• https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/145933
    You ready for more WINNING? President Trump is going after the endowments that are fueling communist universities!!
    Listen in….
    (2 min 26 seconds)
    https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/145933 You ready for more WINNING? President Trump is going after the endowments that are fueling communist universities!! Listen in…. (2 min 26 seconds)
    0 Comments 0 Shares 79 Views 1

  • From a friend
    **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …**

    **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …**

    **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …**

    ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”***

    ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024***

    ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”***

    ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.***

    ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.***

    ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.***

    ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.***

    ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.***

    ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.***

    ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.***

    ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.***

    ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.***

    ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.***

    ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.***

    ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.***

    ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’***

    ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’***

    ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’***

    ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’***

    ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.***

    ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:***

    ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’***

    ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’***

    ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.***

    ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?***

    ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.***

    ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.***

    ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.***

    ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.***

    ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.***

    ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:***

    ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’***

    ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’***

    ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.***

    ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.***

    ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.***

    ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.***

    ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:***

    ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’***

    ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.***

    ***The report explains:***

    ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’***

    ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.***

    ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.***

    ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.***

    ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”***

    ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.***

    ***Focused protection specifically says:***

    ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’***

    ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’***

    ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.***

    ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?***

    ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”***

    https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/

    **Here are some links to this article:**

    - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”***

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/

    - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings***
    ***Updated July 26, 2020"***

    https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    🚨🚨 From a friend **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …** **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …** **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …** ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”*** ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024*** ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”*** ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.*** ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.*** ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.*** ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.*** ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.*** ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.*** ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.*** ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.*** ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.*** ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.*** ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.*** ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.*** ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’*** ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’*** ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’*** ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’*** ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.*** ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:*** ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’*** ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’*** ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.*** ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?*** ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.*** ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.*** ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.*** ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.*** ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.*** ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:*** ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’*** ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’*** ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.*** ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.*** ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.*** ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.*** ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:*** ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’*** ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.*** ***The report explains:*** ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’*** ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.*** ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.*** ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.*** ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”*** ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.*** ***Focused protection specifically says:*** ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’*** ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’*** ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.*** ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?*** ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”*** https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/ **Here are some links to this article:** - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”*** https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/ - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings*** ***Updated July 26, 2020"*** https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking evidence of what happened, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list.
    Angry
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 991 Views
  • Ford to impose international med student ban for Ontario universities
    #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP
    #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud
    #resigntrudeau
    #JustSayNoMore
    https://tnc.news/2024/10/25/ford-impose-international-med-student-ban/
    via @truenorthcentre
    Ford to impose international med student ban for Ontario universities 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://tnc.news/2024/10/25/ford-impose-international-med-student-ban/ via @truenorthcentre
    TNC.NEWS
    Ford to impose international med student ban for Ontario universities
    The Ontario government proposed legislation that would ban medical school seats from going to international students to make room for students in Canada. The aim of the policy is to close the gap of people who are without access to a regular healthcare provider. Premier Doug Ford made the ann
    0 Comments 0 Shares 190 Views
  • GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: AFTER THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917 THAT CREATED THE SOVIET UNION, THERE WAS A GROUP OF MARXIST EUROPEAN THINKERS THAT HAD DIFFERENT IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO ACHIEVE WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST UTOPIA WITHOUT ARMED STRUGGLES AND VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS. THEY CREATED THE 'FRANKFURT SCHOOL' IN GERMANY IN THE 1920s. ONE OF THE MOST OUTSTANDING LEADERS OF THAT SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, WAS THE ITALIAN ANTONIO GRAMSCI. THAT TACTIC TO MAKE THE WORLD COMMUNIST, WAS CALLED 'CULTURAL MARXISM'. INSTEAD OF A REVOLUTION, IT WAS A SLOW PROCESS THAT WOULD START IN EDUCATION, INDOCTRINATING THE FUTURE GENERATIONS INTO THE MARXIST WAY OF THINKING. AFTER ALL, THOSE STUDENTS WILL BE THE FUTURE RULERS RUNNING EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD. THE CULTURAL MARXISM PROCESS INCLUDES SLOWLY INFILTRATING CHURCHES, CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES, ART AND ENTERTAINMENT, THE MEDIA, INFILTRATING AND TAKING CONTROL OF POLITICAL PARTIES, ERASING NATIONAL BORDERS, ERASING NATIONAL CULTURES AND HISTORY, ERASING RACES BY POPULATION REPLACEMENT, ERASING SEX AND REPLACING IT BY "GENDERS", PROMOTING GENERATIONAL CONFLICTS (CHILDREN AGAINST PARENTS), CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING IDEAS... EVENTUALLY, CULTURAL MARXISM REACHED AMERICA BY EUROPEAN PROFESSORS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES. ONE OF THOSE PROFESSORS WAS HERBERT MARCUSE, WHO PUBLISHED MANY BOOKS IN THE 1960s. ACCORDING TO MARCUSE, THE SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE WOULDN'T BE PURE SOVIET STYLE COMMUNISM, NEITHER AMERICAN CAPITALISM BUT RATHER A COMBINATION OF WHAT COULD BE SAVED FROM BOTH SYSTEMS, AS YOU CAN SEE IT IN TODAY'S CHINA. HOW MUCH CULTURAL MARXISM HAS ADVANCED ON A GLOBAL SCALE? JUST LOOK AROUND YOU: THEY CONTROL THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND MANY SO CALLED "REPUBLICANS", THEY CONTROL THE 'UNITED NATIONS', WE EVEN HAVE A MARXIST POPE... THERE IS MORE, BUT THE SPACE IS LIMITED.
    GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: AFTER THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917 THAT CREATED THE SOVIET UNION, THERE WAS A GROUP OF MARXIST EUROPEAN THINKERS THAT HAD DIFFERENT IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO ACHIEVE WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST UTOPIA WITHOUT ARMED STRUGGLES AND VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS. THEY CREATED THE 'FRANKFURT SCHOOL' IN GERMANY IN THE 1920s. ONE OF THE MOST OUTSTANDING LEADERS OF THAT SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, WAS THE ITALIAN ANTONIO GRAMSCI. THAT TACTIC TO MAKE THE WORLD COMMUNIST, WAS CALLED 'CULTURAL MARXISM'. INSTEAD OF A REVOLUTION, IT WAS A SLOW PROCESS THAT WOULD START IN EDUCATION, INDOCTRINATING THE FUTURE GENERATIONS INTO THE MARXIST WAY OF THINKING. AFTER ALL, THOSE STUDENTS WILL BE THE FUTURE RULERS RUNNING EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD. THE CULTURAL MARXISM PROCESS INCLUDES SLOWLY INFILTRATING CHURCHES, CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES, ART AND ENTERTAINMENT, THE MEDIA, INFILTRATING AND TAKING CONTROL OF POLITICAL PARTIES, ERASING NATIONAL BORDERS, ERASING NATIONAL CULTURES AND HISTORY, ERASING RACES BY POPULATION REPLACEMENT, ERASING SEX AND REPLACING IT BY "GENDERS", PROMOTING GENERATIONAL CONFLICTS (CHILDREN AGAINST PARENTS), CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING IDEAS... EVENTUALLY, CULTURAL MARXISM REACHED AMERICA BY EUROPEAN PROFESSORS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES. ONE OF THOSE PROFESSORS WAS HERBERT MARCUSE, WHO PUBLISHED MANY BOOKS IN THE 1960s. ACCORDING TO MARCUSE, THE SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE WOULDN'T BE PURE SOVIET STYLE COMMUNISM, NEITHER AMERICAN CAPITALISM BUT RATHER A COMBINATION OF WHAT COULD BE SAVED FROM BOTH SYSTEMS, AS YOU CAN SEE IT IN TODAY'S CHINA. HOW MUCH CULTURAL MARXISM HAS ADVANCED ON A GLOBAL SCALE? JUST LOOK AROUND YOU: THEY CONTROL THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND MANY SO CALLED "REPUBLICANS", THEY CONTROL THE 'UNITED NATIONS', WE EVEN HAVE A MARXIST POPE... THERE IS MORE, BUT THE SPACE IS LIMITED.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 2 Shares 1K Views 5
  • Liberals give 'climate change' grants to American universities, Liberal-linked firms
    #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP
    #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud
    #resigntrudeau
    #JustSayNoMore
    https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_climate_change_grants_american_universities
    via @RebelNewsOnline
    Liberals give 'climate change' grants to American universities, Liberal-linked firms 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_climate_change_grants_american_universities via @RebelNewsOnline
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Liberals give 'climate change' grants to American universities, Liberal-linked firms
    An internal audit of the Environment Ministry uncovered $18 million in climate grants to Rio Tinto, chaired by the former head of McKinsey, a consulting firm. Millions more were sent to American institutions.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 233 Views
  • Likewise, no matter who wins the election in the US in November, the Israeli tie that binds will continue to be in place controlling many policies and actions of the federal government as well as of many state and municipal administrations. And there are clear signs that those who choose to criticize Israel and the nation’s obsession with going to war will be targeted. Critics of federal government policies defending the wars and specifically Israel will be under attack like never before, most particularly at the universities.
    https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-government-lies-just-keep-on-coming/
    Likewise, no matter who wins the election in the US in November, the Israeli tie that binds will continue to be in place controlling many policies and actions of the federal government as well as of many state and municipal administrations. And there are clear signs that those who choose to criticize Israel and the nation’s obsession with going to war will be targeted. Critics of federal government policies defending the wars and specifically Israel will be under attack like never before, most particularly at the universities. https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-government-lies-just-keep-on-coming/
    WWW.UNZ.COM
    The Government Lies Just Keep On Coming
    Candidates don’t understand that a truly strong America means fundamental rights and no wars
    0 Comments 0 Shares 457 Views
  • Less than half of foreign students attending accredited Canadian universities
    #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP
    #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud
    #resigntrudeau
    https://www.rebelnews.com/less_than_half_of_foreign_students_attending_accredited_canadian_universities
    via @RebelNewsOnline

    Less than half of foreign students attending accredited Canadian universities 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/less_than_half_of_foreign_students_attending_accredited_canadian_universities via @RebelNewsOnline
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Less than half of foreign students attending accredited Canadian universities
    According to data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, of the more than 1,000,000 international students in the country, only 341,531 were attending Universities Canada-accredited schools.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 282 Views
  • 12 Influencers Who Called for Violence Against Trump, Called Him an ‘Existential Threat to Democracy’
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/09/16/climate-hate-12-actors-journalists-influencers-compared-trump-hitler-second-assassination-attempt/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=ODI0LU1IVC0zMDQAAAGVnnzPKHQ_VlL-bTB3ttF5t02oN4ag7j9E2EK7o6BZGvYkPUQTs6dOOxYYpKQrJA8V6uPt-zmteeM2aLL3_cvSbbvcHi_Ijf3rL3E-dQixssF-ZJKAyQ

    Ahead of the second assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, many influential actors, journalists, and influencers warned that Trump is an “existential threat” to democracy, compared him to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, and suggested he or his supporters should face violent attacks. Some continued attacking Trump even after the first assassination attempt July 13.

    The New Tolerance Campaign, a nonprofit watchdog aimed at confronting “intolerance double standards” practiced by “establishment institutions, civil rights groups, universities, and socially conscious brands,” compiled a list of extreme rhetoric against Trump that may have contributed to the second assassination attempt.

    “New Tolerance Campaign research has shown two kinds of consistent and consistently charged rhetoric surrounding President Trump: insistence that his reelection would lead to the collapse of the country, and calls for the former president’s death,” Gregory T. Angelo, New Tolerance Campaign’s president, told The Daily Signal in a written statement Monday. (New Tolerance Campaign has taken to exposing extremism on the Left, to balance the impact of left-leaning groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center.)
    12 Influencers Who Called for Violence Against Trump, Called Him an ‘Existential Threat to Democracy’ https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/09/16/climate-hate-12-actors-journalists-influencers-compared-trump-hitler-second-assassination-attempt/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=ODI0LU1IVC0zMDQAAAGVnnzPKHQ_VlL-bTB3ttF5t02oN4ag7j9E2EK7o6BZGvYkPUQTs6dOOxYYpKQrJA8V6uPt-zmteeM2aLL3_cvSbbvcHi_Ijf3rL3E-dQixssF-ZJKAyQ Ahead of the second assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, many influential actors, journalists, and influencers warned that Trump is an “existential threat” to democracy, compared him to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, and suggested he or his supporters should face violent attacks. Some continued attacking Trump even after the first assassination attempt July 13. The New Tolerance Campaign, a nonprofit watchdog aimed at confronting “intolerance double standards” practiced by “establishment institutions, civil rights groups, universities, and socially conscious brands,” compiled a list of extreme rhetoric against Trump that may have contributed to the second assassination attempt. “New Tolerance Campaign research has shown two kinds of consistent and consistently charged rhetoric surrounding President Trump: insistence that his reelection would lead to the collapse of the country, and calls for the former president’s death,” Gregory T. Angelo, New Tolerance Campaign’s president, told The Daily Signal in a written statement Monday. (New Tolerance Campaign has taken to exposing extremism on the Left, to balance the impact of left-leaning groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center.)
    WWW.DAILYSIGNAL.COM
    12 Influencers Who Called for Violence Against Trump, Called Him an 'Existential Threat to Democracy'
    Actors, journalists, and influencers condemned former President Donald Trump in extreme terms ahead of the second assassination attempt.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 869 Views
  • GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: FOR THE PAST FEW MONTHS WE HAVE SEEN LOTS OF PALESTINIAN FLAGS, PROTESTS AGAINST ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES, SOMETIMES WITH VIOLENCE, YOUNG PEOPLE, MOSTLY IN UNIVERSITIES WEARING MASKS AND PALESTINIAN SCARFS. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE WAR IN GAZA... BUT WHAT ORIGINATED ALL THIS? THE NEWS ONLY SHOW SHORT CLIPS OF DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN GAZA. I THINK THAT TO UNDERSTAND BETTER, WE NEED A LITTLE HISTORICAL CONTEXT. I'LL TRY TO DO IT AND I HOPE IT WON'T BE TOO LONG. IN BIBLICAL TIMES, GAZA WAS PHILISTIA, LAND OF THE PHILISTINES, BITTER ENEMIES OF ISRAEL. IN ROMAN TIMES, ISRAEL WAS "THE ROMAN PROVINCE OF JUDEA", BUT THE ISRAELITES WERE A REBEL PEOPLE, THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE ROMANS TO PLACE STATUES OF CAESAR AND THE ROMAN GODS IN THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM, THE ISRAELITES HAD A KING PARALLEL TO THE ROMAN GOVERNOR. IN JESUS TIMES, THERE WERE MANY "MESSIAHS" OR LEADERS WHO PROMISED TO LIBERATE ISRAEL FROM THE ROMANS. THE ROMANS ENDED UP DESTROYING THE TEMPLE (CENTER OF ISRAEL RELIGIOUS LIFE) IN THE YEAR 70 AD. LATER ON, RENAMED THE PROVINCE OF JUDEA AS "PALESTINE", NAME RELATED TO THE PHILISTINES, ANCIENT ENEMIES OF ISRAEL. THE RELIGION OF ISLAM WAS BORN IN ARABIA IN THE 7th CENTURY OF THE CHRISTIAN ERA. SOON ISLAM STARTED CONQUERING NEW LANDS AND BECOMING AN EMPIRE. THEY DIDN'T PREACH THE NEW RELIGION BUT RATHER CONQUERED WITH "THE EDGE OF THE SWORD" AND IN EVERY LAND THEY CONQUERED, THEY BUILT MOSQUES AS SYMBOL OF THE CONQUEST. IN JERUSALEM THEY BUILT TWO MOSQUES ON TOP OF WHERE THE TEMPLE WAS BEFORE BEING DESTROYED BY THE ROMANS. PALESTINE WAS NEVER A COUNTRY BUT A NAME FOR A FORMER ROMAN REGION. FAST FORWARD TO THE 20th CENTURY. THE OTTOMAN (ISLAMIC) EMPIRE WAS DEFEATED IN WORLD WAR ONE AND THE REGION OF "PALESTINE" WAS ADMINISTERED BY THE BRITISH UNDER A BRITISH MANDATE. THE BRITISH DECIDED TO MAKE A PARTITION OF THE LAND BETWEEN JEWS AND ARABS. FROM THE JORDAN RIVER TO EAST FOR THE ARABS AND FROM THE JORDAN RIVER TO THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA FOR THE JEWS. ISRAEL DECLARED INDEPENDENCE AND WAS RECREATED IN 1948. "FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA PALESTINE WILL BE FREE", MEANS NO ISRAEL AT ALL. RIGHT AFTER INDEPENDENCE, ISRAEL WAS ATTACKED BY THE ARABS THAT TOOK LANDS TO THE WEST OF THE JORDAN RIVER, INCLUDING THE AREAS KNOWN AS JUDEA, SAMARIA AND THE EASTERN PART OF JERUSALEM WHERE THE TEMPLE WAS. THAT AREA WAS UNDER JORDANIAN CONTROL. GAZA WAS NOT ISRAEL BUT UNDER EGYPTIAN SOVEREIGNTY. IN 1967, FIVE ARAB COUNTRIES ATTACKED ISRAEL AGAIN, BUT THIS TIME ISRAEL WON THE WAR IN 7 DAYS, RECOVERING JUDEA, SAMARIA AND THE WHOLE OF THE CITY OF JERUSALEM. ISRAEL TOOK THE SINAI PENINSULA AND GAZA FROM EGYPT. IN 1979, ISRAEL SIGNED A PEACE AGREEMENT WITH EGYPT, GIVING BACK TO EGYPT THE SINAI PENINSULA AND GAZA. EGYPT TOOK THE SINAI PENINSULA BUT ABOUT GAZA THEY SAID "NEVER MIND, YOU CAN KEEP IT, WE DON'T WANT IT, WE DON'T NEED IT". THE ARABS IN GAZA WERE AS TROUBLEMAKERS AS THEIR PHILISTINE ANCESTORS. IN 2005, ISRAEL PULLED COMPLETELY OUT OF GAZA AND GAVE IT TO THE AUTONOMOUS 'PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY' BUT SOON, THE RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST GROUP 'HAMAS', KICKED THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY OUT OF GAZA AND TOOK CONTROL, IN FACT CREATING A TERRORIST ENCLAVE BORDERING ISRAEL. LOTS OF ROCKETS ATTACKS CAME OUT OF GAZA BUT USUALLY STOPPED BY THE 'IRON DOME' DEFENSE SYSTEM BUT ON OCTOBER 7/2023, THOUSANDS OF HAMAS TERRORIST CROSSED THE BORDER FENCE AND ATTACKED CIVILIANS WHO WERE MINDING THEIR OWN BUSINESSES IN THE ISRAELI SIDE, KILLING MANY AND TAKING HOSTAGES. THAT IS HOW THIS GAZA WAR STARTED. WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN THIS VIDEO IS THE ISRAELI PART OF THE STORY THAT YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IN THE NEWS. IT'S RAW AND UNFILTERED AMATEUR VIDEO. WE ALL HAVE OUR OWN OPINIONS AND BELIEFS ABOUT ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIANS. THIS VIDEO IS JUST THE UNSEEN PART OF THE STORY.
    GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: FOR THE PAST FEW MONTHS WE HAVE SEEN LOTS OF PALESTINIAN FLAGS, PROTESTS AGAINST ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES, SOMETIMES WITH VIOLENCE, YOUNG PEOPLE, MOSTLY IN UNIVERSITIES WEARING MASKS AND PALESTINIAN SCARFS. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE WAR IN GAZA... BUT WHAT ORIGINATED ALL THIS? THE NEWS ONLY SHOW SHORT CLIPS OF DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN GAZA. I THINK THAT TO UNDERSTAND BETTER, WE NEED A LITTLE HISTORICAL CONTEXT. I'LL TRY TO DO IT AND I HOPE IT WON'T BE TOO LONG. IN BIBLICAL TIMES, GAZA WAS PHILISTIA, LAND OF THE PHILISTINES, BITTER ENEMIES OF ISRAEL. IN ROMAN TIMES, ISRAEL WAS "THE ROMAN PROVINCE OF JUDEA", BUT THE ISRAELITES WERE A REBEL PEOPLE, THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE ROMANS TO PLACE STATUES OF CAESAR AND THE ROMAN GODS IN THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM, THE ISRAELITES HAD A KING PARALLEL TO THE ROMAN GOVERNOR. IN JESUS TIMES, THERE WERE MANY "MESSIAHS" OR LEADERS WHO PROMISED TO LIBERATE ISRAEL FROM THE ROMANS. THE ROMANS ENDED UP DESTROYING THE TEMPLE (CENTER OF ISRAEL RELIGIOUS LIFE) IN THE YEAR 70 AD. LATER ON, RENAMED THE PROVINCE OF JUDEA AS "PALESTINE", NAME RELATED TO THE PHILISTINES, ANCIENT ENEMIES OF ISRAEL. THE RELIGION OF ISLAM WAS BORN IN ARABIA IN THE 7th CENTURY OF THE CHRISTIAN ERA. SOON ISLAM STARTED CONQUERING NEW LANDS AND BECOMING AN EMPIRE. THEY DIDN'T PREACH THE NEW RELIGION BUT RATHER CONQUERED WITH "THE EDGE OF THE SWORD" AND IN EVERY LAND THEY CONQUERED, THEY BUILT MOSQUES AS SYMBOL OF THE CONQUEST. IN JERUSALEM THEY BUILT TWO MOSQUES ON TOP OF WHERE THE TEMPLE WAS BEFORE BEING DESTROYED BY THE ROMANS. PALESTINE WAS NEVER A COUNTRY BUT A NAME FOR A FORMER ROMAN REGION. FAST FORWARD TO THE 20th CENTURY. THE OTTOMAN (ISLAMIC) EMPIRE WAS DEFEATED IN WORLD WAR ONE AND THE REGION OF "PALESTINE" WAS ADMINISTERED BY THE BRITISH UNDER A BRITISH MANDATE. THE BRITISH DECIDED TO MAKE A PARTITION OF THE LAND BETWEEN JEWS AND ARABS. FROM THE JORDAN RIVER TO EAST FOR THE ARABS AND FROM THE JORDAN RIVER TO THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA FOR THE JEWS. ISRAEL DECLARED INDEPENDENCE AND WAS RECREATED IN 1948. "FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA PALESTINE WILL BE FREE", MEANS NO ISRAEL AT ALL. RIGHT AFTER INDEPENDENCE, ISRAEL WAS ATTACKED BY THE ARABS THAT TOOK LANDS TO THE WEST OF THE JORDAN RIVER, INCLUDING THE AREAS KNOWN AS JUDEA, SAMARIA AND THE EASTERN PART OF JERUSALEM WHERE THE TEMPLE WAS. THAT AREA WAS UNDER JORDANIAN CONTROL. GAZA WAS NOT ISRAEL BUT UNDER EGYPTIAN SOVEREIGNTY. IN 1967, FIVE ARAB COUNTRIES ATTACKED ISRAEL AGAIN, BUT THIS TIME ISRAEL WON THE WAR IN 7 DAYS, RECOVERING JUDEA, SAMARIA AND THE WHOLE OF THE CITY OF JERUSALEM. ISRAEL TOOK THE SINAI PENINSULA AND GAZA FROM EGYPT. IN 1979, ISRAEL SIGNED A PEACE AGREEMENT WITH EGYPT, GIVING BACK TO EGYPT THE SINAI PENINSULA AND GAZA. EGYPT TOOK THE SINAI PENINSULA BUT ABOUT GAZA THEY SAID "NEVER MIND, YOU CAN KEEP IT, WE DON'T WANT IT, WE DON'T NEED IT". THE ARABS IN GAZA WERE AS TROUBLEMAKERS AS THEIR PHILISTINE ANCESTORS. IN 2005, ISRAEL PULLED COMPLETELY OUT OF GAZA AND GAVE IT TO THE AUTONOMOUS 'PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY' BUT SOON, THE RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST GROUP 'HAMAS', KICKED THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY OUT OF GAZA AND TOOK CONTROL, IN FACT CREATING A TERRORIST ENCLAVE BORDERING ISRAEL. LOTS OF ROCKETS ATTACKS CAME OUT OF GAZA BUT USUALLY STOPPED BY THE 'IRON DOME' DEFENSE SYSTEM BUT ON OCTOBER 7/2023, THOUSANDS OF HAMAS TERRORIST CROSSED THE BORDER FENCE AND ATTACKED CIVILIANS WHO WERE MINDING THEIR OWN BUSINESSES IN THE ISRAELI SIDE, KILLING MANY AND TAKING HOSTAGES. THAT IS HOW THIS GAZA WAR STARTED. WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN THIS VIDEO IS THE ISRAELI PART OF THE STORY THAT YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IN THE NEWS. IT'S RAW AND UNFILTERED AMATEUR VIDEO. WE ALL HAVE OUR OWN OPINIONS AND BELIEFS ABOUT ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIANS. THIS VIDEO IS JUST THE UNSEEN PART OF THE STORY.
    Like
    Sad
    2
    0 Comments 3 Shares 2K Views 13
  • https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/137305
    Socialism: A Race to the Bottom.
    (1 min 45 seconds)
    All socialist and communist training in Universities must be stopped as it leads to degeneration, corruption and genocide.
    https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/137305 Socialism: A Race to the Bottom. (1 min 45 seconds) All socialist and communist training in Universities must be stopped as it leads to degeneration, corruption and genocide.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 556 Views 0
More Results
Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here