The United Kingdom was not formed until nearly 200 years after Henry VIII
The United Kingdom was not formed until nearly 200 years after Henry VIII, the formation of the United Kingdom came much later than Henry VIII's reign.

Early States in Great Britain: By the start of the 16th century, Great Britain consisted of two separate kingdoms: the Kingdom of England (which included Wales and controlled Ireland) and the Kingdom of Scotland. The once-independent Principality of Wales had fallen under English control since the Statute of Rhuddlan in 1284.

Union of Crowns (1603): The accidental consequence of a royal marriage united England and Scotland in a personal union known as the Union of Crowns in 1603. However, full political union required a Treaty of Union in 1706 and the subsequent Acts of Union in 1707 to ratify the treaty. This marked the formation of the Kingdom of Great Britain.

Acts of Union 1800: The Kingdom of Great Britain merged with the Kingdom of Ireland (gradually brought under English control between 1541 and 1691) to form the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1801.

Irish Independence and Name Change (1922-1927): The Irish Free State gained independence in 1922 following the partition of the island of Ireland. Six of the nine counties of the province of Ulster remained within the UK, which then changed its name to the current United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1927.

Devolution and Modern Times: In the 20th century, Welsh and Scottish nationalism, along with the resolution of the Troubles in Ireland, led to the establishment of devolved parliaments or assemblies for Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.

McDonald’s Technology Outage Forces Restaurant Closures. As the USA, Australia, Japan, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, Italy. IT failure were reported worldwide Friday that Chicago-based McDonald’s Corp. said the problems were not related to a cybersecurity issue.

───── UKRAINE CRISIS ─────
The United Kingdom's Ministry of Defense said in an official statement on Monday that the country will transfer two Royal Navy minehunter ships to Ukraine.According to the statement, the transfer of Sandown minesweepers is part of a broader effort to strengthen the country's maritime capabilities. It is noted that the ships will be purchased by Ukraine with the help of UK Export Finance. The statement said that the UK alongside Norway will create a new maritime coalition, which will include countries that are ready to provide Ukraine with naval assistance.

The WHO issued a warning regarding an “unusual surge” of myocarditis cases in babies that were born within the United Kingdom.

───── CLUSTER BOMBS FOR UKRAINE ─────

United States President Joe Biden stated Friday that sending the cluster munitions to Ukraine was a "difficult decision." However, he added, Kiev "needed them."

"It was a very difficult decision on my part. And by the way, I discussed this with our allies. I discussed this with our friends up on the Hill," Biden said in an exclusive interview to CNN, adding, "The Ukrainians are running out of ammunition."

The decision has not been easy, as there are more than 100 countries, including strong US allies such as the United Kingdom, France and Germany, that have banned these munitions under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. Yet the US and Ukraine are not signatories to the ban.

If the USA remained a British Colony, it would have been a different country than it is today. Here are some arguments for both sides:

Arguments for the USA remaining a British Colony:

1. Economic Development: The USA would have had a different economic trajectory if it remained a colony of Great Britain. It would have had preferential trading partners with Great Britain, which could have accelerated the country's economic development.

2. Political Stability: Staying under British rule allowed Canada to develop a stable government and avoid the instability that the US went through in the early stages of its democracy.

3. Culture: If the USA had remained a British colony, the culture of the country would have been different. British culture would have been more prevalent, and there would have been more of an emphasis on polite manners and the monarchy.

Arguments against the USA remaining a British Colony:

1. Revolutionary Spirit: The American Revolution was driven by a desire for freedom and independence. Without this struggle, the USA may not be the land of the free and home of the brave it is today.

2. Political System: If the USA remained a British Colony, it would have adopted a different political system. The United Kingdom has a parliamentary democracy, while the USA has a presidential democracy. The change in political systems could have altered the course of American political history.

3. Rights and Liberties: Staying under British rule would have meant the US would have had to comply with British laws and traditions of the day. American citizens fought for their rights and liberties and became a leader in individual freedoms and civil liberties.

Conclusion:

While it's impossible to know for sure how the USA would have developed if it remained a British colony, one can draw conclusions based on the arguments presented. Though there may have been economic benefits and political stability, this would have come at the cost of freedom and individual liberties. Ultimately, the American Revolution and the establishment of the USA as an independent nation allowed for the birth of an American identity and legacy that would not have been possible under British colonial rule.