• Agenda 2030
    https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
    Global digital compact
    https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-gobal-digi-compact-en.pdf
    Declaration on future generations
    https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-declaration-on-future-generations-rev3.pdf
    Uk Gov policy paper on agenda 2030
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agenda-2030-delivering-the-global-goals
    Agenda 2030 https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf Global digital compact https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-gobal-digi-compact-en.pdf Declaration on future generations https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-declaration-on-future-generations-rev3.pdf Uk Gov policy paper on agenda 2030 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agenda-2030-delivering-the-global-goals
    Vomit
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 148 Views
  • @ RealVincentJames
    ROTHSCHILD: “WE CREATED THE STATE OF ISRAEL”
    Where did 'Rothschild' come from?
    Origins of the ★ of David?


    Interviewer shown Balfour Declaration doc
    by Victor Rothschild.
    Descended from Mayer Amschel Bauer, German, 1744
    money lender & goldsmith
    whose shop had a Red Hexagram on it.
    He changed his name to Rothschild / “Red Sign ”in German.
    Mayer found it more profitable to loan money
    to Governments & Kings..
    He had 5-sons who he trained in money creation
    & sent out to the Capitals of Europe to open branches
    of the family banking business..
    What they call the ★ of David is actually the ★ of Remphan
    “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch,
    & the ★ of your god Remphan” Acts 7:43
    You took up for yourself the 6-point ★ of your God
    Remphan or Kiyyun: names for Moloch, Baal, the fire God, devil.
    THEY SACRIFICED THEIR OWN CHILDREN TO THE ★ GOD..
    We never see the ★ of David in scripture
    but the ★ of Remphan/devil”

    @ qthestormrider777

    https://anonup.com/thread/13357266

    @ RealVincentJames ROTHSCHILD: “WE CREATED THE STATE OF ISRAEL” Where did 'Rothschild' come from? Origins of the ★ of David? 👇 🎥 Interviewer shown Balfour Declaration doc by Victor Rothschild. Descended from Mayer Amschel Bauer, German, 1744 money lender & goldsmith whose shop had a Red Hexagram on it. He changed his name to Rothschild / “Red Sign ”in German. Mayer found it more profitable to loan money to Governments & Kings.. He had 5-sons who he trained in money creation & sent out to the Capitals of Europe to open branches of the family banking business.. What they call the ★ of David is actually the ★ of Remphan “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, & the ★ of your god Remphan” Acts 7:43 You took up for yourself the 6-point ★ of your God Remphan or Kiyyun: names for Moloch, Baal, the fire God, devil. THEY SACRIFICED THEIR OWN CHILDREN TO THE ★ GOD.. We never see the ★ of David in scripture but the ★ of Remphan/devil” 💥 @ qthestormrider777 https://anonup.com/thread/13357266
    ANONUP.COM
    Kat istheSea3 on AnonUp.com
    @ RealVincentJames ROTHSCHILD: “WE CREATED THE STATE OF ISRAEL” Where did 'Rothschild' come from? Origins of the ★ of David? 👇 🎥 Interviewer shown Balfour Declaration d
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 314 Views

  • Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped

    Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims

    Post 4921

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

    In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit.

    BACKGROUND

    GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault.

    GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor.

    Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted.

    In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims.

    After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action.

    DISCUSSION

    GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay.

    Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm.

    GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings.

    GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor.

    GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims.

    The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO.

    A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act.

    The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings.

    GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims Post 4921 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog. In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit. BACKGROUND GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault. GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor. Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted. In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims. After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action. DISCUSSION GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay. Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm. GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings. GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor. GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims. The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO. A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act. The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings. GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action. ZALMA OPINION The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 924 Views 0
  • Conspiracy?
    The Defense Department, with the stroke of a pen, has quietly codified its right to deploy lethal force against its own citizens.
    This is not a drill—the reissue of Directive 5240.01 is a declaration of intent.
    Ron Paul warns that the US military was just “authorized to kill Americans on US soil …
    Conspiracy? The Defense Department, with the stroke of a pen, has quietly codified its right to deploy lethal force against its own citizens. This is not a drill—the reissue of Directive 5240.01 is a declaration of intent. Ron Paul warns that the US military was just “authorized to kill Americans on US soil …
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 279 Views
  • Forgotten 1774 Declaration: Precursor to Independence and Bill of Rights
Tenth Amendment Center
    [https://rumble.com/v5ile4k-forgotten-1774-declaration-precursor-to-independence-and-bill-of-rights.html](https://rumble.com/v5ile4k-forgotten-1774-declaration-precursor-to-independence-and-bill-of-rights.html)
    Michael Boldin: ***“To these grievous measures, Americans cannot submit.”***
    That's the bold message - 250 years ago on Oct 14, 1774 - in the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental congress, which helped spark coordinated resistance throughout the colonies. It was a precursor to the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights - and more.
    Forgotten 1774 Declaration: Precursor to Independence and Bill of Rights
Tenth Amendment Center [https://rumble.com/v5ile4k-forgotten-1774-declaration-precursor-to-independence-and-bill-of-rights.html](https://rumble.com/v5ile4k-forgotten-1774-declaration-precursor-to-independence-and-bill-of-rights.html) Michael Boldin: ***“To these grievous measures, Americans cannot submit.”*** That's the bold message - 250 years ago on Oct 14, 1774 - in the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental congress, which helped spark coordinated resistance throughout the colonies. It was a precursor to the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights - and more.
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 368 Views
  • FEMA, Like Ukraine Is Merely Another Democrat Slush Fund.
    Last month, the agency testified before Congress that it still has $4 billion in its Disaster Relief Fund, then claimed that Hurricane Helene wiped through the budget. The agency has been begging Congress to approve additional funding, but a new report found that FEMA has at least $8.3 billion in unused funds.
    Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General issued a report that reveals FEMA still has billions in unused aid. “As of October 2022, FEMA estimated that 847 disaster declarations with approximately $73 billion in unliquidated funds remained open,” the report noted. OpenTheBooks, a nonpartisan watchdog of government spending, claims that “all the money is just sitting there.” stated that FEMA is freezing “unliquidated obligations” at a time when it could easily reappoint those funds for immediate disaster relief.
    FEMA, Like Ukraine Is Merely Another Democrat Slush Fund. Last month, the agency testified before Congress that it still has $4 billion in its Disaster Relief Fund, then claimed that Hurricane Helene wiped through the budget. The agency has been begging Congress to approve additional funding, but a new report found that FEMA has at least $8.3 billion in unused funds. Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General issued a report that reveals FEMA still has billions in unused aid. “As of October 2022, FEMA estimated that 847 disaster declarations with approximately $73 billion in unliquidated funds remained open,” the report noted. OpenTheBooks, a nonpartisan watchdog of government spending, claims that “all the money is just sitting there.” stated that FEMA is freezing “unliquidated obligations” at a time when it could easily reappoint those funds for immediate disaster relief.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 597 Views
  • RECENTLY, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TRIED TO CREATE AN INTERNATIONAL "PANDEMIC TREATY" THAT WOULD HAVE GIVEN THE "W.H.O." POWERS OF A GLOBAL GOVERNMENT TO IMPOSE MANDATES AND RESTRICTIONS ON THE WHOLE HUMANITY BASED ON ANY DECLARATION OF PANDEMIC BY THE 'W.H.O.' THEY COULDN'T REACH A CONSENSUS AMONG THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WHOLE WORLD AND THE PLAN FAILED. IN THE UNITED STATES, AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY NEEDS 2/3 OF THE SENATE TO BE RATIFIED AND BECOME THE 'LAW OF THE LAND'. THERE WAS NO CHANCE FOR A TREATY LIKE THAT TO BECOME THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES. HOWEVER, A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY MAJORITY IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE 'UNITED NATIONS', ALTHOUGH NON BINDING IN THE UNITED STATES, IS CONSIDERED 'INTERNATIONAL LAW' AND IT IS TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION TO OBEY IT OR NOT WITHOUT THE NEED FOR SENATE RATIFICATION. SO, THE FAILED TREATY FROM THE 'W.H.O.' CAME BACK IN AN EVEN MORE EXTREME VERSION FOR A VOTE AT THE 'UNITED NATION'S GENERAL ASSEMBLY'. IT WAS APPROVED BY 193 COUNTRIES, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES UNDER BIDEN-HARRIS. NOW WE HAVE THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, THE NEW WORLD ORDER, AS INTERNATIONAL LAW BY THE BACKDOOR. WATCH THIS WARNING FROM DOCTOR SHERRY TENPENNY.
    RECENTLY, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TRIED TO CREATE AN INTERNATIONAL "PANDEMIC TREATY" THAT WOULD HAVE GIVEN THE "W.H.O." POWERS OF A GLOBAL GOVERNMENT TO IMPOSE MANDATES AND RESTRICTIONS ON THE WHOLE HUMANITY BASED ON ANY DECLARATION OF PANDEMIC BY THE 'W.H.O.' THEY COULDN'T REACH A CONSENSUS AMONG THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WHOLE WORLD AND THE PLAN FAILED. IN THE UNITED STATES, AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY NEEDS 2/3 OF THE SENATE TO BE RATIFIED AND BECOME THE 'LAW OF THE LAND'. THERE WAS NO CHANCE FOR A TREATY LIKE THAT TO BECOME THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES. HOWEVER, A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY MAJORITY IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE 'UNITED NATIONS', ALTHOUGH NON BINDING IN THE UNITED STATES, IS CONSIDERED 'INTERNATIONAL LAW' AND IT IS TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION TO OBEY IT OR NOT WITHOUT THE NEED FOR SENATE RATIFICATION. SO, THE FAILED TREATY FROM THE 'W.H.O.' CAME BACK IN AN EVEN MORE EXTREME VERSION FOR A VOTE AT THE 'UNITED NATION'S GENERAL ASSEMBLY'. IT WAS APPROVED BY 193 COUNTRIES, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES UNDER BIDEN-HARRIS. NOW WE HAVE THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, THE NEW WORLD ORDER, AS INTERNATIONAL LAW BY THE BACKDOOR. WATCH THIS WARNING FROM DOCTOR SHERRY TENPENNY.
    Angry
    1
    0 Commenti 2 condivisioni 943 Views 5
  • UN’s Pact For The Future (er-I-Mean) – TYRANNY
    https://slantedright2.blogspot.com/2024/09/uns-pact-for-future-er-i-mean-tyranny.html

    SUMMARY: The United Nations Pact For The Future is a document lavished with praise by the Mockingbird Media and Globalist dominated governments (SADLY, including my USA). The Pact is loaded with Double-Speak terminology sounding great yet in reality is a precursor leading the world’s masses into a slavery of ONE-World Government where national sovereignty is erased. That means for America, the final torching of our Liberty Documents – the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. …MORE TO READ!
    #UNPactForTyranny
    UN’s Pact For The Future (er-I-Mean) – TYRANNY https://slantedright2.blogspot.com/2024/09/uns-pact-for-future-er-i-mean-tyranny.html SUMMARY: The United Nations Pact For The Future is a document lavished with praise by the Mockingbird Media and Globalist dominated governments (SADLY, including my USA). The Pact is loaded with Double-Speak terminology sounding great yet in reality is a precursor leading the world’s masses into a slavery of ONE-World Government where national sovereignty is erased. That means for America, the final torching of our Liberty Documents – the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. …MORE TO READ! #UNPactForTyranny
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 771 Views
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/hezbollah-says-all-red-lines-have-been-crossed-there-will-be-a-devastating-response-to-israels-declaration-of-war/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/hezbollah-says-all-red-lines-have-been-crossed-there-will-be-a-devastating-response-to-israels-declaration-of-war/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Hezbollah Says 'All Red Lines Have Been Crossed' & There Will Be A Devastating Response To Israel’s 'Declaration Of War' - The Washington Standard
    Even though a lot of people out there don’t seem to realize it yet, we are watching history in the making. Israel and Hezbollah have both been preparing for a final showdown for many years and now here we are. I have a feeling that both sides have more surprises ...
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 118 Views
  • TRUMP IS RIGHT WHEN HE SAYS WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF WORLD WAR 3. WW3 IS IN THE MAKING SINCE THE EARLY DAYS OF BIDEN'S FRAUDULENT REGIME. THE U.S. THROUGH NATO, IS GIVING UKRAINE LONG RANGE AI HIGH PRECISION MISSILES, CAPABLE OF STRIKING DEEP INTO RUSSIAN TERRITORY. THE UKRAINIANS ARE NOT CAPABLE OF OPERATING SUCH SOPHISTICATED WEAPONS, SO THEY WILL BE OPERATED BY NATO PERSONNEL AND SOME OF THOSE MISSILES WILL BE PLACED IN POLAND. THAT IS A NATO DECLARATION OF WAR ON RUSSIA. PUTIN EXPLAINS.
    TRUMP IS RIGHT WHEN HE SAYS WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF WORLD WAR 3. WW3 IS IN THE MAKING SINCE THE EARLY DAYS OF BIDEN'S FRAUDULENT REGIME. THE U.S. THROUGH NATO, IS GIVING UKRAINE LONG RANGE AI HIGH PRECISION MISSILES, CAPABLE OF STRIKING DEEP INTO RUSSIAN TERRITORY. THE UKRAINIANS ARE NOT CAPABLE OF OPERATING SUCH SOPHISTICATED WEAPONS, SO THEY WILL BE OPERATED BY NATO PERSONNEL AND SOME OF THOSE MISSILES WILL BE PLACED IN POLAND. THAT IS A NATO DECLARATION OF WAR ON RUSSIA. PUTIN EXPLAINS.
    0 Commenti 2 condivisioni 791 Views 10
Pagine in Evidenza
Sponsorizzato

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here