The plandemic, as it refers to data, is so off its almost as if it was planned. A little lengthy, but clearly explains how they used data, as not applying bayes theorem to false-positive and false - negatives, and the measures at which they used this data as a representation of 100% accuracy and not a measure of probabilities. Thus creating the false hoods at which we view each other with hostility. Numbers matter, but not as much as the character of the person applying those numbers "for our health". https://towardsdatascience.com/false-positives-negatives-and-bayes-rule-for-covid-19-testing-750eaba84acd
If one prefers video, as I do, here is another link to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYbxQC61pw
If one prefers video, as I do, here is another link to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYbxQC61pw
The plandemic, as it refers to data, is so off its almost as if it was planned. A little lengthy, but clearly explains how they used data, as not applying bayes theorem to false-positive and false - negatives, and the measures at which they used this data as a representation of 100% accuracy and not a measure of probabilities. Thus creating the false hoods at which we view each other with hostility. Numbers matter, but not as much as the character of the person applying those numbers "for our health". https://towardsdatascience.com/false-positives-negatives-and-bayes-rule-for-covid-19-testing-750eaba84acd
If one prefers video, as I do, here is another link to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYbxQC61pw