during the day and slowly release it at night when it’s cooler. It can be turned into a self-sufficient town with a supermarket, hardware store, bars and restaurants. I see a lot of similarities to Marfa which is a small desert city in West Texas. Marfa was also a military town in the 1940s but it was converted into a cultural hub by Donald Judd, a minimalist artist from New York City.

    It’s an over-ambitious plan. Out of the 800 bunkers on site, the Vivos company wants to convert 575 of them. So far, only 50 have been purchased. The lease plan prevents you from ever owning your bunker. The wildlife like cows and deer that roam the site often climb on top of the bunkers causing erosion of the soil and grass, and exposing the concrete. Since it’s not “underground” it’s not as safe as other survival shelters that are buried 3 to 10 feet underground. The company is catering to a small group of people. They warn of nuclear war, bioterrorism, anarchy, electro-magnetic pulses, solar flares, super volcanoes, etc. If they marketed their bunkers as a way to protect family, life and belongings, it might be more popular with a larger group of people. Remote location. In the event of a disaster, you’d need a private plane to take you to Provo, South Dakota. It only works as a survival shelter if you are permanently living there. The nearest hardware store is in Hot Springs, about 45 minutes to an hour away. Vicino’s contractors designed layouts, but I wasn’t impressed with the quality of their work. Contamination of the subsurface soil and water supply is a concern to some residents in the area. Long term effects of living in a concrete box with no sunlight are also problematic.

    It’s an exciting project with a lot of potential if a significant number of individuals move to the area. I don’t know what category these bunkers fit into. It’s not a luxury survival shelter, it’s not in a super-secure, secret location, it’s not conveniently located near a major city unless you consider Rapid City a major city; and it’s not underground. At best, it is an earth sheltered home or bungalow. I’m wary of it turning into a thriving community, unless their marketing strategy changes.
    https://rumble.com/v5gidwh-inside-the-worlds-largest-doomsday-bunker-community.html
    Inside the World's Largest Doomsday Bunker Community An Epic Humanitarian Project the size Of A city: 575 private bunkers with space for thousands in one of North America's safest locations: The decommissioned US Army Black Hills Ordnance Depot at Igloo, South Dakota; south of Edgemont, SD. Mankind has a continuing obsession with end of the world prophecies and judgement day. Any visible or invisible threat to life kicks our survival instincts into gear and we want to take action. The market capitalizes on this fear and pushes innovation and products that both feed and satisfy survivalism. I visited the Terra Vivos survival shelters in South Dakota last month. This former US Army Base was constructed in 1942 and was called the Black Hills Ordnance Depot. It served as an explosives and munitions storage and maintenance facility. The bunkers measure 27 feet in width and 60 to 80 feet in length. The foundation is made of 2 to 3 feet of reinforced concrete. The walls are 12 inches thick and have a trench running down the sides. The interior space is 13 feet tall at their highest point. This entire survival shelter project is headed by Robert Vicino who has a background in manufacturing and real estate. His son, Dante Vicino gave us a tour of the Terra Vivos site and took us to some unfinished and completed bunkers. The bunkers are completely off the grid. To make them livable, you have to consider 4 main utilities. Water, Sewage, Energy, Internet Access. They are structurally sound, so you don’t have to add any additional support or reinforcement. Soil in the area is stable unlike the clayey soil in Texas, so most of the 82 year old foundations are in great shape and don't have any cracks. The curved interior walls are made of board-formed concrete. You can still see the beautiful wood grain etched into the concrete. Working remotely is no longer an issue. Thermal mass of the 12 inch thick concrete walls store heat or thermal energy during the day and slowly release it at night when it’s cooler. It can be turned into a self-sufficient town with a supermarket, hardware store, bars and restaurants. I see a lot of similarities to Marfa which is a small desert city in West Texas. Marfa was also a military town in the 1940s but it was converted into a cultural hub by Donald Judd, a minimalist artist from New York City. It’s an over-ambitious plan. Out of the 800 bunkers on site, the Vivos company wants to convert 575 of them. So far, only 50 have been purchased. The lease plan prevents you from ever owning your bunker. The wildlife like cows and deer that roam the site often climb on top of the bunkers causing erosion of the soil and grass, and exposing the concrete. Since it’s not “underground” it’s not as safe as other survival shelters that are buried 3 to 10 feet underground. The company is catering to a small group of people. They warn of nuclear war, bioterrorism, anarchy, electro-magnetic pulses, solar flares, super volcanoes, etc. If they marketed their bunkers as a way to protect family, life and belongings, it might be more popular with a larger group of people. Remote location. In the event of a disaster, you’d need a private plane to take you to Provo, South Dakota. It only works as a survival shelter if you are permanently living there. The nearest hardware store is in Hot Springs, about 45 minutes to an hour away. Vicino’s contractors designed layouts, but I wasn’t impressed with the quality of their work. Contamination of the subsurface soil and water supply is a concern to some residents in the area. Long term effects of living in a concrete box with no sunlight are also problematic. It’s an exciting project with a lot of potential if a significant number of individuals move to the area. I don’t know what category these bunkers fit into. It’s not a luxury survival shelter, it’s not in a super-secure, secret location, it’s not conveniently located near a major city unless you consider Rapid City a major city; and it’s not underground. At best, it is an earth sheltered home or bungalow. I’m wary of it turning into a thriving community, unless their marketing strategy changes. https://rumble.com/v5gidwh-inside-the-worlds-largest-doomsday-bunker-community.html
    Like
    1
    0 Комментарии 1 Поделились 2Кб Просмотры
  • WE ARE SCIENTISTS: Scientist Without Degree Possible?
    Based on the search results, it is possible to be a scientist without a degree. Here are some key points:

    In bioinformatics, many people working in the field did not have a degree in bioinformatics until recently, when degree programs were established. Self-study and learning by doing can be sufficient to become a bioinformaticist.
    In data science, it is possible to become a data scientist without a degree, as long as one has the necessary skills and can demonstrate their abilities through work and publications.
    In programming, one can learn by self-study and experience, as exemplified by the individual who taught themselves assembly language and went on to start a company and work at Microsoft.
    In astronomy, amateur astronomers have discovered comets and asteroids, and those with larger instruments have discovered supernovae in distant galaxies, demonstrating that non-degree holders can contribute to scientific discoveries.
    The scientific community values results and replicable experiments over formal education. As long as one’s work is well-documented and replicable, their credentials will not appear on the article, and their findings will be acknowledged.
    However, it’s important to note that:

    Without a degree, it may be more challenging to gain recognition and acceptance within the scientific community, particularly in fields with strong academic traditions.
    Self-study and learning by doing require significant dedication and effort, and may not provide the same level of formal training and mentorship as a degree program.
    In some fields, such as academia or research institutions, a degree may be a requirement for employment or funding.
    Ultimately, becoming a scientist without a degree requires a strong passion for learning, a willingness to put in the effort to develop necessary skills, and a focus on producing high-quality work that can be replicated and validated by others.
    WE ARE SCIENTISTS: Scientist Without Degree Possible? Based on the search results, it is possible to be a scientist without a degree. Here are some key points: In bioinformatics, many people working in the field did not have a degree in bioinformatics until recently, when degree programs were established. Self-study and learning by doing can be sufficient to become a bioinformaticist. In data science, it is possible to become a data scientist without a degree, as long as one has the necessary skills and can demonstrate their abilities through work and publications. In programming, one can learn by self-study and experience, as exemplified by the individual who taught themselves assembly language and went on to start a company and work at Microsoft. In astronomy, amateur astronomers have discovered comets and asteroids, and those with larger instruments have discovered supernovae in distant galaxies, demonstrating that non-degree holders can contribute to scientific discoveries. The scientific community values results and replicable experiments over formal education. As long as one’s work is well-documented and replicable, their credentials will not appear on the article, and their findings will be acknowledged. However, it’s important to note that: Without a degree, it may be more challenging to gain recognition and acceptance within the scientific community, particularly in fields with strong academic traditions. Self-study and learning by doing require significant dedication and effort, and may not provide the same level of formal training and mentorship as a degree program. In some fields, such as academia or research institutions, a degree may be a requirement for employment or funding. Ultimately, becoming a scientist without a degree requires a strong passion for learning, a willingness to put in the effort to develop necessary skills, and a focus on producing high-quality work that can be replicated and validated by others.
    Love
    1
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 1Кб Просмотры
Спонсоры

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here