COPS KILL MAN FOR DRIVING ATV IN NEIGHBOR'S YARD! From what I saw, he was driving the ATV in his own yard! This is just another case of "Execute an American over a phone call" It could be an anonymous phone call, a "SWATTING" phone call..... It does not really matter, it's just a phone call! And based on a phone call, with ZERO INVESTIGATION or #Evidence of a #Crime, #Police act as Judge, Jury, and Executioner! Never mind the fact that a "phone call" does NOT meet the PROBABLE CAUSE standard or the "reasonable, articulatable suspicion standard even... It's just a phone call Besides... since when did riding an ATV on your neighbor's property (Or your own) become a capital offense??? The scumbags in blue try to escalate EVERYTHING into an excuse to murder Americans! https://www.bitchute.com/video/BfXtmXwah7E/

Op-ed: The Verdict v. The Constitution By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio https://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2024/06/op-ed-verdict-v.html ...A fair trial with an impartial jury of Trump's peers the Constitution trampling Democrats would never allow, and when that's coupled with how fast the guilty verdict was actually reached, proves to me that Donald J. Trump's constitutional rights were indeed being denied. And when you add in the one-sided “gag order” ...

Trump Conviction Could Be Declared A ‘Mistrial’ After Judge Is Alerted To Post Regarding Possible Juror Breach Of Confidentiality https://www.oann.com/newsroom/trump-conviction-could-be-declared-a-mistrial-after-judge-is-alerted-to-post-regarding-possible-juror-breach-of-confidentiality/ Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Donald Trump’s so-called “hush money” trial, expressed worry in a letter on Friday regarding a social media comment uploaded to Meta (Facebook) by someone claiming to be a juror’s cousin. It’s been one week since the former president was found guilty on 34 criminal counts by a 12-member jury.

Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, per Yale Law Professor https://rumble.com/v508yni-supreme-court-may-prevent-irreparable-harm-to-trump-per-yale-law-professor.html Michael Shellenberger - Supreme Court May Prevent “Irreparable Harm” To Trump, Says Influential Yale Law Professor . Liberal Constitutional law scholar Jed Rubenfeld says New York “hush money” case may violate Trump’s constitutional rights and that he would appeal to federal courts Over the last week, America’s leading legal scholars and journalists have explained that former president Donald Trump is now a convicted felon. A jury found Trump guilty of many crimes, including falsifying business records and interfering in an election. But according to an influential constitutional law scholar at Yale University, legal scholars and journalists got the story all wrong. Trump is not, in fact, a convicted felon. SEE VIDEO HERE - https://rumble.com/v501ur0-yale-law-profs-brilliant-plan-for-trump-legal-team-to-overturn-guilty-verdi.html “You're not convicted unless the judge enters a judgment of guilt against you,” explains Yale’s Jed Rubenfeld, “And the judge still has the power… to throw out that verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal.” Rubenfeld acknowledges that “it's very likely that Judge [Juan] Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issued sentencing, July 11.” But Trump’s lawyers can still sue New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Rubenfeld, “and ask the judge — the federal judge — for an emergency temporary restraining order, halting Judge Merchan from entering that judgment of guilt until the federal courts have had an opportunity to review and rule on the serious constitutional arguments that exist here.” Rubenfeld made his remarks in a video, and I reached him by phone. He elaborated on how the Supreme Court could rule on the case. “If Trump’s lawyers file in a federal district court, they would ask for TRO, Temporary Restraining Order, on an emergency basis,” he told Public. “The court would set a briefing schedule and ask for ‘hurry up’ schedule by July 11. If the court said, ‘No, we’re not issuing a TRO,’ you could appeal to the court of appeals. And then, whatever that court did, you could appeal to the Supreme Court.” Said Rubenfeld, “You could even go over the circuit court to the Supreme Court.” Rubenfeld is a law professor and does not work for the Trump campaign. He is most famous for his liberal positions on issues like affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Rosenfeld expressed concern over three potential violations of the Constitution by the New York state court. First, a felony conviction could cause “irreparable harm” to Trump and his effort to become president. Second, it could have been a case of “selective prosecution” by Bragg, who campaigned on convicting Trump. Third, the court may have violated Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights, which is that the accused must know what they are being accused of....

MISTRIAL: New York Jury Illegally LEAKED Trump Verdict BEFORE Conviction! Judge PANICS, Free Trump https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e083hRQLoiM

THREE COPS LIED; SHE WENT TO JAIL FOR 6 MONTHS - BODY CAM VINDICATION! READ THE TEXT OF THIS FEDERAL LAW!!! And then I want you to explain to me exactly HOW Federal #Prosecutors manage to keep their jobs AND not be charged under the same statute for aiding and abetting the crime by NOT filing charges against these #Criminals with a badge!!! This makes the PROSECUTOR complicit in the crime and the coverup! It should carry the DEATH PENALTY for any prosecutor failing to charge the crime 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty. Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions. AND THIS ONE TOO..... MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus. Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies. https://www.bitchute.com/video/YeydrP6AXf0/

Who has the liberal justice system appointed to judge Hunter? They all happen to have ties to the liberal party and/or would be extremely sympathetic to anyone facing charges due to drug usage. One juror had a childhood best friend die from a heroin overdose, while another had a brother-in-law die from alcoholism, and the juror believes it is a “disease.” A third juror had a brother arrested for possessing narcotics and his father was shot dead. A fourth juror admitted to having a brother who is addicted to both heroin and PCP. One woman on the jury was actually in the Secret Service, and her husband still serves in the Secret Service. You really cannot make this stuff up. One young juror has a DUI charge, while another said that marijuana use should not prevent someone from owning a firearm. The alternate juror had donated to the Obama campaign. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/hunter-biden-jury-truly-his-peers/

The Big Lies From The Idiot & Thief!! “After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. … It’s reckless, it’s dangerous, it’s irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don’t like the verdict.” —Joe Biden “The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed.” —Joe Biden

The Hunter Biden firearms trial begins today. God Bless America, God Save The Republic. Hunter Biden gun trial live: Jury selection begins in historic case https://mol.im/a/13488659 via @MailOnline

The jury failed. God Bless America, God Save The Republic. Judicial Watch Weekly Update with Tom Fitton https://rumble.com/v4yqe33-judicial-watch-weekly-update-with-tom-fitton.html