• LIVE | Trump Declares War On LGBTQ+ | Ban On Gender-Affirming Car, Penalty For Docs
    https://youtu.be/uCKUaJawPco
    Donald Trump recently unveiled his plan to ban gender-affirming care for minors through a social media video. This move has sparked concern and outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and medical professionals. Critics say Trump's proposal would have devastating consequences and essentially erase LGBTQ+ individuals. Watch.
    LIVE | Trump Declares War On LGBTQ+ | Ban On Gender-Affirming Car, Penalty For Docs https://youtu.be/uCKUaJawPco Donald Trump recently unveiled his plan to ban gender-affirming care for minors through a social media video. This move has sparked concern and outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and medical professionals. Critics say Trump's proposal would have devastating consequences and essentially erase LGBTQ+ individuals. Watch.
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 23 Ansichten
  • (admin) Here it is...expect major acting up..batten the hatches
    LIVE | Trump Declares War On LGBTQ+ | Ban On Gender-Affirming Car, Penalty For Docs
    https://youtu.be/uCKUaJawPco
    Donald Trump recently unveiled his plan to ban gender-affirming care for minors through a social media video. This move has sparked concern and outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and medical professionals. Critics say Trump's proposal would have devastating consequences and essentially erase LGBTQ+ individuals. Watch.
    (admin) Here it is...expect major acting up..batten the hatches LIVE | Trump Declares War On LGBTQ+ | Ban On Gender-Affirming Car, Penalty For Docs https://youtu.be/uCKUaJawPco Donald Trump recently unveiled his plan to ban gender-affirming care for minors through a social media video. This move has sparked concern and outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and medical professionals. Critics say Trump's proposal would have devastating consequences and essentially erase LGBTQ+ individuals. Watch.
    Like
    2
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 49 Ansichten
  • BREAKING from Fox news: All the bogus legal cases against Trump have essential gone away since he won last night.
    BREAKING from Fox news: All the bogus legal cases against Trump have essential gone away since he won last night. 😂
    Love
    Like
    Yay
    4
    0 Kommentare 2 Anteile 124 Ansichten
  • Lifelong Democrat Jimmy Dore on why it’s essential to punish and humiliate the Democratic Party eight days from now.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURLfCVjQ5E
    Lifelong Democrat Jimmy Dore on why it’s essential to punish and humiliate the Democratic Party eight days from now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURLfCVjQ5E
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 146 Ansichten

  • Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped

    Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims

    Post 4921

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

    In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit.

    BACKGROUND

    GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault.

    GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor.

    Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted.

    In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims.

    After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action.

    DISCUSSION

    GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay.

    Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm.

    GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings.

    GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor.

    GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims.

    The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO.

    A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act.

    The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings.

    GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims Post 4921 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog. In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit. BACKGROUND GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault. GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor. Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted. In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims. After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action. DISCUSSION GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay. Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm. GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings. GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor. GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims. The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO. A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act. The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings. GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action. ZALMA OPINION The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 923 Ansichten 0
  • Paralogisms are essentially distortions of logical thought processes that lead to incorrect conclusions, e.g., by misrepresenting or discrediting evidence or facts. Paramoralisms are moral substitutions, making evil seem good, and good evil. This can take the form of “paranormal indignation,” which is emotionally infectious and can turn people against the innocent or the virtuous. Both methods block an average person’s mind from being able to perceive the truth.

    https://ponerology.substack.com/p/twenty-five-predatory-tactics
    Paralogisms are essentially distortions of logical thought processes that lead to incorrect conclusions, e.g., by misrepresenting or discrediting evidence or facts. Paramoralisms are moral substitutions, making evil seem good, and good evil. This can take the form of “paranormal indignation,” which is emotionally infectious and can turn people against the innocent or the virtuous. Both methods block an average person’s mind from being able to perceive the truth. https://ponerology.substack.com/p/twenty-five-predatory-tactics
    PONEROLOGY.SUBSTACK.COM
    Twenty-Five Predatory Tactics
    From Karen Mitchell's persistent predatory personality model
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 341 Ansichten
  • The Malayan Leaf Frog (Pangcoh snouted frog or Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis) is a fascinating amphibian native to the forests of Malaysia and surrounding areas. Known for its remarkable leaf-like appearance, which helps it camouflage among foliage, this species displays a unique adaptation that aids in evasion from predators. Its nocturnal behavior and preference for humid environments highlight its ecological role within tropical ecosystems. Conservation efforts are essential for protecting this species, as habitat loss poses a significant threat to its survival.
    The Malayan Leaf Frog (Pangcoh snouted frog or Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis) is a fascinating amphibian native to the forests of Malaysia and surrounding areas. Known for its remarkable leaf-like appearance, which helps it camouflage among foliage, this species displays a unique adaptation that aids in evasion from predators. Its nocturnal behavior and preference for humid environments highlight its ecological role within tropical ecosystems. Conservation efforts are essential for protecting this species, as habitat loss poses a significant threat to its survival.
    Like
    Haha
    2
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 350 Ansichten 2
  • AN AMERICAN WAS JUST JAILED WITHOUT BOND FOR AN OVERTURNED LAW

    #Criminals gravitate towards the illegitimate "government"
    they are a psychopathic #OrganizedCrime syndicate

    And let there be no mistake...
    What you call "government" IS ORGANIZED CRIME !

    This video is just one more, in an unending line of EXAMPLES proving that FACT! The #Police who filed these bogus charges should be PROSECUTED UNDER TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
    AND 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

    They should be found GUILTY and sent to PRISON, lose their job, their pensions, and be forced to sell their homes, to pay damages to the man wronged by their CRIMINAL ACTIONS!

    This is PURE unadulterated criminality on full display!
    Shooting these scumbags is too good for them!

    They should DIE IN PRISON for this criminal act
    Because wrongfully arresting a man is a heinous crime...
    Which is comparative to MURDER

    Because you are essentially "Murdering" an innocent man's life!

    https://old.bitchute.com/video/lUD4tbYokyw/
    AN AMERICAN WAS JUST JAILED WITHOUT BOND FOR AN OVERTURNED LAW #Criminals gravitate towards the illegitimate "government" they are a psychopathic #OrganizedCrime syndicate And let there be no mistake... What you call "government" IS ORGANIZED CRIME ! This video is just one more, in an unending line of EXAMPLES proving that FACT! The #Police who filed these bogus charges should be PROSECUTED UNDER TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights AND 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law They should be found GUILTY and sent to PRISON, lose their job, their pensions, and be forced to sell their homes, to pay damages to the man wronged by their CRIMINAL ACTIONS! This is PURE unadulterated criminality on full display! Shooting these scumbags is too good for them! They should DIE IN PRISON for this criminal act Because wrongfully arresting a man is a heinous crime... Which is comparative to MURDER Because you are essentially "Murdering" an innocent man's life! https://old.bitchute.com/video/lUD4tbYokyw/
    OLD.BITCHUTE.COM
    An AMERICAN was Just Jailed WITHOUT BOND for an OVERTURNED LAW
    Craig's links: Cash app: https://cash.app/$chandtyaudits Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Hendry812185?lo... Gofundme: https://www.gofundme.com/f/5jk8g7-cra... Vermillion County Jail Address to send craig books: 1888 IN-63, Hillsdale, IN 47854 🔴 Gra…
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 608 Ansichten
  • MANUFACTURING CONSENT...The Most Essential Part of becoming and staying free is the ability to recognize when you are being manipulated by external, collectivist demagogues and deceit.

    #SayYeN0TaConfederacy #Isaiah8:12&13 #FOUNDATIONofKHAZARi$tocracy

    https://youtu.be/kyWFpsAnVuI
    MANUFACTURING CONSENT...The Most Essential Part of becoming and staying free is the ability to recognize when you are being manipulated by external, collectivist demagogues and deceit. #SayYeN0TaConfederacy #Isaiah8:12&13 #FOUNDATIONofKHAZARi$tocracy https://youtu.be/kyWFpsAnVuI
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 583 Ansichten
Gesponsert

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here