Campaign Finance Reform: Are all Voices Equal? Why should one person's voice in the election process hold more weight than a citizen when voting for that office? Why should someone who is not going to be represented by the person in a given office be able to influence the election for that office? Supreme Court has ruled that campaign contributions are #FreeSpeech. However, there are two kinds of speech. #VotingSpeech and #OpinionSpeech. The only form of speech that has power, voting speech is limited one opinion per constituent. It is like money in that it is tangible. Why aren't #CampaignContributions considered voting? Why not limit contributions like voting to only those who are entitled/able to vote for that office? Cap the amount allowed like a vote. This is the #CampaignFinanceReform that needs to be discussed.

Campaign Finance Reform: Are all Voices Equal? Why should one person's voice in the election process hold more weight than a citizen when voting for that office? Why should someone who is not going to be represented by the person in a given office be able to influence the election for that office? Supreme Court has ruled that campaign contributions are #FreeSpeech. However, there are two kinds of speech. #VotingSpeech and #OpinionSpeech. The only form of speech that has power, voting speech is limited one opinon per constituent. It is like money in that it is tangible. Why aren't #CampaignContributions considered voting? Why not limit contributions like voting to only those who are entitled/able to vote for that office? Cap the amount allowed like a vote. This is the #CampaignFinanceReform that needs to be discussed. https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/soros-pours-record-50-million-into-2020-election/

Of all the forms of speech available to the citizen, voting speech is the most important, powerful, and influential. Yet, this form is speech is limited to one citizen per election and only to the constituents of the office to be voted for. Allowing campaigns for elected office to recieve tangable assets (money, peoples time, gifts) from those not entitled to vote for that representation is a disenfranchisment of those who are to be represented. We established the 17th Amendment to manage this issue and all that was achieved was disenfranchising the states authority at a federal level. The new attempt is to invoke term limits which will limit the choices of the citizen. No approach will ever be perfect, humans adapt. However, only the constituents of an elected office should be allowed to contribute to the campaigns for that office. #MoneyinPoltics, #BuyingInfluence, #MoneyinElections, #DisenfranchisingtheVoter, #CampaignFinanceReform https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bloomberg-network-climate-lawyers-ag