• Pedophile Bill Clinton expressing fears that Trump might use the military to target him. (1 min, 56 sec)
    https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/144406
    Pedophile Bill Clinton expressing fears that Trump might use the military to target him. (1 min, 56 sec) https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/144406
    0 Comments 0 Shares 136 Views 0

  • Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped

    Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims

    Post 4921

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

    In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit.

    BACKGROUND

    GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault.

    GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor.

    Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted.

    In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims.

    After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action.

    DISCUSSION

    GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay.

    Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm.

    GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings.

    GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor.

    GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims.

    The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO.

    A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act.

    The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings.

    GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims Post 4921 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog. In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit. BACKGROUND GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault. GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor. Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted. In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims. After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action. DISCUSSION GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay. Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm. GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings. GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor. GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims. The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO. A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act. The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings. GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action. ZALMA OPINION The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Comments 0 Shares 759 Views 0
  • https://libertyexpress.substack.com/p/the-changing-landscape-of-us-elections
    https://libertyexpress.substack.com/p/the-changing-landscape-of-us-elections
    LIBERTYEXPRESS.SUBSTACK.COM
    The Changing Landscape of U.S. Elections
    You know, I often think back to when elections were held, and it seemed like we always knew who won right away.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 122 Views
  • The Talk is a colloquial expression for a conversation black parents in the United States feel compelled to have with their children and teenagers about the dangers they face due to racism or unjust treatment from authority figures, law enforcement or other parties, and how to de-escalate them.

    Meanwhile on planet Earth.....
    The Talk is a colloquial expression for a conversation black parents in the United States feel compelled to have with their children and teenagers about the dangers they face due to racism or unjust treatment from authority figures, law enforcement or other parties, and how to de-escalate them. Meanwhile on planet Earth.....
    0 Comments 0 Shares 187 Views 1
  • AS I EXPLAINED IN THE INTRODUCTION TO THE OTHER VIDEO, PREVIOUS TO THIS ONE, THE CENSORSHIP MACHINE TRIES TO FIND NEW WAYS TO BLOCK THE SPREAD OF CERTAIN MATERIAL, EVEN IN SITES THAT PERMIT A WIDER DEGREE OF FREE EXPRESSION, JUST LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER) NOW OWNED BY ELON MUSK AND OPEN TO AN ALMOST UNLIMITED FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN THAT PLATFORM. IT USED TO BE THAT CERTAIN MATERIALS WERE SUBJECTED TO "FACT CHECKERS", WITH NOTES DECLARING CERTAIN POST AS 'FALSE INFORMATION OR FAKE NEWS' AND REFERRING THE READERS TO SOURCES OF "REAL", "ACCURATE", AND "OBJECTIVE" INFORMATION LIKE 'CNN', 'THE NEW YORK TIMES', 'AP' OR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THE OLD 'FACT CHECKERS' ON 'X' (TWITTER), HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH "READERS ADDED CONTENT". IT IS BASICALLY THE SAME WITH A DIFFERENT NAME. A NOTE UNDER A POST TRYING TO DEBUNK OR DENY THE VERACITY OF THE INFORMATION AND THEY REFER THE READERS TO THE "GOOD SOURCES", JUST LIKE THE FACT CHECKERS USED TO DO. THIS METHOD IS VERY EFFECTIVE TO STOP THE SPREAD OF INFORMATION, SINCE ONCE THE READER SEES THOSE NOTES, HE/SHE REFRAINS FROM REPOSTING IT, IN FACT, STOPPING THAT INFORMATION RIGHT THERE. THAT WAS THE CASE WITH THIS POST AND VIDEO OF A FORMER STUDENT OF KAMALA HARRIS RUNNING MATE, CLAIMING HE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY TIM WALZ IN 1997. THE "READERS ADDED CONTENT" DESCRIBES THE VIDEO AS DONE BY 'AI' AND REFERS THE READERS TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES FOR TRUTHFUL INFORMATION. I DON'T KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE GUY OR HOW THE VIDEO WAS DONE BUT IF THE READERS REALLY WANT TO QUESTION THE INFORMATION AND POST A DIFFERENT VERSION OF THE FACTS, LET THE READERS DO IT. WE DO NOT NEED NOTES POSTED BY GOVERNMENT ABOUT WHAT TO BELIEVE OR WHAT TO THINK. WATCH IT AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF WITHOUT CENSORS INTERFERENCE.
    AS I EXPLAINED IN THE INTRODUCTION TO THE OTHER VIDEO, PREVIOUS TO THIS ONE, THE CENSORSHIP MACHINE TRIES TO FIND NEW WAYS TO BLOCK THE SPREAD OF CERTAIN MATERIAL, EVEN IN SITES THAT PERMIT A WIDER DEGREE OF FREE EXPRESSION, JUST LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER) NOW OWNED BY ELON MUSK AND OPEN TO AN ALMOST UNLIMITED FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN THAT PLATFORM. IT USED TO BE THAT CERTAIN MATERIALS WERE SUBJECTED TO "FACT CHECKERS", WITH NOTES DECLARING CERTAIN POST AS 'FALSE INFORMATION OR FAKE NEWS' AND REFERRING THE READERS TO SOURCES OF "REAL", "ACCURATE", AND "OBJECTIVE" INFORMATION LIKE 'CNN', 'THE NEW YORK TIMES', 'AP' OR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THE OLD 'FACT CHECKERS' ON 'X' (TWITTER), HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH "READERS ADDED CONTENT". IT IS BASICALLY THE SAME WITH A DIFFERENT NAME. A NOTE UNDER A POST TRYING TO DEBUNK OR DENY THE VERACITY OF THE INFORMATION AND THEY REFER THE READERS TO THE "GOOD SOURCES", JUST LIKE THE FACT CHECKERS USED TO DO. THIS METHOD IS VERY EFFECTIVE TO STOP THE SPREAD OF INFORMATION, SINCE ONCE THE READER SEES THOSE NOTES, HE/SHE REFRAINS FROM REPOSTING IT, IN FACT, STOPPING THAT INFORMATION RIGHT THERE. THAT WAS THE CASE WITH THIS POST AND VIDEO OF A FORMER STUDENT OF KAMALA HARRIS RUNNING MATE, CLAIMING HE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY TIM WALZ IN 1997. THE "READERS ADDED CONTENT" DESCRIBES THE VIDEO AS DONE BY 'AI' AND REFERS THE READERS TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES FOR TRUTHFUL INFORMATION. I DON'T KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE GUY OR HOW THE VIDEO WAS DONE BUT IF THE READERS REALLY WANT TO QUESTION THE INFORMATION AND POST A DIFFERENT VERSION OF THE FACTS, LET THE READERS DO IT. WE DO NOT NEED NOTES POSTED BY GOVERNMENT ABOUT WHAT TO BELIEVE OR WHAT TO THINK. WATCH IT AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF WITHOUT CENSORS INTERFERENCE.
    Like
    2
    2 Comments 3 Shares 782 Views 10
  • GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: THE FIRST VIDEO FOR TODAY IS A FRAGMENT OF A LONGER VIDEO CALLED "THE META TAPES". IT'S A COLLECTION OF VIDEO CLIPS, TAKEN BY HIDDEN CAMERA TO HIGH LEVEL EMPLOYEES OF 'META' (THE PARENT COMPANY OF FACEBOOK). IN THEIR EXPRESSIONS, THEY CANDIDLY DESCRIBE HOW THE CENSORSHIP WORKS IN THOSE 'MAINSTREAM' SOCIAL MEDIA SITES, USUALLY TAKING DOWN, SHADOWBANNING, ADDING FACT CHECHING OR ADDED COMMENTS TO DEBUNK OR TAKE AWAY THE CREDIBILITY OF MATERIAL. THEY USUALLY DO THAT TO CONSERVATIVE OR RIGHT WING MATERIAL OR POSTS BY USERS. AS PRIVATE COMPANIES, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR OWN EDITORIAL POLICIES AND NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. I'M NOT A LAWYER BUT, IN MY OPINION, THE FIRST AMENDMENT GRANTS TOTAL FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE, NOT INSIDE PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS LIKE CHURCHES, MEDIA COMPANIES, etc. HOWEVER, IF A PRIVATE COMPANY RUNS A SOCIAL MEDIA SITE, FREELY PERMITTING ANYBODY TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT WITH THE PURPOSE OF OPINING, DISCUSSING AND SHARING AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIAL WITH OTHER PEOPLE, THAT SITE BECOMES THE 'PUBLIC SQUARE' AND SHOULD ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IN MANY CASES, THEY EVEN CANCEL AND CLOSE ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN PEOPLE, BASED SOLELY ON OPINIONS EXPRESSED AND IDEOLOGY. I KNOW BY MY OWN EXPERIENCES. IN THE NEXT VIDEO (AFTER THIS ONE) I'LL EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE NEW TRICKS USE FOR CENSORSHIP IN SITES LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER), WHERE THE OWNER (ELON MUSK) PERMITS A MAXIMUM OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
    GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: THE FIRST VIDEO FOR TODAY IS A FRAGMENT OF A LONGER VIDEO CALLED "THE META TAPES". IT'S A COLLECTION OF VIDEO CLIPS, TAKEN BY HIDDEN CAMERA TO HIGH LEVEL EMPLOYEES OF 'META' (THE PARENT COMPANY OF FACEBOOK). IN THEIR EXPRESSIONS, THEY CANDIDLY DESCRIBE HOW THE CENSORSHIP WORKS IN THOSE 'MAINSTREAM' SOCIAL MEDIA SITES, USUALLY TAKING DOWN, SHADOWBANNING, ADDING FACT CHECHING OR ADDED COMMENTS TO DEBUNK OR TAKE AWAY THE CREDIBILITY OF MATERIAL. THEY USUALLY DO THAT TO CONSERVATIVE OR RIGHT WING MATERIAL OR POSTS BY USERS. AS PRIVATE COMPANIES, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR OWN EDITORIAL POLICIES AND NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. I'M NOT A LAWYER BUT, IN MY OPINION, THE FIRST AMENDMENT GRANTS TOTAL FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE, NOT INSIDE PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS LIKE CHURCHES, MEDIA COMPANIES, etc. HOWEVER, IF A PRIVATE COMPANY RUNS A SOCIAL MEDIA SITE, FREELY PERMITTING ANYBODY TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT WITH THE PURPOSE OF OPINING, DISCUSSING AND SHARING AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIAL WITH OTHER PEOPLE, THAT SITE BECOMES THE 'PUBLIC SQUARE' AND SHOULD ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IN MANY CASES, THEY EVEN CANCEL AND CLOSE ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN PEOPLE, BASED SOLELY ON OPINIONS EXPRESSED AND IDEOLOGY. I KNOW BY MY OWN EXPERIENCES. IN THE NEXT VIDEO (AFTER THIS ONE) I'LL EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE NEW TRICKS USE FOR CENSORSHIP IN SITES LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER), WHERE THE OWNER (ELON MUSK) PERMITS A MAXIMUM OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 2 Shares 968 Views 4
  • GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: MIKE BENZ IS BACK IN THE 'WARROOM' WITH INSIDE INFORMATION. LISTEN TO THE NASTY AND DIRTY PLANS BEING PREPARES BY THE DEMONCRAPS, INCLUDING 'RINOs' FROM THE UNIPARY TO PREVENT TRUMP FROM GOING BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE. JUST THE THOUGHT OF IT CAN MAKE YOU DEPRESSED. MIKE BENZ ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE GLOBAL PLANS BEING IMPLEMENTED RIGHT NOW TO SUPPRESS FREE EXPRESSION AROUND THE WORLD. YOU MAY THINK, WELL, HERE IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT, BUT THEY ARE FINDING WAYS AROUND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IF YOU STILL DON'T BELIEVE MIKE BENZ, THE NEXT VIDEO (AFTER THIS ONE) IS FROM THE UNITED NATIONS WITH THE IMAGE AND VOICE OF THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL.
    GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: MIKE BENZ IS BACK IN THE 'WARROOM' WITH INSIDE INFORMATION. LISTEN TO THE NASTY AND DIRTY PLANS BEING PREPARES BY THE DEMONCRAPS, INCLUDING 'RINOs' FROM THE UNIPARY TO PREVENT TRUMP FROM GOING BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE. JUST THE THOUGHT OF IT CAN MAKE YOU DEPRESSED. MIKE BENZ ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE GLOBAL PLANS BEING IMPLEMENTED RIGHT NOW TO SUPPRESS FREE EXPRESSION AROUND THE WORLD. YOU MAY THINK, WELL, HERE IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT, BUT THEY ARE FINDING WAYS AROUND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IF YOU STILL DON'T BELIEVE MIKE BENZ, THE NEXT VIDEO (AFTER THIS ONE) IS FROM THE UNITED NATIONS WITH THE IMAGE AND VOICE OF THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL.
    Like
    2
    0 Comments 3 Shares 618 Views 6
  • Will Tesla’s new personal robots spy on their owners?
    I would get a kick out of a robot helping me fix a few things around the house, but the thing I would be most worried about is having every word, every action, every facial expression, every journey, every movement I made, even in my own home, recorded and shared with big tech and big government.
    https://www.rebelnews.com/will_tesla_s_new_personal_robots_spy_on_their_owners
    Will Tesla’s new personal robots spy on their owners? I would get a kick out of a robot helping me fix a few things around the house, but the thing I would be most worried about is having every word, every action, every facial expression, every journey, every movement I made, even in my own home, recorded and shared with big tech and big government. https://www.rebelnews.com/will_tesla_s_new_personal_robots_spy_on_their_owners
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Will Tesla’s new personal robots spy on their owners?
    I would get a kick out of a robot helping me fix a few things around the house, but the thing I would be most worried about is having every word, every action, every facial expression, every journey, every movement I made, even in my own home, recorded and shared with big tech and big government.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 360 Views
  • Ontario physician stripped of his medical license fights back!
    Former emergency room physician Dr. Mark Trozzi is appealing his college’s decision to permanently revoke his medical license after he dared to write vaccine exemptions and express alleged ‘unacceptable views.’
    #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP
    #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud
    #resigntrudeau
    #JustSayNoMore
    https://www.rebelnews.com/ontario_physician_stripped_of_his_medical_license_fights_back
    Ontario physician stripped of his medical license fights back! Former emergency room physician Dr. Mark Trozzi is appealing his college’s decision to permanently revoke his medical license after he dared to write vaccine exemptions and express alleged ‘unacceptable views.’ 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/ontario_physician_stripped_of_his_medical_license_fights_back
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Ontario physician stripped of his medical license fights back
    The ongoing case of former Ontario physician Dr. Mark Trozzi is more than just a legal battle; it could redefine the future of free expression and justice in Canada.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 429 Views
  • Meanwhile, in Cambridge, England, the prestigious National Express Parkside Bus Station... several pennies well spent there!

    Meanwhile, in Cambridge, England, the prestigious National Express Parkside Bus Station... several pennies well spent there!
    0 Comments 0 Shares 208 Views
More Results
Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here